Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording

Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording Jazz, Classical, Choir, Acoustic Music environments & beyond + Live Performance, Mobile & Location Production & Broadcasting Moderated by Steve Remote of Aura Sonic Ltd. NYC, NY USA

Tags: ,

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 3rd September 2002, 05:34 PM   #1
Jay Kahrs
One with big hooves
 
Jay Kahrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Earth, NYC metro
Posts: 5,770
Send a message via AIM to Jay Kahrs Send a message via Skype™ to Jay Kahrs
Question Remote Possibilities in alternative snare mics!

I guess it's pretty safe to assume that almost everyone defaults to an SM57. But, I know that doesn't work all the time and it never works for some people. What else have you tried and had good success with?
__________________
J. 'Moose' Kahrs
producer|mixer|recordist
MooseAudio.net

Quote:
Originally Posted by the guy who invented fire
All you need to make a record is a mic, some tape and maybe some bad reverb...
Jay Kahrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2002, 06:38 PM   #2
adam_w
Gear maniac
 
adam_w's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: England
Posts: 249
umm..a beta 57 or a shure 545 ? or 2 57's ! How adventurous, eh ?! I have also used some rather too nice and breakable condensers when no-one was looking !
adam_w is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2002, 07:51 PM   #3
Mike Tholen
Lives for gear
 
Mike Tholen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 818
I use a Beyer 201 instead of a 57.
Mike Tholen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2002, 08:13 PM   #4
e-cue
Lives for gear
 
e-cue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Lost Angeles
Posts: 3,834
Ditto on the 201. SM81, really brings out the snares. EM8000, very crispy (very pronouced 9K), almost too crispy for most things. If you feel like experementing, tape a PZM mic real good to the bottom head, and run for cover.
e-cue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2002, 09:39 PM   #5
Remoteness
Super Moderator
 
Remoteness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,625
If the SM57 doesn't do it for you try...

KM140, KM84, TLM103 for most jazz dates.

I got a wierd one for you. How about a MD431? I love the warm sound you get using that mic on snare. I like to use them on bright snare drums when I'm going for a "not so" bright snare sound. IMO, they're pretty phat sounding.
Remoteness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2002, 12:18 AM   #6
davemc
Lives for gear
 
davemc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Melb, Australia
Posts: 1,027
The Audio Technica snare mic ATM23e is cool, although I have not used the 201 I have herad a lot of people do.
The KM85 works cool for brushes.
__________________
Bye Ya Dave
INDENT
davemc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2002, 01:39 AM   #7
unclemurray
Gear interested
 
unclemurray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 27
Sennheiser MD441! I'm a drummer and nothing shines like these pups. You don't need to mic the bottom (i never do anyway). You get a perfect balance between tone and attack.
unclemurray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2002, 01:45 AM   #8
Jules
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Sm57
Beyer 201
Sm57 & AKG 251 (with pad cylinder taped to it)
Neumann KM84 (on side of shell, (needed HP filter!)
1000 years ago Sen 441
AKG 414
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2002, 01:46 AM   #9
Jules
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
A whole lota 201's goin on!

  Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2002, 02:09 AM   #10
Moze
Gear nut
 
Moze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 83
I've had good results with an SM-7, Sennheiser MD 409 and the old 57 works pretty well too.

Just recently had a bottom snare work for the first time. It was a 414.

Most of it really depends on the player and the snare. Sometimes the top works and sometimes I end up on the shell....

