Tascam DR-680... anyone try this yet? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: , ,

Tascam DR-680... anyone try this yet?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 4th April 2010   #1
Gear maniac
 
jason kanter's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 160

Thread Starter
Talking Tascam DR-680... anyone try this yet?

The price is pretty decent and the track count is good but as usual I'm concerned with the quality of the pre's. In particular... how quiet are they?
__________________
Jason Kanter
NYC

-End of line.
jason kanter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th April 2010   #2
Gear addict
 
Mikkel Nielsen's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 328

Quote:
Originally Posted by jason kanter View Post
The price is pretty decent and the track count is good but as usual I'm concerned with the quality of the pre's. In particular... how quiet are they?
Its been talked about in this thread: New portable multitrack recorders from Tascam

Im in search of a new recorder instead of my FR2. But after reading page 3 in that thread, I think Im going for a Sounddevices.

Best wishes,

Mikkel
Mikkel Nielsen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th April 2010   #3
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: San Francisco area
Posts: 2,422

I was sorry they didn't make the DR680 a little more expensive and allow BWF recording w/ an external TC input, as well as ext clock (like HDP2). Close but no cigar. The PSP82 is too expensive re: the price of an SD 788, which does WAY more and is much smaller.

Philip Perkins
philper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd April 2010   #4
Gear addict
 
skygod's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 350

Thumbs down Next product please ...

I was actually interested in several of these this to replace a bunch of aging HD24XRs at the same price point for 12 channels @ 24/96 (2x$999 for each 12channels) w/o any moving parts involved recording to Class 6-10 SDHC until the dreaded epiphany of:

1. Unbalanced outputs
2. Converters are substandard and not AKM grade (confirmed by Sweetwater)
3. Preamps are what? Nobody knows.
4. Can only use two units in tandem just like the limitations of the Korg MR2000S, one master and the other slave for MTC control of transport fucntions
5. The reassurance that Tascam customer support still sucks and always will...

... appeared

~skygod~

PS. But for $5499.00 you can have the balanced outputs in the next model. Now isn't that grand?
skygod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd April 2010   #5
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: San Francisco area
Posts: 2,422

Check this thread on the Tapers forum--a bunch of those guys are pretty happy with their DR680s. It turns out to be much more versatile than I had originally thought.

http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=131128.105

Philip Perkins
philper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd May 2010   #6
Lives for gear
 
DarkSky Media's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,991

Quote:
Originally Posted by skygod View Post
4. Can only use two units in tandem just like the limitations of the Korg MR2000S, one master and the other slave for MTC control of transport fucntions...
I can't speak about the Tascam, but FWIW this is not a limitation of the Korg MR2000S. You can use more than two of the Korg units in tandem.

The user guide for the MR2000S v1.5 update gives as an example, the wiring harness configuration to synchronize four units for simultaneous record/repro of eight tracks. It may be possible to do more - I haven't tried.
DarkSky Media is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd May 2010   #7
Lives for gear
 
sonare's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: southeast
Posts: 1,393

Quote:
Originally Posted by skygod View Post
I was actually interested in several of these this to replace a bunch of aging HD24XRs at the same price point for 12 channels @ 24/96 (2x$999 for each 12channels) w/o any moving parts involved recording to Class 6-10 SDHC until the dreaded epiphany of:

1. Unbalanced outputs
2. Converters are substandard and not AKM grade (confirmed by Sweetwater)
3. Preamps are what? Nobody knows.
4. Can only use two units in tandem just like the limitations of the Korg MR2000S, one master and the other slave for MTC control of transport fucntions
5. The reassurance that Tascam customer support still sucks and always will...

... appeared

~skygod~

PS. But for $5499.00 you can have the balanced outputs in the next model. Now isn't that grand?
The DR680 is *not* intended to do what an HD24XR does. Consider the recording time limit on the 680 (even with 32GB) vs a several-hundred GB IDE drive at a fraction of the cost-per-GB. And if setup grief is on your list the HD24 wins if you are using external. And unless I am deaf your comments on the micamps and ADC are completely unfounded.

The 680 shines for non-session stuff. The Tapers appear to be using the 16bit paradigm of recording levels. This thing is "composite" and is what it is and costs under a grand. The SD and Nagra VI are truly professional devices and cost accordingly.

