Superlux s502 - Page 8 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: ,

Superlux s502

New Reply New Reply View First Unread View First Unread Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20th January 2012   #211
Gear nut
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 80

I am, from a profesional point of view, somewhat involved in solder materials (sales). The appearance on the solder joints can also be contributed to the fact that now lead-free must be used. This has a higher melting point and puts some more starin on both components and soldering equipment. Also it does not look as nice and shine as the older lead content solder
All manufacturers should by now have sorted this out, but it is not unthinkable of course that some are still struggling (or just do not want to spend the money on a higher spec solder line..).
Just a guess of course, but to me the re-flowing of the solder on the S502 did solve the problem to date (from last year June)
victrolasound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2012   #212
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 112

Fragment from choirpractise last night, Breda Cathedral Choir, Hill organ (my own music and playing). Mics at +/- 5m. from choir (choir in fornt of choirorgan).
Attached Files
File Type: mp3 ps119.mp3 (3.04 MB, 143 views)
heva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2012   #213
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: France - Toulouse
Posts: 554

Nice but just like if the organ was an electronic one ??
mathieujm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2012   #214
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 512

Quote:
Originally Posted by victrolasound View Post
I am, from a profesional point of view, somewhat involved in solder materials (sales). The appearance on the solder joints can also be contributed to the fact that now lead-free must be used. This has a higher melting point and puts some more starin on both components and soldering equipment. Also it does not look as nice and shine as the older lead content solder
All manufacturers should by now have sorted this out, but it is not unthinkable of course that some are still struggling (or just do not want to spend the money on a higher spec solder line..).
Just a guess of course, but to me the re-flowing of the solder on the S502 did solve the problem to date (from last year June)
If I can ask about the re-flowing idea ? So the melting point temperature of non lead solder is higher than that of lead based ? With such microscopic components, I'm guessing that the smallest possible solder tip is recommended, applied for the shortest time and using an illuminated magifier lens for viewing the circuit board ? Any other re-flowing tips you could post here would be much appreciated ! I have some small gauge lead based solder, could I tin the tip of my iron with that prior to re-flowing ? Are there any hazards with the 2 types of solder becoming mixed on the board...
studer58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2012   #215
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 512

Maintainence:
Condenser microphone shall be kept in low humidity
environment for best sound performance.
Store the condenser microphones in air-conditioned
room or dehumidifier to keep away form
moisture. Clean air is another important factor.
Keep away from smoking environment to avoid
tar residuals.
------------------------------------------
I just noticed this advisory tucked away at the bottom of the S502 owner's guide. In response what I've done is to pack some small bags of dessicant or silica gel dehydrating crystals in the same case as the mics, and in close proximity to the capsules. I figure they will help to absorb and humidity which finds it's way into the storage box. Now if only I could do the same to the halls where I record using this mic ! Does anyone use these....and if so is there a preference for the dessicant material (there are range of agents including lime, silica gel, clay particles) Here is an example of the product type: Desiccant Sachets - Pack of 5
studer58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2012   #216
Lives for gear
 
boojum's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Astoria, OR, US&A
Posts: 2,308

Silica gel is the standard. It can be heated to make it fresh again. It will turn a turquoise blue when refreshed. Silica gel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________
Nov schmoz ka pop.
boojum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2012   #217
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 112

Quote:
Originally Posted by mathieujm View Post
Nice but just like if the organ was an electronic one ??
An original 7stops 1905 William Hill & Sons organ; think RollsRoyce quality.

But you're right; electronics sound ever more convining
heva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2012   #218
Gear nut
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 80

Quote:
Originally Posted by studer58 View Post
If I can ask about the re-flowing idea ? So the melting point temperature of non lead solder is higher than that of lead based ? With such microscopic components, I'm guessing that the smallest possible solder tip is recommended, applied for the shortest time and using an illuminated magifier lens for viewing the circuit board ? Any other re-flowing tips you could post here would be much appreciated ! I have some small gauge lead based solder, could I tin the tip of my iron with that prior to re-flowing ? Are there any hazards with the 2 types of solder becoming mixed on the board...
well really the components are not that microscopic
The flow temp. of non-lead solder is around 20-30C higher than typical lead contents solder. Import into the CE should require lead-free soldering on modern electronics.
Not saying that that is an issue here, but possible.

Quote wikipedia: "Lead-free solder problems
In addition to higher material costs, lead-free solder has a higher melting point, slower flow rates, and can sometimes cause leeching in the iron components. Higher melting points and decreased flow rates require a longer contact period (4 – 6 seconds)between the solder and the connections in order for the solder to completely fill the holes. Higher melting points also require a melting pot made of more stable material. The melting pot and ducts also need to be made from material that will prevent dissolution. Replacing those parts in a typical wave soldering machine can cost up to $25,000."