-Moze
Moze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2002, 02:34 AM   #11
DigitMus
Gear addict
 
DigitMus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: SouthWest Florida
Posts: 481
Send a message via AIM to DigitMus
Most of the time I get enough from the OH mics, but if I need a track for processing...
Mics I've had good luck with:
Audix OM3xb
Beyerdynamic M260
AKG C410
AKG D1000


Scott
DigitMus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2002, 02:41 AM   #12
Jay Kahrs
One with big hooves
 
Jay Kahrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Earth, NYC metro
Posts: 5,770
Send a message via AIM to Jay Kahrs Send a message via Skype™ to Jay Kahrs
Quote:
Originally posted by Remoteness
I got a wierd one for you. How about a MD431?
Never tried that one. I don't even think I've ever come across one in a studio. That was a "vocal" mic with the on/off switch on a black handle right?
__________________
J. 'Moose' Kahrs
producer|mixer|recordist
MooseAudio.net

Quote:
Originally Posted by the guy who invented fire
All you need to make a record is a mic, some tape and maybe some bad reverb...
Jay Kahrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2002, 03:40 AM   #13
sonic dogg
Gear addict
 
sonic dogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: pacific northwest
Posts: 481
back in my partnered studio daze...we had beyer m-422 and m-201 on the snare...occasionally the senn 421 would show up or the 441 but usually only when the player gave you the room to use em...nowadays i use an audix d-1 or a 57.....the 57 came from a defunct pa company years ago....i bought 10 mics from em...this particular 57 is the only one ive ever heard that sounds like this....i've personally owned a large pa system and had 25 57's at one time....this one is different.....peace
__________________
the clubhouse studio....home of drool'n dogg rekords
sonic dogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2002, 05:50 AM   #14
Lyle Caldwell
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 54
I used to use a 57 whenever a 201 wasn't available, after failed experiments with an Audix D1 (sounded great soloed, but never sat right in a mix). Then I did a snare mic shootout of my own, and I was surprised that, while the 201 remained my favorite, the Oktava MC012 and Shure Beta 98 were right behind it, and that for "that kind of sound" the Shure Beta 87 smoked the SM57, IMO.
So right now, I'm trying these three and seeing how they do in mixes. The Beta 98 has the best hat rejection and its bleed sounds the most natural, and I'm leaning towards it at the moment. Certainly the easiest to place in a kit. I'd highly recommend that others try it- though it's marketed for toms, it is surprisingly good on snare.
Lyle Caldwell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2002, 05:58 AM   #15
alphajerk
There is only one
 
alphajerk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: asheville NC
Posts: 5,291
been my CM700 lately. was a sleeper mic in my closet for a while but has really been used a LOT of snare and electric guitars
alphajerk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2002, 07:11 AM   #16
Drumsound
Lives for gear
 
Drumsound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Bloomington Il
Posts: 3,542
I'll second the ATM23HE. I like it's body a lot more than a 57. I don't think I've used a 57 on snare drum in about three years.

I mostly used the Beyer M88 until I got the AT. I sometime use a 414b/uls.

I generally mic the shell of wood snares. Shell micing doesn't seem to sound on metal drums.

I'd like to try the 201. I love Beyer mics.
__________________
Tony
Oxide Lounge Recording
See the Oxide Lounge!

WWJMD?

Come see me on the Tape Op boards!

"If I have to flip flop more than three times in an A/B test to figure out what the difference is, I lose interest in that difference.'--Tchad Blake
Drumsound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2002, 07:23 AM   #17
Jay Kahrs
One with big hooves
 
Jay Kahrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Earth, NYC metro
Posts: 5,770
Send a message via AIM to Jay Kahrs Send a message via Skype™ to Jay Kahrs
When I'm not using a 57 I usually reach for an AKG D310 which has more of a presence peak and a tighter pattern. After that, I'll try whatever I think might work. A 414B/ULS has ended up in that spot a few times, one time I used a 421 but that almost never makes it onto snare because I like them on too many other things. It's been a while since I've used a 441 because I don't own one but I'd like to one day soon. Haven't used a 201 or the Oktava MC012's yet.

