![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Tags: live performance, live sound, preamplifier, vocalness |
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear addict Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 424
Thread Starter |
I've never heard of anyone using their favorite mic pre for live vocal performance. Do people do this? If not, why not? My guess is that a nice Neve, API, or Great River would be much better than whatever preamp exists in whatever board the house or local hired soundman happens to have. Is my logic correct? If this is a good idea, how do you bypass the micpre in the channelstrip your plugging your vocals into on the mixing board and use your own beloved mic pre? Since I've never read any discussions on this, I wonder if my question has ignorance written all over it. Sorry if this is the case. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Banned Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,099
|
I have bounced back and forth between live and studio for most of my thirty plus years of pro audio experience and I'll have to tell you that it has only really been in the last few years that live rigs have had speaker and amp combinations that allowed you to "enjoy" higher quality pre-amps. A lot of people would disagree, but there have been so many issues to tackle and tame that the benefit gained from a beteer mic pre was pretty far down the list. I have seen artists of stature bring mic pres like Avalons to the F.O.H. position and I guess it was "better," but most respectable consoles have pres that are good enough. The mic pres in all Midas consoles are pretty damn good. I also be;ive that all current production Midas consoles have the exact same mic pre/EQ circuitry. Most all live consoles use the same pre amp for both line in amd mic in, so you are getting the same quality of sound that the console's preamp introduces either way. On the otherhand, if a certian mic pre is fairly colored and you need to get that sound than I guess that it couldn't hurt. Still, if you have a live rig so dialed in that better mic pre would further the sound then go for it. It just doesn't happen that often in my world. Now, if you have a crap console it's a whole different story.... We have a Nexo S series with nine tops and three bottoms which we augment with Renkus Heinz 18" subs. When mixing a good band on that rig using one of our Midas consoles I do wish that I had better outboard compressors. We have several dBx160x and a pair of dBx 900 racks. I always wish I had a compressor setup on the mains like a pair of 1176s or better. The Nexo is the first p.a. rig where I have felt I could benefit from better compressors in all of my years and I've used a lot of p.a.s! Danny Brown |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2004 Location: Canada
Posts: 2,829
|
When I saw Calexico two years back, the sound guy was rocking a couple of Space Echos, an Avalon strip (737?) and a couple of other rack pieces for what I assume was for the vocals.
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2003 Location: The Lone Star
Posts: 554
|
It is more common for FOH guys to use high-end studio comps in live situations. I have also seen a few 737s in various rigs. Also see a lot of of tube-tech comps out there. cheers,
__________________ "Hope doesn't float. It sinks to the bottom... You need more than hope. You have to believe." |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear addict Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 424
Thread Starter |
I really wasn't refering to high quality boards which would usually translate into really good sounding preamps. I'm more refering to some of the lame budget minded boards I've been ran through at various clubs, venues, etc. I'm not really talking about the big time boards that few local acts ever get the pleasure to run through.
|
| | |
| | #6 |
| 3 + infractions, forum membership suspended. Joined: Oct 2004 Location: Rosedale Cemetery Singing Beach, MA
Posts: 4,873
|
Lots of bands use high end pres live. I used to do lights at a club in boston. in the late 90's early 2000's I saw lots of mid level band like 3 doors down, fuel etc... bring in midas consoles but they used avalon pres, Ive seen some focusrite strips. some ameks even some lower end pres. Live you need tons of headroom to really bring the vocals out above the music never saw any neves though. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2003 Location: Beantown
Posts: 2,462
|
I patch in my high end preamps and compressors when jamming with my band through my fairly cheap PA system all the time and I think it makes a HUGE difference. Compared to a Mackie and 3630 or something it`s night and day. If I can detect it through my crappy PA I imagine it`d make a difference live as well and it will make the singer more confident. If the pre`s are good in the console I guess it`s all moot anyways but I think a high end compressor helps quite a bit as well.
