![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Tags: advice observations enlightenment, jazz, mikage, orchestra |
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2009 Location: West Virginia/Pennsylvania
Posts: 904
Thread Starter |
Would a pair of AKG C214s be any good on ensemble recordings of orchestras, bands, or jazz bands? I hear lots of things about them with regards to vocals, piano, and drum overheads, but nothing really in the full ensemble area.
|
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear |
I used a pair of AKG C3000B's as outriggers back when I didn't have much else in terms of mics. They were a little bright, which really helped in distant-mic applications. I thought they sounded pretty good. I don't know how close the 214's would sound to the C3000B's, but I don't think they'd sound bad. LDC mics have a different sound than SDC's for sure, you might like it or you might not. The nice thing is that you can use them for more traditional LDC duties too, if you need. I still have the C3000B's, I use them every once in a while when I need a bright-ish mic, like on a dark tenor sax. However, if you were planning on buying the 214's new, I'd probably spend just a bit more and get a pair of used 414's. Multiple polar patterns are great. I have an AKG C422 stereo LDC that I use all the time, and it sounds great. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2009 Location: West Virginia/Pennsylvania
Posts: 904
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jan 2006 Location: Stockholm Sweden
Posts: 416
|
Just remember that the 214 is a very different mic from the 414. For one thing it is a back electret condenser and as such much more similar to the AKG C3000. The 414 is a normal condensor mic. Secondly the 414 is not one mic but a succession of generations of mics with quite different sound signatures. This makes comparison difficult, but I have no problem in accepting that all of them are excellent, but different. // Gunnar |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear |
If the C214 were a cardioid 414, I'd say go for it. Since it isn't, I wouldn't spend your money. You're better off with a pair of AT4040s. It's a "real" condenser, very detailed, and have an excellent off-axis response. On the flip-side, the AT4033 is an electric condenser, and it sounds very nice. Maybe go that route... |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RECORDING STEREO! Twin AKG C214s or Two Blue Dragonfly Mics? | saxrmc | So much gear, so little time! | 5 | 21st March 2010 12:55 AM |
| Using 2 Ensembles together for 16 inputs? | infiniteposse | So much gear, so little time! | 3 | 21st June 2008 04:48 PM |
| Thickening String Ensembles | soupking | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 49 | 27th November 2007 10:09 AM |
| Two ensembles with DP 5.12 | Houndman | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 11th October 2007 02:59 PM |
| |