Sony PCM-D1 ... anyone? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: ,

Sony PCM-D1 ... anyone?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th May 2006   #1
Gear addict
 
Bhang's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 459

Thread Starter
Sony PCM-D1 ... anyone?

I have been looking for a good high quality ultra portable recorder and am curious how this thing is in action. It looks fantastic. Does anyone have some comments they could share. How are the mics and pre's?
Bhang
__________________
Gear FreQ
Bhang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2006   #2
Gear Head
 
radiated's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Posts: 47

That indeed looks very nice. But of course Sony has skipped spdif input.... So it's basically a bye-bye, as that is not very flexible at all.
radiated is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2006   #3
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 126

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhang
I have been looking for a good high quality ultra portable recorder...
I think one of the Sound Devices machines might be your best bet.
Bixby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2006   #4
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,323

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhang
I have been looking for a good high quality ultra portable recorder and am curious how this thing is in action. It looks fantastic. Does anyone have some comments they could share. How are the mics and pre's?
Bhang
I think it looks terrible. It has some breathtaking design errors including the laughable microphone arrangement. Sound from the left hits the right microphone first and vice versa. What a complete joke. If the rest of the machine is up to this standard then you're wasting your money.

Last edited by David Spearritt; 12th May 2006 at 03:25 PM..
David Spearritt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2006   #5
Lives for gear
 
T.RayBullard's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Columbus County, North Carolina
Posts: 2,426

Send a message via AIM to T.RayBullard Send a message via MSN to T.RayBullard Send a message via Yahoo to T.RayBullard
look at the sound devices 722, or 744t,

marantz pmd 660/671

fostex fr-2

sonosax minir2



www.oade.com modifies these units with different components to sculpt the sound the user is after(mods the marantz and fostex)
__________________
I think it is wrong to make everything equidistant
from the listener with too many mics. The pasting-on effects end up like bad Photoshop work on graphics & photos - too unbelievable.
-Tony Faulkner

http://www.last.fm/user/TeddyBullard/
T.RayBullard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2006   #6
Lives for gear
 
Plush's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: EARS/Chicago
Posts: 4,275

overpriced!

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Spearritt
I think it looks terrible. It has some breathtaking design errors including the laughable microphone arrangement. Sound from the left hits the right microphone first and vice versa. What a complete joke. If the rest of the machine is up to this standard then you're wasting your money.
Come on, now--that's an XY stereo mic--obviously the RT mic is supposed to be wired to the LFT. channel and vice versa. Err, ahem--it better be! Otherwise, it's a joke.

What IS a joke is the price, the 1/8th inch connector mic and line inputs and the miserably skimpy running time on the flash and magic stick media. $2000.00 for this?

It does look really cool though!
Plush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2006   #7
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,323

Quote:
Originally Posted by Plush
Come on, now--that's an XY stereo mic--obviously the RT mic is supposed to be wired to the LFT. channel and vice versa.
Let's look at it in detail. The mic physically on the right is the left channel and the mic physically on the left is the right channel due to the way they are pointing. We are all agreed.

Now lets say you are a little quark capable of surfing the sound wave in towards the unit, for a sound wave coming from the left. Guess which mic you hit first, the RIGHT channel mic, admittedly a bit off axis, but you hit it. Imagine what this does to sound arriving around the image centre from mid left to mid right, where its not as off axis. The image will be disastrous. The mics are arranged correctly for directivity, but are reversed for time of arrival.

This is the reason "crossed" cardioids are always crossed! Sony have made a huge blunder. At least RODE got it right on the NT4.
David Spearritt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2006   #8
Gear addict
 
Bhang's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 459

Thread Starter
Sony Pcm-D1

I really appreciate all the input. For what I use my portable rig for, I don't want to be lugging around an additional mic. I was hoping that someone might have used this machine and would have some feedback. I used to love Sony gear, but in the last 4-5 years they have made some serious garbage. The short record time and lack of SPDIF don't bother me in the least. It does have usb2 so that's all I need. But if the pre's are not kick ass and the mic isn't all that than this would definitely be a pass..
Once again, thanks for all of the comments. One reason I love this board.