Rich
__________________
Sonare Recordings
www.sonarerecordings.com
sonare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2010   #8
Lives for gear
 
RobAnderson's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: NY New York a wonderful town
Posts: 725

I have to say this little box was a perfect thing for me.

On small-scale classical archival recordings, I often mix three or four mic's to 2-TR live through an API 3124. Most of the time it comes out just fine, but there are some times that I wish I were able to re-balance things after the fact. Now I do my usual thing, but I also run the direct outs from the API to the line inputs of this little box. It's already saved my arse a couple of times where I did not get a sound check, but needed spot mic's.

I grant you that the converters on this thing are NOT in the same category as Mytek, but they are really not bad. I can't say for sure, but I think you can clock it externally using the SPDIF input.

For the price, it's hard to beat. It's light-weight and small. Check out this pic from a recent gig. This 680 is under the HD-P2
Attached Thumbnails
Tascam DR-680... anyone try this yet?-dscf0944.jpg  
__________________
"Everybody gets so much information all day long that they lose their common sense." - G. Stein 1946

The reputation of a thousand years may be determined by the conduct of one hour. - Japanese Proverb

"Look into his face and hear the music of the ages. Don't pay too much attention to the sounds--for if you do, you may miss the music." - George Ives

http://www.andersonsoundrecording.com

RobAnderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2010   #9
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,254

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobAnderson View Post
... I think you can clock it externally using the SPDIF input.
Nice setup!

I'm certain you're right about clocking as there's no other way it could work (properly).
MichaelPatrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2010   #10
Lives for gear
 
RobAnderson's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: NY New York a wonderful town
Posts: 725

Thanks Michael!

For these little archival gigs, I can't really justify the cost of a Nagra or SD788, and for the larger multi-track gigs, there are other options that are better and more cost effective (per track count) for my needs.

At this price point and for this function, this Tascam box has been just the ticket for me.
RobAnderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2010   #11
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Taipei
Posts: 167

Maybe just bad luck, sounds like I got a lemon.
Waiting Tascam service email reply.
I got apparent digital clocking noise on channel 2. There's lower leve in channel 3 as well. There're this kind of noise on every channel, but much lower level.
The sound file was boosted by 40dB. Trim level on DR 680 is +17. Input gain at low. Any one experience similar noise?
Attached Files
File Type: mp3 100527_001_st12_noise_40db.mp3 (235.9 KB, 321 views)
File Type: mp3 100527_001_st34_noise_40db.mp3 (234.4 KB, 254 views)
File Type: mp3 100527_001_st56_noise_40db.mp3 (311.6 KB, 221 views)
9sbean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2010   #12
Super Moderator
 
Remoteness's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,405

Everyone seems to be very happy with the ones I had in stock.
No issues were reported as of yet.
Remoteness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2010   #13
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Taipei
Posts: 167

Quote:
Originally Posted by 9sbean View Post
Maybe just bad luck, sounds like I got a lemon.
Waiting Tascam service email reply.
I got apparent digital clocking noise on channel 2. There's lower leve in channel 3 as well. There're this kind of noise on every channel, but much lower level.
The sound file was boosted by 40dB. Trim level on DR 680 is +17. Input gain at low. Any one experience similar noise?
After talking to Tascam service over the phone, I'll return this one to B&H for replacement. Shall not get another lemon.
9sbean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th May 2010   #14
Gear maniac
 
noamraz's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Israel
Posts: 219

Quote:
Originally Posted by 9sbean View Post
After talking to Tascam service over the phone, I'll return this one to B&H for replacement. Shall not get another lemon.
Please let us know how it goes..
noamraz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2010   #15
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Taipei
Posts: 167

Quote:
Originally Posted by noamraz View Post
Please let us know how it goes..
Return is on the way. I just tried antoher 2 new DR-680, both works great. However, a friend who own one told me he got very low level noise on CH6.

According to recent user responses, my last one must be a lemon.
9sbean is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
DOD 680 JimmyTurbo Geekslutz forum 1 4th March 2008 02:12 PM
Travler @ $680 vs Mackie 400F same price? composer Low End Theory 6 28th December 2005 11:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:44 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.