Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Waves SSL Comp Meter in dBu Question tekn0 Geekslutz forum 2 1st March 2007 04:31 AM
Waves SSL Comp Meter in dBu Question tekn0 Music computers 4 28th February 2007 03:27 AM
RME Fireface 400 vs. Fireface 800 heksu High end 10 23rd August 2006 02:42 PM
How many volts are 13 dBu? bobby_z Geekslutz forum 10 10th May 2006 11:20 PM
Portable dBu meter cvanwinkle So much gear, so little time! 0 5th April 2005 07:18 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 3rd March 2007, 06:55 PM   #1
Joost
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 155
+4 dBu vs Lo Gain on Fireface?

Do I plan to record something with using the internal preamps of the fireface, but reading the manual I see that the Lo Gain setting gives me more headroom. What the disadvantages of that setting?

the manual says:
"Reference 0 dBFS @ Headroom
Lo Gain +19 dBu 15 dB
+4 dBu +13 dBu 9 dB
-10 dBV +2 dBV 12 dB
With +4 dBu selected, the according headroom meets the latest EBU recommendations for
Broadcast usage. At -10 dBV a headroom of 12 dB is common practice, each mixing desk operating
at -10 dBV is able to send and receive much higher levels. Lo Gain is best suited for
professional users who prefer to work balanced and at highest levels. Lo Gain provides 15 dB
headroom at +4 dBu nominal level.
The above levels are also found in our ADI-8 series of AD/DA converters, the Multiface, and
even in our Mic-Preamps QuadMic and OctaMic. Therefore all RME devices are fully compatible
to each other.
Joost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd March 2007, 11:36 PM   #2
synthoid
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 753
Well, the disadvantage is very simply that if your input signals fall substantially below the reference level (+19dBU is quite hot) then you will in effect reduce the resolution of the A/D converters -- you will be forcing them to express the input signals using fewer bits.

-synthoid
synthoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2007, 07:53 AM   #3
GearGeek
Gear maniac
 
GearGeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 185
It depends what you are recording. For most applications the +4 setting is the way to go. However, I record with a tube pre amp, and sometimes I like to crank the hell out of the tubes. In this case I use the low gain setting so I don't clip the input. Also, you might want to use the low gain setting for high volume instruments like horns or electric guitar cabs. Good luck!
GearGeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2007, 09:24 AM   #4
Joost
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 155
How dumb, I hadn't thought of it like that. Thanks guys, excellent answers. +4db for me then
Joost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2007, 10:31 AM   #5
liuto
Gear nut
 
liuto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rekawinkel, Austria
Posts: 144
Joost, maybe I did not understand your question correctly, but if you want to use the internal preamps of the FF, the different settings (-10dBV, +4dBu and high gain) are not relevant. They only affect the use of the line ins. The level of the mic ins is only controlled by the gain controls on the front side.

Regards
Hermann

Last edited by liuto; 4th March 2007 at 10:33 AM.. Reason: formulation
liuto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2007, 02:39 PM   #6
Joost
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 155
Thanks, btw, I don't get why people are so negative about the preamps. they tested almost flat over the entire frequency spectrum, so they are excellent 'wire with gain' pre's and they're much quieter than a lot of expensive pre's. but maybe that's just me being stupid again.
Joost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2007, 03:33 PM   #7
liuto
Gear nut
 
liuto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rekawinkel, Austria
Posts: 144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joost View Post
Thanks, btw, I don't get why people are so negative about the preamps. they tested almost flat over the entire frequency spectrum, so they are excellent 'wire with gain' pre's and they're much quieter than a lot of expensive pre's. but maybe that's just me being stupid again.
No, they're just positively characterless, that's what some people seem to dislike. I use them always for spot mics and for that application they are perfect.

Hermann

Last edited by liuto; 4th March 2007 at 03:35 PM.. Reason: better English :-)
liuto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2007, 07:52 PM   #8
GTR
Gear maniac
 
GTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 275
Quote:
Originally Posted by synthoid View Post
Well, the disadvantage is very simply that if your input signals fall substantially below the reference level (+19dBU is quite hot) then you will in effect reduce the resolution of the A/D converters -- you will be forcing them to express the input signals using fewer bits.

-synthoid
+4 or -10 has absolutely nothing to do with the amount of bits used on the A/D.
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------
PLATINUM SELLING ARTIST
----------------------------------------------------------
GTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2007, 11:14 PM   #9
synthoid
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTR View Post
+4 or -10 has absolutely nothing to do with the amount of bits used on the A/D.
If you calibrate your converter so that 0dBFS corresponds to +19dBu and your input never exceeds 0dBu, then the upper 19dB of dynamic range of the converter -- corresponding roughly to the three upper bits of its output -- will be unused. That is to say, the three upper bits of the converter's output will always be zero. If the converter puts out 20 bits total, the input signal will have to be expressed in terms of the remaining 17 bits.

-synthoid
synthoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2007, 06:31 AM   #10
GTR
Gear maniac
 
GTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 275
To quote Paul Frindle, +4 or -10 has NOTHING to do with the amount of bits being used:

The most important thing to remember is that recording and processing at lower levels DOES NOT waste 'bits'. It doesn't work like that - all your 'bits' are there all the time at all levels :-)


So there! Nanny nanny boo boo to you.