Bhang
Bhang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th August 2010   #9
Shy
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,940

I know this is an old thread, but it's still relevant. Like the thread poster, I'm looking for the best possible ultra portable recorder with built-in mics. I've tried Zoom/Edirol/Marantz/Sony D-50/whatever recorders and nothing came anywhere near the PCM-D1's quality (very good mics/preamps and extremely low noise). Is there anything comparable or better? I'm not talking about units like the obviously great Sound Devices 722, I'll reiterate I need an ultra portable recorder with built in mics that has great sound quality and extremely low noise like the D1. I will not connect external mics to it, I'd do that with a different unit.
Shy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2010   #10
Shy
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,940

Alright, I guess this 5 year old unit really is still the best.
Shy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2010   #11
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Taipei
Posts: 167

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shy View Post
Alright, I guess this 5 year old unit really is still the best.
If people agreed, there must be some replies.

The recorder trend at this moment: Recorders with built-in microphones.

Looking forward to:

Microphones with built-in recorder.
9sbean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2010   #12
Shy
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,940

Yes, thanks for the great reply, obviously derived from experience with specific equipment and understanding of special field requirements.

I've searched everywhere for a unit as small/easily portable with a comparable quality of internal mics/preamps (response/distortion/noise-wise) and found nothing even close to the D1 at any price level. I wouldn't mind paying even more than the D1's price, in fact I'd be glad if there was a better one not from Sony, a company I have various issues with. I thought it's likely that I'm missing something if this quite old unit is the best I could find, so I asked here (blame me), but apparently I'm not.
Shy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2010   #13
Lives for gear
 
John Willett's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 5,291

Sony PCM-D1 ... anyone?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 9sbean
Looking forward to:

Microphones with built-in recorder.
Already exist - HHB FlashMic.



Sent from my iPhone using Gearslutz
John Willett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2010   #14
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Taipei
Posts: 167

Unfortunately, the majority products will satisfy generic public first. So the first batch "microphones with built-in recorder" will be something like for news journalists or music learning... Wait until Schoeps, DPA... to produce prestige "microphones with built-in recorder" could be only a dream.

For the very demanding user, the only possible way is to built your own system, or integrate your own "all-in-one" unit.

Here is a short recording at this afternoon. Special "Summer Song". Did it with my kind of "all-in-one" unit.
Attached Files
File Type: mp3 Summer_cicadas.mp3 (1.68 MB, 52 views)
9sbean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2010   #15
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Taipei
Posts: 167

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Willett View Post
Already exist - HHB FlashMic.



Sent from my iPhone using Gearslutz
Yes, but the product is still emphasis on the "recording", not the microphone. What I mean is that you choose the microphone first. The recorder comes with it is some kind of feature. Just like the microphones on the recorders now, those microphones are just a feature.
9sbean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2010   #16
Shy
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,940

You don't "choose the microphone first" when you need an extremely portable recorder to use in certain extreme conditions, you choose the recorder first. The fact that the mics and preamps in almost all of them really are "just a feature" is the sad part for people who want truly high quality with such a recording solution. D1 is an exception since its specially designed mics and Analog Devices preamps were not made for "prosumers".
Shy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2010   #17
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: France - Toulouse
Posts: 554

Quote:
Originally Posted by 9sbean View Post
Here is a short recording at this afternoon. Special "Summer Song". Did it with my kind of "all-in-one" unit.
Nice !
And what is your "all in one" unit ?

