Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reverb chambers back in the day Jay Kahrs Low End Theory 23 5th November 2007 05:03 AM
A "back in the day" question re: compression... guittarzzan So much gear, so little time! 3 24th November 2006 09:58 PM
Ja Rule's Posse Back in the Day Fluency Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 17 13th November 2006 10:13 PM
Were De-Essers Used Back In The Day? Football High end 15 24th May 2006 03:19 AM
back in the day... ("Notator", etc.) genericperson Music computers 14 26th September 2004 03:14 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 21st December 2006, 09:15 AM   #1
soupking
Lives for gear
 
soupking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,563
Pultec back In The Day

When did Pultec become known in the music industry as a production use?

I'm trying to figure out what early rock and reggae artists might've stumbled into a place with a Pultec.

Artists mostly in the Desmond Dekker, Link Wray variety.

Thanks everybody, you guys kick some serious ass.
soupking is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2006, 10:36 PM   #2
Bob Olhsson
Motown legend
 
Bob Olhsson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 5,273
Pultec was probably the very first equalizer available that had a built in make-up gain amplifier. They came out in the early 1950s and were intended for disk mastering.

I bought a pair of API 550s in 1972 for the same amount I could have bought a pair of used EQP1as for. I went for the APIs because I couldn't even imagine a studio that didn't have Pultecs.
Bob Olhsson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2006, 11:05 PM   #3
soupking
Lives for gear
 
soupking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,563
Sounds like they weren't too expensive back then.
soupking is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2006, 11:14 PM   #4
dbbubba
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,901
Not only were they not tremendously expensive "back then" but I could have bought a pair that even hads the original owners manuals (they came in colored folders like you put school reports in!) for approx. $450.00 in 1988. A fellow that I know quired some and he was aound during their original days, so he didn't think of them as extremely desirable pieces.

Then again... what seems "inexpensive" now was still a considerable chunk of change back then.

They were built by Pulse Electronics.
Pultec is a contraction of that name.

Danny Brown
dbbubba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2006, 11:38 PM   #5
PRobb
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,901
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbbubba View Post
They were built by Pulse Electronics.
Pultec is a contraction of that name.

Danny Brown
That would have made them Pulelecs. Actually, It was PULse TEChniques.
__________________
We are the people we've been waiting for
-Barak Obama

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
-Edmund Burke
PRobb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2006, 12:34 AM   #6
soupking
Lives for gear
 
soupking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,563
Rats I guess if I want to mimic old school production, I'm going to have to get a Pultec.

Sounds like they were pretty abundant from the 50's on.
soupking is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2006, 01:26 AM   #7
RoundBadge
Lives for gear
 
RoundBadge's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles ,Ca.
Posts: 5,979
I see beat up EQH-2's going for 2500 plus.clean ones for over 3K

tried the Mercury..not a bad eq..not exactly a pultec though.

I dunno,Fletcher seems to really like these:
might be worth a demo. $2250.00..


http://www.mercenary.com/ampemoeq.html
RoundBadge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2006, 01:28 AM   #8
RoundBadge
Lives for gear
 
RoundBadge's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles ,Ca.
Posts: 5,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by soupking View Post
Rats I guess if I want to mimic old school production, I'm going to have to get a Pultec.

Says who?
RoundBadge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2006, 02:51 AM   #9
soupking
Lives for gear
 
soupking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,563
Well, nobody in particular. What I'm trying to do is an impressionistic project. Meaning that I'm trying to emulate an age of sound to the best of my ability.

It's quite the learning experience because I have to research like crazy, and even then there are holes in discovery.

I'm trying to comb what I can in a given area (right now, it's early 60's) and then if i don't need/want it, I'll drop it from the path.
soupking is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2006, 04:32 AM   #10
Steffmo
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Haven, CT
Posts: 1,163
I have a pair of Lang PEQ2s.....discreet transitor Pultecs basically......sometimes I like them better than Pultecs.

Bought them for 900.00(pair) in 87.
Steffmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2006, 05:31 AM   #11
dbbubba
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,901
Quote:
Originally Posted by PRobb View Post
That would have made them Pulelecs. Actually, It was PULse TEChniques.
Yes, yes, yes....
I was typing fast because we were trying to leave the office for lunch.
I thought of the wrong name after I left.

Danny Brown
dbbubba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2006, 05:47 AM   #12
James Guitar
Lives for gear
 
James Guitar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steffmo View Post
I have a pair of Lang PEQ2s.....discreet transitor Pultecs basically......sometimes I like them better than Pultecs.
for Langs!
-J
James Guitar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2006, 06:22 AM   #13
PRobb
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,901
Quote:
Originally Posted by soupking View Post
Well, nobody in particular. What I'm trying to do is an impressionistic project. Meaning that I'm trying to emulate an age of sound to the best of my ability.

It's quite the learning experience because I have to research like crazy, and even then there are holes in discovery.

I'm trying to comb what I can in a given area (right now, it's early 60's) and then if i don't need/want it, I'll drop it from the path.
I know I could get evicted from Gearslutz for this, but it's not the arrows, it's the Indians. Start with a good song. Then write a good arrangement. Then get a group of real good players together in a nice sounding room. Use as few mics as possible. Track the whole rythm section live. Don't worry about bleed, use it.

Sure period gear will make it better. As many tubes as possible will make it better. Ditto tape.

But that approach with a Mackie console into PT will sound more "period" than overdub by overdub with all the Pultecs in the world.

But Pultecs sure do sound great, don't they?(After all, this is Gearslutz )

Power Station used to have a rack of 24 that could be patched between the console and the machine for tracking or machine and console for mixing. Heaven!
__________________
We are the people we've been waiting for
-Barak Obama

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
-Edmund Burke
PRobb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2006, 06:40 AM   #14
James Guitar
Lives for gear
 
James Guitar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 540
Quote:
Originally Posted by PRobb View Post
Power Station used to have a rack of 24 that could be patched between the console and the machine for tracking or machine and console for mixing. Heaven!
i was watching a johnny cash special the other night and the shots of him in the studio featured a great many pultecs. my guess is it was around '69... no idea which studio, though...
-J
James Guitar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2006, 06:55 AM   #15
soupking
Lives for gear
 
soupking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,563
Quote:
I know I could get evicted from Gearslutz for this, but it's not the arrows, it's the Indians.
Totally man, I hear ya'. I'm a musician and a converted luddite.

I've had the song for years, now I'm just bringing it to justice the best that I can. For this occasion it's not enough that it sounds good but that it sounds authentic, or faux-authentic I guess is my angle. It's pretty steep angle too, but the tape doesn't lie.

You guys rock, I love this site.

Peace,
-soupking
soupking is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2006, 08:09 AM   #16
RoundBadge
Lives for gear
 
RoundBadge's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles ,Ca.
Posts: 5,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steffmo View Post
I have a pair of Lang PEQ2s.....discreet transitor Pultecs basically......sometimes I like them better than Pultecs.

Bought them for 900.00(pair) in 87.
Ha Ha..not no more

I regretfully sold a pair 6 years ago for $2500.00 in the midst of the stupid psuedo PT/ plug in uprising/ studio downsize[bought for 400 apiece in the early 90's]
they're going for even more now
RoundBadge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2006, 08:10 AM   #17
RoundBadge
Lives for gear
 
RoundBadge's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles ,Ca.
Posts: 5,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by PRobb View Post
I know I could get evicted from Gearslutz for this, but it's not the arrows, it's the Indians. Start with a good song. Then write a good arrangement. Then get a group of real good players together in a nice sounding room. Use as few mics as possible. Track the whole rythm section live. Don't worry about bleed, use it.

Sure period gear will make it better. As many tubes as possible will make it better. Ditto tape.

RoundBadge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2006, 08:34 AM   #18
vernier
Lives for gear
 
vernier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,674
You need period correct equipment to dupe the sound authentically. That means recorder, mics, limiters, eq, period correct instruments, and using the right tecniques. Every piece of the puzzle is crucial.
vernier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2006, 08:08 PM   #19
Jeff Goodman
Gear maniac
 
Jeff Goodman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 198
Quote:
I regretfully sold a pair 6 years ago for $2500.00 in the midst of the stupid psuedo PT/ plug in uprising/ studio downsize[bought for 400 apiece in the early 90's]
they're going for even more now
Oh man, I can relate. I had a pair of consecutive serial # Langs that I bought for $300 a piece in '88. Got broke for a time in the early '90s and sold 'em for $2500.

Regretted it ever since.
__________________
Siento, no puedo mezclar su canción ahora mismo, los glotones han comido mis yemas del dedo.
Jeff Goodman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2006, 08:30 PM   #20
Tamra
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 77
I've got one of those Power Station 24~ Complete with the Ed Evans/Clearmountain mod. That thing sounds so sweet! Just love it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PRobb View Post
I know I could get evicted from Gearslutz for this, but it's not the arrows, it's the Indians. Start with a good song. Then write a good arrangement. Then get a group of real good players together in a nice sounding room. Use as few mics as possible. Track the whole rythm section live. Don't worry about bleed, use it.

Sure period gear will make it better. As many tubes as possible will make it better. Ditto tape.

But that approach with a Mackie console into PT will sound more "period" than overdub by overdub with all the Pultecs in the world.

But Pultecs sure do sound great, don't they?(After all, this is Gearslutz )

Power Station used to have a rack of 24 that could be patched between the console and the machine for tracking or machine and console for mixing. Heaven!
Tamra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th December 2006, 07:09 PM   #21
Bob Olhsson
Motown legend
 
Bob Olhsson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 5,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by soupking View Post
Sounds like they were pretty abundant from the 50's on.
Yes and no. Everybody had a few but they were often as not just used on the plate and the lead vocal when there was a sibilance problem.

They were pretty expensive, maybe equivalent to $2000+ each but musicians who could really play were lots more expensive so all gear was small change in the overall scheme of things.

As for atmosphere, it was one of utter terror about screwing up. If you failed to point out your mistakes to the producer, you wouldn't get called again but if you made too many causing everybody to have to take it again, you also wouldn't get called again.
Bob Olhsson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0