![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Tags: advice observations enlightenment, beginners, technique |
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3
Thread Starter |
I'm interested in doing oral histories in the homes of friends. I have no gear and am starting from scratch. I don't want to hold a mic or pass it back and forth, but I do want my questions recorded. So, do I have a setup with two desktop mics- (one facing each person) or 1 interview mic between me and my interviewee? I don't think I want to record using the onboard mics of whatever portable recorder I buy. I'm having a hard time finding concrete advice about this online... Thanks!! |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2008 Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,554
|
In interviews, each person needs a mic. Or you can overdub your questions later. One shared, sitting by it self, will not cut it.
|
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2011 Location: Stroud,Glos,UK
Posts: 820
|
Of course they don't An overhead boom with a good card will easily cover two persons. An electric shaver on a boom or table top ditto. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2008 Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,554
|
Eehhhh....If you want it to sound professional, or unless you plan on conducting the interview while french kissing, better to stick with two mics. I've been in radio long enough to know that much at least.
|
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear |
One mic might work, if it is a figure-8 and each party is sitting in the center of one of the two lobes. I got that to work for me. But, two mics is safer.
__________________ Nov schmoz ka pop. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2009 Location: hull
Posts: 733
|
And one mic overhead might pick up the dog barking, the tv in the other room, mobile phones,the teenagers doing whatever they are doing in their rooms etc etc. 2 lapel mics for me I think. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear addict Joined: Sep 2006 Location: Portland OR USA
Posts: 300
| |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2011 Location: Stroud,Glos,UK
Posts: 820
|
Rubbish. A good cardioid split between 2 seated persons will be fine. This is radio not tele. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2009 Location: hull
Posts: 733
|
Always good to see a newbie getting sound advice on gearslutz, with everyone marching to the same drum,
|
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2008 Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,554
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2010 Location: The OC
Posts: 525
|
If you want your questions recorded for posterity or transcription, then one mic should be fine. If you want your questions to be part of the final product, you may need two mics. Try one mic first and see how it goes. Make sure not to step on their lines, as we do in everyday conversation...it makes editing a real hassle. Give a good pause before speaking after they finish...but tell them you're going to do that so that they don't think you're weird! Make sure to record around 30 seconds of "room tone" at every recording. Room tone is the sound of the room with no talking, used in editing. It's a very good habit to get into.
__________________ www.steinbachsound.com |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2010 Location: The OC
Posts: 525
| |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2011 Location: Stroud,Glos,UK
Posts: 820
|
American presenters seem to eat mikes Very testosteronne driven, discuss. A wide card overhead ,on a music stand, split between 2 ,on a table works fine. BBC Talks used 8's at eye level, but 8's are expensive. Main idea ,don't intimidate the talent. |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2004 Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,376
|
He might be able to get away with a fig 8 between them if they face each other. But pretty much what Rumley said - 2 decent mics close will sound better than a condenser far away. Especially for speech.
__________________ www.symphonicsound.com "The secret of life, though, is falling down seven times and get up eight times." Paulo Coelho |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2004 Location: Finland
Posts: 3,756
|
2 mics panned slightly and having the interviewer bit lower in the mix? Matti |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear |
Always two mics Don't screw around, don't be lazy. |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2008 Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,554
|
2 mics. Good wind padding, shockmount if able. A bumped table top can transfer alot of noise to a microphone.