Lyle, funny that you mentioned the Beta 87 for snare. I saw a couple pictures of the band Hum in the studio recently and there was a Beta 87 on snare which is something I've never thought about trying. I'm going to see if I can borrow one soon.
__________________
J. 'Moose' Kahrs
producer|mixer|recordist
MooseAudio.net

Quote:
Originally Posted by the guy who invented fire
All you need to make a record is a mic, some tape and maybe some bad reverb...
Jay Kahrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2002, 08:40 AM   #18
Remoteness
Super Moderator
 
Remoteness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,625
Quote:
Originally posted by Jay Kahrs


Never tried that one. I don't even think I've ever come across one in a studio. That was a "vocal" mic with the on/off switch on a black handle right?
Jay,

Yup, That's the one.

The first one I ever bought was from Media Sound. Picked it up from their auction way back when. It has their name in script etched into the mic body. :)

We used one of them on that WBGO Block Party broadcast in Newark, NJ you met me at. The MD431 has a magnetic reed switch that you can remove and/or reinstall with a couple of screws. :) The artist wanted a switched mic to control, so I got one of my (removed) switches from my field shop parts bin and installed it onsite during soundcheck for him.

Usually, I remove them, 'cause I don't want the artists screwing with the on/off switch. I'm a "control" freak about that kind of stuff.
Remoteness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2002, 11:42 AM   #19
Wiggy Neve Slut
Lives for gear
 
Wiggy Neve Slut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,819
I was using u87 on the top with s SM57 * km 84 taped together off too the side....

However our U87 copped a stick once and it still works a charm!

PEACE
Wiggy
Wiggy Neve Slut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2002, 03:32 PM   #20
subspace
Lives for gear
 
subspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Too sun
Posts: 546
For one mic, my favorite tones have come from either an SM81 on the shell or an SM98 an inch off the top skin.
For two mics, I like a 57 on top with either a 421 or a 414 in figure 8 on bottom.
I used to use a 201, but it got clobbered and I wasn't sure about the new TG-X replacement sounding the same.
__________________
"If you never did, you should. These things are fun and fun is good."
subspace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2002, 06:06 PM   #21
Jay Kahrs
One with big hooves
 
Jay Kahrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Earth, NYC metro
Posts: 5,770
Send a message via AIM to Jay Kahrs Send a message via Skype™ to Jay Kahrs
414 in figure 8 on the bottom? Doesn't that get you into trouble with the bass drum?
__________________
J. 'Moose' Kahrs
producer|mixer|recordist
MooseAudio.net

Quote:
Originally Posted by the guy who invented fire
All you need to make a record is a mic, some tape and maybe some bad reverb...
Jay Kahrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2002, 07:31 PM   #22
C.Lambrechts
Lives for gear
 
C.Lambrechts's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ans (Liege) Belgium
Posts: 3,182
Quote:
Originally posted by subspace
For one mic, my favorite tones have come from either an SM81 on the shell or an SM98 an inch off the top skin.
For two mics, I like a 57 on top with either a 421 or a 414 in figure 8 on bottom.
I used to use a 201, but it got clobbered and I wasn't sure about the new TG-X replacement sounding the same.

why the 414 in figure 8 ??? just curious .....
__________________
Chris Lambrechts

MiLaR Event
ITB or OTB ... Who cares .... it's all about MIXING.
C.Lambrechts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th September 2002, 01:12 AM   #23
subspace
Lives for gear
 
subspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Too sun
Posts: 546
It's tighter in figure 8 than in hypercardiod, and as long as you can point the rear lobe towards the throne, keeping the kick in the null, you can zero in on the exact spot you want.
I was actually trying to mic a kick from the beater side when I discovered it. It wasn't working for the kick, but the snare was sounding real good all of the sudden. A little re-positioning to attenuate the kick bleed and I stuck with it.
My 414 sounds best to me in either omni or figure-8, and the rear lobe in 8 has a darker tilt to it for mellowing out bright sources. Cardiod and hypercardioid sound a bit harsh in the midrange for most things.
__________________
"If you never did, you should. These things are fun and fun is good."
subspace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th September 2002, 01:22 AM   #24
bleen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have an ATM23he that I really like on the top of the snare, but it doesn't work underneath. I did give an Oktava Mk012 a try on top a few weeks ago - interesting sound; good attack, but not enough body.

