Universal Audio Solo/610 - User review - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > News > Reviews

Universal Audio Solo/610

Gearslutz Reviews

Win 1 of 4 Softube TubeTech Classic Channel plug-ins in our May/June giveaway!

All you have to do is write a review of any pro audio gear (hardware or software) between now and the end of June. Gearslutz' very own Jules will choose the best four reviews after the closing date and those four lucky writers will each receive a TubeTech Classic Channel license from our friends at Softube. Already have this awesome plugin? No problem - Softube will let you swap it for other plug-ins of your choice (up to a $489 value).

Read more about this incredible plugin here.

The boring stuff: the contest closes June 30, 2013. You can do as many reviews as you like but remember they are being judged on quality, and you can only win once! An iLok is required to use the plug-in. Winners will be notified via Gearslutz PM or email. The judge's decisions are final and no correspondence will be entered into regarding the outcome.

Good luck!


Universal Audio Solo 610

Universal Audio Solo 610

4.35 4.35 (9 Reviews)
A tube based monophonic mic pre-amp slash DI, with a vintage sound.
Universal Audio Solo/610
Topic: Add Review Add Review Review Tools Search this Review
User Review
Sound Quality
4 out of 5
4
Ease of use
5 out of 5
5
Features
4 out of 5
4
Bang for buck
5 out of 5
5
Overall: 4.5 4.5
Universal Audio Solo/610
Published by Dean Roddey
6th December 2011
Universal Audio Solo/610

Overview

The Universal Audio Solo/610 is a standalone mic pre-amp with handle, not the usual rack mounted type. It's about the size of two longish bricks stacked one atop the other, a form factor roughly used by a few other well known mono-preamps or DIs.

'Based on' the original Bill Putnam design that was part of the early UA 610 console, it's anything but modern and clean really, but in a good way in the reviewer's opinion. It has what it needs to get the job done without any extraneous features.

There is also a Solo 110 as well, which is a solid state version of this pre-amp, or there used to be. It appears to now have been dropped in favor of other options.

Features

The 610 has two big knobs of the vintage console sort, the left of which controls the input gain and the right controls the output gain, marked 0 to 10. Generally the suggested method of setting gain is to start with the input gain around 7, lower if clipping is occurring, then bring up the output gain until you are getting the desired levels into the downstream chain.

However, you can get a wide variety of tone variation out of it by playing with the relative levels. Being tube based and not having huge headroom, you can push the the input gain and hear it start to fatten up the sound as it begins to have some subtle distortion, first on peaks and then more and more. There is a clipping light that blinks yellow when clipping is getting close and red when you are into clipping, but that's not always a bad thing with this type of tube-based pre-amp.

Below the knobs are a set of simple single throw switches. First is the Mic/DI switch, then the Low/Hi-Z switch to control the input impedence, followed by the 48v phantom power, an 80Hz engageable high pass, and phase switch. The impedence switch is nominally for switching between mics vs. line level instruments when DI'ing, but can be used for tonal variation in any use case.

On the rear are XML inputs, and a mic/line switch to control whether it outputs a line level signal or passes through a mic level signal, perhaps to feed into some other downstream pre-amp or console pre-amp input. There is also a ground lift switch.

On the front is also a DI input and a passthrough output. The input to the DI is passed right back out to the output, and is typically used to feed both an DI'd signal and an amp signal simultaneously.

In the Studio

The 610 gets a lot of flack around these parts, because of it's supposedly untenably low input overhead, and in some cases because they are contemptuous of the claim that it is the same as the 610 console pre-amps of yore. But I don't find either concern to be a problem. Of course I'm not a metal screamer, or using it to mic snare drums either (not that that might be a bad thing given the nice crunchy distortion that might provide.) I've never run into a situation where it's required anything more than reaching over and bringing down the input gain knob a bit. And of course in some worst case scenario you could use an inline pad.

Those who think that the whole point of digital is to be super-clean and crispy obviously wouldn't like this pre-amp, since it's anything but. Though it can get clean to the point that you wouldn't particularly notice it relative to a plethora of other pre-amps (by cranking the input down and the output up), it can also get quite thick with noticeable harmonic enhancement from the tubes starting to break up. If you are a tube maven of course you could play with various tube replacements to see if you find something you like better. The one I have came with some vintage NOS tubes already in it.

