![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Tags: advice observations enlightenment, board console desk |
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Aug 2005 Location: France
Posts: 229
Thread Starter |
Does anybody know one of these small mixers? I've read that the preamps are the same as in Studer 169, but AFAIK the latter was build in the 70's and the A779 in the 80's so I'm a bit confused... Plus who knows about the difference between Studer A779 and Revox C279? Last but not least: How do they SOUND? Are they much better as A&H or Soudcraft? Do they get THE sound? (I'm recording mainly acoustic jazz) Thx |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jun 2007 Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 392
| Revox C279
Revox C279 is the same console as Studer A779, they looks identical and the only difference is probably the name. The A779s are standard equipment in professional broadcast studios. They have 6 stereo channels, great sounding mic preamps with phantom power, VCA faders and very flexible input configuration (mono/stereo lines). I bought nice Swiss made C279 and just going to try THE sound. Sure both consoles are excellent choice for spoken word, acoustic jazz or classical music recording (analog or digital). Forget Soundcraft and another crap :-)
|
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear addict Joined: Sep 2004 Location: Netherlands
Posts: 472
|
The Studer A779 has balanced I/O and was supposed to be a more pro broadcastmixer than the Revox C279 in terms of build quality and pro I/O. Rest is the same. I have the C279 and a Studer 169 and the 169 sounds better than the C279 for me. Though the C279 isn't bad at all . Henk
__________________ "Poetry and music" http://tinyurl.com/cmtwkp We say we shall not meet: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4BWwpKTIRI |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jan 2005 Location: Roma, Italy
Posts: 445
|
The Revox C279, which I have, has balanced XLR ins and outs as well. I like its sound very much, but haven't compared with Studer best regards Massimo
__________________ - even nostalgia isn't what it used to be - |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear addict Joined: Sep 2004 Location: Netherlands
Posts: 472
|
Sorry for confusing, off course revox C279 has Balanced I/O as well. A779 has additional balanced Aux and monitor I/O and longer faders and faderstart. Here are some pics. STUDER und ReVox - Das Infoportal | Analoges Kleinmischpult - STUDER A779 Henk |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Aug 2005 Location: France
Posts: 229
Thread Starter |
Thank you guys to give your opinion 18 month later!!! ![]() In between I bought a Studer 169 which I find fantastic! Real high end with that vintage yet clean sound, yep! It is less portable (25kg w/o flycase) than a c279 though... |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear nut Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 82
| Revox c279
I have been checking out this mixer all day... it looks... perfect for me. I Have a 6 track tape machine that this would mate perfectly with. Sure, it would be nice to have a couple more channels for other things but I still think the board would be a useful purchase for me. A couple things are still unclear to me, so can anyone with information help me out: Can I use the 6 pres on the board to track into each one of my 6 tracks, or is this exclusively a 6 into 2 board? Does anybody have a little clip or something that was recorded using this board? Thanks! |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear addict Joined: Sep 2004 Location: Netherlands
Posts: 472
|
The C279 has on each input channel an unbalanced (RCA or cinch) pre- and after fader output. There under the unbalanced stereo input pair. Henk |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear nut Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 82
|
Looking at the pictures, I see what you're saying now. Do you use the Revox C279 in your main recording rig? |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear Head | Pres?
Does anybody know how the C279 sounds? I already have a desk that I like (TAC Scorpion) but am looking for good analog pres, Cheers.
|
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Gear Head Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 36
|
What is "fader start", and what type of plug goes into these holes anyway? Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Sep 2004 Location: Netherlands
Posts: 472
| Quote:
I have a C279 so the tiny 'holes' of the A779 I only know by the picture. It looks like mini-jacks to me but I'm not certain. | |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Gear interested Joined: Oct 2007 Location: Berlin
Posts: 27
| Quote:
I've used the pres (with their direct ins/outs) for classical strings and keyboards.
__________________ Ali N. Askin | |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear |
What would you like to know about the consoles? i can tell you anything you want to know about them. with thanks, Plush
__________________ Atelier HudSonic, Chicago EARS-Chicago (Engineering And Recording Society) visit me at https://public.me.com/hudsonic1 to hear recordings and ephemera |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Mar 2011 Location: Oregon
Posts: 151
| Quote:
Not a A779/C279 question, but semi-related. I need a couple of what I have heard called "mickey bars" for my 961. These would be the plastic dealies used to bridge adjacent fader pairs, i.e. the masters or 2 of the inputs. Even before Harmon killed Studer, years ago the parts guy in Northridge (JBL campus) told me they were not available. I have seen them on a couple of eBay consoles over the years, but the sellers would not separate them. I have tried the ones for P & G's, they don't fit. Any ideas? John | |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear interested Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6
| |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2011 Location: Stroud,Glos,UK
Posts: 820
| Quote:
Use 20mm plumbing clips. | |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear | |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 130
| Quote:
Happy Holidays | |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Lives for gear |
INCredible, Doc! You da mang. I miss seeing you for sure. That sound on that Studer console was PHAT, wasn't it? Niiiiiiiiiiisssche. |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jan 2005 Location: Roma, Italy
Posts: 445
|
I no longer own the C279. Absolutely excellent, gorgeous sounding mic preamps and musical, minimalist eq. A wonderful piece of gear. Only thing, stereo separation is its worst spec (I think -65dB or so). This is quite audible, depending on applications. The Studer 961, based on detailed info I gathered at the time, fares 15-20dB better! best regards Massimo |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Mar 2011 Location: Oregon
Posts: 151
| |
| | |
| | #23 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 130
| Quote:
it rides along side a MCI 1 inch 8 track when "the sound" is dejour.. Happy Holidays! | |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Lives for gear |
Lovely! Thanks for posting. Merry Christmas to ALL.
|
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Studer A779 Specs? | KSwan | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 5 | 14th April 2008 05:42 AM |
| studer a779/revox C279 summing | Joe_Scumbag | High end | 4 | 10th March 2008 10:32 AM |
| Studer A779 | Ronski | High end | 0 | 2nd November 2007 10:34 AM |
| |