![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Waves SSL Comp Meter in dBu Question | tekn0 | Geekslutz forum | 2 | 1st March 2007 04:31 AM |
| Waves SSL Comp Meter in dBu Question | tekn0 | Music computers | 4 | 28th February 2007 03:27 AM |
| RME Fireface 400 vs. Fireface 800 | heksu | High end | 10 | 23rd August 2006 02:42 PM |
| How many volts are 13 dBu? | bobby_z | Geekslutz forum | 10 | 10th May 2006 11:20 PM |
| Portable dBu meter | cvanwinkle | So much gear, so little time! | 0 | 5th April 2005 07:18 AM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 155
| +4 dBu vs Lo Gain on Fireface? Do I plan to record something with using the internal preamps of the fireface, but reading the manual I see that the Lo Gain setting gives me more headroom. What the disadvantages of that setting? the manual says: "Reference 0 dBFS @ Headroom Lo Gain +19 dBu 15 dB +4 dBu +13 dBu 9 dB -10 dBV +2 dBV 12 dB With +4 dBu selected, the according headroom meets the latest EBU recommendations for Broadcast usage. At -10 dBV a headroom of 12 dB is common practice, each mixing desk operating at -10 dBV is able to send and receive much higher levels. Lo Gain is best suited for professional users who prefer to work balanced and at highest levels. Lo Gain provides 15 dB headroom at +4 dBu nominal level. The above levels are also found in our ADI-8 series of AD/DA converters, the Multiface, and even in our Mic-Preamps QuadMic and OctaMic. Therefore all RME devices are fully compatible to each other. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2006 Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 753
| Well, the disadvantage is very simply that if your input signals fall substantially below the reference level (+19dBU is quite hot) then you will in effect reduce the resolution of the A/D converters -- you will be forcing them to express the input signals using fewer bits. -synthoid |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 185
| It depends what you are recording. For most applications the +4 setting is the way to go. However, I record with a tube pre amp, and sometimes I like to crank the hell out of the tubes. In this case I use the low gain setting so I don't clip the input. Also, you might want to use the low gain setting for high volume instruments like horns or electric guitar cabs. Good luck! |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 155
| How dumb, I hadn't thought of it like that. Thanks guys, excellent answers. +4db for me then |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Rekawinkel, Austria
Posts: 144
| Joost, maybe I did not understand your question correctly, but if you want to use the internal preamps of the FF, the different settings (-10dBV, +4dBu and high gain) are not relevant. They only affect the use of the line ins. The level of the mic ins is only controlled by the gain controls on the front side. Regards Hermann Last edited by liuto; 4th March 2007 at 10:33 AM.. Reason: formulation |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 155
| Thanks, btw, I don't get why people are so negative about the preamps. they tested almost flat over the entire frequency spectrum, so they are excellent 'wire with gain' pre's and they're much quieter than a lot of expensive pre's. but maybe that's just me being stupid again. ![]() |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Gear nut Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Rekawinkel, Austria
Posts: 144
| Quote:
Hermann Last edited by liuto; 4th March 2007 at 03:35 PM.. Reason: better English :-) | |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 275
| Quote:
__________________ --------------------------------------------------------- PLATINUM SELLING ARTIST ---------------------------------------------------------- | |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2006 Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 753
| Quote:
-synthoid | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 275
| To quote Paul Frindle, +4 or -10 has NOTHING to do with the amount of bits being used: The most important thing to remember is that recording and processing at lower levels DOES NOT waste 'bits'. It doesn't work like that - all your 'bits' are there all the time at all levels :-) So there! Nanny nanny boo boo to you. :)
__________________ --------------------------------------------------------- PLATINUM SELLING ARTIST ---------------------------------------------------------- |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2006 Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 753
| Quote:
-synthoid | |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Charlotte
Posts: 950
| I tried recording at both the +4 and Lo gain. I use API pre's in my setup and the Lo-gain setting has worked out the best due to their hot output. I've never noticed a decrease in resolution and have to agree that the level you go into your system is always at full resolution. It's what you do with it after it's in the system that can hurt you. I generally shoot for -10 to -6 depending on how dynamic something is. The only arguement I see here is that you may get more analog noise using the lo-gain input as you need more gain from your pre, but in reality I'm not hearing it and worry more about making cool music. |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Charlotte
Posts: 950
| ALL YOUR BITS ARE BELONG TO US! |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 244
| That's great! So run that fingerpicked acoustic guitar right up to the red without clipping. You'll be "using all the bits"! Let us know how that works out for you. |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2006 Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 753
| Quote:
![]() *sigh* I'm not advocating pushing your converters to the limit. I'm simply saying that, for a fixed input voltage level, the calibration of the input to the converters certainly makes a difference. Why do you think that they *have* a calibration at all, if the only sensible setting is the high gain (+19dbu) setting? -synthoid | |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Toronto
Posts: 263
| duuurrrrr?????.... ... ...
__________________ Simon |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 275
| You are very good at spreading digital audio myths. Keep up the good work!
__________________ --------------------------------------------------------- PLATINUM SELLING ARTIST ---------------------------------------------------------- |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2006 Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 753
| Quote:
Here's how I think it works. i think that the reference level is the input voltage that will cause the converter to output 0dbFS. Do we agree about that? -synthoid | |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 275
| Quote:
When I got a Mic Pre (DAV), I had it modded so that the peak level RED LED lights up at +19dbu, which is the peak level of my Fireface 800 inputs. Hope this helps-- rock on! - GTR
__________________ --------------------------------------------------------- PLATINUM SELLING ARTIST ---------------------------------------------------------- | |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 275
| Check this out--- ![]()
__________________ --------------------------------------------------------- PLATINUM SELLING ARTIST ---------------------------------------------------------- |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2006 Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 753
| |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |