By John Eppstein on 4th December 2011
If ever the phrase "Jack of all trades, master of none" applied to a microphone, that microphone would be the Shure SM57.
This mic is ubiquitous - you find it everywhere. It's fairly durable (its Achilles' heel is the front screen assembly which can be knocked off quite easily. In the last few years Shure finally started selling replacements so you don't need to buy an entire new cartridge anymore), and it sounds pretty much OK on anything you want to use it on, which is why it's such a standard on stage and in small studios. You put it up and it just works.
But it's never really great. Some years back (late '80s or early '90s) Shure changed the voice coil wire from copper to aluminum, which didn't do anything for the tone of the mic, which is why there are people who tell you that the old chrome body Unidyne III sounds better.
There is also a considerable frequency response variation sample to sample, which is something you only really know if you're had a chance to run pen graph plots on a bunch of mics. While they all pretty much conform to the generalized response plot that Shure prints in their literature the resolution of that plot is not as detailed as it might be and there's actually a lot of raggedness in the region of the presence peak that isn't the same from mic to mic. This means a couple of things - while certain quality brands of mic can be effectively used as stereo pairs without matching, you would not want to try this with a 57. In fact, Shure doesn't even offer matched pairs because AFAIK they do only the most rudimentary response testing. The other thing is that the non-identical response curves make these mics more prone to feedback onstage when multiple mics are open in the monitors. (I found out this stuff back when I was teching for a large sound reinforcement company that sent out mics for analysis by Marin County's Ultrasound.
But hey, I own a few of 'em. You probably will, too. It's a workhorse or, at least, a reliable pack mule. And they're definitely not expensive. You could do a lot worse for your first mic if you're strapped for cash.
People use 'em all the time on toms, snare (which I don't advise as the heads get knocked off too easily), guitar cabs, vocals, what have you. People even use 'em on kick drum and bass guitar which they are not really very good at. They handle moderately high SPL.
What's the one thing that I really love me an SM57 on? Blues harmonica. You want that Paul Butterfield/Charlie Musselwhite sound? There you go.
Cardioid pickup pattern. No rolloff switch (which isn't a factor for me as I never use them anyway.)
By windmillsound on 5th December 2011
Totally disagree with the former review of the SM57.
The SM57 is the best mic in the world...
In that it does almost anything, for less than £100 and it happens to be virtually indestructable.
Snares - it just works.
Right on the grill of a guitar amp - it just works - OK for a particular instrument/amp/sound there might be a mic that comes out 5% better, 5% of the time. But I can buy at least 12 of these for the price of a Royer, so there is no contest.
I've used all kinds of things on toms from C418s to MD421s, and you know what? - the SM57 does a damn good job. Sure, I'll grant you that having a cupboard full of U67s would sound quite good too, but for the rest of us mortals...
Backing Vocals - the other day I had a great vocalist with a smokey voice - so I used a Limited edition Gemini III on him to get that wonderful valvey thing going - but on backing vocals it was way too present and I didn't want them to distract from the main vocal line. Line up the SM57 - instantly sits just perfectly in the mix.
And I heard JJP uses them on Bass Cabs too.
I'm not expecting to record acoustic guitars with it (though some love it), but as an all round workhorse it is ridiculous how much use you will get out of what is probably the cheapest mic that deserves the monika 'professional'.
Honestly, generations of sound engineers are not wrong about this mic.
By Sunscape on 12th December 2011
I was surprised to see only two reviews so far, so I'll add my own opinion. The SM57 is one of the most iconic mics ever made. It’s an industry standard, and every studio has one in their mic locker, and for good reason. It's good for almost everything, from drums to vocals. I have mostly used it for vocals, though I experimented using it on African drums, with quite good results. It doesn’t add much to the sound of it though, and can be difficult to position near the drum, so a condenser may be a better option in that aspect.
As far as sound quality is, it sounds quite warm to me, but sometimes picks up a little too much background noise for my tastes. I guess I should make my PC quieter, but it's not very loud as is. It does pick up my “record” mouse clicks (which proves
Features: It's a mic. It looks cool. It is hugely rugged and works on most anything. What else can I say?
Value: Defiantly worth the $100. Even comes with a leather (pleather, I’m not sure?) carrying case. This should be your first or one of your first mics.
By cc1sound on 22nd December 2011
It's in my Mic Locker.
The Shure SM57 is a unidirectional cardioid dynamic microphone. This piece of gear is often regarded as a mic locker staple. This rugged mic has the distinction of being one of the most recorded mics since 1965. The excellent off axis rejection of this mic makes it a popular choice for instrument recording in the studio and live vocal work. With a frequency response of 40hz-15,000khz, SPL of 94db, 6 3/16 “ in length and 10 oz in weight makes this multi-tool a “GOTO” choice for my toolkit. The pairing of this mic with a ribbon on guitar cabinet has become a popular recording setup. The SM57 has been a familiar piece for drummers and is frequently employed for use with snare and toms. This microphone is simply regarded as a potential Life Saver when all others fail.
It’s just going to work better than some choices and should always be considered.
When I was first venturing into recording, I was talking with a seasoned sound engineer
about getting into the field and he asked me the following;
So ya wanna be a sound guy,,,,? What kinda mics ya got..? Do you have an SM57 ?
Readily found for under $100.00, I say pick up a pair or more
By Salivan on 22nd December 2011
Sound Quality: 7
This microphone has been used on thousands of recordings all over the world. It is a studio standard. The problem about it´s sound is that it maybe really harsh, with a very hyped top end. Sometimes that is what you want, some times it is not. The SM57 is most used for guitar cab, and snares. It combined with another microphones (darker / flatter), like a ribbon, a U89, is a great combination, and may sound really good. I gave it a 7 because it is not always that you´ll get a good sounding using just the sm57, not saying it is impossible, it is possible, just listen to slash´s tones, but you must have to know how to work with it, or it can be harsh.
And, it is a really good microphone for those who are starting out and don´t have a treated room, it is a dynamic microphone, with a really good off axis rejection, what makes it get little ambiance, for non treated rooms it is really good. Worked really well for acoustic guitars.
Ease of use: 10
Well, it is a 10 for me. It is a dynamic, doesnt need phaton power, supports high SPL, tough like a rock (the bulding supports falls and crashes), easy to place.
No pads or filters, you can´t make any single change on the mic, always on cardioid, it doesnt come with any features at all.
I gave it a 7 though because of the price, it is just 100 dollars, you can get it for less than that sometimes. You can´t expect to pay 100 dollars and have all the features as a C414 has for example.
Bang for buck: 10
For me it is "go without saying" a 10. For just 100 dollars you have a studio standard and an awesome microphone.
By Glenn Bucci on 22nd December 2011
A mic that was great when it came out, but not now
I found with today's newer mic's, one of the few purposes for the SM57 that still sounds decent is on a snare. The other time it is useful is when you don't want to hear all the freq's of a vocalist or instrument and just want the mid's pushed.
The Shure Beta 57, Blue Encore 100, 200, Audio Technica 2010, mic's from Audix, Rode, and EV all provide superior sound and accuracy over the SM57. The 57 came out when everything was recorded on tape and people were playing music on records. They were not focused on higher frequency's that we hear more of with digital recordings. The 57 sounds muffled comparied to a lot of the other mic's mention.
I actually did a session where on the drum kit, they had a SM57 on a snare. I asked them if they ever tried a Beta 57, and they were like, uh no. When we A/B them, they were amazed of the more open sound of the snare and the more accurate sound the Beta 57 gave. They asked me why do so many people still use the SM57? I said because it has been used on so many records and live situations in the past. People feel if it was good enough back then, its good enough for me today. They forget with digital recordings, we capture more of the higher freq's that was done in the past. Also many don't want to try something new. Now maybe you like the sound of the 57, if that is the case, I would encourage you to continue to use it. I know some don't like the Beta 57 and prefer the SM57 because they want that particular sound. That's all fine and good. But from an engineer perspective, I have heard a lot of great sounding snare drums in front of me. Drummers are very particular of what snare they will record a drum set with....as they should. When it goes through a SM57, it no longer has the sound it has live. It is compressed, the mid's are pushed out, and there is little top end. I would prefer to capture more accurately the sound of the snare that the drummer loves. I also found I prefer many of the mic's listed above on guitar cabinets over the SM57. There are so many higher freq's on the guitar that it does not capture. Perhaps for a artistic approach you don't want those freq's being heard....but I would rather capture more of the sound coming out of the amp. You can always reduce higher freq's through a good EQ later to tailor the sound you want. Here is a comparison of the SM57 and Beta 57. Vergleich: Shure PG57 / SM57 / Beta 57A Instrumentenmikrofone: - YouTube They sound similar but the higher freq's of the amp the Beta 57 picks up. The sample of the SM57 at 1:36 compared to the Beta 57 at 1:55 sounds like there is a sock over the mic
By IGive'nTakeInfo on 23rd December 2011
sound quality depends on source, source has to be pretty loud.
