![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Tags: drumage, jazz, mikage |
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2005 Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,035
Thread Starter |
On Monday 5/29/06 I'm recording a trio (pno, bs, drums) "live" (no audience, just playing together with no iso). Which of these two would you prefer for a be-bop (actually, Bill Evans-esque) recording on a little jazz bass drum with the head on? I know both are good, but do you have a preference? If anyone does this jazz trio stuff and has other recommendations I'd love hearing about it. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear nut Joined: May 2006 Location: New York
Posts: 110
|
My preference would be leave out the bass drum mic. I record lots of "live in the room" jazz and rarely have need for a bass drum mic. It only seems necessary when the room is too small and the bass drum booms around between the walls. It then comes over every mic (which is usually good) in a bad way. I then prefer to have a rather close mic on the bass drum just to make it appear to be coming from the same place as the rest of the set. I guess I'd go with the 421, but the SM7 would work too. JazzYoda |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2005 Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,035
Thread Starter |
Whoa, thanks for the reply. I'll try leaving the mic out in the mix and see what that sounds like. In fact, I'm going to try to get a good balance in the main pair (prob.xy) and use the close mics just to fill in the holes. Except the bass, which always disappears ime. I bought a DPA 4021 compact mic to hang behind the bridge, which I'm hoping will help. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear nut Joined: Apr 2006 Location: the netherlands
Posts: 117
|
Hello, I'd use a mic on the bassdrum anyway. 421, sm7, re 20 whatever. You can always add some attack when you need some clarity of what the bassdrum is doing. Didn't get many good results , picking up the bass under the bridge. Try a good condenser or tubecondenser just above the bridge, under where the fingers hit the strings. about 6 inches away. This should work in a Oscar Peterson kind of set up. greets |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Aug 2005 Location: France
Posts: 229
|
Good advices here... Right, you don't really need some BD mic in such a situation, but might help. Recording in a small room is always a Bass-mid nightmare. As far as upright bass micing, I too had often bad results with micing inside the bridge (with km84). Though it might be an other story with a DPA omni SDC, but this is luxury! I've never tried this personaly, as I don't own such a good (and expensive) mic. I get good results with a LDC 6 inches away as proposed, MIXED with the direct sound comming from an inboard Schertler stat cell. The DI from cell gives some precise bass sound (no room bass sound) plus a electrical sound à la 80's, the LD sound is acoustical and natural but often muddy sounding in the bass range (room bleeding) so I'm used to High Pass filtering this chanel. You have to experiment blending both signals, the result might come close to "best of both worlds" in such a situation. Any other comments? Good luck! |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Aug 2005 Location: France
Posts: 229
|
Oh yes and the Bass itself has to be a good one and the player as well. Close micing is rarely a good idea on such an instrument, even with a SDC: Bass frequencies need to BREATHE. This is the law of physics. "The law of physics is cruel, this is the law nevertheless". [French singer/componist Georges Brassens] |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Super Moderator Joined: Aug 2002 Location: NYC
Posts: 7,405
|
Either mic or no mic would work for me. I would start with the MD421 and use it if necessary.
__________________ Steve Remote AuraSonicLtd.com the home of ASL Mobile & Location Production Remoteness on the Linkedin Network What about my Facebook Profile? Remoteness on Myspace |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
Speaking of imageing, how do you plan to pan stuff? The old Van Gelder method is to pan drums hard right with reverb returning to the left channel only. Piano and bass up the middle without any reverb. For trio recordings without horns, it is best to pan the piano to the left Columbia 30th street style. Avoid panning drums and piano full left-right for jazz unless you want it to sound like an early 80s fusion record. | |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Apr 2006 Location: the netherlands
Posts: 117
| Quote:
stereo image same as recorded convenient for the musicians because they're close together (no headphones needed) Drums: left bass :middle piano: right used it a few days ago .Actually I use it as often as possible. Doesn't work with a loud drummer tough. | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2005 Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,035
Thread Starter |
Thanks for these great responses! I've always had poor results placing the LDC there in a live situation. It becomes a room mic for the drums usually. But I think I'll set one up just in case the attached mic doesn't do it for me. I just received the DPA 4021 and the holder today, and I'm very anxious to discover how it works. I'll post an example of the results here. Thanks for that photo! I don't know if I'll want to set up like that this time because my plan is to get a good stereo pickup of the group, which I think will require a semi-circle arrangement, no? I'll get them close, though. I will try that arrangement in the future, though. This recording will be on the stage of a medium size (empty) recital hall. Although I generally like to avoid walls, I've recently liked placing the sources closer to the back of the stage so as to reduce the huge reverberance from the empty hall in the pickup. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2005 Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,035
Thread Starter |
I take that back. I think I'll go with this "Oscar Peterson" setup this time and try something else another time. You've helped so much!! |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear interested |
i would prefer the md 421. very often i use a dpa 4007 or sometimes a tlm 170. i also would recommend the oscar peterson setting as described above, it gives you soundwise, and more important, musical very good results, because the musicians don´t need to wear headphones and keep a good acoustical balance. |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2005 Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,035
Thread Starter | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
That setup looks good, tell the drummer not to play loud and you'll be fine. The "Oscar Peterson setting" as you call it, was the standard setting for years. I prefer it because everyone in the rhythm section is closer together. Billy Taylor, Cyrus Chestnut, Eric Reed and others favour this set up today. If you wish to see pictures of Dr. Van Gelders 60s set up at his studio, visit Creed Taylor's website at: www.ctijazz.com | |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Apr 2006 Location: the netherlands
Posts: 117
| Quote:
Telling a drummer no to play loud? (i'm only using it when I know he can play soft) Thanks for the pixlink. Great. I like the pic of the Billy Strayhorn orchestra. I'm using this setting a lot for bigband (only studio of course) Here in europe there's a blue note cd out called: "perfect takes" also a free dvd with an interview with Rudy van Gelder Not technical but inspiring though. greets | |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear |
Dr. Van Gelder thinks he's some kinda genius, so he won't be giving out any valuable information. The CTI photos will have to do. The Strayhorn big band set up is a good one for medium size rooms. Substitute ribbon mics for the Schoeps in the brass section. |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear nut Joined: May 2006 Location: New York
Posts: 110
|
Check out that pic of Grady Tate to see a close up of classic jazz drum mic technique, 2 mics! (and not 2 overhead )
|
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Lives for gear |
[QUOTE=tool] Quote:
This was for a TV commercial and we only had an hour so we used U87s and RCA44s. I usually like TUBE mics over the U87s but it's just a commercial. | |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2005 Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,035
Thread Starter |
Here's a sample from the recording without any processing. The bass is a big, cheap boomy box that sounds terrible. I used the DPA 4021, but I liked the TLM170 above the bridge about 5" out the best, which is the mic in this example. There's a MD421 on bass drum.
