![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Tags: advice observations enlightenment, splitter, technical techiness |
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 484
Thread Starter |
I know mic splitters have been discussed before, But I could not find a final decision on the direct outputs.. Take the radial for example, it has direct output and isolated outputs, as does most mic splitters. My question is, does the 'direct output' mic signal remain uneffected as if it never plugged into the mic splitter... We want to use multiple preamps on some vocal sessions, but would like the direct output to be completely original to the mic signal, if you get my drift... I understand that the isolated outputs will be degraded somewhat... but i'm just asking about the direct output here... |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 293
|
I just got a Radial OSX8-J last week. I used it for the first time on a remote this weekend using all three of the splits. I recorded the direct out to my system (MH ULN8), the Jensen transformer isolated split was sent the a second recorder (Presonus FW box) and the Aux out was sent to front of house. (We were running all three, and mic reinforcement for FOH was very minimal). I'm not sure how much degradation of signal you get in a $1,200 splitter with Jensen transformers, but I'm guessing not much! I didn't get a chance to compare the two recordings yet, but I'm interested to see the differences. Any differences we hear will much more likely have been due to differences between MH & Presonus convertors rather than Jensen transformers or not in the signal path. The Radial is totally passive and their stuff is top notch. From what I understand from the manufacturers mouth, the Direct Out is as close to "bare wire" through the box as you're gonna get. That's why I payed the premium over something like the Whirlwind or ART pieces. Doug
__________________ Red Penguin Rentals - High end recording rentals (Pgh, PA) Gear from API, Neuman, Korby Audio & Royer Transitioning to Red Penguin Remote in 2011! |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008 Location: Chestertown MD USA
Posts: 969
|
The direct output is unaffected except that the impedance that the microphone sees will be the combined load of all the connected devices. And BTW. the direct split is just wire like all direct splitters. |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 293
| Quote:
However, that is straying a bit from the OP's original question. In the original posters scenario, I would probably use the direct out for the cleanest / most transparent pre-amp or the tried and true one from previous sessions. I would reserve the transformer isolated split for the more "colored" / "character" pre-amp options. Doug | |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008 Location: Chestertown MD USA
Posts: 969
| Quote:
But having a splitter in the circuit that is connected to multiple preamps will affect the mic signal due to the lower combined impedance and this will affect all the outputs of the splitter. | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 484
Thread Starter |
Wow, awesome, thanks guys Yeah well we are in a situation where we have a 'tried and true way', with Brauner mic, into avalon 737, we would like to try a VT-2 Fearn, So we would like to just make sure the "Brauner / avalon" is really staying the same as per normal, From what you guys are saying, it seems that with the Fearn VT-2 plugged into a Isolated output, it will change the impedance???, therefore the Brauner / avalon, will sound different?, Is that what you are saying? Anyways, good to know others are happy with Jensen, it's what Doug Fearn reccomended to me. Laddie. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear Head |
hi, maybe I'll find an answer about splitters here. I want to split the signal of my wireless mic live to use two channels of the mixer. the second would be just a compressed 5 khz fill of the main channel. so, is this safe phase wise and what type of splitter would fit the job best.
|
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear addict Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 458
|
Into the same mixer? I'd use a "Y" cable. Should be no problem and a lot less expensive than a Jensen transformer<g>. D.
__________________ Douglas Tourtelot, CAS Seattle, WA "Recording sound is merely problem solving. Solve one problem and move on to the next" |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008 Location: Chestertown MD USA
Posts: 969
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Super Moderator Joined: Aug 2002 Location: NYC
Posts: 7,405
|
Just like Douglas mentioned, a simple Wye cord will work fine. If there isn't a FOH engineer playing with the balances between the two channels, why not just compress the vocals without the extra channel?
__________________ Steve Remote AuraSonicLtd.com the home of ASL Mobile & Location Production Remoteness on the Linkedin Network What about my Facebook Profile? Remoteness on Myspace |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Quick mic splitter question | guitarguy12387 | Geekslutz forum | 2 | 24th July 2009 01:54 PM |
| Quick Mic comparison question | Mindcore | So much gear, so little time! | 5 | 25th December 2007 11:47 PM |
| A quick question about a Mic. | EasT | So much gear, so little time! | 4 | 16th May 2007 06:58 AM |
| Quick Question About A Mic... | Smitty Boy | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 5 | 23rd January 2007 04:42 PM |
| Quick mic storage question | MAKmusic | High end | 3 | 14th July 2006 01:31 AM |
| |