![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What's the BIGGEST lie you've told a client? | James 'LA' Lugo | So much gear, so little time! | 133 | 10th February 2007 10:30 PM |
| Grigori 3 (i've been told we sound like Lacuna Coil, etc.) | JustinBailey | Work in progress / advice requested / Show & Tell / Artist showcase | 1 | 3rd November 2006 05:42 PM |
| Always told told to demo before buying... | Geddyleewannabe | So much gear, so little time! | 22 | 30th July 2006 11:43 AM |
| Always told to demo before buying... | Geddyleewannabe | So much gear, so little time! | 13 | 28th July 2006 04:39 AM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4
| Profire-I told you I just got this mail from m-audio.Strange no-one else noticed this.Must be all units. We just finished running those tests, and we were able to duplicate the issue you reported. We did notice that when playing a track from Pro Tools and recording it back in (Via an ADAT Loop), the new track was showing up about 150 samples earlier than the original file. Changing buffer sizes only made a slight difference, 10 samples or so (from 128 samples to 2048 samples buffer sizes). We have logged this issue and escalated it to our software development team for further investigation. Jared Adler M-Audio Technical Support 5795 Martin Rd. Irwindale, CA 91706 USA http://www.m-audio.com (626) 633-9055 Where do you want to take your music? _____________________________________________ _________ |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 15
| 150 samples EARLIER? That makes no sense !?!? |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 127
| "We're sorry to inform you that your Profire's clock is out of sync.......please refer to the time-space continuum calibration manual that came with your Profire" |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 171
| bump |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear interested Join Date: May 2008 Location: Madrid
Posts: 17
| ...This happens because the drivers compensate for the delays they have in the conversion and any other process they may have inside the box. Once you go out and back in via ADAT thereīs no conversion delays but the driver still compensates for them because it doesnīt know if the audio is digital or not. It happens with RME and MOTU, etc. Iīm not saying itīs nice, just explaining itīs not really a bug... the only way to solve this IMO is to split the driver in two...one for analog I/O and the other for digital...maybe this lead to worse problems. BTW: why do you do that?...a bounce gives you the same results, or it should... |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |