Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oops... I recorded that all wrong. What to do? (DI guitars) DivideByZero So much gear, so little time! 7 10th April 2006 08:52 AM
Help! Tuned guitars to 450Hz. . .and recorded it. Autocrat Music computers 7 18th March 2006 04:01 PM
AMS-Neve 1073DPD Guitars straight in? potex High end 10 15th March 2006 05:58 PM
Has anybody recorded Ac. Guitars with a Soundelux E47 or ifet7? Magnus So much gear, so little time! 6 9th October 2003 07:41 PM
I finally got a big, thick, tight heavy guitar sound straight to disk...details at 11 guittarzzan The good news channel 13 1st April 2003 05:55 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 22nd January 2004, 02:39 AM   #1
guittarzzan
Lives for gear
 
guittarzzan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 605
Best sounding guitars you KNOW were recorded straight to disk.

I'm trying to get a little list of songs/bands I could check out that were recorded straight to daw and got great sounding guitars. I'm mainly speaking in terms of slightly to heavily distorted guitars, but any recommendations are welcome. My purpose is just for a little inspiration and to give me something to shoot for.

thanks,
Steve
guittarzzan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2004, 05:40 AM   #2
BobbyPeru
Gear addict
 
BobbyPeru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 343
The silence speaks louder than words....

Bobby Peru
Milwaukee, WI
BobbyPeru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2004, 06:01 AM   #3
Sir Bob
Gear maniac
 
Sir Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 240
I'm not sure if this is what you are looking for but John Lennon plugged in straight into the board and cranked the gain to get the sound in Revolution. Skunk Baxter plugged into the board for Steely Dan.
Sir Bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2004, 08:01 AM   #4
Bang
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,292
I like my guitar sounds and others have given me kind words as well. I recorded them straight to the DAW. Let me know what you think.
Steve

http://www.blacklinerock.com/music/R...NEROCK.COM.mp3
http://www.blacklinerock.com/music/K...NEROCK.COM.mp3
Bang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2004, 08:08 AM   #5
imacgreg
Gear maniac
 
imacgreg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Silver Lake, LA
Posts: 294
Send a message via AIM to imacgreg
I'm assuming that when you say straight to DAW you mean, no tape? Not just DI'ed and amp-farmed right?

This whole record was done in the box, and we think the guitars turned out pretty well:

http://www.code415.com/pages/listen.html

Click on "Stand and Fight" (my fav)

Gibson SG's straight into Marshall JCM800 2203 and Matchless. Cranked pretty good. 57 and 412 on each cab, a royer in the room for room sound (duh). Pre's were the Oram console pres, straight to Bro Tools HD via a 192.

Ian
__________________
----------
Ian MacGregor
www.standard-audio.com
imacgreg is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2004, 08:25 AM   #6
guittarzzan
Lives for gear
 
guittarzzan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 605
I should have been more clear. sorry... what I meant to say was best sounding guitars that were recorded straight to disk and not using tape first. This means miking cabs, direct, both or even amp farm type stuff. I'm just looking for some stuff I can listen to that didn't use 2" tape etc to help it sound that way.

thanks,
Steve
guittarzzan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2004, 09:42 AM   #7
drundall
Lives for gear
 
drundall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 756
Send a message via MSN to drundall
I think most albums of the last few years have been recorded that way. Does this mean you don't like anything since 2000-01?

Most people aren't even using the higher sample rates.
__________________
Darian Rundall
drundall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2004, 06:13 PM   #8
guittarzzan
Lives for gear
 
guittarzzan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 605
Quote:
Does this mean you don't like anything since 2000-01?
No, I've heard bands in the last few years that I thought the guitars were at least decent. I don't know exactly when their albums were recorded, but some of the ones that have caught my ears are:
-Foo fighters...to me sounds fairly raw and natural
-Godsmack...aside from crappy song writing, the guitars are huge and still, to my noob ears, sound "real"
-Nickelback...to me their guitars sound very live
-Linkin Park....they don't sound "real", but they work for that style...I don't know, but am guessing ampfarmaholics?

the clips sound good too guys.......thanks for the candy.

steve
guittarzzan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2004, 10:50 PM   #9
BattleAngel
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 930
Send a message via ICQ to BattleAngel Send a message via AIM to BattleAngel Send a message via Yahoo to BattleAngel
Imacgreg,

Wow that's all in the box? Sounds great to me. Not my style but a very big, unfettered sound. Good work :-)
BattleAngel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2004, 11:03 PM   #10
Jason Poulin
Lives for gear
 
Jason Poulin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sudbury, On. Canada
Posts: 1,686
This is one of my bands

It's Metal but tracked all in the box.

http://adhominem.4qtherapeia.com/mp3...re_release.mp3

Jason
__________________
most important gear I own are my ears!

visit my band www.apparatusmusic.com
www.myspace.com/apparatusnumetal
Jason Poulin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2004, 11:41 PM   #11
flexoffset
Lives for gear
 
flexoffset's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Muscle Shoals, Alabama
Posts: 530
Send a message via ICQ to flexoffset Send a message via AIM to flexoffset
What about Evanescense (evanecense, eveniscence, evinasince, HOWever you spell it)?

On their CD jacket, there's talk of ProTools 'programming.'
And for the longest time, Line6 dot com featured their guitarist as then using Line6 products.

It's speculation, but it sure SOUNDS like this is the route they took. The guitar tone sounds identical throughout the CD...kind of like he found one preset and welded the knobs in place.
flexoffset is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2004, 11:49 PM   #12
BattleAngel
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 930
Send a message via ICQ to BattleAngel Send a message via AIM to BattleAngel Send a message via Yahoo to BattleAngel
I heard that they did mic amps (real ones) in the studio for that album, but wouldn't be surprised if they didn't (they certainly seem to claim that it's all Line6). But I personally think that is one of the most horrific guitar sounds of all time and epitomizes the "bad"ness of tracking heavy guitars to digital, imho.
BattleAngel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2004, 12:20 AM   #13
drundall
Lives for gear
 
drundall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 756
Send a message via MSN to drundall
Quote:
Originally posted by guittarzzan
No, I've heard bands in the last few years that I thought the guitars were at least decent. I don't know exactly when their albums were recorded, but some of the ones that have caught my ears are:
-Foo fighters...to me sounds fairly raw and natural
-Godsmack...aside from crappy song writing, the guitars are huge and still, to my noob ears, sound "real"
-Nickelback...to me their guitars sound very live
-Linkin Park....they don't sound "real", but they work for that style...I don't know, but am guessing ampfarmaholics?

the clips sound good too guys.......thanks for the candy.

steve
I think the new FF was recorded to hard disk. I know the old Godsmack CD was recorded on a Mix+ PT system, not sure about the new one but I assume so. Maybe someone can help out on the Nickelback and LP.

I don't really like the gtr sound on the new FF CD but I think the time has come for digital recording and you can get good results, you just have to be careful. Yesterday I recorded just 2 tracks with a triple rectifier (not my first choice) and a great player and it sounded amazing. I think you have to create depth and keep an eye on getting too harsh, tape used to smooth it over for ya a little. I have good luck with 2 mics per cab.

Good luck.
__________________
Darian Rundall
drundall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2004, 01:22 AM   #14
natpub
More cowbell!
 
natpub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,710
pretty sure I read an article with Dave Groll saying they recorded to Pro Tools on the past couple discs at least. They experimented quite a lot, and did most of it at his home. The big thing I recall was them using 1073 preamps on guitars into 1176's because Dave made some comment in the interview about being able to do most anything with just a 1073, an 1176, and a computer. Dunno about the mics, and I dont recall what his rig is.

listening to those discs, i would say the sound depends less on what was used to record it, and more on how he plays, how his rig is set, what gtr and rig it is, and how it is mixed...in other words..kickass sound came from good ears and hard work from real musicians...go figure

kt
__________________
Vibrational Arts, Inc.
Blue Sky Way
Sonic Sorcery Studios
Austin, Texas/Columbus, Ohio
natpub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2004, 01:46 AM   #15
imacgreg
Gear maniac
 
imacgreg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Silver Lake, LA
Posts: 294
Send a message via AIM to imacgreg
Quote:
Originally posted by BattleAngel
Imacgreg,

Wow that's all in the box? Sounds great to me. Not my style but a very big, unfettered sound. Good work :-)
I wish I could say I engineered that whole thing, but I was the assitant. Althought I did a big part in getting the guitar sound (the head engineer was sick). The guywho engineered it is pretty damn good at getting in the box mixes to kick ass. Oh yeah, I hung out with Dave Fortman (producer-Evanescence) a couple times and I think his MO is to track to Bro Tools HD and mix on SSL's. Whether or not you like the record he produced, its got what, like 4 hits out of it already? I think he's nominated for a Grammy... Pretty damn cool guy too.

Ian
__________________
----------
Ian MacGregor
www.standard-audio.com
imacgreg is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2004, 03:11 AM   #16
thethrillfactor
Gear Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 11,233
Quote:
Originally posted by imacgreg
Oh yeah, I hung out with Dave Fortman (producer-Evanescence) a couple times and I think his MO is to track to Bro Tools HD and mix on SSL's. Whether or not you like the record he produced, its got what, like 4 hits out of it already? I think he's nominated for a Grammy... Pretty damn cool guy too.

Ian
I thought i read somewhere that he mixed it on a Neve.
thethrillfactor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2004, 04:21 AM   #17
Absolute
Lives for gear
 
Absolute's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 833
Are you talking about recording Direct--as in no mics?--or direct to hard drive meaning not to analog tape first?

Cause Nickleback and linkin Park mic their amps(they use ampfarm for demo and writing). I know Linkin park does not use analog tape anymore(they used to use it on drums and bass).

There are currently no speaker sims that dont sound harsh for distorted rhythm guitars. If your skipping the tape--skipping the speaker and mic and preamp too is not the best idea. But if your going for harsh guitars--that another story

John Petrucci went straight into Pro Tools on the Dream Theaters new album(mic'd, of course, but no tape)
Absolute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2004, 05:15 AM   #18
BattleAngel
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 930
Send a message via ICQ to BattleAngel Send a message via AIM to BattleAngel Send a message via Yahoo to BattleAngel
Yeah, Dream Theater is huge into Protools now- and I think they've suffered for it honestly. Awake is one of the greatest sounding metal albums of all time, and I think the last one is just so icky sounding.
BattleAngel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2004, 06:19 AM   #19
guittarzzan
Lives for gear
 
guittarzzan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 605
I loved Dream Theater...briefly. A super talented band with great sound, but so many songs started off with great riffs and melodies then transformed into some hideous beasts that destroyed the groove of the song. I'd love to say that I'd have more restraint than them if I could play like that, but I'm not sure I'd have the inner strength to just say no.

steve
guittarzzan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2004, 09:20 AM   #20
ixnys
Gear addict
 
ixnys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 325
Quote:
Originally posted by Absolute
Are you talking about recording Direct--as in no mics?--or direct to hard drive meaning not to analog tape first?

Cause Nickleback and linkin Park mic their amps(they use ampfarm for demo and writing). I know Linkin park does not use analog tape anymore(they used to use it on drums and bass).

There are currently no speaker sims that dont sound harsh for distorted rhythm guitars. If your skipping the tape--skipping the speaker and mic and preamp too is not the best idea. But if your going for harsh guitars--that another story

John Petrucci went straight into Pro Tools on the Dream Theaters new album(mic'd, of course, but no tape)
What about mixing ampfarm with the miced guitar tracks...how does that affect the sound. Since I don't have ampfarm or sansamp I've never been able to try this out. I mean I listen to the song "from the inside" from linkin park's sophmore cd and I'm amazed at the guitar sound. Sounds so huge and tight...I have a triple rectifier but it doesn't sound like this. The best way to describe the difference is my guitar tracks sound like the modern channel on a rectifier but when compared to linkin parks gtrs it sounds more crunchy and not as leady. I don't know what the hell they do to get those guitar sounds. I've doubled my guitar tracks 4 times tightly and eq'd them to hell and i still can't get them to sound as powerful as linkin parks.
ixnys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2004, 09:32 AM   #21
kittonian
Lives for gear
 
kittonian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 2,396
In my opinion if you want great guitar sounds and want to skip going to tape you need a couple of key components.

1. Great mics and amps (obviously)
2. Great converters and clocks (the single biggest hurdle in any digital audio environment)
3. Very high end cables that capture all the magic (my personal love is the Monster Studio Pro 1000 and M-Series custom cables)
4. The know how to place the mics perfectly

If you've got those components you should be able to get a really great guitar sound but to be honest it also comes down to the room, the player, the vibe, etc. Just do the best you can and keep learning. I've been doing this for a lot of years and I've not found one tried and true method that I use all the time. I start with a formula that has worked in the past and tweak from there depending on the situation.
__________________
Joshua Aaron
President/Chief Engineer
AudioLot/AudioLot Studios
High End Pro Audio Sales & Consulting
Recording/Music Production/Mixing

http://www.audiolot.com
kittonian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2004, 10:36 AM   #22
stealthbalance
Lives for gear
 
stealthbalance's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: united states
Posts: 625
OMG
stealthbalance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2004, 01:26 PM   #23
jeronimo
Lives for gear
 
jeronimo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Salvador, BA - Brazil
Posts: 2,536
Send a message via ICQ to jeronimo Send a message via AIM to jeronimo
Ok guys check this out:
Trilhar (Right click & Save As...)
The song is in Portuguese, but the intention is to listen to the guitar tracks right?!
Tell me how do you like it.
__________________
Think Diferente!
www.verticeestudio.com
http://www.myspace.com/jelmet
jeronimo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2004, 02:07 PM   #24
guittarzzan
Lives for gear
 
guittarzzan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 605
jeronimo,

sounds great imo. Heavy and still sounds pretty natural. ...so what gear/techniques were used for the heavy rythm tracks?
...now you'll probably tell me it was all done through a Behringer amp simulator, a Fender Squire into a Fostex mini disk recorder. If that's the case, then I give up. I'll go buy a hot dog stand and take up shop haha.

thanks for the clips,
steve
guittarzzan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2004, 03:54 AM   #25
gracejames
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 278
I'm totally diggin the guitar sound from the latest
Puddle of Mudd. Andy Wallace rules. I wish i could
get that sound. Any of you guys know more of the
recording?

I used to be a Dream Theater fanatic.
I loved 'Images and Words' and 'Awake'.
They are killer but they really haven't
topped themselves since those CDs imo.
One of my favorite lead tones is
in 'Perpetual Burn' by Jason Becker.

peace,
--james
gracejames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2004, 01:06 PM   #26
narco
Lives for gear
 
narco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Switzerland/New Zealand/guitar case
Posts: 3,458
I've worked with the same production team that did the foofighters "colour and the shape" album which to me is some of the best heavy guitar sounds around. they tracked to protools, then dumped it to tape to mix off..
narco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2004, 11:42 PM   #27
jeronimo
Lives for gear
 
jeronimo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Salvador, BA - Brazil
Posts: 2,536
Send a message via ICQ to jeronimo Send a message via AIM to jeronimo
Quote:
Originally posted by guittarzzan
jeronimo,

sounds great imo. Heavy and still sounds pretty natural. ...so what gear/techniques were used for the heavy rythm tracks?
...now you'll probably tell me it was all done through a Behringer amp simulator, a Fender Squire into a Fostex mini disk recorder. If that's the case, then I give up. I'll go buy a hot dog stand and take up shop haha.

thanks for the clips,
steve
Thanks guittarzzan this is the chain:
dual rectifier or v-twin rack + 50/50 hooked to a 4x12 or 2x12 mesa w/ vintage 30.
on the 4x12 - atm 25 w/ low only, 57 w/ mids, 441 w/ mids and AT 3525 w/ highs
all into a Tascam 2524 board then into a 001.
And that's prety much it.
__________________
Think Diferente!
www.verticeestudio.com
http://www.myspace.com/jelmet
jeronimo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off