Inside the grand piano: close miking techniques - Page 4 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: , , , ,

Inside the grand piano: close miking techniques

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th May 2011   #91
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Spearritt View Post
These pictures demonstrate clearly why you shouldn't mike in the near field to a planar sound source. Acoustic guitar is not unlike a piano soundboard.
BBC News - In Pictures: Stringed theory
Wow! Nice find!
chris319 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2011   #92
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492

I have just ordered one of these for my closed-lid miking dilemma:

CBL 99

I like that it is lightweight (56 g). I'm not so skittish now about using blue painter's tape to tape it to the inside of a piano lid using eight strips of tape in an octagonal configuration.
chris319 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2011   #93
Lives for gear
 
hbphotoav's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Location: NashVegas
Posts: 1,049

Just curious... unless the price was the determining factor... why would you choose the attached AKG CBL-99 FR over the DPA 4060/61 (see at: omni capsule question Post #11) ?

Off-axis response is pretty much identical... but +10dB at 7K...? Thatsalotsa "air"...
Attached Thumbnails
Inside the grand piano: close miking techniques-image126894ba21d6861251.jpg  
__________________
Harry Butler
Photography • Videography • Audio Visual Production
www.harrybutlerphotoav.com
hbphotoav is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2011   #94
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492

Four reasons:

1. Price

2. Price

3. Price

4. It is a non-paying gig and I'm treating it more as an experiment than anything. I wanted to try something specifically designed as a boundary mic.
chris319 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2011   #95
Lives for gear
 
hbphotoav's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Location: NashVegas
Posts: 1,049

Kewell. Let us know what you think...
hbphotoav is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2011   #96
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492

I have a Crown PZM-30D I could press into service but it is not light in weight, and it has one of the best Live Performance Detectors in the industry. If I'm using light-tack blue painter's tape to hold it on during a live performance ...
chris319 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2011   #97
Lives for gear
 
John Willett's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 5,291

Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by hbphotoav View Post
Just curious... unless the price was the determining factor... why would you choose the attached AKG CBL-99 FR over the DPA 4060/61 (see at: omni capsule question Post #11) ?

Off-axis response is pretty much identical... but +10dB at 7K...? Thatsalotsa "air"...
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris319 View Post
Four reasons:

1. Price

2. Price

3. Price

4. It is a non-paying gig and I'm treating it more as an experiment than anything. I wanted to try something specifically designed as a boundary mic.
I was surprised how inexpensive the DPA kit was - about £600 for the complete stereo kit when I asked a few weeks ago.
__________________
John Willett
Sound-Link ProAudio Ltd.
Circle Sound Services

President - Fédération Internationale des Chasseurs de Sons

(and lots more - please look at my Profile)
John Willett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2011   #98
Gear nut
 
Bechstein's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Location: Spain
Posts: 113

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Willett View Post
I was surprised how inexpensive the DPA kit was - about £600 for the complete stereo kit when I asked a few weeks ago.
Same price in the EU. I'm even considering buying a set.
Bechstein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th May 2011   #99
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492

Quote:
Originally Posted by hbphotoav View Post
Just curious... unless the price was the determining factor... why would you choose the attached AKG CBL-99 FR over the DPA 4060/61 (see at: omni capsule question Post #11) ?

Off-axis response is pretty much identical... but +10dB at 7K...? Thatsalotsa "air"...
OK Harry, you talked me out of it. I have cancelled the order for the AKG boundary mic and have ordered an omnidirectional one of these. It only has a 5 dB bump! The price is comparable.

http://www.shure.com/idc/groups/publ...o_mx391_ug.pdf

If it doesn't sound good it's YOUR fault!
chris319 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th May 2011   #100
Lives for gear
 
hbphotoav's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Location: NashVegas
Posts: 1,049

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris319 View Post
OK Harry, you talked me out of it. I have cancelled the order for the AKG boundary mic and have ordered an omnidirectional one of these. It only has a 5 dB bump! The price is comparable.

http://www.shure.com/idc/groups/publ...o_mx391_ug.pdf

If it doesn't sound good it's YOUR fault!
I would be happy to accept blame if you'd ordered a DPA4061 and were not satisfied that IT sounded good in this application... I'd also likely offer to buy it from you since I think it might make for a cool, lightweight Decca tree. I've never used the Shure... but since the sound pressure level inside a concert grand piano can exceed 130 dB SPL peak 20 cm (8") over the strings (refer to: http://www.dpamicrophones.com/en/Mic...and-Piano.aspx )... the MX391's somewhat anemic "Maximum Sound Pressure Level (1 kHz at 1% Total Harmonic Distortion, 1 kΩ load)
Cardioid: 118.8 dB Supercardioid: 117.5 dB Omnidirectional: 110.7 dB " may leave you wanting the AT851RO's (which I own) 132dB, or, for a decent amount of headroom, the 4061's 144dB max before clipping.

