![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| buying a second distressor 4 years later for stereo work... | ine-kpro... | High end | 2 | 1st September 2006 03:19 AM |
| Mono Distressor, Stereo Workaround? | wilcofan | So much gear, so little time! | 17 | 13th May 2006 08:20 PM |
| Stereo Distressor question | springs | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 22nd June 2005 03:03 AM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Beezers' Nook
Posts: 684
| Why i might need a stereo distressor. Could someone please explain to me why i might need a stereo pair of Distressors instead of just a mono? I plan on using it to process my drums but couldn't i process them in mono, and then double track it back into Logic? Would the stero unit make a difference in the processing? Also, do i really need them in the chain while recording the drums? i am using a great river mp2nv for kick and snare, and a phoenix drs 1 for overhead. I am thinking of getting and RNC to cover the kick and Overhead during initial recording. Anyone tried the RNC on this? Thanks, Little Doodler |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear | A stereo Distressor would be used anytime you want to process a true stereo track (i.e. like acoustic guitars or overheads in x-y, etc). You may also want to use it on the drum sub mix, slam and color the signal, and mix back in with a little unprocessed, or very lightly processed tracks. The link, while not completely perfect, does help maintain a more stable stereo image than without it. If you aren't doing anything that you think it would be applicable, then it may not be worth the extra money. The 'brit mod' comes together with the image link from dealers, if you need a unit with just British mod it could easily be arranged from your dealer...although last time I talked to Dave Derr regarding this he was thinking it may be best to offer only the non mod OR both mods in one unit. Seems people tend to return it eventually to get both mods done. I have four standard mono units in the rack in my studio, and for me that works fine (but I have a lot of other things as well). If it's your main or only good compressor, options can be a good thing.
__________________ Nathan Eldred Atlas Pro Audio- Boutique Gear, Consultation, Sales, & Distibution Home of the Atlas Juggernaut Preamp & 500 Series Revolver Rack USA Distributor for Buzz Audio Exclusive Worldwide Distributor for Atlas Pro Audio Gear, Old School Audio (OSA), and Burgin McDaniel Design ![]() Atlas Recording Studios, Inc. Recording/Mixing/Mastering Services |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Beezers' Nook
Posts: 684
| Thanks Nathan. Yes a drum sub mix is what i am most interested in. Don't really know if i need a true stereo sub mix. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: nyc
Posts: 219
| I've wondered that too...when I compress a submix (usually with my Alan Smart) I always leave it in dual mono--especially for say, guitar submix where there might be a part hard-panned that I wouldn't want effecting the guitars on the other side. Same for drums. X-Y is different thought I suppose.... |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Beezers' Nook
Posts: 684
| i am recording in a pretty bad sounding room, so i use a mono overhead pretty low to the kit. don't need x/y don't really like x/y. I like the sound of vintage recordings with the minimal mics employed. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |