![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Tags: decisions decisions decisions, mikage |
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Joined: Sep 2011 Location: Malmö, Sweden
Posts: 25
Thread Starter |
I've read everything I can find in this matter here on gearslutz and elsewhere, but I still can't decide between these. It seems hard to find comparisons between them, I've only found one SFX-sample of the mk22. I will use the stereo-pair mainly for recording close miked sound effects and distant atmospheres. And sometimes music (close miked solo instruments or stereo recordings). Both ORTF (or modified for the mk22) and X/Y. Pretty much everything in other words, but most important are the sound effects! I use the sounds in sound design for theater and sometimes film. I record on a PMD661 (oade FET MOD). Which of the mk4 and the mk22 has the best character for sound effects? I like the bass in the mk22, but is it too dark for sound effects? The mk4 seems to be very standard for sfx, but is that because its better than the mk22 or just because its been used for so long? ![]() (Next thing on my wish-list is a royer SF-12, does any of the suggested mics work better together with it on music??? )Though there might not be a final answer to the questions, I would really appreciate a little discussion around this to help me in this important decision, how should I sound? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jul 2007 Location: Southern York County, PA
Posts: 124
|
mk21h, the best of both worlds
|
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Sep 2007 Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 264
|
Mk21 might be a bit too wide if he wants to close mic effects in the field.
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jul 2007 Location: Southern York County, PA
Posts: 124
|
But it's not as wide as a 22, and the 21H with the HF bump helps balance out some of the additional bass.
|
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Sep 2007 Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 264
|
It's wider. The mk22 is similar to a mk21, but with more emphasis on directionality. I believe that was the idea behind it, to have something between the mk21 and the mk4. Mk22 ![]() Mk21H |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jul 2007 Location: Southern York County, PA
Posts: 124
|
Ah, my bad, I'm a few years out of paying much attention to what schoeps is selling. I thought the 22 was another omni. In that case, I'd definitely say the 22.
|
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Sep 2007 Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 264
|
Only recently gotten into Shcoeps myself, superb mics! Though I've heard horror stories from lads that have gone out in the humidity with them for long periods. That said, there's this cool Aussie recordist that travels around all sorts of environments with a Schoeps M/S pair and gets beautiful recordings of tribal bands and such. Here's his site, Blog | Sound Related |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear |
MK22 sounds to me a way better than MK4. It became my favourite capsule ... MK21 is nice but more and more I perceive it as tiny bit sharp ... MK22 sounds nicely "warm"
|
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,254
| Quote:
I've been using MK22s for only a few months and I'm in awe! They are now my favorite too. They just kill for MS with an MK8 because you can get the mics closer and still hear lots of air. The magic is how they retain focus on the source while capturing ambiance almost like an omni -- with better rear rejection than MK21. This is just a delightful capsule. I'd definitely use one for Foley and SFX. | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear interested Joined: Sep 2011 Location: Malmö, Sweden
Posts: 25
Thread Starter |
This sounds good! All votes for mk22 so far... I've also thought about adding a mk8 later for MS, so its nice to hear that they work good together. I like the word "warm" about a mic, makes me want it |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear |
You guys are creeping me out. I pretty much thought I had the mic addiction licked. But continued praises for the Mk22 have me jonesing. Hmmm, maybe if I sell the dogs, the washing machine and, ummm, . . .
__________________ Nov schmoz ka pop. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear interested Joined: Sep 2011 Location: Malmö, Sweden
Posts: 25
Thread Starter |
Is there anyone who prefers the mk4 over the mk22?
Last edited by akej; 2nd February 2012 at 12:27 PM.. Reason: grammar |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jul 2007 Location: Southern York County, PA
Posts: 124
|
The mk4 doesn't sound as good, but has better rear rejection. It's still an excellent choice, but if you don't need cardiod, subcard is a better choice.
|
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear |
Yes, for general use I prefer the MK 4. Universal capsule for universal use
|
| | |
| | #15 |
| Lives for gear |
MK22 is almost cardiod too ... just a tiny bit broader and more pleasant sounding )
|
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 823
| |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jul 2007 Location: Southern York County, PA
Posts: 124
|
It's not a big bump, and it worked well for me. I don't do field recording anymore, but I was happiest with my mk21h/mk8 setup of all the rigs I tried.
|
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Live sound nightmare! Please help!!! | AV Guy | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 26 | 12th February 2012 11:04 PM |
| Video: Skywalker Sound Secrets | starcrash13 | Post Production forum! | 8 | 15th December 2007 10:34 PM |
| Sound Design software suggestions? | deadhorses | Post Production forum! | 8 | 6th October 2007 08:56 AM |
| Forums for live sound engineers, light designers, etc. | Beaker02 | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 5 | 29th May 2007 03:27 PM |
| More design for sound design | Soundproof | Post Production forum! | 6 | 13th March 2007 02:26 PM |
| |