31st January 2007
|
#1 | | Moderator
Joined: Dec 2003 Location: London, innit
Posts: 5,255
Thread Starter | Cardioid room mics --- Do you Add EQ for bottom end fatness?
Just wondering whether you do this as a matter of course for all mics in cardioid setting to compensate for (lack of) proximity effect.
I just noticed yesterday in rehearsal how much roll off there is say 6 - 10 feet out, compared with what my ears/body are hearing from that part of the room. The body/thump of the sound I'm hearing gets lost. (I don't have outboard EQs --- only preamps)
|
| |
31st January 2007
|
#2 | | Gearslutz.com admin
Joined: Apr 2002 Location: A Yank in London, UK | Greets Andy!
For drums - I point mine at walls (about 6 inches - 1 foot away) with the back of the capsule facing the kit. I usually get plenty of low end in mine.. often too much kick drum 'woof' & not enough snare 'crack' as I would like.. |
| |
31st January 2007
|
#3 | | Moderator
Joined: Dec 2003 Location: London, innit
Posts: 5,255
Thread Starter |
LOL --- "woof" is perfect. I guess its down to the freq response of the mics. I remember your 149s being very meaty in the lowend (and your ribbon mics) I definitely need more:
|
| |
31st January 2007
|
#4 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Mar 2006 Location: Bahstahn, MA
Posts: 2,698
|
it depends on the room and the kit and yadda yadda yadda, but...
if you've got your room mics out far enough, the low end frequencies have enough time to fully develop. you should get plenty of low end with the right mic and right placement.
|
| |
31st January 2007
|
#5 | | Moderator
Joined: Dec 2003 Location: London, innit
Posts: 5,255
Thread Starter |
I see... So this is independent of proximity effect. Could theefore be phase cancellation, although what my ears hear is definitely not thin or lacking in bottom end.
|
| |
31st January 2007
|
#6 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Sep 2002 Location: Elmont NY |
What's important is to understand how the room mics work in the drum sound.
You usually don't want alot of bottom from the room you wan't it for the air and brightness. I usually hpf the room mics, usually I use figure 8 pattern. If you get fat bottomed room sounds by the time you mix in the rest of the kit you got mud
__________________
Lou Gimenez
www.musiclabnyc.com
|
| |
31st January 2007
|
#7 | | Moderator
Joined: Dec 2003 Location: London, innit
Posts: 5,255
Thread Starter |
OK gotcha... I was thinking more in terms of the room mics thickening the attack and brightness of the over heads and/or closer mics. (I guess thats where the hi pass comes in, with the natural "band pass" effect of more distant mics --- More emphasis towards lower mids and mids)
|
| |
31st January 2007
|
#8 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jul 2005 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,358
|
I was lying in bed last night thinking about this...
If your kick has a fundamental tone of about 60hz, and the speed of sound is about 1100 feet/second, then each wave is about 18 feet long. So, at 9 feet, you'd be about 180º out of phase with a close kick mic. At 18 feet, you're 360º, which is like being in phase.
So, at 9 feet, you're not going to hear much low end.
Of course, you're high frequencies are more sensitive to the time delay, a 18 millisecond delay might sound funky, espeically on faster drum parts. You'd also likely want a tighter kick sound on fast material.
So, if you're recording something slowish, with a tempo in the 100 bpm range, I'd go for the big bottom room at 18 feet or so. If you're doing fast punk or metal, get the room in closer, and jsut worry about getting that bright attack that others referred to.
On a related note: What are you guys trying to get out of your room mics. If you just solo'd the room mics, what are you hearing? Is it clear? It seems my rooms often sound brassy, trashy, just kind of ugly. But I'm often working in less than ideal rooms, too.
Do you use your best mics and pres for the room (I've read a few approach this way)? I usually use a condenser, not my best, through a pre that I have available, usually an open channel on my mixer...
|
| |
31st January 2007
|
#9 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jul 2005 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,358
|
Also, I wanted to point out that you can't hear phase cancellation in the room. It only makes itself apparent when two or more signals are combined into one mono signal, via a mic, or processing, or at the speaker...
|
| |
31st January 2007
|
#10 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jan 2005 Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,044
|
I don't think I ever boost lows on cardioid room mics. Maybe I'll roll some off, though.
|
| |
31st January 2007
|
#11 | | Lives for gear
Joined: May 2006 Location: Liverpool, UK
Posts: 582
|
I'm wondering the same things as Mr Suitcase - I'm going to be moving drum sessions from the smaller drum room into our large room as of tomorrow (when we have built our gobo's) and its going to open up all sorts of room micing possibilities.
Mono, stereo, omni, figure 8, coincident? Should be fun!
RE phase cancellation - you could get this in the room from reflections from the walls causing nulls at various points in the room couldnt you?
Al
|
| |
31st January 2007
|
#12 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jul 2005 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,358
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Worlez RE phase cancellation - you could get this in the room from reflections from the walls causing nulls at various points in the room couldnt you?
Al | I would imagine that would be the case, but with a cardioid, it's likely t be less of an issue than with an omni, I would suspect. The reflected sound should be lower enough in level relative to the direct sound so as not to be a major issue. Of course, if sound bounces off of several surfaces and happens to travel the same distance, it could refocus at the mic, causing enough level to cause problems...
I like the idea of plugging one ear and walking around 'til you hear the sound you're after. I don't know that using only one ear is quite the same as using a mic, but it should get you close.
If you know what you're listening for, that is!
|
| |
31st January 2007
|
#13 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jan 2003 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 5,838
|
One thing to keep in mind is that there will be dips and peaks in the low end response of your room. One very big reason why you may experience a lack of low end in certain spots in the room is because of the comb filtering in the low end. See the Realtraps site for articles on this subject. If you have a well treated room then you will find that things will be more even around the room. I've definitely noticed sweet spots in my room where the balance of lows to highs is really good and it's in those spots where the kick and snare have the best impact. I typically find that using large diaphragm condenser mics gives me a really trashy room sound that is overly bright. Using ribbon mics seems to smooth things out. Although those $5 Karma mini's work rather well. I'm also finding that SM57's sound pretty awesome as room mics in my room and add just the right mojo to the midrange. I have sometimes added a low shelf to room mics to restore the girth...especially on the condensers.
In my room one side is reflective with lots of diffusors. I usually set up the drums on this side of the room. When I put the room mics on the opposite side of the room I get a nice diffuse sound being picked up by the mics. I should try putting a cardioid mic a couple feet in front of the kit but facing away toward the far wall...I bet that would sound good since all the diffuse sound would have time to bounce around a bit.
Brad
|
| | | |