| User Review | | Sound Quality | | 8 | | Ease of use | | 7 | | Features | | 6 | | Bang for buck | | 10 | |
Score: 78%
| Golden Age Project PRE-73
Published by mequaz
13th December 2011
| | Golden Age Project PRE-73 I am a firm beliver in being focused on the end results. Sure it would be great to have "XYZ" or "123" but most of us cant afford that. And Lets not kid oursevles if you have a wife,a kid or two and you have a spare $1500, buying the $1500 preamp may not be the first thing you do. So you look for something that can give you that "xyz" sound with out "xyz" price tag.
The Golden Age Pre-73 does just that. I have had the honor of working with avalons, neve, and my personal fav UA pres. (like i said personal fav  ) so i know how to refrence the quality of it. Im not saying its gonna be 1:1, no not what im saying. But for 350 brand new you cant beat it in that price range PERIOD. Its warm, and sligtly dark but in a good way. Yes its colored, so dont expect wire with gain. Now im not some super audio guru so my review comes from MY EXPERIENCE. I used it with 3 mics, MXL v67g, MXL Genisis, and CAD E100s. Unfortunalty i like it so much on the CAD i didnt give it much time with the other 2. LOL. The CAD is an awesome mic and its very honest and before i was just going straight into my m-audio fast track. It was cool, nothing to yell about. But once I added the Pre-73, YEAAAAAAA (young jezzy voice)
I only do vocal tracking in my studio. Im a hip hop aritst and i do work with r&b singers so there are not a lot of times where im gonna be working with acoustic insturments. Now as far as male vocals go this thing is def the truth. Of course having the 48v phantom power(using a condensor mic) engaged and going into the CAD E100s then into the GAP-pre73 it was warm, detailed and sounded full. I had the input switch set at about -70 and the output knob set to a little below half, while adjusting with the input dial on the interface so i dont get clipping. Now as you turn the output you do get me more color and that gave my vocal some Density that wasnt there before. It wasnt harsh. It was neveish. Not 100% like a neve but i was completly satisfied with the results. I read SOS mag's review on this and it was described as sounding "rounded". I can agree with that. Not like it cuts things off. But thats what makes SSL, and Neves, what they are. Now that diffierence is not night and day. However if you have worked on the high end stuff just know its not gonna have that "fast" preamp sound. Moving on: I then stacked my vocals, and for the first time in my home studio i understood why some say they are almost plugin free. Everything just fit. My voice wasnt brittle and this thing added to the flavor of my mic. Now keep in mind mic and pre-amp combos differ greatly. So RESULTS MAY VARY What works for me and mine wont work for you and yours. But for my voice with the CAD mic the GAP Pre-73 worked for me.
Next i tried female and vocals and i started off with similar seetings only this time i wanted to use as little output dial as i could. SO i set the "mic/line" switch to about 70 and just enough of the output pot to have a good signal going in. Once again warm full and had a forward mid range. The ability to control the amout of color is also a very usful thing while tracking, HOWEVER turning the mic/line switch while tracking is not recommended. Yea that noise was def un-appreciated.
Now i have been raving about how this things sound and all because like i said, im a results driven person. Noone listens to thier fav song and says: Wonder what kinda preamp they used. they just turn it up. And it sounds great but Pre 73 has its downers. First it has no high pass filter switch. Now granted 2 out of my 3 mics do, and yea its easy to just add a HPF in Reaper, but thats a feature that the big boy preamps have. Not a deal breaker, also the knobs are like the Neve that its modeled after. Which is great however, it can be confusing. Takes some time to get familar with this. Most of us who are in this price range are used to turn the knob right and your adding more signal. But once again a lil learning curve no big deal. No switch or dial for impedance either. Not something thats a deal breaker either but in comparison to pres that are highly regarded as "pro" that could be a difference maker.
Despite its short comings im a fan of this pre. Its a good pre. I wish i could have given it a 8.5 on sound quality because it gets your right in the leauge. You may not be in the all star game but your def pro! (even the last guy on the bench in the NBA was a highschool standout! and if the neves are kobe, this thing is at least a good lamar odom or ron artest) YES, there are mods for it, (yea ill be modding mine!), but that doesnt mean its not great out the box. Behind a great mic, quality cable into a decent converter and you will def achieve a high quality vocal sound. So my personal conclusion: If you have 500 to spend on a preamp give the Pre-73 some major consideration especially if you want color. Its def worth your hard earned dollar, and you can save the rest of the money and take your woman somewhere nice for a change. | | | |
By
kelvyn
on
14th December 2011
| | User review | | Sound Quality | | 7 | | Ease of use | | 10 | | Features | | 5 | | Bang for buck | | 10 | |
Score: 80%
|
| Plug in and a few la la's later.... "Hey Presto!" This review is for newbies with no technical knowledge (like me except I'm an oldbie).