__________________ - Kev |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2004 Location: MO USA
Posts: 2,153
|
You bet. We used Pendulum SPS for years for live vocal mics. Then when I tried Gordon on it, that was a done deal. Just breathe on it and it is right there, just an incredibly fun and powerful way to sing. Feedback and mush all gone. Can never go back to using mixer channels. Steve |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 278
| Quote:
If your outboard gear is doing some specific processing (like a compressor, or even a tube pre that's pushed hard), then it may contribute to a specific sound that you are after, but it's still going through the cheap mic pre that's built into the mixer. | |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2003 Location: Beantown
Posts: 2,462
| Quote:
I tend to think if your getting 90% of the level from the high end mic pre and just a little bit of juice from the Mackie or whatever your using than most of the sound is coming from the mic pre. If your not overloading the Mackie pre or line input and keeping it well within it`s limits than it`s not necessarily something that`s going to effect the basic sound of the better pre negatively. The initial relationship between the mic and high end pre is there and that`s the most important thing. Try it ! It sounds better though I agree it obviously doesn`t sound as good as a great pre going through an allready great sounding board. | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jan 2006 Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 75
|
I'm not saying you shouldn't do it, but here are some things to consider: If you've never done FOH for a living, you should know that the show is the FOH mixer's #1 priority is getting the show on, on-time, without snafu's. People are always making PITA requests that involve some risk to that mission, should he indulge them. Your local/house soundman may not feel like using a piece of gear he can't vouch for personally, which you should respect...even though "in theory" your trying to "improve" the sound. He also might be pressed for time. If you ask, ask reee-ally nicely. Don't assume that the soundguy knows how to patch and use your gear properly. Sometimes you get SoundGod, sometimes you get a drummer on his day off. ***JOKE*** He could make things worse. A thief could walk out the front door of the club with your API pre more easily than with your Les Paul. Will it help your performance to look out and see your beloved pre being used as coaster for a pint of Guinness? Just a thought. If after thinking about all these things, you still want to patch in and bypass the board's pre's (and if it's okay with the soundman), you can use the insert return. This is more complicated than you might think, as some boards use unbalanced inserts (a la Mackie), that are ring return, whereas (more rarely) unbalanced inserts are tip return. Then you've got balanced TRS (separate send and return and XLR-M returns on the better boards. Do you (or the soundman) know if the board's insert returns are pre or post-EQ? You should know, or ask...to keep from making a silly request. Your soundguy should know, but maybe he does, maybe he doesn't. If you know, you can avoid the part where the green soundguy 'thinks' he's EQd the hell out of your vocals, but they're still muddy. Using your own preamp w/EQ would cover more scenarios. |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Gear Head Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 34
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2005 Location: good ol´germany
Posts: 1,553
|
Interesting points in this thread. I can say that whenever the PA and the location where good sounding i didn´t miss better preamps, since the consoles were appropriate. I´d lean towards bringing better compressors or reverbs whenever the the rest (console, PA, location) is ok. But well, all that has been mentioned before... (...and then there´s these guys that bring an SPL Goldmike and Neumann´s for the acoustic guitar and the sound guy isn´t even able to bring up the guitar without a huge feedback orgy...) |
| | |
| | #14 |
| one man, ONE mic pre Joined: Jan 2004 Location: New York
Posts: 2,303
|
Because she's used to hearing her voice through really good preamps in the studio, we carry an API for front-of-house and a Daking for monitors on the road with Cyndi Lauper.
__________________ William Wittman Producer/Engineer (Cyndi Lauper, Joan Osborne, The Fixx, The Outfield...) prorecordingworkshop.lefora.com thewombforums.com |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear Guru Joined: Jul 2004 Location: Orygun
Posts: 10,234
| You know that you can spoil musicians with monitors that are to good, don't you? The IEM is making monitor engineers work harder. I still don't know if you can justify an outboard pre-amp at most venues, though. The Focusrite-whatever-it-is was nice because it had a good EQ and compressor built in. But something that's _just_ a pre-amp? -tINY |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear addict Joined: Mar 2005 Location: Saskatoon SK, Canada
Posts: 346
|
Hey there. Been schlepping my GR MP2NV between by studio & stage. I use one channel for my vocal mic (Neumann KMS 105) and the other channel for my acoustic guitar. Both then go into a BSS DPR 402. The good news is that we have a reasonably nice front end system (EAW) - and I noticed the improvement right away. When we do gigs with other sound companies providing the front end - it's always fun to watch their reactions when I take the cover off my vocal/acoustic rack. Also - just to mess with the sound people who think they know everything - I have a Funk Logic piece mounted at the top of the rack. I like to demonstrate the effects of this unit - and watch them fall for the bait - then show them the back of the rack SparkyCanada |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Mar 2004 Location: Hawaii
Posts: 239
|
My last big gig on new year's eve we used my Quartet for the main act and my 737 sp for me as the opening act through a Soundcraft board (forgot which model). Not sure if I heard that much of a difference with the 737 but the Quartet did sound pretty sweet through the McCallay (sp?) speakers (forgot which amp). Forgive me for forgetting, I was drunk... Oh, but I do remember that we used the high end Shure wireless mics (forgot which model)...
