Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording

Tags:

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tascam or Radar,,,whats the difference? PT User Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 77 18th June 2007 10:52 AM
Tascam X48 for Remote Recording... crogersmod Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 63 5th April 2007 04:43 AM
otari radar VS IZ radar noequipment High end 10 19th January 2007 05:34 PM
Tascam DM24 vs Tascam M5000 Gaston69 So much gear, so little time! 3 11th July 2006 06:55 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 5th February 2006, 06:57 PM   #1
JOHN
Gear addict
 
JOHN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: LONDON
Posts: 303
Talking Radar V or Tascam X48 ?

Hi gearslutz People,
Which do you think is good for the money Radar V or Tascam X48 ?
JOHN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2006, 07:29 PM   #2
Dr. Nutz
Gear maniac
 
Dr. Nutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 260
just basing my opinion on customer/client psycology...the name "Tascam" might drive more people away than it brings in. Most people associate Radar systems with very high quality (almost analog-esque) HDR systems.

ive never used the X48, so dont interpret this post as saying that the X48 is of low quality, because i cant attest to that.
Dr. Nutz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2006, 07:51 PM   #3
drew
Lives for gear
 
drew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Maryland,USA
Posts: 2,282
without a doubt, buy the Radar. a little lite on the feature set compared to DAWs but an awesome product with great support from a great company. i bought one of the first Radar24s off the line in 2000 and used it for 4 years. turns out a DAW suited my needs better but it was a cool box. not to mention Tascams track record for support suck big time.
__________________
Drew Mazurek
Artist Direct Page

Mixing ITB? Just because you're not good at it, doesn't mean it sucks.
drew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2006, 08:33 PM   #4
everyday
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Midtown, NYC
Posts: 276
Hi?

I don't know much about the Radar but I know something about Tascam in general...

Tascam always comes up with great idea. However, they end up with cheap build quality....

I have four Tascam products. Everything is great for the first time, but one year later, almost all of them are broken or not working properly...

Oh, I don't have the X-48... One of the beta testers once said that it was simply good and convenient.

T...
__________________
Good day!!!
everyday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2006, 08:44 PM   #5
jdunn
Head of Bumping Security (B.S)
 
jdunn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: in the hills of Southern California
Posts: 2,695
I always had good luck with their (Tascam) Portastudios back in the day, but the digital stuff has been somewhat less reliable. DA78HR's had some problems, so I traded for an MX2424. That was a good machine, but it took them forever to come up with the editing software, so I got rid of it.

My first DV-RA1000 had a bad switch, the power button! The second one works fine. It's a little slow to work with, and I've had a few failed discs. But as long as I'm patient waiting for the DVD drive to access, get ready to record, enter USB mode, etc.... it's usually not a problem.

It does sound pretty good.
__________________
Jason Dunn
5 Sonic Productions
jdunn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2006, 09:13 PM   #6
davedarling
Gear maniac
 
davedarling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: west coast yo
Posts: 170
The Radar stuff is first rate - some of the Tascam stuff is great (mx2424 - solid ,sounds good)

The difference in support is huge - Tascam is in my opinion one of the worst companies ever for stranding customers, vaporware, and shitty OS uprades.

I've yet to hear a bad word about Radar systems.

good luck - dave darling
davedarling is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2006, 09:29 PM   #7
Meriphew
Lives for gear
 
Meriphew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Seattle USA
Posts: 2,176
I'd take one of the Radar's over ten of the Tascams without a second thought.
__________________
www.myspace.com/meriphew
Meriphew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2006, 11:36 PM   #8
Adebar
Gear addict
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 445
Is the X-48 already available?
Adebar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2006, 12:44 AM   #9
Mike O
Lives for gear
 
Mike O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 693
Nope. Not according to Steve Remote . According to Steve, who I believe ordered more than one, Tascam is currently one year behind the promised shipping date given to him last year.

As Steve points out, much better to be late and EVERYTHING work than to be what Tascam has been for a while now in addition to late to the party.....late with support, and early to abandon it's customers.
Mike O is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2006, 12:50 AM   #10
mixerguy
Lives for gear
 
mixerguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,987
Quote:
Originally Posted by davedarling
..... (snip) ....some of the Tascam stuff is great (mx2424 - solid ,sounds good) ......

Um - the MX2424 = "solid"?

Not in my experience. I was a power user of it at one point - and it could be VERY frustrating and buggy. I worked very closely with Tascam. Big hassle. Not solid.

Go for Radar, without a doubt. (Yes, I have used them a bunch too)

YMMV
mixerguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2006, 01:09 AM   #11
No4PCs
Lives for gear
 
No4PCs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Brasil
Posts: 714
for the price !