easy to use point and shoot.
features, none irrelevant
bang for buck 10 out of 10.
get it on vocals, guitar cabs, bass cabs, brass instruments, drum kits (srn, toms, hats, kik) u can do a whole album with a 57
get 10 of them for under a grand!
By Groovedog on 24th December 2011
I can't say enough good about a sm57 mic. It is by far the most versatile mic I have ever used. I am probably going to repeat what has already been said hundreds, if not thousands of times on the internet and in mags but I will go with my own experiences, in my own space, that I record in.
From a vocals perspective, it can be a fabulous mic. It really depends on the voice itself, the experience of the singer, and the signal chain going in, and the monitoring situation. Proximity to the mic is also a huge factor. When the right voice is comfortable being close to the mic while tracking, the results can be astounding.
On snare and guitar cabs, countless recordings have included this mic for good reason. In my limited recording terminology the only way I can describe the results for use on both instruments is that the sound is detailed enough but not enough to be brittle. Volume is never an issue as far as damaging the mic unlike a ribbon mic.
Although its not really what the mic is intended for, I have had great results on kick drums with this mic. It comes down to drums being tuned well, a good drummer, and mic placement. Just like the vocals, it kind of "depends on other factors". in the studio. Sometimes it works in this application and sometimes no matter what experimentation occurs, it just doesn't. Overall though, I have never found a mic to be more of a great overall mic than this one......especially in my own digital tracking world that I am in.
By Tube World on 24th December 2011
I agree you can make very good recordings with a SM57. I mean, look at how many great recordings were made with them. However I must admit 25 years later with newer technology, and newer recordings capturing more higher freq's there are better choices. I usually prefer the Beta 57a over the SM57. Not the Beta 57, but the Beta 57a that was made a little closer to the SM57 but with some more higher freq's being captured and like others have said. It has more an open sound....not muffled. Some just don't want to get out of their comfort zone and try something new. I listened to the samples on youtube with the shoot outs and I agree the Beta sounds more like the source which is generally what we try to do in the studio. There is still a purpose for the SM57, but 8 out of 10 times, I will pick the Beta 57a. Time to start a Beta review.
By JerryOrdoñez on 24th December 2011
why 10 out of 10?
Well...let's be honest. We always find ourselves trying to replace it with something else more "expensive" or "better" just because it's a simple SM57. But at the end, it's the best sounding mic for the job.
The mic is so good, it even let's you complement its sound with another mic. It's always an SM57 with this, or that. But even if you end up leaving the guy on its own, you know you'll get a great sound.
bass?...sure! why not, add some grit to your sound
drums? oh yeah...
anything else? yup, just try it.
By tribedescribe on 25th December 2011
Hall of fame for mic's
Let me say that the sm57 is to guitars, what the u87 is to vocals. Its a classic and is still very relevant in today's music scene. Through a neve pre it just sounds like a record on guitar. Mix it with a ribbon and you are in heaven. The early sm57's from the 70's and early 80's do sound slightly better and slightly less congested. They will look like a regular 57 but say unidyne III usa.
I shot out a bunch of dynamics like a vintage md421, beta 57a, audix i5, newer sm57, a e609, and a old unidyne III sm57. Through my neve portico pre the old unidyne was #1 and the new sm57 was my #2 top sound. Some people judge mic's when they are sole'd tutt , to really appreciate a mic you need to hear it in a mix. The sm57 has the right type of grit and midrange honk to give its own space in a mix.
I have tried to love the beta 57 but I cant on guitars, it has no balls and is to bright. The beta on snare is whole other story, It can really outshine a sm57 on snare due to its hyper card. pattern and tonal freq. plot.
By Goodlove on 26th December 2011
Also comes in 5 pack.
Yes this mike will last a real long time, and is all over the world. I just saw the Glenn Miller big band in Germany. They were actually using this mike to record the horn section.
It would be nice to have an on-off switch.