As a bass DI the 610 rocks definitely, though maybe not for super-bright moh-dern type of recording. But for anything from Jazz though country through rock it's a great bass DI, and sounds kind of nice push to the edge of a little breakup. I use it with a Jazz. Use the Low/Hi-Z switch to play with different tones, regardless of whether your bass is active or passive, since you might find something that fits the requirements better.

It also makes a very nice DI for hardware analog synths though you have to be careful of the levels since the synth will put out a line level signal. You can always use a re-amp box to bring the signal down appropriately if necessary. I don't use amp sims myself anymore, but I did back some years ago and it was a very nice way to get a nice guitar signal into the box to apply to a sim.

On vocals be sure to play with the gain structure to get a fatter or thinner sound depending on the characteristics of the singer. For me, keeping it cleaner works better on vocals, but your mileage may vary.


Summary

I find the 610 to be an excellent pre-amp for my particular needs, which leans towards more vintagey type material. Though it's a marketing cliche theses days, it really is a good way to offset the overly clean digital capture mechanism and get some old school harmonic distortion into the box (on the way in, not faking it later.) Having had it beside a Great River pre-amp for a good while, I would use the 610 just as often as the Great River, which is considerably more expensive.

Given the quite reasonable price for the 610, compared to most pro level mono pre-amps out there, it has significant bang for the buck. New on the street it runs around $800, as compared to $1150 for the aforementioned Great River. Used they go for around $500 or so, which makes them a great deal.
  #1  
By on 13th January 2012
Sound Quality
4 out of 5
4
Ease of use
4 out of 5
4
Features
5 out of 5
5
Bang for buck
5 out of 5
5
Overall: 4.5 4.5
lots of tonal variety

I have had the Solo 610 since mid-2009 and I can emphatically say it is a fun pre to use. Fun because there are so many different sounds to be had with this unit. With different Gain and Level combinations, you can easily go from “big and clean” to “big and fuzzy”, but you should understand that it has a certain harmonic warmth to it even in its clean settings. The effect of the impedance switch is way cool, allowing a choice between low and high impedance for either the mic or DI input, with different impedance range for each. For mic input, the impedance choice is 500 ohm or 2K ohm, and for DI the choice is 47k ohm or 2.2M ohm. On mic input, UA docs say the low impedance setting is for dynamic mics and the high impedance setting is for condenser mics, but UA emphasizes that there are “no rules”. I have found that it is always worth trying the high and low setting for any mic you use with the 610. I have found lots of variation in sound by using this switch alone.

The UA 610 imparts a big sound to vocals and acoustic guitar, making it a fantastic choice for the singer/songwriter soloist and other sparsely-tracked projects. It seems to match up well with lots of mics. I recently conducted a shootout of mic-pre combos for male vocals, and the Solo 610 was chosen as the best pre matchup for 4 out of the 7 vocal mics in the shootout. It also shines on bass DI, and I love it as a mic pre for acoustic bass.

The specs say it only has 60 db max gain on the mic input at 500 ohms, but I record a lot of quiet sources and have never been disappointed in its gain, even with ribbon or dynamic mics. In fact it seems to have as much or more gain than several of my preamps rated at 70 db. It drives my SM7b just fine with Gain at 5 and Level at 8.

FYI, UA recommends powering up the Solo 610 about 20-25 minutes before operation so that the tubes and transformers are at proper operating temperature.

This unit is well-built and has been an extremely reliable performer.
  #2  
By on 18th January 2012
Sound Quality
4 out of 5
4
Ease of use
4 out of 5
4
Features
4 out of 5
4
Bang for buck
4 out of 5
4
Overall: 4 4
This is my go to pre for anything harsh that needs to be softened. I find that this preamp handles shrill signals in a very pleasing way,making them much more usuable and not as ear piercing. It is useful on thin sounding vocals and harsh guitars.

On inside kick/snare/toms I found it to soften the transients a bit more than what I would want (at least for the aggressive music I record). It does work well as an outside or sub kick preamp.

As a bass/key DI it has a nice tube-like squishy low end when driven correctly. It doesn't handle low B strings as well as my Radial J48 or Sebatron DI

I've also gotten some of my best baritone sax recordings with a UA610 and a Coles 4038

There are a ton of tonal variations to be had in this box, between the
impedance switch and the input/output gain knobs

It is built well and I have no doubt that it will work for years to come without a problem.
  #3  
By on 4th March 2012
Sound Quality
4 out of 5
4
Ease of use
4 out of 5
4
Features
5 out of 5
5
Bang for buck
4 out of 5
4
Overall: 4.25 4.25
The Solo 610 is notable for its abundance of features compared to other preamps. In addition to Direct Inject input, you also have selectable impedance, and a two stage gain section for tonal control, as well as the usual pad, phase invert controls.