For the price , Tascam !
But when it arrives, ppl will make reviews.
I think 48 channels 48/96khz resolution is very good tool. If the machine work fine and have pieces to fix, ok. Tascam claim this machine can fly too , e.
Lets see , friends !
__________________
"Be not fond of the dull smoke-colored light from hell." - Tibetan Book of the Dead

Last edited by No4PCs; 6th February 2006 at 01:11 AM. Reason: first time i did write wrong...
No4PCs is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2006, 01:15 AM   #12
synthetic
Gear maniac
 
synthetic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 202
X-48 doesn't ship until May. I don't think there are any beta testers yet, either. You might want to reserve judgement until they actually begin production.
synthetic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2006, 05:45 AM   #13
DaveH
Gear maniac
 
DaveH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 288
Thumbs down Tascam

My experience, my comment:

Unless Tascam changes their colors over night I would not have anything to do with a X-48.
For me it doesn’t matter how “great” the product may be. Tascam support has been bottom of the barrel.

I have a pair of DM-24’s and a pair of MX-2424s. Also GigaStudio 3.
The support for ALL of this has been a pain in the %$#@*.

I would drop GigaStudio in a heartbeat if I hadn’t bought a dedicated computer and about $8,000 in sampled software.
( VSL Pro is just one of the packages).

If fact last time I got support for GigaStudio3 they were insulting.
It took 30 minutes to get routed to tech support. Then 2 hours 40 minutes to
get someone in tech support only to get routed back to a “secretary type” person
who could barely be bothered to get the right “code” for an upgrade from one version
of gigastudio to another.

(Edit: Yes BCGOOD, GigaStudio crashes on a regular basis.
But it crahes less often with a dedicated computer with NOTHING else on it).

If this was an isolated experience I would have over looked it.
But I have not had ONE pleasant experience with Tascam.
(To date no other company has been worse to deal with.)

Tascam dropped support of the MX-2424s at the hint of the new X-48.
(About a year ago, and the X-48 has not shipped).

I would look toward another company for better support.

Just my opinion.

p.s I am arranging a demo of the Radar V.
Check the threads, their support is reported as great.
__________________
Anything that is too stupid to be spoken is sung - Voltaire
DaveH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2006, 06:11 AM   #14
bcgood
Lives for gear
 
bcgood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: West Coast
Posts: 2,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveH
My experience, my comment:

Unless Tascam changes their colors over night I would not have anything to do with a X-48.
For me it doesn’t matter how “great” the product may be. Tascam support has been bottom of the barrel.

I have a pair of DM-24’s and a pair of MX-2424s. Also GigaStudio 3.
The support for ALL of this has been a pain in the %$#@*.

I would drop GigaStudio in a heartbeat if I hadn’t bought a dedicated computer and about $8,000 in sampled software.
( VSL Pro is just one of the packages).

If fact last time I got support for GigaStudio3 they were insulting.
It took 30 minutes to get routed to tech support. Then 2 hours 40 minutes to
get someone in tech support only to get routed back to a “secretary type” person
who could barely be bothered to get the right “code” for an upgrade from one version
of gigastudio to another.

If this was an isolated experience I would have over looked it.
But I have not had ONE pleasant experience with Tascam.
(To date no other company has been worse to deal with.)

Tascam dropped support of the MX-2424s at the hint of the new X-48.
(About a year ago, and the X-48 has not shipped).

I would look toward another company for better support.

Just my opinion.

p.s I am arranging a demo of the Radar V.
Check the threads, their support is reported as great.

Interesting feedback on Gigastudio. It's supposed to have great sounding samples that play at low latency, directly from the hard drive. When I demoed it on my computer it caused it to crash. I'm really leaning towards a strictly out board gear set up...

As far as Tascam goes I use one of there soundcards and I like it. It has never gone down on me once, (ok once but it had a lot to drink that night). As far as color goes, eq your own color. You can feel it all over, just like music.

bcgood
bcgood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2006, 06:40 AM   #15
everyday
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Midtown, NYC
Posts: 276
Quote:
Originally Posted by synthetic
X-48 doesn't ship until May. I don't think there are any beta testers yet, either. You might want to reserve judgement until they actually begin production.
Mr. Farrow at Tascam forum have used one for Tascam...

BTW, oh yeah... OS upgrade for their digital stuff is real slow...