Sometimes when it goes into feedback, I got to unplug the cable at the mike.
I usually do vocals with it.
Next time I get the SM58 with switch.
By BluegrassDan on 28th December 2011
Every mic locker should have a pile of SM57s. It is known worldwide for its versatility, ruggedness, and value. It is a piece of equipment that can always perform regardless of the application.
There will most always be a better mic for "the job," but the SM57 is rarely a wrong choice. It is the go-to mic for snare, guitar cabs, and live acoustic instruments.
Perhaps the best feature of the moving coil SM57 is its unidirectional cardioid pattern that seems to reject even the worst potentials for feedback. It makes multi-miking onstage easier and can allow for high levels for monitor mixes.
I have found the SM57 particular good in the studio on bluegrass style banjo, which have high transient levels compared to most acoustic instruments. The SM57 handles these loud transients and extreme dynamics quite nicely and musically. It also has been used effectively on bluegrass mandolin in situations where artists prefer to live track vocals and instruments at the same time. Its off-axis rejection helps eliminate unwanted bleed and problems with phasing.
A typical use of the SM57 is for live upright acoustic bass. Old timers learned that wrapping an SM57 in a towel and stuffing it under the tailpiece was a quick and easy solution at all-day bluegrass festivals.
By Steaudiophen on 31st December 2011
There is always room for a 57
I have a few of these and you really can't get away from them. Simple, cardioid pattern, solid build(legend has it that drummers have been cracking cases), but the bottom line is they work well for many applications. If you are just starting out and are in the market for a mic in the 100 dollar range I'd go with one of these over some garbage equally priced condenser. If you have all the dank 1500+ goodies you already know and still have a few kicking around. I do know a guy who bought a bunch for his live sound company and reported the frequency response was not 100% the same on all 20 or so, but it was close. It is 100 dollars or less after all. Good mic, dependable, decent sound, cheap. Not the best, but surely one of them in it's price range.
By campers on 3rd January 2012
I have a few different versions of SM57; modern Mexican and a few different type of vintage Unidyne III. Each mic has slightly different sound and gain, so I don't know which one has the standard "sound" of SM57, but they all perform very well on many instrument including voice. The apparent least favorite is modern Mexican, but It's still good.
By Insain on 16th January 2012
Let me start out by saying: What a great microphone. I predominantly do live recordings in a world that dishes out quite a beating, and the two SM57's I have hath survived it all. These things can be used for ANYTHING: snare, tom, close-up cymbals, guitar cabinets, bass cabinets, saxophones, clarinets, tubas, trombones, inside of organs, hanging from the ceiling for a choir... the list goes on and on. They are so well built and cheaply found, worrying about them is non-existent. I've used my two mainly as under-snare/tom microphones and they have only been hit a thousand times yet still work. These things are TOUGH. This mic is a dynamic cardioid, with the side rejection being wonderful. It takes a lot, from what I’ve experienced, to make these cause feedback on a stage. I would mainly use it as an instrument microphone; vocals sound horrendous.
You can pick up a SM57 for around 100$ new, or where I live around 50$ used. Being so tough, I would never worry about buying a defective SM57 used, but always double check!
Keep in mind, that the SM57 is essentially a SM58 with a smaller windscreen and screen head. Adding an extra foam screen to the outer screen head does NOT work as good as the SM58’s default design, I’ve tried it before.
By asdfdsa on 22nd January 2012
Seriously, for $100 you can't go wrong, even if it's only used for pounding nails to install your sound-treatment
In my experience (to save you what's been reapeated so much) I have found the sm57 to be a very useful tool, if not only because you can relate with other engineers or recordings and have a 'standard' reference point that everyone can give a useful judgement by.
On distorted guitars the mic sounds best right up on the speaker, actually, practically everything on this mic sounds the best right up in and on the source. Distance micing has generally sucked in my trials, but ymmmv. Snare, excellent, really captures that THACK and SNAP without much bleed, and with a good mix of body throughout the spectrum. Loud vocals, it's interesting as well for a compressed dirty mid focused sound, but I'd stick to an LDC for vox. For any bass work, or low-end detail this mic is not something you want to use if you have other choices, but, it is feasible, with some work, to get an alright/ decent sound out of - kinda the thing with the sm57, you can throw it on anything and it'll hear it and you can make it work 'good enough', but only great on a few things generally snare, electric guitar, and any mid-oriented source...but don't forget you can use it's mid-forward compressed characteristic on anything for that certain effect. Be sure you pay careful mind to placement as with this mic it can make a drastic difference. Also be wary this mic is not one to capture the full detail of sources, but that of course, can be an advantage in certain situations.
