Are Mackie VLZ mixers good enough for classical? - Page 2 - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording

Tags: , ,

Are Mackie VLZ mixers good enough for classical?
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th March 2010   #31
Lives for gear
 
rumleymusic's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,837

Quote:
The newer VLZ-series suffer from some build-quality issues IMO. I had to return an 802 because of a 3 dB level mismatch between the left and right channels.
Mackie does suffer from the cost cutting Chinese manufacturing trend unfortunately. My 802 doesn't have the same problems as yours luckily, it is pretty reliable.
__________________
Daniel Rumley
Rumley Music and Audio Production
http://www.rumleymusic.com
rumleymusic is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2010   #32
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 708

I recorded the Mozart Horn Concertos for Olympia using the original version of the VLZ. I recall a review saying something like "this would have been the best ever version of the Horn Concertos, except X released his version the same week". (Can't now remember the name of X who was the horn wunderkind of the day).

Amazon.com: Mozart: Complete Horn Concertos: Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Roy Goodman, Herman Jeuissen, Herman Jeurissen, Giorgio Mereu: Music

However, what was fine fifteen (?) years ago might not be that good in comparison with others now. But junk it isn't. (Wasn't).
Ozpeter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2010   #33
Lives for gear
 
Teddy Ray's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: Carolina is where they'll bury me.
Posts: 7,095

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozpeter View Post
I recorded the Mozart Horn Concertos for Olympia using the original version of the VLZ. I recall a review saying something like "this would have been the best ever version of the Horn Concertos, except X released his version the same week". (Can't now remember the name of X who was the horn wunderkind of the day).

Amazon.com: Mozart: Complete Horn Concertos: Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Roy Goodman, Herman Jeuissen, Herman Jeurissen, Giorgio Mereu: Music

However, what was fine fifteen (?) years ago might not be that good in comparison with others now. But junk it isn't. (Wasn't).

Sounds great. Ordered.(I always try to order things I know forum members have done) your post just proves that they are competent. Even the series 1...
__________________
"I would shoot a man if he put me through autotune" - Charlie Louvin
Teddy Ray is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2010   #34
Lives for gear
 
d_fu's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,427

I've made recordings with the original 1202's preamps (pre-VLZ)... If they don't sound as great as my current recordings , it's likely to be a result of the number, choice, and placement of microphones more than the preamp quality per se, I would suspect... Still carry the 1202 around at the bottom of the case I keep my mics in, as last resort...
d_fu is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2010   #35
Lives for gear
 
RobAnderson's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: NY New York a wonderful town
Posts: 856

Maybe my 1202 didn't age well or something - the mic amps sound a little muffled to me. It's not that they are terribly colored or noisy, just not the "ultra high-fi" sound you can get with the good stuff.

Decent recordings have been made with less.

I guess I should mention that I had to retire the Micro-series 1202 and replace it with a VLZ-3 version a few years ago because the right main output became intermittent. Buying a new one was cheaper than fixing the old one.

As for the 802, it is not unreliable, and it does its job nicely: it's light to carry and fits easily into a small backpack - a great little mixer with some remarkable features packed into a very small footprint.

It's just not very precisely calibrated.

What do you expect for $200?
__________________
Quote:
"Everybody gets so much information all day long that they lose their common sense." - G. Stein 1946

The reputation of a thousand years may be determined by the conduct of one hour. - Japanese Proverb

"Look into his face and hear the music of the ages. Don't pay too much attention to the sounds--for if you do, you may miss the music." - George Ives
http://www.andersonsoundrecording.com

http://www.facebook.com/AndersonSoundRecording
RobAnderson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th March 2010   #36
Lives for gear
 
Don S's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,511

Glad to see this thread. Some of my best recordings were made using my 1402 VLZ pro. I've been tempted for lower budget jobs (lately) to use it as a summing amp to a SD702.
__________________
www.symphonicsound.com
"The secret of life, though, is falling down seven times and get up eight times." Paulo Coelho
Don S is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th March 2010   #37
Musician
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Glendale Ca.
Posts: 254

Fwiw, (it's Jazz not Classical) the first track (Joy Spring) on my MySpace page was made with my 1202 VLZ, pair of DPA 4011s > a Marantz CDR300 CD recorder.

