Wireless advice? - Page 2 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: , ,

Wireless advice?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22nd September 2011   #31
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: San Francisco area
Posts: 2,422

Quote:
Originally Posted by aracu View Post
I like your "buried crackling electret" sound imagery.

I find the mix of lav and boom to usually sound less coherent than one or the other, although it is an accepted norm.
This can be made to work very well with some experience, and it is done all the time on movie and episodic audio. In post I rarely if ever mix lav and boom on the same voice, having the lavs iso'ed is about choices and being able to make fixes gracefully and fast.

phil p
philper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2011   #32
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 850

Quote:
Originally Posted by philper View Post
This can be made to work very well with some experience, and it is done all the time on movie and episodic audio. In post I rarely if ever mix lav and boom on the same voice, having the lavs iso'ed is about choices and being able to make fixes gracefully and fast. phil p
Although I prefer the ADR approach on narrative films with a substantial budget for postproduction sound, the lav approach uses a real recording of the moment in which the scene was shot, and allows for a faster workflow.

ADR is a more drawn out and artificial process. If it is done in short fragments of dialogue, in an unhurried, relaxed setting, most actors including children will do a fine, convincing job of lip synching.

There are even some good examples of ADR in classic analogue films. The 400 Blows was made entirely in ADR and uses many child actors. There are also good examples from classic analogue days of films shot entirely with a boom mic in cities (Crime Wave etc.).

If a director plans on making a film with an emphasis of boom / ADR
as opposed to boom / lavs, the production stage of the film can be less
complicated. The post production will take a little longer.
aracu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2011   #33
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Location: Stroud,Glos,UK
Posts: 820

ADR can now be good
But the concept does not configure to me
Performance is compromised
In the BBC we were taught to record a dialog premix
Not a guide track, or to acquire multiple tracks.
This is now quaintly old fashioned I fear.
Bumpkin
Rolo 46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th October 2011   #34
Lives for gear
 
Henchman's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: LA, USA
Posts: 6,836

In my experience, the original performance will always be preferable over ADR, if it can be made to work..
Wether it's recorded by boom, lav or 2 tin cans and a string.
Henchman is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:18 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.