P.S I already spent $700 include shipping to repair my DM-24... I hope they come up with a solid one this time...
__________________
Good day!!!
everyday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2006, 06:46 AM   #16
midnightsun
Lives for gear
 
midnightsun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Alaska
Posts: 813
RADAR VS TASCAM

I personally own a RADAR II (Otari) and and a number of TASCAM products. I purchased a TASCAM SX1 that was released with a tremendous hype. It was supposed to be their flag ship digital recording solution. I must say that the SX1 is a hell of a rig and I really have liked it....BUT.... midstream TASCAM dropped the SX1 like a hot potatoe. TASCAM FAILED.... AND I SAY FAILED TO LIVE UP TO THEIR PROMISES. I still have the origional brochure that made the promises of what the SX1 would do. TASCAM stopped upgrading the software and they never did allow me to jump to 96K which was a big selling point for me. On the other hand TASCAM gear is relatively cheap and you get a pretty big bang for your buck. I am going to get a DV RA1000 but I think I know what to expect. TASCAM converters are very much consumer quality.

Now for RADAR. Though I purchased my RADAR in the olden days from Otari the folks at iZ have been stellar.... these guys set the gold standard for customer service. The RADAR converters are music to my ear.... I love em. Also, in the 8 years I have owned the RADAR it has NEVER crashed.. and I don't use the term NEVER lightly. The RADAR is the rock. I am considering upgrading to a RADAR SNyquist. I consider my time to be valuable and a downed machine eats any savings of getting the cheaper solution.

The only circumstances underwhich I would consider the TASCAM 48 is if I had a chance to spend a few days with one in full function. I would use my ear and learn exactly what it was capable to doing. I would absolutely not believe anything TEAC says or even prints regarding what is supposed to do.

Many people would consider RADAR converters to be upper class. If you add up the cost of 24 AD and DA converters that are upper class quality that just about equals the cost of a RADAR V. Not only can the RADAR stand on its own as a hard disc recorder but it can be linked directly to a DAW AES or TDIF and provide a front end of 24 great AD converters if you like to work inside of the box.

Keep in mind that the RADAR simply works as a recorder that allows one to edit. You get 24 and you get 24 out. No mixing inside of the box, no plugins, no automation, no EQ, no dynamics. With the TASCAM you get alot of hype.

If the TASCAM were anything more than vapor it would be out already. I think there must be problems with it because it was promised a long time ago. I don't think that they have hit the street yet.

Check out the the unoffical TASCAM forum http://tascamforums.com/ and you can see there is a topic for the 48. The folks that frequent the Tascam forums are a great group and are the saving grace for the Tascam products.

Well, I guess I got that off my chest!
midnightsun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2006, 08:30 AM   #17
GYang
Lives for gear
 
GYang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Moscow
Posts: 2,643
Giga Studio 3.0 works, but is not 100% reliable (even on dedicated machine). I don't face crashes, bit some strange behaviour is quite normal for it.
To avoid risk, very often I use old samples in old way (Kurzweil etc.)

TASCAM SUCKS BADLY !

And it does not belong to high end forum at all.
GYang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2006, 06:40 PM   #18
peter-pan
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 144
I heard CBC Montréal had a night mare of a problem with their new Radar system.
Do you happen to know someone who has a X-48?

Do you know that the Fostex D2424LV can record 8 tracks at once at 24 bits 96K and you can sync/chase as many recorders as you would like together?

JF
peter-pan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2006, 06:49 PM   #19
Mike O
Lives for gear
 
Mike O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 693
I would be MOST interested to know what kind of difficulties CBC had with Radar. Most responders to this thread have discussed their personnal experiences. I would not want to imply CBC did not have problems, but I do have a problem hearsay.

Details please.
Mike O is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2006, 07:28 PM   #20
trident fan
Gear addict
 
trident fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 320
radar tascam
trident fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2006, 07:30 PM   #21
midnightsun
Lives for gear
 
midnightsun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Alaska
Posts: 813
Hear say

I think that it is not unreasonable to comment on what someone heard about someone or something and appreciate that it is kept in context. iZ RADAR is one of a handful of companies that sets the Gold Standard for product quality and customer service. I can say this from personal first hand experience.
midnightsun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2006, 07:36 PM   #22
MIKEHARRIS
Lives for gear
 
MIKEHARRIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MIAMI FLA
Posts: 1,291
Even tho we are no longer iZ dealers...i hafta say the RADAR...these folks live and breathe their product..with excellent communication and support
__________________
harrisaudiosystems.com
MIKEHARRIS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2006, 01:08 AM   #23
Snatchman
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,656
Well....I have some Tascam gear. All analog! The thing that bugs me about this ( X-48), why would you promote releasing a product ( especially digital, etc.) but release it 1-2 years later! Now it's basically obsolete! Especially the way digital, software, etc. changes seeminly overnite!..(YMMV)......
__________________
Thanks for your time and ears!
Snatchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2006, 02:01 AM   #24
mcguin
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: de ilands mon
Posts: 125
Radar or tascam??