JMM
mathieujm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2010   #18
Lives for gear
 
didier.brest's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,792

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shy View Post
I've tried Zoom/Edirol/Marantz/Sony D-50/whatever recorders and nothing came anywhere near the PCM-D1's quality (very good mics/preamps and extremely low noise).
Is there such a difference between the D1 and the D50? Not obvious from the samples here.
didier.brest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th August 2010   #19
Shy
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,940

Quote:
Originally Posted by didier.brest View Post
Is there such a difference between the D1 and the D50? Not obvious from the samples here.
Yes, quite a big difference, especially when it comes to picking up more details with much less noise (nature recording etc.). Differences are very obvious even on the site you linked, D-50's sound is more "hollow" and uneven compared to D1. It is of course far above avarage.
Shy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th August 2010   #20
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Taipei
Posts: 167

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shy View Post
You don't "choose the microphone first" when you need an extremely portable recorder to use in certain extreme conditions, you choose the recorder first. The fact that the mics and preamps in almost all of them really are "just a feature" is the sad part for people who want truly high quality with such a recording solution. D1 is an exception since its specially designed mics and Analog Devices preamps were not made for "prosumers".
Well, I do choose microphones first for my recording tasks. I regard those "features" microphones as general electret condensers with its own performance rating/preference. D1 could be very good compared to lower cost palm recorders, and it shall considering the $. But I would rather go for the prestige solution when I need prestige quality.

My 2 $.
9sbean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th August 2010   #21
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Taipei
Posts: 167

Quote:
Originally Posted by mathieujm View Post
Nice !
And what is your "all in one" unit ?

JMM

It is not very "all-in-one", but it is convenient enough because I only need to hold a light weight microphone.

The microphone was made with 2 DPA 4060, and 2 interface board took from Superlux PS418S which adapts 48VDC phantom and balanced output for the electret condenser. The 4060 were arranged in a 20 cm styrofoam ball. DPA 4060 and styrofoam weight almost nothing, the only heavy parts is the metal tube of PS418S. I keep one metal tube and replace the 3-pin XLR to 5-pin XLR.

Only a short stereo cable with 5-pin XLR to SD 722 in Porta Brace bag.

Wondering how Nagra ARES-MII perform compared with D1?
9sbean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th August 2010   #22
Shy
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,940

Quote:
Originally Posted by 9sbean View Post
But I would rather go for the prestige solution when I need prestige quality.
Obviously I prefer a "prestige" solution, or I wouldn't be looking for the best possible ultra portable recorder. Using a bigger and more complex and frail setup is not even feasible in the situations I need to record.
Shy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th August 2010   #23
Shy
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,940

Quote:
Originally Posted by 9sbean View Post
Wondering how Nagra ARES-MII perform compared with D1?
Very noisy compared to it, for one.
Shy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th August 2010   #24
Lives for gear
 
Yannick's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: Brussels
Posts: 595

Funny thing is (sadly) that the Sony D50 STILL HAS A WRONG XY configuration !!!

If your Sony camera would have a faulty lens like that, you would throw it away asap.
__________________
Yannick Willox
www.acousticrecordingservice.be
(mobile recording)
Yannick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th August 2010   #25
Gear maniac
 
mgoorevich's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: Tel Aviv
Posts: 249

I own PCM-D1 for quite allot.
It's OK quality wise and maybe the best all in one recorder out there.
But don't expect it will deliver superior results on recording atmos room tones and quite effects. It will do it but you will never be happy with them.
I own SD744T for serious field work. I use schoeps, DPA and Sennheiser mics for quite sfx and other critic stuff.

But the Sony PCM-D1 is always with me in my backpack so I just cat pickup usable sound any moment, everywhere.
However when I go to my studio and start listening to the sound ...and sometimes it's so interesting, that it makes me cry - why I didn't take my SD774?!!!
But anyways it's the best recorder of all handhelds.
mgoorevich is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Old AD-DA Converters? Like the Sony pcm-501ES? Reptil Mastering forum 2 26th August 2006 05:56 PM
Sony PCM-D1 darkwater Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 0 19th July 2006 07:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:31 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.