|
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2005 Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,034
|
Two mics I would say. A boom operator could do it on one by swinging or turning the mic, but if it's an informal sit-down chat situation and you're setting the mics yourself, and not necessarily monitoring them throughout, use one each and put them down to separate tracks on a recorder. Then mix afterwards (typically muting any mics when they're not spoken into.... but listen and decide). It's funny, if in any doubt, I always mic the interviewer, even if they insist that they're not going to use the interviewers voice in the mix. A few years back, I recorded an interview with a rock star for some DVD extras (not filmed, audio-only. They used a montage of archive pictures on-screen), and the interviewer/producer told me "Oh no no no, I'm not going to be on the DVD, we're definitely going to edit the questions out so that it's only the artist you hear talking." So to keep things quick and simple (working very quickly in the artist's hotel room) I put up one good shotgun in the best place to pick up the artist. Then they made sure to get the artist to repeat the question in their reply, so that it would make sense without hearing the interviewer.... Some noise reduction to get rid of the aircon whoosh in the background. All sounded great. ...and then when the DVD came out, I discovered that they'd decided to use the WHOLE interview including the interviewer's voice (which of course was massively off-mic). Probably blamed the sound recordist (me). Don't believe what the idiots tell you, because they inevitably change their plans. Cover yourself. |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Lives for gear |
In the days of mono radio one bidirectional figure 8 microphone between two people seated at a table worked GREAT. Today no one wants to sit that close and so two cardioid microphones would be the way I would do it. FWIW and YMMV
__________________ -TOM- Thomas W. Bethel Managing Director Acoustik Musik, Ltd. Room with a View Productions Oberlin, OH 44074 www.acoustikmusik.com Doing what you love is freedom. Loving what you do is happiness. |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2011 Location: Stroud,Glos,UK
Posts: 820
|
8s great for radio The nulls perfect for script page turns Proximity brilliant. The BBC 4038 was a 50's general purpose mic for talks and music What a cracker, with a perfect presence lift and weight. Stereo killed em of, pity. A crossed pair could have covered a table full of talkers, now they eat dynamic mics and still don't sound as good. I love my MKH 30's, the modern equivalent of a 38, imho Use em in any situation I can. |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Voiding warranties Joined: Feb 2004 Location: beautiful Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 10,081
|
Get 2 lav's and clip one to each person's shirt. Be a pro, not a dolt. Watch Jay Leno for examples or Fox News (oh, the horror!) or even CNN. Even Lady Gaga can find a place to put one. That mic on Jay's desk is a prop BTW. |
| | |
| | #22 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Sep 2006 Location: Portland OR USA
Posts: 300
| Quote:
![]() And the mic on Letterman's desk is also a prop. (Although they seem to have it potted up slightly and/or gated so that you can hear when he beats on it with his pencil.) | |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2011 Location: Stroud,Glos,UK
Posts: 820
|
That was the mic that enabled NASA blast offs to be commented on live,something that eluded American Broadcasters previously...... The lip mike was BBC design for Footy and Sports Very effective Even used in vision! |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Gear interested Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3
Thread Starter | OP's final decision! (for now)
After hours of perusing on GS and many other forums, I've made a decision: Zoom H1 with splitter and two ATR-3350 lavs. Very low tech, and $150 for the entire rig. But I tested last night with great results. My guess is I will evolve/upgrade as I figure out what I need. For now, just going to do some informal oral histories and give CDs to my interviewees...... |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Gear addict Joined: Sep 2006 Location: Portland OR USA
Posts: 300
| |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2011 Location: Stroud,Glos,UK
Posts: 820
|
They distorted badly. The best take off I saw on tele was with James Burke He walked down the side of aTitan(?) doing a piece to camera about vacum flasks ,reached the engine ventura and said' the end result is this' and aTitan took off the pad behind him. Great timing (he had Nasa command in an earpiece feed) and professionalism. He wasnt on a lip mic just an ECM 50 but he was at the NASA museum site some miles away . I was at a night time pool party for another launch ,that was great fun,and noisy as hell. PS just found it on the tube, there is a cut.... but its still v clever and cool.http://www.youtube.com/view_play_lis...571&playnext=1 |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Gear Head Joined: Dec 2006 Location: London, UK
Posts: 41
|
In this situation I'd use 2 cardioid mics with pop shields on stands, set up fairly close to each person, facing each other, but ideally without a table in the middle, as there might be additional reflections from that. I'd close mic, as the room acoustics are probably far from ideal, so I don't want the room sound or background noises. It's much easier to balance the levels later if both voices are on different tracks. The interviewee is likely to be much less disciplined in staying on mic and their levels will probably vary a fair amount.
|
| | |