27th January 2004
|
#1 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Aug 2003 Location: East Coast, USA
Posts: 656
Thread Starter | PC or MAC for Mastering/Editing Only
I was looking for opinions whether I should go Mac or PC if all I'll ever do is master & edit on the computer (no plans to ever record/mix "in the box"). I've been a PC guy all my life, but I know there are loads of Mac advocates out there. Thanks!
|
| |
27th January 2004
|
#2 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Apr 2003 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,473
|
What is your price range? By now 4 of the 5 major mastering workstations are PC-based (Sequoia, Pyramix, SADiE, and the Cube) Sonic Studio is the only mac-based one.
Overall, you'll have more choices on the PC end of things. Like anything there are advantages and disadvantages to each setup depending on what you are looking for in your computer.
I use a Sequoia DAW for my editing and mastering, but then again, I do a lot of classical work and the 4-point editing model in Sequoia is IMO one of the best implementations of that on the market.
--Ben
|
| |
27th January 2004
|
#3 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Aug 2003 Location: East Coast, USA
Posts: 656
Thread Starter | Price Range Quote: Originally posted by fifthcircle What is your price range? By now 4 of the 5 major mastering workstations are PC-based (Sequoia, Pyramix, SADiE, and the Cube) Sonic Studio is the only mac-based one.
Overall, you'll have more choices on the PC end of things. Like anything there are advantages and disadvantages to each setup depending on what you are looking for in your computer.
I use a Sequoia DAW for my editing and mastering, but then again, I do a lot of classical work and the 4-point editing model in Sequoia is IMO one of the best implementations of that on the market.
--Ben | Hadn't thought about price range. I want to spend as little as possible. I record to a Tascam MX-2424. I am also planning on doing some serious archiving to EIDE drives with the projects from the MX. Should I have separate PCs for Archiving & Mastering? Thanks!
|
| |
27th January 2004
|
#4 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Nov 2002 Location: Ohio |
While I am by no means an authority on the subject of mastering, my G3 running Peak has been completely flawless. You can buy a B&W G3 like mine for $300, and Peak is pretty inexpensive and has a lot of great features. If you're looking to do a good job on the cheap, that's the way I'd go. Good luck!
|
| |
27th January 2004
|
#5 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Apr 2003 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,473
|
No need for seperate computers for those functions. I have a SCSI card in my good Sequoia rig that I use for transfering of MX-2424 sessions into a format that I can mix in the box. I use a program called EDL convert pro which will take just about any format and turn it into just about anything else...
You can purchase a copy of Samplitude on "competitve upgrade" for about $500. There was also a deal awhile back (don't know if it still exists) where you can purchase an RME Digi96-PAD card and a copy of Samplitude 6 for about $400. The copy of Samplitude comes with a certificate for a free upgrade to version 7 (the latest version). Can't beat that kind of deal.
If you run a PC, go to www.musicxp.net and go through the list of tweaks to make it a usable O/S for running a music machine.
--Ben
|
| |
28th January 2004
|
#6 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jun 2002 Location: uh..... Hollywood
Posts: 1,242
|
At the low end of the price range, I'm finding Sound Forge and CD Architect from Sony to be very nice for 2 track work. PC all the way.
__________________
steve
Lexington 125 - High Resolution Location Recording
lex125@pacbell.net
http://www.lexington125.com
|
| |
28th January 2004
|
#7 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jun 2002 Location: uh..... Hollywood
Posts: 1,242
|
If you run a PC, go to www.musicxp.net and go through the list of tweaks to make it a usable O/S for running a music machine.
Seems like some of those might really help; but its aimed at the XP OS, is there a Windows 2000 version somewhere?
|
| |
28th January 2004
|
#8 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Florida
Posts: 2,501
|
It's a sad state of affairs for those of us who prefer Mac, but need some of the more advanced features of the Windows-based mastering software(s)--ie: DDP master creation, Plextools, ets... It's disappointing that Bias, Digidesign, Emagic, et al haven't thought it worthwhile to come up with something competitive.
-dave
|
| |
29th January 2004
|
#9 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2003 Location: meta city 1
Posts: 4,410
| Quote: Originally posted by dave-G It's a sad state of affairs for those of us who prefer Mac, but need some of the more advanced features of the Windows-based mastering software(s)--ie: DDP master creation, Plextools, ets... It's disappointing that Bias, Digidesign, Emagic, et al haven't thought it worthwhile to come up with something competitive.
-dave | No kidding.  You'd think that at least one of these companies would see the gap and come out with something competitive for the Mac (and make some decent $$ in the process from all of us Mac users) but they haven't. I mean DDP at least... somebody...?
|
| |
29th January 2004
|
#10 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2003 Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 3,872
| Re: PC or MAC for Mastering/Editing Only Quote: Originally posted by bloodstone I've been a PC guy all my life... |
Trust me, there is no need to change! |
| |
29th January 2004
|
#11 | | Mastering Moderator
Joined: Apr 2003 Location: Always on the Run
Posts: 2,947
| Quote: Originally posted by dave-G It's a sad state of affairs for those of us who prefer Mac, but need some of the more advanced features of the Windows-based mastering software(s)--ie: DDP master creation, Plextools, ets... It's disappointing that Bias, Digidesign, Emagic, et al haven't thought it worthwhile to come up with something competitive.
-dave | For all of you (well...us...) using the Mac platform......maybe there is hope.
A while ago in November 2003 Sonic announced they were porting Sonistudio to OSX, they also announced they were testing the new G5 and the DSD boards. So far so good.
