![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Tags: accessories and stuff, gigging or gagging, mikage |
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 512
Thread Starter |
Occasionally I experience situations when I'd like a little more diffuse field HF lift from my 8020 pair (this isn't built into their design, unlike some Schoeps, Neuman KM183, Rode NT55 etc). I remember that a pair of pressure build-up washers were supplied with the older MKH20 omni mics, to achieve this end without electronic or software-based eq...at source if you will. I found a couple of plumbing store washers and slid them over the end of the mics, in an attempt to emulate the MKH20 procedure...they are approximately the same dimensions as the washers for that particular mic. The grille cover of the 8020 is a bit 'wavy' (doesn't mate with the body quite flat, you may see this in the photos) so mine is a best attempt to line the washer up with the lower edge of the grille. I'm sure this (if it works) would provide a much more subtle 'lift' than APE spheres, for example, but may address the concerns of those who find the mic's flat response to be a little dull ? Don't forget that the MKH20 really hedges it's bets, because in addition to the pressure rings it also includes a Diffuse Field Eq switch which introduces a gentle (?) lift beginning above 2k of 6dB from 8k to 20k. Can anyone here see any reason why they wouldn't function in a similar way to the MKH20 rings ? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear Head Joined: Jan 2010 Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 45
|
Hi, I'm afraid it will not work as you expect as a pressure ring will only lower the frequency where the pressure bump and the increasing directivity starts at. So, for a diffuse field equal. mic the bump gets wider to lower freq., for a free field equalized mic like the MKH8020 you will only get a small bump at mid frequencies and very few HF lift (this is already compensated by the mic itself). The best way to achieve a variable diffuse field compensation is to use a software eq afterwards. A rule of thumb is +3 dB when half the wavelength is equal to the mic diameter increasing linearly up to a boost of about 6-10 dB (depending on the polar pattern of the mic). Nils |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 941
|
studer58- In addition to what Noki has said, remember that with the pressure rings, in addition to the boost of a limited range of frequency on axis (about 2 or 3 to 8k), there is also there is also a depression of those same frequencies from obtuse angles. It makes the mic more directional-a bit toward hypercardioid. So, as Noki has said, this isn't related much to the issue of free/diffuse field omni's. The effect of the rings (limited shelf) with the HF shelf produces a frequency response that is a little counter intuitive, it is much more of a peak, something like the chart of a Neumann 183/130. No reason not to try DIY rings-the Sennheiser supplied ones leave a sticky deposit on the on the mic-not something you want near the diaphragm. Used without the lift, the rings can contribute texture and detail. |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sennheiser MKH8020 wind ensemble samples | hughesmr | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 8 | 3rd March 2009 06:01 AM |
| QTC1-MKH8020-CM3 mp3's! | Audiop | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 20 | 21st October 2008 09:19 PM |
| True pressure vs pressure gradient? | jnorman | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 17th January 2008 05:49 PM |
| RF Choke rings. Do you use them? Do they work? | roonsbane | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 11 | 13th September 2007 05:41 AM |
| |