I'm really not chiding you, or trying to force my choice upon you or anyone else. But I also hate to see money spent twice... and the DPAs are truly amazing mics. I'm going to try my pair on rack and floor toms tomorrow, to see if I can get a sweeter cymbal sound than we get through the "usual" Audix pair...



HB

Late edit: Here are up to 10 4061s with LEMO connectors for $150 each...

http://cgi.ebay.com/DPA-Microphones-...#ht_500wt_1156

MicroDot connectors are available for $99 here...

http://cgi.ebay.com/DPA-DAD6001BC-Mi...#ht_1581wt_907

$250 for a 4061 and MicroDot... sounds like a deal to me...
hbphotoav is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 30th May 2011   #101
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492

I'll have a Crown PZM-30D along in case the Shure doesn't work out. The Crown can take 150 dB SPL. As I said, I'm treating the mic in the piano basically as an experiment and it's plan "B" anyway. I can't be damaging the finish of a rented instrument and I can't have the mic go ker-plop during a live concert. And I can't have the lid open (unless the conductor changes her mind). The last time I did this, the lid was going to be open in a phone conversation with her the week before, then it was closed the day of. I wound up putting a mic on a low stand beneath the piano on the wrong side of the sound board. Suffice it to say, the sound was nothing to be proud of.

If there is an opening in the lid near the hammers, behind the desk where the sheet music is propped up, I will aim a Rode NT-1A at that opening. That is plan "A".
chris319 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th May 2011   #102
Lives for gear
 
hbphotoav's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Location: NashVegas
Posts: 1,049

Cool. At any rate, and especially if you need to use the PZM, have a fresh roll of 2" PermaCel ShurTape or ProGaff genuine gaffer tape (or its $20/roll equivalent in SoCal) as well as the paper painter tape. If you're concerned about the metal surface of the Crown, use the painter tape to cover the bottom, and use four 18" strips of gaff to tape it to the lid, once you've determined where you want it. I like about 18" behind the hammers, and centered (or cheated toward the bass strings, if anything) on 5' and 7' grands.

In 20 years of doing shows with closed grand pianos (some with RadioShack PZMs, some with Crown PZMs, some with AT851s, and most - recently - with 4061s) I have NEVER had an issue with either PermaCel or the ProGaff I source at Tour Supply here in Nashville. Never. Even through a week of rehearsal followed by a week of shows. Never an issue.

Truly... good luck, and break a leg.

HB
hbphotoav is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 30th May 2011   #103
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492

In reading the PZM patent (which has expired):

Pressure recording process and device - Google Patents

two properties of a proper boundary mic are that a) the diaphragm be parallel to the boundary, and b) that it be just a few millimeters away from the boundary (the piano lid being the boundary). Does the DPA 4061 satisfy both of these requirements? Of course if you're getting satisfactory recordings it's really a moot point.

Listening to the last recording I made of this group, one of my problems seems to have been the piano bleeding into the stage mic used for soloists. There's another problem to solve. Keep in mind that this is a YOUTH symphony. The playing -- let's not talk about that
chris319 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2011   #104
Gear nut
 
Bechstein's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Location: Spain
Posts: 113

Thread Starter
And what about this ?

Blue Microphones | Ferras
Attached Thumbnails
Inside the grand piano: close miking techniques-captura-de-pantalla-2011-06-11-las-02.14.03.jpg  
Bechstein is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
FUNNIEST CLOSE MIKING video YOU HAVE EVER SEEN (wait till the end)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! meymia So much gear, so little time! 45 2nd April 2009 04:00 AM
Grand Piano: Petrof PII or Kawai RX-6 Christof High end 8 4th March 2008 01:50 PM
Live Recording has less bleed on close miking.. Ribbonmicguy Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 21 10th November 2007 02:31 PM
Is Schoeps MK4 good also for close miking in the studio ? ISedlacek Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 26 1st June 2007 01:53 PM
Okay, Who Close Miked Drums First? Mark So much gear, so little time! 8 3rd September 2005 07:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:09 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.