|
| | |
| | #20 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2005 Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,035
Thread Starter |
And the setup was (especially thanks to Tool):
|
| | |
| | #21 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2003 Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 629
|
I always use a bd mic, although often don't wind up using it in the mix. I've had great results with both the SM7 and 421 or just a d12 or 112 on kick. I've always been happy with 1 or 2 ribbons (lately royer 122) for OH and usually a 451 for snare. Hope that helps.
__________________ - Jan Folkson www.janfolkson.com If you can't make it good, the least you can do is make it perfect. |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2005 Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,035
Thread Starter |
I'm going to record another trio in the same space, and I'm thinking about switching places of drums and bass from the "Oscar Peterson" setup that Tool suggested. So the bass would be behind the pianist's left shoulder (Al Schmidt style), and the drummer would behind the piano lid (a Steinway D, this time, as opposed to the little Yamaha used on the recording above). I think the drums would bleed less into the piano that way. They want to use headphones, so hearing shouldn't be a problem. Any objections to this arrangement? |
| | |
| | #23 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
Why would anyone want to use cans in this situation? Anyway, the set up shouldn't present any problems. | |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Lives for gear |
Ever tryed a Sennheiser MD441 on jazz bass drum? Sounds smooth and detailed.
|
| | |
| | #25 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2005 Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,035
Thread Starter | Quote:
Good point. Thanks! | |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2005 Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,035
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #27 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
So there are two sides to the headphones issue. I still prefer no cans. | |
| | |
| | #28 | |
| Gear interested Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 16
| Quote:
So much of what we think "ought" to sound a certain way has little to do with your choice of transducers (as I'm sure you're aware), but has MUCH to do with the instrument and performer (actually this "sound bite" presents a bass sound that is FAR from bad... I think it's quite good, actually, or at least reasonably common.) Chuck Berghofer (sp?), bass player extroadinare, is a session "ringer" in the LA scene. More than anything else, he has a "sound" that is very uniform (level from lo to hi), and has a "pulse" that everyone appreciates. It's not an aggressive thing, but supports a tune like few bassist can. Ray Brown had a sound that was instantly identifiable and very aggressive. Ray liked the "bite" that he could develop (sometimes the terms "wood" or "point" are used), but frequently settled for something a little "rounder", I think in an effort to placate other people's idea of what bass "ought" to sound like (I am no exception.) The point is... there's no such thing as "good" and "bad" intrinsically from an instrument. But capturing the notion, or intent, or the perception of quality (both from the point of reference of the artist, composer and listener) CAN be objectively rated on a scale of "1 - 10." What does the artist think?? Thanks for sharing in your experiences... very interesting. | |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2005 Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,035
Thread Starter |
Whao, nice post. Thanks for the compliment. The upcoming session is on another level entirely. The big challenge for me when recording on a hall stage is getting isolation while keeping sight lines.
|
| | |
| | #30 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2005 Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,035
Thread Starter |
The results of the session may be instructive. It is probably the worst recording I've ever made. The headphones encouraged them to disregard all stage levels, so basically, we have a huge, washy, drum solo over everything but the softest passages. Here are some examples that, even eq'd, demonstrate the phenomenon. BTW, the bass was miked with a DPA 4021, U87s on piano, 414s for OH, C451B on snare, TLM170 on bass drum. (This is so bad, I think it's funny.)
|
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RE20,SM7 or MD421 for audio book/educational CD | SveNaj | So much gear, so little time! | 5 | 13th September 2006 06:36 PM |
| Shure SM7 vs. MD421 for rock vocals | twonky | Low End Theory | 24 | 18th March 2006 11:35 AM |
| Shure SM7 or Sennheiser MD421? | jsrockit | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 11 | 14th January 2006 01:48 PM |
| |