The gain's a little lower on this but same chain
Beatrice 3.mp3 - DivShare

Disclaimer---I'm not an engineer.
Dave Ferris is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2010   #38
Gear addict
 
roonsbane's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 436

I once started a gig with the back bay choral using my Millenia HV3. The church was on Newbury st. in Boston. One block away from the radio towers on top of the prudential building, an area well known for it's RF issues. I could not get rid of some bad RF until I switched to my spare first generation VLZ 1402 that I used to keep with me. The RF was switch off like a light bulb and the recording came off fine considering I was very limited in where I could put mic stands, (the much bigger issue). I have since recorded many multiple mic jazz gigs in a church on the next block using my ATI 8MX2 without any issues.
Cameron
roonsbane is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2010   #39
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 179

So are you saying that I got stuck with a bad Mackie, or you just got lucky?
John Brook is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2010   #40
Gear addict
 
roonsbane's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 436

I am saying for me, something changed for the better when it comes to RF rejection. It could be as simple as a change in input impedance. If I remember correctly, I was using my Neumann U89's with a transformer plugged into two different preamps with no transformer. Come to think of it U89's KM84's and KM86's are really the only mics I have gotten RF on during literally thousands of live recordings.

There is a place I have done broadcast's here in Minnesota where I could not use any dynamic mics due to two specific bad dimmer packs on the lights. Using 421's, 441's, D112, EV408's, Beyer M160's, SM7's, I would get bad humming when they weren't full on or full off. Replace them with any condenser mic and all is good.
Cameron
roonsbane is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2010   #41
Lives for gear
 
Teddy Ray's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: Carolina is where they'll bury me.
Posts: 7,095

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Brook View Post
So are you saying that I got stuck with a bad Mackie, or you just got lucky?

sounds like you got a bad one...stories of great results with Mackie mixers(in spite the constant badmouthing them here on GearCasteSystem Central ) are in abundance.

If they were not L7...Marc Aubort wouldn't go near them.

allmusic ((( Marc Aubort > Credits )))
Teddy Ray is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2010   #42
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 220

I've been using an 802 VLZ3 for a while and the preamps are pretty nice sounding for the price. (Obvious Fact: they won't be in the same league of boutique preamps, but still, they do the job.) I always keep the EQ flat when recording. They would have to be my favorite Mackie preamps. I've used their other Mackie preamps and they just don't match up. Plus weren't VLZ's designed for mainly recording purposes?
Scottn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2010   #43
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,131

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Ferris View Post
Fwiw, (it's Jazz not Classical) the first track (Joy Spring) on my MySpace page was made with my 1202 VLZ, pair of DPA 4011s > a Marantz CDR300 CD recorder.

The gain's a little lower on this but same chain
Beatrice 3.mp3 - DivShare

Disclaimer---I'm not an engineer.
Very nice playing, nice piano sound. The only distracting thing is the noise which still isn't very offensive spectrum wise but still way to high IMO.


/Peter
Audiop is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2010   #44
Musician
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Glendale Ca.
Posts: 254

Hey thanks. Appreciated.

You know that's exactly what Rich Breen (Jazz engineer extraordinaire) said to me regarding the noise. He also said it was "right heavy" about 2 DB.

He said I probably had the gain staging on the 1202 VLZ and levels on the CD recorder mismatched.

That's why the disclaimer
Dave Ferris is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2010   #45
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 179

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teddy Ray View Post
sounds like you got a bad one...stories of great results with Mackie mixers(in spite the constant badmouthing them here on GearCasteSystem Central ) are in abundance.

If they were not L7...Marc Aubort wouldn't go near them.

allmusic ((( Marc Aubort > Credits )))
I'm not bashing the Mackie, even if it comes across that way. I got a lot of great recordings out of it. It's just that every once and a while, I got a nice radio station, florescent lights and coke machine noises. The later had to come through the PS; who knows how the former got into the machine????