Generally, I use the ATM23 on top and a 57 on the bottom; condensers on the bottom tend to be too bright on an already bright source, so the 57 seems to work nicely still for my needs.

I also gave an AT4033 a go on top, just for grins, and was pleasantly surprised by the results!

Cheers,

Don
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th September 2002, 06:02 AM   #25
Jay Kahrs
One with big hooves
 
Jay Kahrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Earth, NYC metro
Posts: 5,770
Send a message via AIM to Jay Kahrs Send a message via Skype™ to Jay Kahrs
Quote:
Originally posted by subspace
It's tighter in figure 8 than in hypercardiod, and as long as you can point the rear lobe towards the throne, keeping the kick in the null, you can zero in on the exact spot you want.
I'm still not sure how I'd position that so the kick is in the null. Mostly because it's mostly kick down there. Can you take a picture?
__________________
J. 'Moose' Kahrs
producer|mixer|recordist
MooseAudio.net

Quote:
Originally Posted by the guy who invented fire
All you need to make a record is a mic, some tape and maybe some bad reverb...
Jay Kahrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th September 2002, 04:41 PM   #26
subspace
Lives for gear
 
subspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Too sun
Posts: 546
Sure, I can set-up a quick picture. I use a mic clamp on the snare stand if things are tight and keep the 414 close, close, close, with the -20 pad in. There's some added click from the beater, but so long as you flip polarity and don't squash the mic, it's controllable. No worse than hat bleed in the top mic, except it's easier to gate out if you don't like it.
__________________
"If you never did, you should. These things are fun and fun is good."
subspace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th September 2002, 02:13 AM   #27
ZEUSS
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 348
I use a 414 on the bottom of the snare all of the time. -20db pad ,cardiod, 150 roll off. Its real easy to get the mic positioned since it is small and flat. I find it adds a nice amount of body when mixed with a 57 on top. I never have any problems with it picking up kick drum or other parts of the kit. I put it about 3-4 inches from the head in the center of the drum.
ZEUSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th September 2002, 06:05 AM   #28
Jay Kahrs
One with big hooves
 
Jay Kahrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Earth, NYC metro
Posts: 5,770
Send a message via AIM to Jay Kahrs Send a message via Skype™ to Jay Kahrs
I've used a 414 for both top and bottom of snare before but never in figure 8. Actually I think I did use on the side of the shell once in figure 8 with the hi-hat in the null. That worked at the time.
__________________
J. 'Moose' Kahrs
producer|mixer|recordist
MooseAudio.net

Quote:
Originally Posted by the guy who invented fire
All you need to make a record is a mic, some tape and maybe some bad reverb...
Jay Kahrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th September 2002, 04:06 PM   #29
subspace
Lives for gear
 
subspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Too sun
Posts: 546
I got a chance to snap a pic. It's kind of hard to tell in the photo but the 414 is under the half of the snare furthest from the kick drum.
Attached Thumbnails
remote-possibilities-alternative-snare-mics-snare_mic.jpg  
__________________
"If you never did, you should. These things are fun and fun is good."
subspace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th September 2002, 04:57 AM   #30
Jay Kahrs
One with big hooves
 
Jay Kahrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Earth, NYC metro
Posts: 5,770
Send a message via AIM to Jay Kahrs Send a message via Skype™ to Jay Kahrs
Ah. I get it now. Cool.
__________________
J. 'Moose' Kahrs
producer|mixer|recordist
MooseAudio.net

Quote:
Originally Posted by the guy who invented fire
All you need to make a record is a mic, some tape and maybe some bad reverb...
Jay Kahrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Remote Possibilities in TAGs -- What are your favorites? Remoteness Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 1 8th April 2008 06:47 AM
Remote Possibilities - A positive vibe! phil. Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 31 3rd September 2007 08:54 AM
The "Remot