16 channels of 1:2 line level splits? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags:

16 channels of 1:2 line level splits?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd May 2006   #1
Lives for gear
 
dubrichie's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 2,375

Thread Starter
Question 16 channels of 1:2 line level splits?

alrighty,

i need to split 16 channels 2 ways each at line level to get signal to both main and backup recorders.

is it ok to just use simple y-cables? the signals will be of high quality, eg: gefell mics, wunder/chandler pres, etc. so i dont want to compromise this in any way.

if you can recommend a splitter box, active, passive, tranny isolated, whatever, please do.

again, just a very simple 16 channel 1:2 splitter.

thanks,

regards,

richie.
__________________
Regards,

Richie.

"a paradigm of restraint and good taste at a time of frequent excess"
dubrichie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2006   #2
Lives for gear
 
Clueless's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 1,706

A patchbay is just a splitter

If you're feeding one line level signal to two Hi-Z inputs (which it sounds like you are doing), then using a Y-cable is no worse than taking a feed off your friendly patchbay. Given the number of people who seem quite comfortable to put patchbays in between their high-end gear and their high-end consoles, and given the number of people who will, when they need to, take a feed from their patchbay into some efx device headed for some additional set of inputs, I think you can rest assured that a Y cable (or 16) will do the trick.

As for signal loss--don't worry. You're not going to lose much splitting a signal into two Hi-Z (1 MOhm) recording inputs!
Clueless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th May 2006   #3
Lives for gear
 
dubrichie's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 2,375

Thread Starter
thanks clueless,

thants what i figured but just wanted some more opinions as i have gotten a few conflicting ones already.

regards,

richie.
dubrichie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th May 2006   #4
Gearslutz.com admin
 
Jules's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Location: A Yank in London, UK
Posts: 17,808


This is a good one for this forum..
Jules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2006   #5
Gear nut
 
Diskordia's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: MN
Posts: 106

this topic needs more attention because everyone should be splitting their signal and we all can't afford a thousand dollar splitter box..which is said to be low quality (?)
Diskordia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2006   #6
Super Moderator
 
Remoteness's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,405

A "Half Normal" patch bay is exactly what you're looking for.
The top row of jacks can be split or monitored by patching a cable while it still makes the connection to the bottom row of jacks. The bottom row can be disconnected from the top row by dead patching directly into the bottom row.
Remoteness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2006   #7
Super Moderator
 
Remoteness's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,405

Here are two pictures of Jethro's dual multitrack machine panel.
We have 48 channels from the console on the first two ELCOs.
The middle set of two ELCOs are the console return feeds.
The last the last two ELCO are the inputs to the chassis mounted ELCO splitter.
Machine A and Machine B flank the console return ELCOs...
Attached Thumbnails
16 channels of 1:2 line level splits?-jethrorearcrmelco90.jpg  
Remoteness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2006   #8
Lives for gear
 
dubrichie's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 2,375

Thread Starter
half normal patch, so simple!

great idea steve, and flexible.

thanks,

regards,

richie.
dubrichie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2006   #9
Super Moderator
 
Remoteness's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,405

Keep in mind we use both depending on the situation.

The line level stuff is "Half Normal" patch bay jacks but, we still have two 24 channel chassis mounted ELCO 90s Y cords by the multitracks.

I'm all about options... It sounds like the "Half Normal" patch bay idea will work just fine for your setup.

Good luck and keep us posted on your developments.
Remoteness is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
a box to convert balanced line level to instrument level ? dj_who So much gear, so little time! 8 15th February 2012 05:28 PM
How: adapting a line level signal for mic level input Farshad So much gear, so little time! 10 22nd May 2010 09:16 AM
+4 line level to hi-z instrument level? edIT So much gear, so little time! 60 2nd May 2006 04:34 AM
Line level to splitter, mic level out..How? Sean Holland Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 2 14th May 2005 09:13 AM
Line level, mic level, direct box... ? Umlaaat So much gear, so little time! 7 20th May 2004 12:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:28 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.