Really, reflowing with a normal, small gauge, iron should work. But of course tred with much caution! You should be somewhat skilled in soldering techniques obviously. Mixing with other soldering tins should not be a problem since we are not talking here about a "strong" contact, just a metallurgic contact, so a melt is a melt
Again not saying that that is a problem in these mics. Just a guess, and it did solve my "noise" problem I had on one of my S502's

"Bon Courage" as the French say
victrolasound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2012   #219
Gear Head
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 36

I would choice 1uF caps rather than 0.1, certainly direct current isolation function or power filtering, so, bigger value is better for low frequencies. resistors are not often the problem, there are strong components, bad melt or low quality capacitors are often the problem. Just choise good quality and correct type of capacitor (tantalium)
50V is very close to 48V and capacitors may have been damaged with phantom power and additionnal static charges.
Jean30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2012   #220
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 19

I recorded this a couple weeks ago, running my S502 into a Canon XH-A1. Additional cameras were a GoPro Hero2, and a pair of Canon HV30s.

The S502 was at the stage lip, on the same stand as the GoPro. I think the mic did a passable job.

AngusF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2012   #221
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 512

I'm still plagued with a popping sound in one channel that starts off around once every 2 seconds and after around 15 minutes tapers off to once every 3 seconds. However as the 'frequency' diminishes (not the Hz, the often-ness) the loudness/amplitude gets higher. You can see the waveform attached here, the pops are the vertical spikes. I set the mic in it's carry box in a quiet room, the other hashy bits of the waveform are me coming back in the room to check via headphones, so ignore those. Any ideas re fault tracing..ie is it likely to be the mic capsule or the mic-amp circuit components board ?
Attached Thumbnails
Superlux s502-superlux-mic-test.jpg  
studer58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2012   #222
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 512

slight correction...after about the 12 minute point it reduces to around one (louder than earlier) pop every 30-40 seconds.
studer58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2012   #223
Gear maniac
 
Bibster's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2011
Location: Near Toulouse, France
Posts: 220

Looks like some discharge or so...
Static building up in a capacitor that suddenly goes 'Bzz....t'.
It is not very symmetrical a signal... Maybe something in the power-supply part of the circuit. (Do we have the schematics?)

Strange how it all of a sudden goes from frequent to less-frequent, and not slowly slowing down... But you say the plops get louder than, so the total amount of energy per time is (more or less) the same...


Have you contacted Superlux? Or your supplier? I'm pretty sure they'll replace it, right?
Bibster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd March 2012   #224
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 512

Hi Bibster,

Yes they are definitely not symmetrical, the displacement of the 'pop' waveform is definitely in the upper part of the waveform, unlike music which distributes itself evenly above and below the centre line. The pops get louder over time, beginning about one every 2 seconds at switch-on time and decreasing to once every 30 - 40 seconds after about 12 - 15 minutes.
They are a short, bassy 'pop' rather than a click. There is no schematic yet available as far as I know.

I have sent the screenshot of the waveform to Superlux, plus an mp3 audio file of the pops as well. They are currently scratching their heads and puzzling over it....
studer58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd March 2012   #225
Gear maniac
 
Bibster's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2011
Location: Near Toulouse, France
Posts: 220

Good to hear, Studer58. Hope they find what it is , and give you a new one...
No trouble so far with mine (Crossed fingers!).
Bibster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd March 2012   #226
Gear addict
 
amfortas2006's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 432

Maybe its not the microphones, but something else in the chain.
amfortas2006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd March 2012   #227
Lives for gear
 
didier.brest's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,792

I encoutered a similar issue with a new S241 the mono version of the 502: noise bursts. I just send it back to Thomann for exchange and got another one that is OK.
didier.brest is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd March 2012   #228
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 512

Quote:
Originally Posted by amfortas2006 View Post
Maybe its not the microphones, but something else in the chain.
There is no chain...it's mics straight into recorder, which has onboard/inbuilt phantom powered mic preamps ! Records to SD card, and that's the waveform you see reproduced a few posts above here, which corresponds perfectly with what I hear over headphones while monitoring the recording. It's similar enough to other's experiences with Superlux mics (both this model and others in the line) that I thought the company should be made aware of it. I'm just now listening to a pair of Line Audio CM3 mics plugged into the same recorder, same gain levels etc and no pops at all...so that eliminates the 'recording chain' from the list of possible causes.
studer58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd March 2012   #229
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 112

I've had a S502 replaced by Thomann, which gave the low noise/rumble when I used it one night with quite high humidity. Since storing it in plastic zip bag with a silicagel bag, no more issues; it's perfectly usable for hours on.
heva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th March 2012   #230
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 512

