26th October 2006
|
#1 | | Gear Head
Joined: Oct 2006 Location: USA
Posts: 30
Thread Starter | Backup Recorder Setup Options
Hey folks!
I just wanted to ask a poll-type question of those who do lots of live recording gigs. How do you set up your backup recording rig?
A) Separate mics, preamps/mixer & everything -- from start to finish
B) Same mics as main rig running to hardware preamps/mixer -- which feeds both the main recorder & the backup
C) Same mics & preamps as main rig -- using monitor output from main rig to feed backup recorder
I do some live work with my Yamaha AW16G HDD recorder, which acts as both my pre-amps & mixer. Normally I would attach my backup recorder via the optical or stereo out (1/4" balanced) connections on the Yamaha -- basically option "C" as listed above. (All of this is powered by a UPS -- which I've tested -- to handle any A/C power loss.) I'm OK with having just a stereo mix as my backup. However, this runs the risk that if the Yamaha dies completely, my feed to the backup recorder is gone.
Option "A" means either I get a different sound on the backup recording (different mics, mic locations, pre's, mixer, etc.) or I have to buy a LOT of extra equipment and set it up EXACTLY like the main rig.
Option "B" runs the same risk as "C" -- except that I'm counting on external pre-amps and/or a mixer. If the pre-amps/mixer die, I've got the same problem -- no signal to the main recorder or the backup.
Which option do you consider the most responsible option? I'm thinking of expanding some of my live session work, and I'd like to make sure I'm not doing something really stupid. Right now, I'm inclined to buy a better quality external mixer (...got a really cheap one for monitoring a bunch of different sources in the studio) and go with option "B". I have put a lot of thought and research into this; but I'd like to confirm what I've decided.
|
| |
26th October 2006
|
#2 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jul 2006 Location: Germany
Posts: 2,427
|
I do B) with a stereo mixdown to a DAT as backup most of the time. For redundancy (in case of PC crash or other problems), I split the signal at the mic preamp (RME Octamic D), the digital ADAT signal goes to the PC, the analog line outs go to a line mixer, from there to the DAT. Will probably use another PC as backup for an upcoming recording. The Octamic has two ADAT outputs (for 96k/SMUX), which carry the same signal in 44/48k, so one can even split signals digitally, with no risk of a crash of one PC affecting the other.
Ummm... Ok, I'll admit it... The line mixer is a Behringer (RX 1602)... But I didn't only choose it because it was cheap. It was at the time of purchase the only affordable one I could find which would mix 8 mono inputs to stereo and provide a headphone output as well. It may not be great, but it gets the job done. Still haven't come across an alternative that will do the same. If you know one, let me know (19 inch, 1U).
I also have a similar setup with a Soundcraft Spirit Protracker (excellent preamp and mixer, mix goes to DAT) and an RME ADI-8, which sends ADAT to the PC.
In your case, maybe an external preamp/mixer would be a good option.
Daniel
|
| |
26th October 2006
|
#3 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2006 Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 1,606
|
The weakest part comes last.
Mics: very reliable, as long as P48 from pre is there.
Pres: reliable enough.
AD: in my pres, so reliable enough.
computer: not reliable --> last part of the chain.
Backup HD recorder: not as reliable as pres, but well...
Thus I go from pres into HD recorder, and the recorder's outputs go into the computer.
Safer would be having an HD recorder with hardware patch between analog ins and outs, thus sort-of passively splitting the signal. My pre's converters are better than the HD's though, so this usually isn't an option.
__________________
Microphones always make me sound louder and better! -- Guitar Girl
Last edited by pkautzsch; 26th October 2006 at 09:03 PM..
Reason: This is my post No. 333!!!!!!!!! heh
|
| |
26th October 2006
|
#4 | | Gear Head
Joined: Oct 2006 Location: USA
Posts: 30
Thread Starter |
Hey folks! Thanks for the input. This pretty much confirms what I thought.
It sounds like a Mackie 1202 VLZ (PRO) front end split immediately to the Yamaha and the backup is the safest way to go. The Mackie is about as simple and bulletproof as you can get...short of ultra-expensive preamps that cost more than my whole setup.
...'preciate the info. Any further comments are also welcome. I'll continue to check this thread.
|
| |
27th October 2006
|
#5 | | Gear Head
Joined: Jan 2004 Location: Dreis-Brück; Eifel; Germany
Posts: 35
|
for classical recordings (normally up to 8 mics) i go from the mics to the mixer (small midas venice) from there via direct outs to a hd24, and from there via adat-out to my laptop, second via groups and sends to an tascam da and also mixing the returns from the hd24 to stereo and to DAT.
so normally i look at my laptop as main recorder with a "digital copy" on the hd24, and backups are da38 and DAT.
at the moment my dat is broken, but i think a can live without that Quote: |
The Octamic has two ADAT outputs (for 96k/SMUX), which carry the same signal in 44/48k, so one can even split signals digitally, with no risk of a crash of one PC affecting the other.
| i also like that idea and an octamic d is on my wishlist (or perhaps two  ) if i ever can afford that
__________________
wolfgang
|
| |
27th October 2006
|
#6 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2003 Location: Modena, Italy
Posts: 620
|
Hi
I think I'm doing the B option: I use the dual outputs in my preamps to go ADAT into my Mackie SDR2496 HD recorder and analog via DSub-25 to whatever number of Tascam DA88 or 78 recorders for backup. I'm planning to get another HD recorder just like the Mackie, because lugging 12 RUs of Tascam isn't convenient... I know the backup medium should be of different type than the main, but my SDR has been so reliable over the years that I'm confident enought get a second one for backups. I would hook it up to the second ADAT port on each preamp D I/O, and get the same exact signal I'm feeding the main one; From the analog outs of my m,ain recorder I go into a mixer and create a rough mix that gets also printed on CD for producer/musicians reference after show.
If you start considering what can go wrong, well...pretty much any piece of equipment can fail, so you should have a backup piece for everything starting from mics...which I think isn't a practical thing...so far I've been good with just the backup recorders, and to be honest I haven't had the need to use a backup untill now that I've said this
L.G.
|
| |
27th October 2006
|
#7 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Apr 2005 Location: New York Friggin' City
Posts: 2,571
|
Historically my choices have been:
1) secondary output from mic pre (chooosing the right pre's becomes a BIG deal)
2) SPLIT! transformer output to backup machines, direct to main machines
3) use broadcast iso records as backups via Aux paths, groups, matrixes, and mults. This was I get isolated or group mixes of each element.
I don't put out backups mics for a backup recorder that I don't intend to use on the main recorder.
|
| | | |