![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Tags: classical, reverb, show and tell, youtube |
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #31 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,792
|
My theoretical statement said that there is a pitch change related to the time variation rate of the sound speed. Indeed I would'nt expect this variation being fast enough for this pitch being audible. Actually I have no idea about its order of magnitude. ![]() My statement was only a spontaneous contribution to the discussion, not the fruit of previous work or thinking. ![]() Of course, I agree that the pitch does not depend on the sound speed itself. |
| | |
| | #32 | |
| ValhallaDSP Joined: Feb 2009 Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,718
| Quote:
For example, if you take a 440 Hz sine wave, and modulate the amplitude by a random function that has most of its energy under 2 Hz, what will the tuner do in this situation? Theoretically, it is the same sine wave, with a random amplitude - but signal can also be viewed as a statistical signal, centered at 440 Hz and around 4 Hz wide. Is it possible to accurate track the period of the signal in this situation? Such amplitude modulations can be caused by pitch variations in a multitude of delayed signals, or amplitude variations in a multitude of delayed signals, or even by the spectral, time-invariant characteristics of the space (i.e. the spacing of the resonances around 440 Hz). I don't have the answer to this question. I had thought before that the temperature variations caused speed of sound changes, but Casey's arguments against this in another thread were fairly convincing. It is certainly relevant to my work and research.
__________________ Sean Costello Valhalla DSP, LLC Words: http://valhalladsp.wordpress.com Plugins: http://www.valhalladsp.com | |
| | |
| | #33 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2003 Location: Cambridge MA USA
Posts: 1,113
| Quote:
I am arguing that air currents modulating the distribution of temperature within a hall over time, cannot cause audible pitch variations within the direct sound or within the ensemble of reflections (or in fact in any single reflection) within the reverb of the hall. ![]() -Casey
__________________ cdowdell@bricasti.com www.bricasti.com My love shall hear the music of my hounds. - Shakespeare | |
| | |
| | #34 | |
| ValhallaDSP Joined: Feb 2009 Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,718
| Quote:
"I don't have the answer to this question. I had thought before that the temperature variations caused pitch changes, but Casey's arguments against this in another thread were fairly convincing. It is certainly relevant to my work and research. " | |
| | |
| | #35 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2003 Location: Cambridge MA USA
Posts: 1,113
|
I think we are going to get kicked out of this thread soon anyhow. ![]() ![]() -Casey |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Berliner CM-33 compare to Km84??? | Jpec | Product Alerts older than 2 months | 61 | 18th April 2012 02:37 PM |
| Berliner Philarmoniker | videoteque | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 9 | 31st August 2009 10:00 PM |
| Berliner CM33 SDC??? | erock | Low End Theory | 18 | 11th April 2009 02:07 AM |
| Berliner U77....anyone? | NoEgo | High end | 48 | 28th February 2009 06:34 PM |
| Help! Not sure which Amp / Mfr for this school hall's PA! | primemeat64 | So much gear, so little time! | 3 | 14th January 2009 10:33 PM |
| |