13th February 2013
|
#1 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 158
Thread Starter | Splitters
Please recommend good go-to splitter for guitar and bass.
Simply need to put passive instrument into a splitter, in order to go to
mixer or amp, and simultaniously, a secondary output to the DAW to record
the clean signal.
Am i simply looking for a couple Radial JDIs? (all our guitars and basses have passive pickups btw).
thank you
|
| |
14th February 2013
|
#2 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,651
|
That would be a DI box.
1/4 in 1/4 out to amp, XLR to mixer or interface mic input.
__________________
27" Imac 2.93 ghz I7 12GB ram OSX 10.6.5,
MacBookPro 2.4 ghz duo 4GB ram,
Mackie Onyx 1640I, Motu Ultralite Mk3,
LA610 Solo, Logic Pro 9.1.6 DAW
|
| |
14th February 2013
|
#3 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 158
Thread Starter | Quote:
Originally Posted by Manfrensengensen That would be a DI box.
1/4 in 1/4 out to amp, XLR to mixer or interface mic input. | Yes, thanks, i think i am just fuzzy on the whole passive/active thing...
I had another thread and got myriad of answers, so i started another.
If we have all passive pickups on our guitars and basses, we require
active DI's?
thanks again
|
| |
14th February 2013
|
#4 | | Gear Head
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 63
| Quote:
Originally Posted by trupro Splitters | The Judean People's Front!?   |
| |
14th February 2013
|
#5 | | Gear Head
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 67
|
Little Labs Redeye 3D Phantom.
Look it up. Read about it. The sound quality and the two features "di/re-amp" and "re-amp overdrive" is what sets this product apart from the rest.
|
| |
19th February 2013
|
#6 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 158
Thread Starter |
ah yes, now i see. This thing is well liked, as are other Little Labs products overall. This is best i think if an engineer wants to simultaniously reamp to several stacks, whearas a Radial JD or N-Audio DI can do the same, but not simulataniously, of course.
The main thing i cant seem to find a solid answer on is the whole active/passive thing. Some folks tell me to use active, phantom powered DIs for our guitars and basses, since they are all passive pickup. Others told me to use passive. Im new to guitar electronics, what say you all?
thanx guyz
Last edited by trupro; 19th February 2013 at 09:27 PM..
Reason: more betterer
|
| |
19th February 2013
|
#7 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 158
Thread Starter |
So its definately going to be a Radial J48 or the Little Labs Redeye 3D Phantom.
Most of my reamping goes down in the box in whatever DAW i fancy at the time, still for a few bux more you are getting a great reamper product, allegedly.
However, can you guys tell me if the Little Labs will color the sound at all? Not that this matters too much but...how is at at taming the loading and leaving stuff pretty much alone for a clean, strong input (versus the Radial, i mean).
thanx again
|
| |
19th February 2013
|
#8 | | Moderator
Joined: Dec 2003 Location: London, innit
Posts: 5,258
|
Have a look at the manual and what it says about the buffered high impedance instrument input, esp paragraph 2 - Quote:
We have also added to the now called Redeye 3D a very high quality, hi
fi
, phantom powered, high impedance instrument buffer. When you are
using the Redeye 3D with sensitive passive pick ups, this high quality
buffer assures no tone change from loading will occur
| http://www.littlelabs.com/REDEYE3Dmanual.pdf
You should get a great performance out of this box! The input impedance of 1 Mega ohm should ensure you'll get good transparency with your guitar signal
|
| |
20th February 2013
|
#9 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 158
Thread Starter | Quote:
Originally Posted by Blast9 Have a look at the manual and what it says about the buffered high impedance instrument input, esp paragraph 2 - http://www.littlelabs.com/REDEYE3Dmanual.pdf
You should get a great performance out of this box! The input impedance of 1 Mega ohm should ensure you'll get good transparency with your guitar signal | What, do you work for Little Labs or something? Maybe you just own this thing and totally love it. Either way, you would be proud...plus alot of people have great things to say about this piece so i bought one just now!
For a few bux more than a Radial J48, now i also have a nice reamper
(i did get a sweet deal on the Little Labs though).
Thanks for the recommendations guys, also gioing to cop a Radial J48 and then we'll be latency-free with both gtr and bass...and with better tone of course.
Cheers,
S.
Last edited by trupro; 20th February 2013 at 07:40 PM..
Reason: cus i rool
|
| |
20th February 2013
|
#10 | | Moderator
Joined: Dec 2003 Location: London, innit
Posts: 5,258
|
Nah - Just going by the spec!
Actually... I've just used Little Labs stuff before - top notch gear... as is the Radial stuff - you can't go wrong really...
Congrats! |
| |
21st February 2013
|
#11 | | Gear Head
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 67
| Quote:
Originally Posted by trupro ..so i bought one just now! | You took my advice, excellent Quote: |
For a few bux more than a Radial J48, now i also have a nice reamper
| Exactly. Two-in-one box. It replaces two Radial boxes. And with better control over the signal level through the chain. Which is paramount for an optimal reamp tone.
|
| |
21st February 2013
|
#12 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 158
Thread Starter |
Yeah good advice, thanks again guys |
| | | |