(Added): Now that I think about it, it was when I was doing classical recordings with the gain turned up, not when I was doing close miking. FWIW.

Last edited by John Brook; 18th March 2010 at 02:16 PM.. Reason: add text
John Brook is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2010   #46
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: France - Toulouse
Posts: 593

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Ferris View Post
Fwiw, (it's Jazz not Classical) the first track (Joy Spring) on my MySpace page was made with my 1202 VLZ, pair of DPA 4011s > a Marantz CDR300 CD recorder.

The gain's a little lower on this but same chain
Beatrice 3.mp3 - DivShare

Disclaimer---I'm not an engineer.
Great piano sound and playing, but where does all that noise come from ? If it's from the 1202, sure this should not be used for classical recording.

JMM

EDIT : I didn't see your previous answer
mathieujm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2010   #47
Lives for gear
 
rumleymusic's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,837

Quote:
I'm not bashing the Mackie, even if it comes across that way. I got a lot of great recordings out of it. It's just that every once and a while, I got a nice radio station, florescent lights and coke machine noises. The later had to come through the PS; who knows how the former got into the machine????
The only noise and frequency pickup problems I usually get are from using unbalanced or flimsy cables. In any analog mixer there is also a chance AC noise or foreign transformer noise will get into the system. It is a common problem that usually can be solved by using a power conditioner.
rumleymusic is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2010   #48
Lives for gear
 
GYMusic's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: Santa Ynez, Marxifornia
Posts: 852

Quote:
Originally Posted by JEGG View Post
Yes, Mackies are just fine with a couple of caveats. Gain structure is absolutely key. Follow directions exactly. Everyone wants to run these boards way too hot! Failure to employ good gain structure will result in compromised recordings. OTH, the Mackies can sound very open and easy if they're used correctly. Let the thing breathe.
I agree. Especially if you use the EQ in an additive way... pull back the gain... you can hear it start clipping (which can be a good thing in some instances).
__________________
Web Site
Mastering
Blog
GYMusic is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2010   #49
Shark Sandwich
 
recordinghopkins's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Gig City
Posts: 2,041

I have a 1604 VLZ PRO, and it sounds great with dynamic mics, but the input impedance is pretty low and it makes condensers sound harsh.

If I am not mistaken, the 1604's input impedance is around 1100Ω. For 200-300Ω condensers, you would want at least a 2000Ω preamp input. From what I understand, the rule of thumb for target input impedance should be on the order of ten times the mic's impedance.

Anyway, regardless of why, I don't like the sound of condensers with my 1604's preamps.
__________________
Hopkins Media Services
recordinghopkins is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2010   #50
Lives for gear
 
Tommy-boy's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Suburbs of Philly, PA
Posts: 583

Quote:
Originally Posted by recordinghopkins View Post
I have a 1604 VLZ PRO, and it sounds great with dynamic mics, but the input impedance is pretty low and it makes condensers sound harsh.

If I am not mistaken, the 1604's input impedance is around 1100Ω. For 200-300Ω condensers, you would want at least a 2000Ω preamp input. From what I understand, the rule of thumb for target input impedance should be on the order of ten times the mic's impedance.

Anyway, regardless of why, I don't like the sound of condensers with my 1604's preamps.
I have the same observations on my 1604. Condensers sound leans toward being harsh and even brittle. But the 57s hold up just fine.
Tommy-boy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2010   #51
Lives for gear
 
rumleymusic's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,837

The VLZ-3 mixers have an impedance of 3400ohms on the mic ins. Enough to bridge mics with higher output impedance's.
rumleymusic is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2010   #52
Shark Sandwich
 
recordinghopkins's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Gig City
Posts: 2,041

I just got out my manual for the 1604 VLZ PRO and double checked the input impedance. Turns out that it is 1300Ω, not 1100Ω as I stated. Still, the same problem with condensers arises. It's nice to see that Mackie has made this change in the VLZ-3.
recordinghopkins is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 23rd March 2010   #53
Gear interested
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 4