Please don't take this the wrong way but if you have to ask - then you don't get it. The two are not even in the same league. As a recorder, the RADAR is so far ahead of any other hard disc system - support, sonics, stability, support, sonics, support, ease of use, stability, support, easy learning curve, sonics, stability, support. Get the idea??

In all seriousnes - for what it is, there is nothing that comes close.
mcguin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2006, 02:39 AM   #25
Bridge Audio
Gear interested
 
Bridge Audio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 17
Yeah, the price is a big one. 4x as expensive? I'm not sure.

But, I've used RADAR for 1 1/2 years now and I have to say it works really nice. If you're used to analog signal and flow, then this is super easy.

And the A/D convertors are high end, yada yada,

-Go RADAR

(started in Vancouver, BC)
Bridge Audio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2006, 02:46 AM   #26
TER
Gear maniac
 
TER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Newburyport, MA, USA
Posts: 166
Every day, all day, while my RADAR machine chugs along peacefully, there next to the tracking settings, meters and track data on my LCD screen is the number for tech support. I've called three times in four years, gotten a real person immediately every time, and had my issue solved in less than 10 minutes each time.

I use the converters as the front and back end to a DAW via TDIF, and as a master clock. It works great. I don't think you could buy 48 converters of this quality for less than the price of the entire machine.

My Tascam CDRW402 has never failed me, my Tascam CD701 broadcast cd players were solid... but they, like Sony and many other companies have to hit the top and bottom of the market. Some stuff will work forever, some stuff will die quickly under heavy use.

IZ is a boutique company, they do one thing, sell it a very good price, and stand behind it completely. I thoroughly believe that you cannot go wrong with a RADAR machine if it serves your needs.

-tom
__________________
thomas eaton recording
acoustic music specialist
thomas eaton recording
newburyport, ma
(978) 465-5102
TER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2006, 03:24 AM   #27
No4PCs
Lives for gear
 
No4PCs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Brasil
Posts: 714
Talking hahahaha

Quote:
Originally Posted by peter-pan
Sorry for the size...it is an accident!
Hahahaha, funny !!
__________________
"Be not fond of the dull smoke-colored light from hell." - Tibetan Book of the Dead
No4PCs is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2006, 03:41 AM   #28
Ziggy!!
Lives for gear
 
Ziggy!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,320
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcguin
Please don't take this the wrong way but if you have to ask - then you don't get it.

It is an interesting statement considering the tascam isn't even shipping yet. In all aspects this makes it nothing short of a very valid question...
Ziggy!! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2006, 04:58 AM   #29
thesteve
Gear maniac
 
thesteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 268
I use a Radar with Nyquist and I have never heard another digital system that sounds better. Even when it was the classic converters it still sounded awesome, so its hard to go wrong. In 3 years I have had 3 crashes total, but never lost any audio files so it is definately rock solid. It is easy to get Cubase to lock to it as well. Also, if you are thinking of buying one and you are in the states get hold of a Canadian dealer and have them ship it down to you. The prices up there are so much cheaper (its a Canadian product) and most stores will ship it to the US if you pay for UPS.
thesteve is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2006, 12:25 PM   #30
JOHN
Gear addict
 
JOHN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: LONDON
Posts: 303
Thanks to all for your comments but Radar V does not have any virtual tracks and you cannot use a mouse for editing it also costs $21,000. I called tascam and they told me the X48 will only cost $5,000 and has Time-stamped Broadcast WAVE file format
Workstation/Mixing:Turn-key operation: no software conflicts to troubleshoot
Graphic user interface for editing, mixing, plug-ins and meters
48-channel mixing at 96kHz / 24 channels at 192kHz
32-bit floating point mixer resolution
6 stereo returns (60 inputs at mixdown)
24 busses, 6 aux sends, stereo master buss
Full dynamic automation
Dynamics, 4-band parametric EQ and 4 VST plug-in inserts per channel

X-48 is Tascam's first standalone 48-track Hybrid Hard Disk Workstation which integrates the best of both worlds: the stability and ease-of-use of a purpose-built hard disk recorder, with the GUI, editing features and plug-in compatibility of a computer-based digital audio workstation.
It boasts 96kHz/24-bit recording across all 48 tracks and 192kHz across 24 tracks. Yet the X-48 goes beyond mere standalone recorders – its built-in, automated 48-channel digital mixer, VGA display output, powerful editing functions and DVD+RW backup drive transform it into a complete integrated workstation.


I cannot see the point spending $21,000 on a Radar V which only has 24 tracks and does not even have virtual tracks and has no mouse editing. Is Tascam that bad of a company?why would they make the X48 unuseable. What do you think gearslutz people?
JOHN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off