Thanks for that advice heva. However when I did the test which resulted in the popping and generated the waveform posted above, at the end of the recording (when popping was reduced to every 40 seconds or so) I brought the mic close to my mouth and exhaled over the capsule slowly, surrounding it with moist air. You would assume this would increase the local humidity in the air close to the capsule to around 100%...but there was no increase in the popping.
So, humidity doesn't seem to have been a factor in this case ?
I will try your silica gel suggestion, it certainly can't do any harm...but i suspect that humidity is not the cause ?
studer58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th March 2012   #231
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 112

One thing to note that puzzles is me is that the first S502 I had, had removable capsules (with a thread), I've posted pictures before. The replacement one has the capsules somehow fixed (maybe glued/soldered somehow). Can't see how and why that would be.

Still, my no-budget studio is happy with it ;-)
heva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th March 2012   #232
Gear maniac
 
Bibster's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2011
Location: Near Toulouse, France
Posts: 220

Some modding and mk12 comparision going on right next door...
Bibster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th March 2012   #233
Lives for gear
 
didier.brest's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,792

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bibster View Post
Some modding and mk21 comparision going on right next door...
MK 21 is Schoeps. At next door, it is MK-012 from Oktava...
didier.brest is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 28th March 2012   #234
Gear maniac
 
Bibster's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2011
Location: Near Toulouse, France
Posts: 220

Quote:
Originally Posted by didier.brest View Post
MK 21 is Schoeps. At next door, it is MK-012 from Okatava...
Zut! Sorry for my typo!
Bibster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th March 2012   #235
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 512

Latest feedback on the popping sound in 1 side of my S502..Superlux are unable to replicate the problem in their factory/lab. So they are suggesting that I return it to the retailer I purchased it from under warranty and get a replacement. Does this sound fair or reasonable to readers here ? I guess my question is, are they correct to assume it's an occasional, non-endemic problem with the S502...in other words likely to be a rogue sample, and therefore better dealt with via dealer replacement than factory repair ?
studer58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2012   #236
Lives for gear
 
boojum's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Astoria, OR, US&A
Posts: 2,308

Quote:
Originally Posted by studer58 View Post
Latest feedback on the popping sound in 1 side of my S502..Superlux are unable to replicate the problem in their factory/lab. So they are suggesting that I return it to the retailer I purchased it from under warranty and get a replacement. Does this sound fair or reasonable to readers here ? I guess my question is, are they correct to assume it's an occasional, non-endemic problem with the S502...in other words likely to be a rogue sample, and therefore better dealt with via dealer replacement than factory repair ?
Not everyone who owns these mics is having your problem, though a few are. It could b a bad batch/parts from a supplier's bad batch. I'd get the replacement - it is free - and see what happens. There have been others who have DX'ed them and their new mics worked fine.

Good luck. The mic does seem good when it does not have this problem.
boojum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2012   #237
Gear addict
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Blackburn, OZ
Posts: 351

Quote:
Originally Posted by studer58 View Post
Latest feedback on the popping sound in 1 side of my S502..Superlux are unable to replicate the problem in their factory/lab. So they are suggesting that I return it to the retailer I purchased it from under warranty and get a replacement. Does this sound fair or reasonable to readers here ? I guess my question is, are they correct to assume it's an occasional, non-endemic problem with the S502...in other words likely to be a rogue sample, and therefore better dealt with via dealer replacement than factory repair ?
The rate of failure is higher than I would expect to see, but my experience with receiving my first S502 displaying such symptoms was that it was promptly replaced (by Thomann) and the replacement unit has performed without failure for the last six months.

The other good thing with returning faulty units is that it allows a good company to analyse the failed units to determine the cause and take corrective action in future production. Unless the units are fairly costly items, it is unusual for them to be repaired.

(Some manufacturers of expensive ($1000+) items will repair and offer them as 'refurbished' at a lower price - if they have been put through the same quality control as the original production, they are a good buy because they are also less likely to experience early failure.)
__________________
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. It is also a breach of copyright.
panatrope is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 4 Days Ago   #238
Gear interested
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8

Did we ever learn the identities of the samples presented in post #18?

Thank you.

DG
dgpretzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 4 Days Ago   #239
Lives for gear
 
didier.brest's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,792

1 = Oktava
2 = DPA
3 = Superlux
didier.brest is online now   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Superlux R-102 dickiefunk Low End Theory 26 24th June 2011 05:17 AM
Superlux S241/U3 TheArchitect So much gear, so little time! 0 29th February 2008 12:06 AM
Superlux Microphones Farfensound So much gear, so little time! 2 27th October 2005 04:31 AM
Superlux? RSMITH123 So much gear, so little time! 0 25th April 2003 08:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:22 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.