Stage Bleed into Vocal Mic: Clearing things up...? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: , , , ,

Stage Bleed into Vocal Mic: Clearing things up...?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th September 2011   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3

Thread Starter
Question Stage Bleed into Vocal Mic: Clearing things up...?

Hey Everyone,

So I've been having some issues with stage bleed and feedback into the Sennheiser e935 that my band's lead singer has been using and would like to clear something up..

Essentially, I did some "Google-ing"/searching around and have yet to find any trends to suggest that this particular mic has significant bleed issues, but I can't honestly recall an instance where I've experienced worse rejection with a live vocal mic.
What I am left wondering is whether I've simply forgotten that other common mics like the SM/Beta 58 are just as bad or worse, if this particular unit is a lemon, or if anyone else has in fact experienced terrible rejection/bleed/feedback with this mic???

(Notes: Rock band situation leaning toward heavier styles. Some moderate amounts of compression used on vocal mics. The N/Dyn967 that I use on background vocals and some lead sections is compressed to all heck and causes essentially no feedback/issues by comparison.)
stringsibanez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2011   #2
Lives for gear
 
huub's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: amsterdam
Posts: 1,208

An SM58 CAN be just as bad if a singer sings very softly and/or not close to the mic in combination with a loud band..
With this combination you're screwed anyways..
But an SM58 is a safe choice nonetheless, so are some Audix mics, designed for very loud environments..
huub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2011   #3
Lives for gear
 
AlexK's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Cardiff & Bath, UK
Posts: 1,344

The off-axis response of the Sennheisers is much smoother than the SM58 in my experience, and yes you do get more spill from the stage/audience, but it's easier to mix in as it actually sounds half decent unlike the SM58 which sounds bloody terrible off-axis (and on-axis for that matter).
__________________
Alex

Twitter
AlexK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2011   #4
Lives for gear
 
cheu78's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 1,251

don't compress so hard...
or get a Telefunken M80, afaik has a great rejection..

I don't do hard rock or metal stuff (usually), but when I use compressors for live vox is just for controlling a bit the peaks... like 3-5 db max.. but hey that's me..

just my 0.02$,

Bests

Cheu
__________________

www.masterdaelion.com
A new, breaktrough way of reading your music scores.


"If you want to be given everything, give everything up"

www.qtrio.ch

www.studio21.ch

Quote:
We're only as good as the musicians we keep; the same goes for the musicians. - Remoteness
cheu78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2011   #5
Lives for gear
 
hbphotoav's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Location: NashVegas
Posts: 1,044

More info would be good. What, in particular, is the worst offender... Guitar amps, snare, cymbal wash... What?

We mitigate cymbal wash on a short stage with a drum shield, further by putting the BGVs on dynamics (Audix OM-2 and/or SM58), and guitar amp wash by moving the amps to the wings and baffling with acoustic panels.

These remedies work well for us, but might be non-starters for you. As a rule though, mics with smooth off-axis response coupled with extended HF sensitivity (IOW, most high end vocal condensers) will be much more suceptible to cymbal wash... Loud guitar amps will saturate a small room all by themselves and bleed into everything not gated to death.

Finally, it's never too late to train, cajole or mentor a vocalist into good, basic on-stage mic technique. Like, stay on-axis, stay close, sing loud (especially if the band is cooking) and don't point the mic straight into the wedge when you relax.

Basic stuff, but important stuff.

HTH

HB
__________________
Harry Butler
Photography • Videography • Audio Visual Production
www.harrybutlerphotoav.com
hbphotoav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2011   #6
Lives for gear
 
perform/record's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: earth
Posts: 538

Send a message via ICQ to perform/record
Look at the Audix OM-7.
perform/record is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2011   #7
Gear interested
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3

Thread Starter
Hey, thanks for the replies so far...

As far as stage bleed goes, I would say that cymbal wash is consistently the worst of the offenders, but there is still a good deal more of everything in that Sennheiser than there is in the vocal mic that I use (and I am certainly compressed to an equal or likely greater degree).

For me, the real issue is that on top of the separation issue (which primarily affects the vocalist's in-ear mix), the mic seems excessively prone to feedback.. What caught me off-guard was how many reviews of this mic seemed to mention that is worked well in loud venues, cut through, and didn't cause feedback...

Personally I think it causes a ridiculous level of feedback, but I might be fooling myself. It's a hard comparison since the EV I use is specifically designed to reduce feedback and reject signals that aren't just off-axis, but are any distance away on-axis as well.
stringsibanez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2011   #8
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 189

I think you need to keep in mind that there is nothing magic about any particular microphone. They all use the same physics principles, and it simply comes down to a combination of polar pattern, sensitivity, and frequency response. A particular mic may have a combination that works better in a certain situation, singer, setup, but there is nothing magic.

Really you just need to understand the characteristics of the mics you are using and know how to best utilize them. You and the singer need to use the tools correctly for what they are. Know the polar pattern and frequency response characteristics. Sometimes you need to have a technical discussion with a singer to understand their mic. Like about the back lobe on a supercardiod and how to best avoid it.

Steve Remoteness here has some subtle brilliance for using the right thing in the right way, and his work speaks for itself. He has no magic toys, in fact he advocates some rather pedestrian mics. But he knows exactly how to get what he wants out of each.

The only mic I know of that has had any sort of different physics principle involved, was the now defunct Crown Differoid series. Some people swore by those and could get amazing results. Others said otherwise. But obviously they didn't gain enough popularity.

And lastly, you may need to deal with stage acoustics. Fixing a couple glaring problems can do a lot more than a locker full of mics.

Nathan
locutus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2011   #9
Lives for gear
 
12ax7's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,139

Quote:
Originally Posted by locutus View Post

[...]
Fixing a couple glaring problems can do a lot more than a locker full of mics.
.

.
12ax7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2011   #10
Gear interested
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3

Thread Starter
I feel like it may have been helpful to have mentioned that there are no wedges whatsoever on the stages, or at rehearsals as we are all using wireless In-Ear-Monitoring systems. Somehow it slipped my mind when I made my initial post.. chalk it up to a late hour and being overly used to something..
stringsibanez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #11
Gear interested
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5

Hey man, don't know if this post is still active or not but I've been noticing some serious feedback issues with the e935's I've come in contact with. I'm FOH at an "acoustically challenged" mid-size venue, and I swear I thought my board was freaking out until I deduced the common thread being the e935's that people would bring in. I have this room pretty chopped, you really have to in order to have a functional show, and these are the only mics I have seen that have this problem, and honestly it's pretty severe. And random. I can completely ring out wedges and the room, and this thing will still feedback. I'm searching the interwebs myself to see if anyone else has this problem. It's a shame because I usually swear by Sennheiser, great products all around but there has got to be something wrong with these mics for them to exhibit this behavior. But, like I said, nothing else (including really awful wireless mics) has been this bad, so in this case, switching mics should fix the situation. Best of luck!
Frobog is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
How can i minimalise cymbal bleed into my snare mic beau_mckee So much gear, so little time! 43 31st May 2010 05:25 PM
What headphones have the least bleed into a mic? Curtis Day So much gear, so little time! 14 28th April 2010 07:34 AM
Headphonemix bleeds into Guitar´s Humbucker??? RoyalRichmen instruments, guitar, bass, amps 3 29th January 2010 02:54 PM
Wanna clear some things up once and for all! phillis Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc 15 25th December 2009 04:48 PM
Recording problem w/ Acid, beat bleeds into vocals even w/ headphones plugged in BalsamEtheridge Low End Theory 2 14th October 2008 07:57 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:18 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.