:)
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------
PLATINUM SELLING ARTIST
----------------------------------------------------------
GTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2007, 09:33 AM   #11
synthoid
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTR View Post
To quote Paul Frindle, +4 or -10 has NOTHING to do with the amount of bits being used:

The most important thing to remember is that recording and processing at lower levels DOES NOT waste 'bits'. It doesn't work like that - all your 'bits' are there all the time at all levels :-)


So there! Nanny nanny boo boo to you.

:)
That's great! So turn your input levels down as far as they will go. You'll never have to check for overs again. Let us know how that works out for you.

-synthoid
synthoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2007, 12:10 PM   #12
Slaytex
Lives for gear
 
Slaytex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 950
I tried recording at both the +4 and Lo gain. I use API pre's in my setup and the Lo-gain setting has worked out the best due to their hot output. I've never noticed a decrease in resolution and have to agree that the level you go into your system is always at full resolution. It's what you do with it after it's in the system that can hurt you. I generally shoot for -10 to -6 depending on how dynamic something is. The only arguement I see here is that you may get more analog noise using the lo-gain input as you need more gain from your pre, but in reality I'm not hearing it and worry more about making cool music.
__________________
Clayton Yunt
Full Volume Sound
Full Volume Sound
Slaytex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2007, 12:12 PM   #13
Slaytex
Lives for gear
 
Slaytex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 950
ALL YOUR BITS ARE BELONG TO US!
__________________
Clayton Yunt
Full Volume Sound
Full Volume Sound
Slaytex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2007, 01:14 PM   #14
subatomicpieces
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by synthoid View Post
That's great! So turn your input levels down as far as they will go. You'll never have to check for overs again. Let us know how that works out for you.

-synthoid
That's great! So run that fingerpicked acoustic guitar right up to the red without clipping. You'll be "using all the bits"! Let us know how that works out for you.
subatomicpieces is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2007, 01:26 PM   #15
synthoid
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by subatomicpieces View Post
That's great! So run that fingerpicked acoustic guitar right up to the red without clipping. You'll be "using all the bits"! Let us know how that works out for you.


*sigh*

I'm not advocating pushing your converters to the limit. I'm simply saying that, for a fixed input voltage level, the calibration of the input to the converters certainly makes a difference. Why do you think that they *have* a calibration at all, if the only sensible setting is the high gain (+19dbu) setting?

-synthoid
synthoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2007, 02:51 PM   #16
Windtaken
Gear maniac
 
Windtaken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by subatomicpieces View Post
That's great! So run that fingerpicked acoustic guitar right up to the red without clipping. You'll be "using all the bits"! Let us know how that works out for you.
duuurrrrr?????.... ... ...
__________________
Simon
Windtaken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2007, 06:10 PM   #17
GTR
Gear maniac
 
GTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 275
Quote:
Originally Posted by synthoid View Post
That's great! So turn your input levels down as far as they will go. You'll never have to check for overs again. Let us know how that works out for you.

-synthoid
You are very good at spreading digital audio myths. Keep up the good work!
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------
PLATINUM SELLING ARTIST
----------------------------------------------------------
GTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2007, 11:24 PM   #18
synthoid
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTR View Post
You are very good at spreading digital audio myths. Keep up the good work!
I certainly don't mean to be spreading misinformation. Instead of repeating that I'm wrong, why don't you explain what the reference level (0dbu, +4dbu, +19dbu) is, how it works, and what its purpose is? That was after all the original question.

Here's how I think it works. i think that the reference level is the input voltage that will cause the converter to output 0dbFS. Do we agree about that?

-synthoid
synthoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2007, 07:17 AM   #19
GTR
Gear maniac
 
GTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 275
Quote:
Originally Posted by synthoid View Post
I certainly don't mean to be spreading misinformation. Instead of repeating that I'm wrong, why don't you explain what the reference level (0dbu, +4dbu, +19dbu) is, how it works, and what its purpose is? That was after all the original question.

Here's how I think it works. i think that the reference level is the input voltage that will cause the converter to output 0dbFS. Do we agree about that?

-synthoid
Yes, a pro piece of gear with a reference level of +4dBu will read 0VU on the meters of another pro piece of gear.

When I got a Mic Pre (DAV), I had it modded so that the peak level RED LED lights up at +19dbu, which is the peak level of my Fireface 800 inputs.

Hope this helps-- rock on!

- GTR
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------
PLATINUM SELLING ARTIST
----------------------------------------------------------
GTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2007, 07:21 AM   #20
GTR
Gear maniac
 
GTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 275
Check this out---

__________________
---------------------------------------------------------
PLATINUM SELLING ARTIST
----------------------------------------------------------
GTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2007, 09:55 AM   #21
synthoid
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTR View Post
Yes, a pro piece of gear with a reference level of +4dBu will read 0VU on the meters of another pro piece of gear.
I see, that clears it right up!

Thanks,

-synthoid
synthoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0