I used the Solo 610 on a lot of sources with good luck, notably bass, acoustic guitar, and electric guitar. I preferred the Solo 110 for vocals most of the time with condenser microphones, but I did like the 610 with dynamic vocal mics such as the Shure SM7B. This preamp seems tailor made for bass guitar, whether DI or miked up, it's warm and fat. I also like the way it softens an acoustic guitar track. You can get some really classy vintage sounds out of this box, and in my world, that's a delight.

The variable impedance was very useful to me for tuning the tone of dynamic microphones, many of which seemed to love the "low Z" setting.

I tried different tubes and found them to provide subtle shadings of difference, and ended up with a JAN GE 5751 in the first position for a slightly cleaner tone, although the stock JJ 12AX7 sounded excellent.

The Darth Vader appearance of the unit is something to love, and it seems built to last. I only occasionally ran into headroom issues, usually when trying vocals.

I like listening back to my recordings made with this preamp, the sounds are warm and inviting. A perfect preamp for those looking to upgrade or expand from a basic setup, or for those getting started looking for a useful single channel. The Solo 110 is a perfect partner, if you can find one.

I think the trick to get this thing not to clip on highly dynamic sources is to crank the first gain knob, and not the second level knob. Crank the first knob way up, as far as needed even to 100%, and then bring up the level only just as far as you need to get the right level. With an SM7 I got clipping on vocals when I set the second level knob to 100% and the first gain knob lower. Try to get as much gain as you can from the first knob, when and if you encounter clipping.
  #4  
By on 5th March 2012
Sound Quality
4 out of 5
4
Ease of use
5 out of 5
5
Features
4 out of 5
4
Bang for buck
5 out of 5
5
Overall: 4.5 4.5
Great Pre!

This is such a great DI/pre. I used it on every Bass track on my last album. It really does create a big and warm tone.

I also used this on the Kik in my drum tracking. I must say it didnt give me quite the bite i wanted. it left it feeling slightly muddy and a little too boomy for my taste, however it was a great sound to start off with. nothing a lil Eq'n cant fix.

Vocals & Ac guit I found that this really does add alot of character. Warm and Big.

This is really an amazing deal for that great tube sound. i bought mine and i'm extremely happy with it. It's built like a tank and feels like it looks.

The only reason i would give it a 9, in sound and in features, rather than a 10 is that some of the controls are in the back which makes it difficult to switch around, and with the Warm Big tone, it sometimes creates unwanted mudd in a mix. But for the money, i'd recommend this to anyone looking for a tube pre.
  #5  
By on 8th March 2012
Sound Quality
5 out of 5
5
Ease of use
4 out of 5
4
Features
4 out of 5
4
Bang for buck
4 out of 5
4
Overall: 4.25 4.25
UA 610 Pre

A little over a year ago I started to build my home/project studio - after many years out on the road. Having produced, and co-mixed a number of albums in the early-mid 90s - back then, I was fortunate enough to have worked in a studio using 2" decks about 95% of the time.

Needless to say - when I started the mission of building a home studio - I knew I was tackling getting into the digital world, and building my proficiency with PT. Through all that though - I knew that the main course I wanted to plot in building the studio was to have as much analog character as possible (with pre's and mikes) to try to set the "warmth bar" as high as possible in my recordings.

Enter stage left - the UA610. A great engineer and touring friend of mine told me "if your goal is to start with a warm, tube-pre, you need to get the 610. And if you ever decide to play out, you've got a really cool looking D.I."

WOW was he right! After doing a bunch of recording and testing, testing and recording over the last year to get things where I want them - the 610 has stood out every time as a KILLER source for vocals, acoustic guitar, mandolin - just about anything I can throw at it with the right mic.

I was so impressed with it in the first three months, I went out and bought a second one. And I'm really glad I did. Recently bought a 4-710 about a month ago, and am about to start a new album session with some friends. This round I'm going focus on just using the 610s for vocals, to try and make them stick out a little farther in the mix.

No complaints - and in my opinion, a must own for any studio.
  #6  
By on 13th March 2012
Sound Quality
4 out of 5
4
Ease of use
4 out of 5
4
Features
5 out of 5
5
Bang for buck
4 out of 5
4
Overall: 4.25 4.25
I have one of the old units with the (best) 12ax7/ge jan 6072a combination and it is incredible on bass and acoustic guitar. It's really good for everything else also but these 2 instruments are where the 610 shines. Condensers usually work better on high impedance but this is a box that rarely doesn't sound great (mediocre is an unknown word). I refered to the tubes combination because if you have a newer unit with a 12at7, you'll have to change that to a gen jan 6072a (+50$). I propose that because i already made the comparison. The 12at7 does not saturate as easily as the 6072a, but the latter has a fuller and more clear sound at conservative settings (which are enough for everything). The talk about ua distorting the sound is not understood to me. Never occured to me. If i want to distort the box, i'll have to crank it on purpose.
Another cool move you can make is change the input tube with a better one. I put a Telefunken instead of a JJ which was a bit harsh on the midrange. The sound is more analytical now with more depth extended response and the same smooth sound.
So grab one if you want the classic vintage sound and you 'll get a fine tube di also.
Highly recommended.
  #7  
By on 29th March 2012
Sound Quality
4 out of 5
4
Ease of use
5 out of 5
5
Features
5 out of 5
5
Bang for buck
5 out of 5
5
Overall: 4.75 4.75
Overview

The Universal Audio Solo 610 pre-amp is a portable single channel version of the classic 610 preamp. Featuring input and output gain, instrument DI input, hi and lo-z switch, phantom power, lo-cut switch, and DI through.

In Use

The Solo 610 is a smooth, rich pre-amp, and brings to mind what you would think of when you think tube gear. While maybe not as defined or extended in frequency response as a Neve or Great River it can be the perfect match for certain sources or microphone's particularly vocals and ribbon's. Also works great on bass allowing you to dial in some grit with the gain controls. The instrument throughput is also really convenient when tracking bass or electric piano in the studio and has made it my go to DI box. The multitude of switches allow you to dial in just the right sound and go from line in, to mic, to instrument with ease. The ability to send mic or line level signal along with the previously mentioned throughput would also make it a great option for bass/keyboard players live setup giving you flexible and convenient control of both your amp and DI sound. Not to mention giving the studio engineer a wide variety of options to experiment and create different sounds from smooth tube's to fuzzy distortion.

Summary

The Solo 610 would be a great addition to just about any studio based on it's portability, flexibility, and quality and would also be a worthwhile to check out for most bass or keyboard player's setup's to add extra control and depth to your sound in situations where you need to DI. The price also makes it attractive for smaller studio's where a couple hundred really makes a difference.
  #8  
By on 28th April 2012
Sound Quality
4 out of 5
4
Ease of use
4 out of 5
4
Features
4 out of 5
4
Bang for buck
4 out of 5
4
Overall: 4 4
Great pre!

Bought one of these used for 500 bucks. Wasn't very fond of it at first -- it was noisy, distorted easily, and had a very low output. But I was stuck with it. Figured it might need new tubes since it was five years old, so I replaced the stock JJ's with a pair of Genalex Black Lions (ECC81 and ECC83 -- a $90 upgrade). Holy cow! Suddenly I had a hot output, low noise floor, and tone to die for -- tight bottom, punchy mids, and silky highs. Though not quite as detailed as my solid-state Pendulum Audio SPS-1 preamp, the Solo 610 made my vocal tracks POP in the mix like never before. Also works great as a DI for my live acoustic guitar setup. Love the portability. I don't use it for all my recorded tracks because the Pendulum preamp is better for non-lead tracks that don't need to sit high in the mix. Still, a highly recommended front-end that will make any so-so mic sound so so great. Spend the extra 90 bucks to upgrade those disappointing stock tubes -- you won't regret it (and I'm a guy who used to think all that audiophile vacuum tube snobbery was complete BS).
More Mic Preamps (Reviews)

Add Review Add Review Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Review Tools Search this Review
Search this Review:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Purchasing Universal Audio SOLO/610 with Rode NT2A.. Need HELP with Audio Interface. Spitz B Low End Theory 18 1st December 2009 07:52 AM
Universal Audio SOLO/610 or Daking Mic Pre Solo imnickb So much gear, so little time! 11 27th September 2009 11:40 PM
FMR R.N.P or the Universal Audio solo 610/110. Which would you choose? Reag1502 High end 13 3rd August 2006 03:40 AM
universal audio solo 610 or solo 110? xiandishinger So much gear, so little time! 0 19th October 2005 10:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:36 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.