|
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Nov 2005 Location: Europe
Posts: 270
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2005 Location: good ol´germany
Posts: 1,553
| Quote:
No seriously, that might work. You just have to keep in mind that you probably won´t have access to the preamp during the show - but a proper level setting during the soundcheck should work for your show... Then you might run a balanced line to a balanced insert (return) point on the console - to avoid the console´s built-in preamp. | |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2003 Location: Beantown
Posts: 2,462
| Quote:
I`m in a band and I wouldn`t even trust myself with that luxury. | |
| | |
| | #21 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2005 Location: Porto - Portugal
Posts: 718
|
I suppose there would be a difference, and sure it is possible. Is it really worth the trouble/risk? It depends... But do people really care? Common listeners are not freaks like us. They do actually listen to music, rather then gear. Having said that, one of these days you'll probably find me doing just that. Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________ Zé Nuno | |
| | |
| | #22 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2005 Location: good ol´germany
Posts: 1,553
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #23 | |
| Super Moderator Joined: Aug 2002 Location: NYC
Posts: 7,405
| Quote:
If you want to bring your favorite mic pre to your next live performance go for it. Plug the output to the line input of the desk. Hey, for that matter you can keep it onstage with you and feed it thru the snake or run your own cable if we want.
__________________ Steve Remote AuraSonicLtd.com the home of ASL Mobile & Location Production Remoteness on the Linkedin Network What about my Facebook Profile? Remoteness on Myspace | |
| | |
| | #24 | |
| Gear interested Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3
| Quote:
even with a good level set during rehearsals/sound check, there is always the possibility that some minor adjustments need to be made | |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Lives for gear | |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Gear interested Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 17
|
Hey,sorry for old thread will be doing sound for a small gig with 4 artists, was thinking of using focusrite Isa1 for vocals and acoustic guitar.. Not sure what desk i'll be using yet but i will know soon.. Is this a bad idea? will be recording also but preamp doesn't have a/d card. thanks, help much appreciated
|
| | |
| | #27 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,254
| Quote:
Yes, it can work if you also run FOH, or just split the mic so you can at least use the quality preamp for recording. | |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Lives for gear | Give the engineer a heads up that you'll be sending him/her a line level signal. They shouldn't bat an eye. Once you've got your levels set at sound-check, don't change them. Leave a little headroom so you can get louder throughout the show without overloading the recording or FOH. The ISA One will do you just fine. I have used a Focusrite ISA 220 for lead vocals on several occasions. Though it's time for me to move on: http://www.gearslutz.com/board/gears...ip-d-card.html |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,072
|
I did a system design two years ago where we put 16 channels of grace 801 in with a Soundcraft live 8. There's also a lunatec for live recordings, and several neumanns in the mic locker. The board and gear is used by everyone from the open-mic coffeehouse dudes to the headliners and occasional punk band. The A1 has discretion as to what bands may use the neumanns, but everyone goes through the sixteen channels of grace before they hit the soundcraft (via the insert return). Most folks visiting have been very pleased to see those racked 801s at FOH. I've never heard any complaints. If only they hadn't shoehorned FOH into the balcony... |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Looking for high quality mic stands.. | MikeMitchell | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 12th September 2006 10:39 PM |
| Whats the best mic for high quality broadcasting | cmbsounds | High end | 0 | 8th September 2006 02:52 AM |
| Good preamp for live gigs | mac black | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 6 | 4th February 2006 05:12 PM |
| what is a good high quality a/b-y splitter box? | maskedman72 | So much gear, so little time! | 6 | 11th June 2005 11:39 PM |
| High Quality Mic Pre Kits! | SeventhCircle | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 3rd March 2004 11:11 PM |
| |