I decided a long time ago that I am going to compose songs and not be a technician. So I read a lot of reviews/forums/magazines about equipment to get the lowdown on what's hot and what's not. I bought a microphone I had heard was good (Brauner VM 1) and a Focusrite ISA 430 producer pack... So far so good, everything sounds great... But! The singer whose album I'm producing doesn't sound so good with this combination. So.. Back to the reviews section of Gearslutz. Read lots about lots of reaaaaaallllly expensive mic pres (bearing in mind my already substantial outlay) and it looked like mortgaging the wife until I stumbled across the GAP - Pre 73 MKII. Great reviews/great price... worth taking a risk I thought. Ordered, delivered and plugged in... EUREKA! What an amazing sound. I'm not going to bore you with technical details (cos I don't know any) the simple fact is... You plug it in and it sounds really amazing, it's built like a tank and extremely easy to use. The results are two very happy people (me and the singer and maybe the rest of the world when the albums finally done) and a very relieved wife. | | |
By
s12512
on
20th December 2011
| | User review | | Sound Quality | | 7 | | Ease of use | | 10 | | Features | | 10 | | Bang for buck | | 10 | |
Score: 93%
|
| Gona keep this short and sweet. at our studio we have a few vintech x73's, and also some 573's (500 series version). i have a gap73 at my house and a couple at the studio. this thing doesn't just sound good for the money. it sounds good period. the vintechs do have a little more mojo but if you are gona spend $300 on a pre, you'd have to be crazy not to check this out!! i've done 2 full records on one of these for vocals this past year. the vocals came out great with it. nice and full. plenty of body. Definitely a fantastic purchase!  | | | | | | User review | | Sound Quality | | 10 | | Ease of use | | 10 | | Features | | 10 | | Bang for buck | | 10 | |
Score: 100%
|
| Golden Age , Go-To Age? What first turned me on about this pre amp? I received some stems to mix for a client, once i heard the bass i immediately turned on my macbook and emailed the engineer who tracked the record. "What did you use to track the bass? Neve pre and an SVT ampeg?" He chuckles and says: "No man , GAP73! I just used the D/I and a Fender Jazz Bass." Im sure you all could imagine what i did next.. I log onto Ebay.com and find an authorized dealer and purchased this fine pre amp .
What am i doing with it now? Recently I have used this pre with my LA2A on the past three records that I have done this past month. Im wondering if I will ever NOT use it? Doubtful  | | | | | | User review | | Sound Quality | | 10 | | Ease of use | | 10 | | Features | | 8 | | Bang for buck | | 10 | |
Score: 95%
|
| Best character pre "bang for the buck" out there. Sure all the "Neve-Alike" pre's sound slightly different... but so do all old Neve Pre's! This little guy has all the "stuff" I turn to this style of pre for... and for a LOT less money. They make really big "expensive" sounding recordings possible for a lot less money. Hard to go wrong here!
My only complaint is that I wish that would put their entire series in 500 series format... but it looks like that is possibly starting to happen.  | | | | | | User review | | Sound Quality | | 8 | | Ease of use | | 8 | | Features | | 8 | | Bang for buck | | 10 | |
Score: 85%
|
| A "best bang for buck" for sure. This thing can be warm and crunchy when dialed in just right. Its not a "transparent" sounding pre, its meant to be colored....and it is!
Sounds great on Vox and Guitars, and has high enough output for Ribbon mics.
There may be some "quality" issues. My 1st unit came with a non-functional "phantom power" switch. My 2nd unit that I received that had a blown LED light (not a big deal).
Quality seems to be hit or miss. But for such a cheap price and a great sound....its hard to complain. | | | | | | User review | | Sound Quality | | 2 | | Ease of use | | 5 | | Features | | 1 | | Bang for buck | | 1 | |
Score: 23%
|
| I have a different view of the GAP Pre73. It's a murky, muddy sounding basic preamp in an ugly little red box. Way over priced and overhyped. Discrete, class A blah, blah, blah...so is a used Shure M67 that you can get for 30 or 40 bucks. Come to think of it, the Shure M67 also has transformers in and out and discrete wiring, and while sounding cloudy it still sounds better to my ears than the GAP. | | | | | | User review | | Sound Quality | | 10 | | Ease of use | | 8 | | Features | | 8 | | Bang for buck | | 10 | |
Score: 90%
|
| Normally I use the Amek consoles´ clean amps. They are awesome and the Amek console gives me 44 of these pre amps to work with.
For colouration I have some GAP PR-73 in the studio. I do use them sometimes to record mic signals and line signals (DI) when I want the GAP colour printed during recording.
I truely love recording bass thru these!
But most often I use the PRE-73 for reamping and sidechaining. Especially Lead Vox !
I patch them in and try out both the Line DI and Mic I/P positions to get the desired effect. It´s a great tool that really makes a difference.
As a result of that I´m considering buying two more. | | | | | | User review | | Sound Quality | | 6 | | Ease of use | | 10 | | Features | | 6 | | Bang for buck | | 7 | |
Score: 73%
|
| Believe and Don't Believe the Hype So I was curious about buying a PRE-73, so I borrowed one from a co-worker. Used it on vocals, tried some reamping with it as well, and this is what I have to say...
Wow great tone, very Neve-ish I loved it, except i didn't find the preamp very useable in a professional situation. It's so freakin' noisy. My suggestion would be to have the guys at zenpro to mod it, but than you looking at something like 600 for the preamp, if you got the eq to go with it it's another 300, and if it has the same noise issues as this one, i'd suggest a mod too, but I don't think they offer it. Although I really did thing the tone was great I feel I'd rather get a Vintech, or I hear BLA's coming out with a 1073 preamp as well. So overall it's cool for an entry level recordist, or a hobbyist, but professionally speaking I couldn't touch it even as a second of third preamp unless it was modified. | | | | | | User review | | Sound Quality | | 6 | | Ease of use | | 8 | | Features | | 8 | | Bang for buck | | 9 | |
Score: 78%
|
| I have owned both the stock.version and a fully modded version with upgraded caps and x formers.
I do agree the value is here. Its a classic design and the price is downright from china, well and it is.
The stock version is where its at.
While I felt the fully modded version did outperform the unmodded it was not night and day more towards different.
Also I did not do the power supply mod which I feel would be a good idea.
The downside of the cheap parts,
A woolier low end.
However this little pre makes friends, it holds its own against much.more expensive pres.
After months with this pre its short comings did appear, but
Nothing in the way of dont use it,or you couldnt get a good result
With this pre.
I sold mine but will have to pick up a pair again, really fun.
Also the DI has a warm lo fi vintagey sound really cool | | | | | | User review | | Sound Quality | | 8 | | Ease of use | | 8 | | Features | | 7 | | Bang for buck | | 7 | |
Score: 75%
|
| Golden Age Project PRE-73 I've had the PRE-73 for a couple of years now in my home studio using it as a better alternative than the standard pres in my Profire 2626, which runs through ADAM A5X monitors. Just so you can judge from where my opinion is coming from, I've studied sound engineering for 3 years, and have been working in a good quality studio of late, but I would still say I lack the experience of having hundreds of sessions under my belt.
With LDC mics, it definitely offers a warm, clear signal path which certainly flatters my vocals a little, and low-z switch makes recording with a ribbon mic a breeze. The DI input is good too, I've done A/B tests in the past with a guitar and also a bass and there was notable extra depth using the PRE 73 over the 2626. The PRE 73 is also capable of some warm, usable analogue clipping with judicious balancing of the gain and output knobs.
I remember reading about the gain section of the pre in the manual or a forum somewhere,
Low Output/Higher Gain = Warmer Sound
Higher Output/Low Gain = Cleaner Sound
A fairly obvious observation, but it is true of this pre and I find it an usable and effective way to vary the tone.
The one thing I'd say though, is that the PRE 73 wasn't the £200 game changer that I was hoping it to be (with all the hype it gets). It has improved my signal quality yes, but by a modest amount, as there's plenty of other factors which will affect the recording quality. | | |
By
Magpel
on
28th February 2012
| | User review | | Sound Quality | | 8 | | Ease of use | | 9 | | Features | | 8 | | Bang for buck | | 9 | |
Score: 85%
|
| I have recorded extensively with the Golden Age 73 preamp, both stick and with transformer upgrades. I Recently did some recordings in which the pres "in the running' were a few of these (modded at this point), a rare Bryston two channel preamp, and even rarer Gates tube pre that really looks like somehting a radio operator in a foxhole might use...and in fact I think that's about what it is...and it sounds great. The a Great River one channel model and the pres on an Preaux Toulez HD rig.
Well, in my opinion, the Great River smokes most things and it is the one I iwll have in my composing/overdub facility someday. But the the GAP.
Lacks the strong three dimensional quality of the Great River, is a little wooly but in a pleasing way, very satisfactory on lots of vocals. I tended to prefer a faster sounding pre on acoustic guitar, but I was pretty pleased with the GAP on cabs, both with dynamics and ribbons.
If I weren't so dead set on grabbing one of those GRs when the time is right, I would no doubt snag one of these for their pretty incredible price. I guess my feeling is that the sort of colored character of the GAP is a bit redundant with the Peavey VMP-2 tube pre I currently use, but we rode these things hard and they were an invaluable part of this CD we made. | | | | | | User review | | Sound Quality | | 8 | | Ease of use | | 9 | | Features | | 8 | | Bang for buck | | 10 | |
Score: 88%
|
| Golden Age Pre73 Mk II I've owned two of these Golden Age preamps since last summer and I have to say that they've served me very well.
While I haven't been able to compare them to actual Neve Pre's, I have been in studios where my drums have been tracked through 1073s and the few recordings I've made of my kit at my home studio compare favorably to recordings I've made at some of the best studios in the Massachusetts Area.
Paired with a SM7b on a tenor saxophone, we were able to get a lush sound that the saxophonist said was the best he'd ever heard himself sound.
I've also put an SM57 infront of an Epiphone Valve Junior through this thing and it sounded divine.
For the price, I have to say that there are few preamps on the market that accomplish what this thing does. For my use, I didn't see the point of getting the mods offered by companies like ZenProAudio, simply because it sounds great to my ears in its stock form. I've also run two Cascade Fatheads (version II with the Lundahl upgrade) and was pleasantly surprised at the detail and character that I got out of my overhead sound. My recent acquisition of a Cloudlifter CL2 has also enabled me to track acoustic guitar with my ribbons and again, I'm very pleased with the results.
I especially like the grit I'm able to dial in when I mess with the input and output gain levels and I find myself using these two pre's far more often than my ISA 428 and UA La-610.
Hope that helps. If $350 is all you have to spend on your next preamp, this is the one you should buy. | | | | | | User review | | Sound Quality | | 9 | | Ease of use | | 9 | | Features | | 7 | | Bang for buck | | 10 | |
Score: 88%
|
| What a fantastic pre. The sound is warm, can be fuzzy, definitely full fat. The output control allows the user to dial in exactly the right amount of drive, which you can't with an original 1073. Oh, and did I mention the price? You've got to consider it! The pre amp offers up to 80dB of gain, with phantom power, a DI input, and switchable low impedance which can offer a useful change in tone, depending on the microphone being used. I personally love using this pre amp at every stage of the recording process. Snare drums can sound huge with a bit of drive from the Pre 73 on the top snare mic. Guitars sound incredibly full, and heavyweight through this. Vocals can really benefit from a bit of warmth, especially through a a high quality dynamic mic like an SM7. I don't have an original Neve 1073 with which to compare the Pre 73, but I find it compares well to my SCA N72s with Carnhill transformers (an upgrade option for the Pre 73). The fact the Golden Age Project have designed the unit with user upgrades (to transformer as well as electrolytics and other on-board components) is a great step forward, to my mind, for relatively low cost far-eastern manufactured units. | | | | | | User review | | Sound Quality | | 8 | | Ease of use | | 10 | | Features | | 9 | | Bang for buck | | 10 | |
Score: 93%
|
| Golden Age Pre-73 MkII I was really pleased with the preamp when I got it for a number of reasons.
First, until pushed to extremes, it sounds incredibly similar to an actual 1073, which is to say it has that warm mojo that the 1073s are known for historically.
Second, the featureset is great, with polarity, DI, and phantom power on the front, plus great IO on the back with quarter inch, as well as XLR ins and outs.
I found the difference between the built in pres in my presonus firestudio, and this astonishing, especially when using a mic that requires more gain, such as a Shure SM7b.
The true reason I bought this though, is that it makes a great platform to play with a bit of modification. Next step with this bad boy is to replace the stock trafo's with Carnhill transformers, and hopefully take this preamp to the next level.
Overall, in terms of sound, features, and ease of use, I'd probably call this preamp the best deal going!
It may not be able to model dozens of preamps, like some digital pres, but the golden age does one thing; gives you some real mojo, and it does it incredibly well. | | | | |