Dynamic Hum

Quote:
Originally Posted by roonsbane View Post

There is a place I have done broadcast's here in Minnesota where I could not use any dynamic mics due to two specific bad dimmer packs on the lights. Using 421's, 441's, D112, EV408's, Beyer M160's, SM7's, I would get bad humming when they weren't full on or full off. Replace them with any condenser mic and all is good.
Cameron
I once recorded a large piece for the New Music America festival at the Brooklyn Academy of Music, in the Carey Playhouse (now a movie theatre, I think.) There was a subway electrical substation directly below the stage, and all dynamic mics produced (or induced) hum. We had to use all condensor mics on that stage. It was a 40-some channel mix, with two drummers, and not a single dynamic.

Michael DeMark
mikerphone is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 23rd March 2010   #54
Shark Sandwich
 
recordinghopkins's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Gig City
Posts: 2,041

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikerphone View Post
I once recorded a large piece for the New Music America festival at the Brooklyn Academy of Music, in the Carey Playhouse (now a movie theatre, I think.) There was a subway electrical substation directly below the stage, and all dynamic mics produced (or induced) hum. We had to use all condensor mics on that stage. It was a 40-some channel mix, with two drummers, and not a single dynamic.

Michael DeMark
sheesh, have fun in post with that one!
recordinghopkins is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 23rd March 2010   #55
Gear interested
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 4

There was no post - straight to 2-track.
mikerphone is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th March 2010   #56
Shark Sandwich
 
recordinghopkins's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Gig City
Posts: 2,041

wow, do you remember what condensers you used for close miking the drums?
recordinghopkins is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th March 2010   #57
Gear addict
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: Sao Paulo
Posts: 306

Send a message via Skype™ to DannyL
A few years ago there were several Mackie desks in OB vans around the USA. I discovered that the VLZ mic preamps were extremely subject to RF interference because of the low impedance of the inputs. V ery L ow
Z impedance. On short cable runs there was no problem, but on runs in excess of 60 ft..... Ouch! Considering that most stadium announce booths are more than 2500 cable feet away from the mic pre....well, we used a lot of battery powered mic pre's

The line inputs seemed okay. The EQ was not great.

Danny
DannyL is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2010   #58
Gear Head
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 46

Soundcraft Notepad?

i wonder if anyone A/B'ed a test between the 802 and the new Soundcraft babymixer with the GB30's....
studentjohn36 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2010   #59
Lives for gear
 
Teddy Ray's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: Carolina is where they'll bury me.
Posts: 7,095

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikerphone View Post
I once recorded a large piece for the New Music America festival at the Brooklyn Academy of Music, in the Carey Playhouse (now a movie theatre, I think.) There was a subway electrical substation directly below the stage, and all dynamic mics produced (or induced) hum. We had to use all condensor mics on that stage. It was a 40-some channel mix, with two drummers, and not a single dynamic.

Michael DeMark
do you have a link to the recording, where I may purchase it?
Teddy Ray is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2010   #60
Lives for gear
 
Teddy Ray's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: Carolina is where they'll bury me.
Posts: 7,095

I also want to say that the WENDT X4 is a phenomenal mixer. Very clean, nice sound, and very, very flexible.

God, I miss mine.
Teddy Ray is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Mackie VLZ3 4-Bus Mixers Offer Proven VLZ Technology with Higher Channel Count The Press Desk at Gearslutz.com Product Alerts older than 2 months 0 7th June 2010 07:58 AM
1604 vlz pro mackie.... did i get a good deal?? tyler477 So much gear, so little time! 5 7th November 2008 09:53 PM
Mackie VLZ vs VLZ Pro. What's the difference simonv So much gear, so little time! 8 12th October 2006 08:02 PM
Mackie onyx mixers,1620 any good? FOURTHTUNZ Low End Theory 8 1st October 2005 07:01 PM
Mackie XDR preamps like on 1402 VLZ Pro - good or bad? Dorkas High end 4 20th February 2005 10:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:13 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.