![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Tags: ad da, beginners, classical, mikage, preamplifier, show and tell, technique |
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6
Thread Starter | Input on newbee recording with NT5, Apogee symphony IO and SCA C84
Hi guys, First post on Gearslutz although I have been lurking on these forums for some time now. I earn my living as a classical performer and teacher but I have started to do some recordings on the side as a hobby. Nothing serious (yet...) Recently i had the chance to record some of my fellows here in Barcelona. They were performing Schubert´s octet on a fairly nice hall so I decided to record them. As the title of the thread indicates, recording chain is a pair of NT5 with omni capsules spaced about 43 cm with a slightly open angle. Pre is Seventh circle audio C84 and converter is an Apogee Symphony IO going USB to my laptop. This is a live concert so I didn´t have many choices regarding mic positioning, etc... I have had the luck to have some recording techniques lessons with Pere Casulleras, former Harmonia Mundi engineer, and he says that in the end the most important part is the hall, performers and where you place the mics...no matter what they are. So I guess that I´m just looking forward to your impressions specially regarding the NT5 as they do seem to get a nice share of bashing around here. The omni caps seem nice to me (not so sure about the cardioid) I´m purchasing a trio of Josephson C617 pretty soon so i hope I can improve in that area. Thanks for your time. I hope you enjoy the clips!! Best, Nacho Gascón |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6
Thread Starter |
2nd Mov
|
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6
Thread Starter |
and 3rd
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2008 Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,554
|
It sounds like you know that the NT5 bashing is mostly elitist nonsense. With results like you got, it can be difficult to find fault. Having used both, however, I think you will find the C617 on a whole other level of sound quality. Faster, cleaner, more extended, and without any hint of distortion that the NT5's can sometimes display on harsher instruments. Don't get rid of your Rodes though. They work great on many things. Nice recording. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6
Thread Starter |
Daniel, Thanks for your comments. Yes, not planning to get rid of those NT5, they were my first pair of mics and I´m very fond of them. They can work really well in some situations. I do expect those C617 to bring something more "special" to my recordings. Take care |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Gear maniac | Quote:
How were the performers arranged around the mics? I ask because I find myself wishing there was a little less clarinet , and a little more violin, and I wonder if it had to do with the way they were arranged. Thanks for the music!
__________________ Pulsipher Music Mobile Recording Studio Serving the northern Colorado area pulsiphermusic.weebly.com | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6
Thread Starter |
The performers were arranged in a semi-circle. From left to right: Violin I, Violin II, Viola, Cello, Double Bass, French Horn, Bassoon and Clarinet. I moved the performers before the concert as much as I could to achieve good balance. On the dress rehearsal I moved the middle row forward as I was getting a bit of the hole in the middle effect that I believe is still present in the recording but is somehow bearable. Same distance from the mics for the Violin and Clarinet but I guess the clarinet player really was into playing this piece ![]() Thanks for listening and for the comments! |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Banned Joined: Dec 2011 Location: usa
Posts: 675
| Quote:
i enjoyed it pleasant recording to listen to might be improved slightly if you could try otehr mike positions but no complaints with this recording there is ever so slightly a hint of something missing but that may be that you didnt destroy the recording with fx and compression like so many are these days --and i am getting used to the bad stuff and starting to think that those are normal good work ! | |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Oct 2009 Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 450
| Quote:
My only small criticism is that I also hear the clarinet too loud. It sounds a little closer than the other instruments, based not just on the volume but the relative lack of room ambiance. Of course, for recording a concert we don't always have as much control as we would like over the arrangement of the instruments, so this may not have been avoidable. Again, this is a relatively minor issue. Overall, this is a very nice recording.
__________________ "If you have to flip back and forward, A/Bing to work out the differences, it's not "night and day" - any more than you have to blink many times to work out the difference between dark and light." Psycho_Monkey | |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Gear maniac | Quote:
As neirbod said, this is a minor issue, and you should be proud of this recording. It sounds great. | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6
Thread Starter |
Thanks for the comments!! Yes, I agree. Shame I wasn´t able to move people around as I would have Liked. Clarinet player could have moved away a little and at the same time I could have faced the violin player forward a bit more...in general I also feel that mics could have been just a tiny bit little closer to performers. Next time I´ll be wiser! Recording is totally unprocessed. The big -3dB or so peaks are in the 6th movement... Good to hear that people likes the C617. I´m committed to those. Cheers |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2008 Location: France - Toulouse
Posts: 554
|
Great recording but there wil be a big improvment with the C617 about the richness of the texture of the strings I think
|
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| latency differences between Apogee Syphony IO and AVID HD IO with ProTools HD | JoFo | Music computers | 14 | 24th April 2012 06:04 PM |
| Compare Apogee Symphony IO, Lynx Aurora, and SSL Alphalink, Need your help... | musicwatch80 | Music computers | 0 | 3rd June 2011 11:20 AM |
| Apogee Symphony IO and SBUS | dethbyoogabooga | High end | 0 | 21st August 2010 05:06 PM |
| Apogee Symphony IO!! | DeadOnAudio | Product Alerts older than 2 months | 4 | 10th August 2010 02:28 AM |
| |