Berliner Philharmoniker hall's reverb. Listen. - Page 2 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: , , ,

Berliner Philharmoniker hall's reverb. Listen.

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25th October 2010   #31
Lives for gear
 
didier.brest's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,792

My theoretical statement said that there is a pitch change related to the time variation rate of the sound speed.

Indeed I would'nt expect this variation being fast enough for this pitch being audible. Actually I have no idea about its order of magnitude.

My statement was only a spontaneous contribution to the discussion, not the fruit of previous work or thinking.

Of course, I agree that the pitch does not depend on the sound speed itself.
didier.brest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2010   #32
ValhallaDSP
 
seancostello's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,718

Quote:
Originally Posted by dseetoo View Post
TYou can observe this effect by using a tuning strobe in the hall and play a short steady note, generated by a tone generator and then watch what happens to the tuning strobe after you shut off the generator. This randomness is very necessary in a well-designed reverb system, regardless what technology it is based on.
A question: could the changes in the tuning strobe after you shut off the generator be due to amplitude fluctuations in the reverb decay?

For example, if you take a 440 Hz sine wave, and modulate the amplitude by a random function that has most of its energy under 2 Hz, what will the tuner do in this situation? Theoretically, it is the same sine wave, with a random amplitude - but signal can also be viewed as a statistical signal, centered at 440 Hz and around 4 Hz wide. Is it possible to accurate track the period of the signal in this situation?

Such amplitude modulations can be caused by pitch variations in a multitude of delayed signals, or amplitude variations in a multitude of delayed signals, or even by the spectral, time-invariant characteristics of the space (i.e. the spacing of the resonances around 440 Hz).

I don't have the answer to this question. I had thought before that the temperature variations caused speed of sound changes, but Casey's arguments against this in another thread were fairly convincing. It is certainly relevant to my work and research.
__________________
Sean Costello
Valhalla DSP, LLC
Words: http://valhalladsp.wordpress.com
Plugins: http://www.valhalladsp.com
seancostello is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2010   #33
Lives for gear
 
Casey's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2003
Location: Cambridge MA USA
Posts: 1,113

Quote:
Originally Posted by seancostello View Post
I had thought before that the temperature variations caused speed of sound changes, but Casey's arguments against this in another thread were fairly convincing. It is certainly relevant to my work and research.
Of course temperature does change the speed of sound. I have never argued otherwise.

I am arguing that air currents modulating the distribution of temperature within a hall over time, cannot cause audible pitch variations within the direct sound or within the ensemble of reflections (or in fact in any single reflection) within the reverb of the hall.



-Casey
__________________
cdowdell@bricasti.com

www.bricasti.com

My love shall hear the music of my hounds. - Shakespeare
Casey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2010   #34
ValhallaDSP
 
seancostello's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,718

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casey View Post
Of course temperature does change the speed of sound. I have never argued otherwise.

I am arguing that air currents modulating the distribution of temperature within a hall over time, cannot cause audible pitch variations within the direct sound or within the ensemble of reflections (or in fact in any single reflection) within the reverb of the hall.



-Casey
My bad. I meant to say:

"I don't have the answer to this question. I had thought before that the temperature variations caused pitch changes, but Casey's arguments against this in another thread were fairly convincing. It is certainly relevant to my work and research. "
seancostello is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2010   #35
Lives for gear
 
Casey's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2003
Location: Cambridge MA USA
Posts: 1,113

I think we are going to get kicked out of this thread soon anyhow.



-Casey
Casey is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Berliner CM-33 compare to Km84??? Jpec Product Alerts older than 2 months 61 18th April 2012 02:37 PM
Berliner Philarmoniker videoteque Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 9 31st August 2009 10:00 PM
Berliner CM33 SDC??? erock Low End Theory 18 11th April 2009 02:07 AM
Berliner U77....anyone? NoEgo High end 48 28th February 2009 06:34 PM
Help! Not sure which Amp / Mfr for this school hall's PA! primemeat64 So much gear, so little time! 3 14th January 2009 10:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:51 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.