![]() | All Advertisers |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2007 Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 1,064
Thread Starter | FF800
Is the Fireface 800 that much better than the MOTU 896HD? Can you use more than one FF800 at the same time at 192/24? How about a FF800 and another 192capable card (like a MOTU 896HD) and run both at 192/24? Thanks, Rob |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2004 Location: Charlotte
Posts: 1,034
|
yes, yes, no, no. But that is just my opinion. Last edited by Slaytex; 7th February 2007 at 03:17 AM.. Reason: typo |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2007 Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 1,064
Thread Starter |
based on?
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jul 2004 Location: Rekawinkel, Austria
Posts: 145
|
It is possible to run 3 Firefaces at the same time, but only on the Firewire 800 buss (says manual). The limiting factor will most likely be your computer. Regards Hermann |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2004 Location: Charlotte
Posts: 1,034
| I'm confused. You asked is the FF800 better than the Motu 896HD..... I said yes, in my opinion. I prefer the FF800 pre's and converters over it hands down. I only use the FF800 pre's for scratch track stuff or tom pre's since I only have an API 3124 as my go to for everything at the moment. I do kick, snare and OH's through the 3124, then toms plus a room mic on the FF800 pre's... Sounds great. Good luck. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2007 Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 1,064
Thread Starter |
Sorry, I meant the last 2 "no's"
|
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2004 Location: Charlotte
Posts: 1,034
|
When having 2 different cards running at once you will have driver issues as an app. can only see one (as far as I know). I do know that you can run a RME 9652 and a 9632 at once under MME. Anyway the FF800 is a great rock solid interface with a ton of flexibility. If you don't need mobility or the option of running it on multiple computers I would look into getting a multiface or digiface or hell even both since they are PCI based and will achieve even better stability and latency. I use direct monitoring in Nuendo, so latency is not an issue at all and everything is compensated for flawlessly. Hope this helps. |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help with setup! Cubase 4 + FF800 | tasker | Music computers | 5 | 23rd January 2007 10:56 PM |
| RNC unbalanced to FF800? | MikeMitchell | Low End Theory | 2 | 1st January 2007 12:28 AM |
| What to blame: FF800, DP 4.61, OSX 10.3, or me? | Clueless | Music computers | 6 | 5th December 2006 04:01 PM |
| rme ff800 help please | frankie | High end | 11 | 23rd November 2006 06:12 PM |
| |