![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 293
Thread Starter | Melodyne plugin
Has anyone noticed that this plugin kills the highs of your audio? Makes it unusable for me. Even the Autotune destroys a bit of the top end, but it so little it is acceptable, but this is not the case with Melodyne. Even just running the audio trough it (not making any pitch changes) the audio is "destroyed". Is there any good alternatives for Melodyne? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear |
Gregg Wells had stated, and I concure - the Waves Tune plugin sounds the best. Melodyne is cool and does other stuff too. You really need all of them, as they do different things... well... differently. You're kind of destroying the vocal by f***ing with the pitch anyway, right?tutt try them all with their demo's and see for yourself. |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2006 Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 918
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2005 Location: Annapolis, MD/Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,631
|
Actually, as much as I love this plugin, I noticed something kinda scary a few weeks ago... I was importing a vocal track into Melodyne Studio and back out when I noticed a drop in the "body" of the voice. That is, I was losing a tiiiiny bit of low end warmth. I tried importing and exporting without any pitch correction (I never pitch correct the entire file anyways same thing!I'm still kinda scared about it. Might have just been a fluke, I haven't hardcore tested this loss of low-end out yet, but I will. It pissed me off that day, tho, cuz the track needed to be out ASAP and I wasn't about to compromise the tone of the vocalist for some slight pitch correct on two notes in the entire performance. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear nut Joined: Apr 2004 Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 112
|
Amen about Melodyne. I have noticed the audio degradation too, and in a big way. I find it to be completely unusable. I really don't understand all the hype around it.
|
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2006 Location: Los Angeles/Detroit
Posts: 669
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2005 Location: Annapolis, MD/Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,631
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear |
I have not noticed the degradation. I only tune the audio that I need tuned. I do not suck a whole track into the plugin. Which Daw platform are you using it on?
|
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2006 Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 918
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear addict Joined: May 2006 Location: Bernardston, MA
Posts: 484
|
Are we still talking about the plug-in version? I downloaded the plug-in demo because I'm interested in getting it. I haven't noticed a preference to change the bit rate or that it defaults to 16-bit on import. In regards to the sound changing with the transferred audio, this is a response from a Celemony support guy on thier forum: "the facts in question here are due to Melodyne's properties to handle not only pitch changes, but also time changes. If these were only time changes that were defined within Melodyne's editor, it would be able to know if a note had been changed or not. But Melodyne also reacts to realtime time changes from the host, i.e. if you change the playback tempo in your host application in real time, you will hear the audio from the plugin at the correct place. Thus, as Melodyne does not know if there is a change in time to come, it always has to be prepared and will always be in "processing" state, regardless if you have changed the pitch or timing of some notes or not. With the "melodic" playback algorithm, this processing implies that the signal may be modified a little bit. With the "percussive" playback algorithm this is not the case. So as soon as you transfer a segment of audio, you should be aware that you don't only visualize that melody segment in the plugin, but you give the control over audio processing to the plugin for that segment. If you want to be sure to avoid any signal modifications in unchanged places, you should delete the blobs in the editor that you don't intend to change or correct in pitch. And if you use the plugin on a track for the only purpose to visualize the melody of that audio track or its notation, you should set the plugin to "bypass" instead of making the plugin render the audio. "
__________________ Scott Sibley Technical Advisor - Toontrack Music Owner•Engineer•Producer Rainbow Sounds Recording www.rainbowsounds.com |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2006 Location: Los Angeles/Detroit
Posts: 669
| Quote:
Now I'm going to have to go experiment! | |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear |
I have liked Melodyne better than Autotune...but I've noticed that it can introduce artifacts - little warbles and robotic sounds. It seems to do this with breaths and sounds the vocalist makes before going into the passage. Like it freaks out when it doesn't know what to do with a grunt or something like that. This happens when you bring it into melodyne - even when you don't tune it.
|
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2005 Location: Hollyweird
Posts: 7,629
| Then is Waves Tune better?
To those who actualy knw with hands-on experience? Thanks, -a |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Nov 2006 Location: Seattle
Posts: 166
|
[QUOTE=Johnkenn;1121685]I have liked Melodyne better than Autotune...[QUOTE] me too....but I use both, and I would suggest if you need a solution for tuning voice...have more than one option available so that you can use what is best for taht senario. And with all autotune solutions...less is always more in my book! Only tune what you have to and keep the changes as small as possible for the best sound. |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Lives for gear |
[QUOTE=theoryinmotion;1122155][QUOTE=Johnkenn;1121685]I have liked Melodyne better than Autotune... Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2006 Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 918
|
I did some experimenting after reading this thread and I have come to the conclusion that Melodyne does slightly effect the sound. It is doing something wierd in the high end. Kind of a phase/distortion type of thing. It is barely noticable UNTIL I APPLY EQ TO THE HIGHS....then it sounds really bad. I find that applying EQ and compression and getting the track to sound the way I want it BEFORE hitting Melodyne is acceptable (and what I've been doing anyway). Once the track is "melodyned" it really doesn't take well to eq or compression.
|
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,489
|
Autotune is much more obvious and wierd. Melodyne is better. But the sound change can easily be your system. Tamas Dragon |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004 Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,224
|
oh my , thank goodness for this thread!! and all this time i thought it was my own guilty feelings, for simply using any tuning at all in the first place, that made my brain think there was indeed an affect on the sound. last couple weeks i've been using the plug a lot for a certain project, and i started noticing the slight differences in sound. (similar to the ones described in this thread.) i didn't have any A/B tests or scientific process, but i did notice something. I wonder is it just the 'plugin' or melodyne as a whole? Good advice though on deleting the 'blobs' where you don't need correction. |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2005 Location: Annapolis, MD/Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,631
| |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Melodyne 3 | Trebor Flow | Music computers | 15 | 25th February 2007 10:46 PM |
| Upgrading to Melodyne plugin | Andrew07 | Music computers | 4 | 9th February 2007 04:56 AM |
| Melodyne Studio 3 vs Melodyne Uno | jonutarr | Music computers | 0 | 6th February 2007 03:00 AM |
| Melodyne anyone? | Ken | Music computers | 8 | 12th October 2006 09:21 PM |
| Melodyne ... not quite yet | C.Lambrechts | Music computers | 3 | 23rd April 2004 10:05 PM |
| |