The big news was that they saud they were thinking of developing a software/native only (lower cost) version of sonicstudio with some omitted features.
Those lines in the announcement were edited (disappeared actually) a week or so later.
I really hope they are still thinking of doing it.
__________________ Velvet Room Mastering
"Can you imagine how great the Beatles or Pink Floyd could have sounded if they had used better cables?
I expect a Nobel prize to someday be awarded to an audiophile cable designer, as they clearly are way ahead of the rest of us.
" - DC -
|
| |
29th January 2004
|
#12 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Aug 2003 Location: East Coast, USA
Posts: 656
Thread Starter | Update
I've made some decisions. I'm leaning toward a LynxOne card, PC, and either Soundforge Wavelab or Samplitude Classic 7.0. Samplitude's ability to apparently "mix" more than two tracks looks appealing if I ever got into Sound for film. Thanks!
|
| |
29th January 2004
|
#13 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Oct 2002 Location: D.C. / MD
Posts: 222
|
I'm using Sound Forge with a Lynx 1 card. It's been a great combination. It's also my mixdown chain.
FWIW
-Scotty
__________________
"It's just like being in a reverb sandwich" - D.R.
"It's those rock and roll hours...... really graves without flowers" - Lowell George
"I wish more musicians were more interested in their "performance" than the "technology" that lets them appear to be musicians" - mixman499
"He was playing a Fender Precision with flatwound strings, like God meant for man to do." - Jim Dickinson
|
| |
30th January 2004
|
#14 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Apr 2003 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,473
| Re: Update Quote: Originally posted by bloodstone I've made some decisions. I'm leaning toward a LynxOne card, PC, and either Soundforge Wavelab or Samplitude Classic 7.0. Samplitude's ability to apparently "mix" more than two tracks looks appealing if I ever got into Sound for film. Thanks! | If you have any way to afford it, go for the Lynx 2- it is a pretty masive sonic improvement over the Lynx One. Even if you go for the L22, it is the same card as the Lynx2 and AES-16, just with fewer bells and whistles.
Also, check the competitive upgrade offers for Samplitude Professional. Ends up costing about the same amount as Samp. Classic and you have much more functionality.
What you have spec'd out is still great gear, but for little more (and careful shopping), you can do better...
--Ben
|
| |
30th January 2004
|
#15 | | Motown legend
Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 12,068
|
Anybody doing mastering today has no choice but to own a PC just for testing because of the colossal drop in the quality of blanks that has accompanied the colossal drop in the price of blanks. For this same reason delivering DDPs is far more important than ever. Apple is down for the count when it comes to audio mastering and it looks a lot like they simply don't care.
|
| |
30th January 2004
|
#16 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jun 2002 Location: uh..... Hollywood
Posts: 1,242
|
I just received my new copy of Sony's CD Architect 5.0 from the UPS dude this morning. Last week I purchased a six (6!) year old box containing CD Architect 4.0 and an old version of Sound Forge when West LA Music cleaned out their basement. Sony was so surprised that I was able to buy a new copy of 1998 software that they gave me a complete boxed set of the new version for a silly price, $74.
I'm really impressed with CD Architect, for what it is. Its not for pro mastering houses; they need SADIE, Sequoia, Pyramix, etc. But for anybody who needs to "pre-master" CDs or do cut and paste 2 track editing for whatever reason, CD-A 5.0 seems like it offers more functionality than I will ever need. Yet its not one of those "all-in-one" programs that also does sampling, loops, recording, mixing, etc - its a 2 track editor, thats all, but a very good one.
It really seems like a great solution to the original post on this thread. A PC running CD-A 5.0 would make a great 2 track editing station for anyone but full time mastering facilities.
|
| |
31st January 2004
|
#17 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2003 Location: meta city 1
Posts: 4,410
| Quote: For all of you (well...us...) using the Mac platform......maybe there is hope.
A while ago in November 2003 Sonic announced they were porting Sonistudio to OSX, they also announced they were testing the new G5 and the DSD boards. So far so good.
The big news was that they saud they were thinking of developing a software/native only (lower cost) version of sonicstudio with some omitted features.
Those lines in the announcement were edited (disappeared actually) a week or so later.
I really hope they are still thinking of doing it. | I sure hope they go through with it. That would be a godsend for us Mac users. Quote: | Anybody doing mastering today has no choice but to own a PC just for testing because of the colossal drop in the quality of blanks that has accompanied the colossal drop in the price of blanks. For this same reason delivering DDPs is far more important than ever. Apple is down for the count when it comes to audio mastering and it looks a lot like they simply don't care. | I wish you weren't so right on this, Bob.
While we're on the subject, does anyone one know of a good Mac substitute for Plextools?
|
| |
2nd February 2004
|
#18 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Apr 2003 Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,328
| Quote: Originally posted by hollywood_steve
If you run a PC, go to www.musicxp.net and go through the list of tweaks to make it a usable O/S for running a music machine.
Seems like some of those might really help; but its aimed at the XP OS, is there a Windows 2000 version somewhere? | sorry to highjack the thread... http://www.opusaudioprojects.net has some articles including W2K.
Also check out www.blkviper.com for more serious service-tweaking.
Back on topic: I think the way you go into and out of the box you're planning on using is more important than the programs you'll be using... most do the same, only look different.
Maybe better to find an old computer with a good soundcard ...
Herwig
|
| |
30th December 2008
|
#19 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Nov 2008 Location: London
Posts: 290
|
PC & Wavelab = cheaper (but great option)
PC & Sadie, Pyramix = more expensive (but.......)
Mac = limited to sonic......
|
| | | |