Overall, you shouldn't be looking to get an sm57 if you don't have one, you should just go get one because you need it, if only for the reference point; but if you're recording more than one type of source, you can guarantee it'll come in handy and pay for itself many times.
By jonnycat on 23rd January 2012
Simplicity Is A Savior!
The Sm57 is a classic dynamic mic from sure, I have used these mics on everything from vocals to brass and snares. They are one of the most durable mics I have ever used and very cheap too! Great for anything and everything these mics are perfect for the beginner and the pro!
By S.J.Band on 25th January 2012
its great for home studios recording lots of guitar and drums,
I use 2 of these, when I record lead guitar on my tracks, (grunge, blues, poprock).
I try to not get to technical, I use to record Electric guitar using several mics on individual tracks.
I use, -
2 x sm57 (or sm58, its nearly the same).
At the final, I blend these together and the sm57 sounds great alone and/or together with other mics.
I can recommend it as a first investment in that microphone category.
By connorh on 30th January 2012
A real dynamic workhorse
The SM57 is well known for being a workhorse of the studio. It is a cheap but good all-round dynamic microphone. It is great for use in drum recording, often classically used on the snare (both top and bottom microphones) as well as toms. Jerry Finn, the late engineer for Blink 182, used the SM57 for the snare on many of Blink's recordings. As a dynamic microphone it can withstand high sound pressure levels, making it also ideal for close-micing a guitar amplifier. It gives a mid-rangey sound in this context, and if placed at the centre of the amplifier driver cone will give a bright sound from the amp.
I have also used this microphone for vocal recording, where its performance is similar to that of its brother, the Shure SM58. The sound is coloured and less natural than a condenser microphone, however there are occasions in which this sound may be desired - an edgy rock vocal perhaps. The SM57 is also great as a dummy microphone when recording a singer who likes to hold a microphone as they perform or moves about a lot. If the singer is told to sing into the 57 then a better quality condenser microphone can be set up to record the actual performance.
In general this is a great workhorse microphone for drum recording (snares and toms) and close-micing an electric guitar amp. It can also be used to record vocals to produce a coloured sound, similar to that from the SM58.
By guitstef71 on 2nd February 2012
In the 22 prior reviews there is not much I can add, except for I remember meeting Alla Rahka in Toronto, he was playing with Ustad Ali Ahkbar Kahn, and I asked him as the sound on his tablas was just amazing, lets face it he is the greatest tabla player in the world, and as far as drumz go tabla's have more then just a little vocal tone to them, "what kind of mic are you using, it really captures all the subtleties in your playing" thinking he has some $10,000 mic that was specially made for him. He said " I just use two SM-57's, I always have they are the best sounding mic's I have ever used, and I have had a lot of mic's sent to me for trial, but I just find this to be the best mic in the world"
What more can you say...he's tried em all and still sicks with his 57's. What a wonderful man, musician and what a wonderful mic!! As for me on stage I will never use another.
If it aint broke...don't fix it. Thats my way of looking at it. Sure you can spend thousands, but at $120, you won't find better.
By The Pressman on 6th February 2012
Works on Nearly Everything
Sure, it may not sound truly great on many things (or... most things), but for a rugged, cheap microphone, you can't go wrong with a 57. Slap it in front of anything, and it will do the job a microphone should do. And it will keep doing it for years, without complaint.
Over the years, I've successfully used 57's on: guitar amps, bass amps, snare drums, drum overheads, room mics (for a really cool, trashy sound), violin, acoustic guitar. If there's a shortage of mics, the 57 will handle just about anything without to many "surprises".
And occasionally, just occasionally, it will absolutely blow you away with the sound it managed to capture. Every studio should have a couple.
By donsolo on 24th February 2012
Close to Jack of All Trades
Do you only have the budget for 1 mic that happens to be $100? This is a good place to start.
The SM57 has been used on so many records, the list would take up more than we have room to go into.
Normally this is used for your utility sort of situations, Guitar Cabs, Drums, Brass.
In terms of drums, this is a workhorse for the snare. There are other techniques like using a Small Diaphragm condenser but when you're worried about the drummer accidentally whacking the mic, you don't feel as weird about the SM57.
In terms of guitars, this has a high mid rise that can sound harsh so you have to use it off-axis. Even at that point, it can get a bit harsh, it's a bit finicky when it comes to placement.
For all of these uses, there are better, more specialized options. I personally like using MD421s and Royer 121s on guitar cabs, I like SDCs on snares and MD421s on toms, for brass I tend to go with RE20s for the louder players and LDCs for the quieter ones.
But, when you need a mic that just works, this is the one for you. I like my Audix i5 a bit better for most situations but I don't think it'd be as durable.
By shreddersinc on 26th February 2012
The world famous Shure SM57 microphone! This baby has been used on so many hit records, it's amazing. I love to put it in front of any guitar amp, from tube to solid state. This microphone is a legend. I haven't had the privilege of using it on a snare but it's know to rock. My favorite thing about this mic is it compliments my voice beautifully...with a little proximity effect my wife thinks I have one of those 1-900 voices, Then I think how do you know what those 1-900 voices sound like? Getting the right distance from this mic is the key to a magical vocal experience.
From newbie to pro you can't go wrong with this mic...I don't know if you can live without it actually. I bought a shure 6 inch pop filter(double thick version)
Which you do need if you are going to do any intimate vocals with this mic as it will give you problems with plosives. Sibilance has happened with me a few times on this mic, not a major sibilance issue though. My wife has never had a problem with sibilance along with other female voices.
This mic is built tough, legend has it that roadies have used these as hammers before. To get the true beauty out of this mic you do need a decent amount of clean gain, Dynamic mics love clean gain.
I have heard about modding these mics by taking the transformer out. It will need substantially more gain, but is supposed to make it sound more like the SM7b. There are plenty of threads on this here at Gear Slutz.
The difference between the sm57 and sm58 are negligible for the most part, but I always say the sm57 is for recording studio and the sm58 is for live performance, with it's added windscreen. You could always get a 57 and add your own windscreen.
Beware of second hand fakes, my friend has at least one fake. He didn't even know it until I told him.
By Wesma on 11th March 2012
Very good value!
The Shure SM57 has been of incredible value for me over the years. When starting out this microphone was pretty much all I had and there was not really anything I couldn’t use it for. Actually I still only have got this single one but there haven’t been that many times where I felt I needed another one (I do have a SM58 also though). My 57 has been used on live gigs as a vocal mic and in the studio it has been used for snare, kick, mono overhead, guitar amp, acoustic guitar, bass amp etc. I simply just need it.
The sound of this microphone is nothing spectacular but a lot of times, especially in a busy arrangement, it just makes stuff fit. The most common use for it is probably to close mic a snare drum. It handles SPL very well, captures a lot of the snap of the drum and rejects other sounds pretty good.
This microphone does rarely sound great on its own and I wouldn’t use it in a sparse arrangement for the main sounds (well maybe if I’m going for a Lo-Fi sound or something). The sound is simply not detailed enough for something like lead vocals in a pop song for example.
The SM57 is inexpensive and very solid – mine is still going strong even after some serious accidents.
By grooveminister on 18th March 2012
Everything changes, the SM57 stays on snaredrum ;-)
The SM57 is one great sound option for snare drum and versatile as well: Because it never deeply sucks on other instruments!
You cannot say that about many mics...
During the last 12 years, I´ve exchanged every single mic on my drumset.
I started with dynamic mics on all shells and condensers for overheads and hihat.
I bought new overheads, hihat mics. Then I became more and more dissatisfied with my kick mike and the tom mics.
A very strong urge emerged to replace them with alternatives that I had spotted to be perfect for my personal taste.
It was only some months ago, when I realized that I´m now using the cheapest mike of them all (and the only dynamic one) on the most important drum: The SM57 on snaredrum(s).
And: I´m totally satisfied with it.
In this video you can hear the SM57 on every snaredrum
(14": maple, birch, steel, eucalyptus / 13": bronze / 12": cherry/maple)
except for the 10" one where I´m using a Beyer M201.
The snare EQ was OFF except for the birch and bronze model where I boosted the fundamental a bit due to mic placement.
I´ve chosen the "Ampex" version of this video, because the "mastering" sounds better than the fullscreen version...