Orchestral Percussion Sampling Project - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: , ,

Orchestral Percussion Sampling Project

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22nd February 2010   #1
Lives for gear
 
recordinghopkins's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Music City
Posts: 1,536

Thread Starter
Talking Orchestral Percussion Sampling Project

In the next few weeks, I will begin recording high quality orchestral percussion instruments to create a sample pack to augment my productions. There are a ton of great libraries out there, but I am a student and the good ones cost several hundred dollars. Once complete, I will give them away to anyone that wants them, probably governed by a Creative Commons license.

I would love to get some input from fellow gearslutz as I plan the sessions.
I will probably begin with the most common stuff - triangle, tambo, suspended and crash cymbals, etc, then moving on to melodic percussion like vibes and timpani. My plan is to record one instrument at a time, with as many possible techniques as useful. I am doing this in cooperation with the department of percussion studies at my college, and I have outstanding talent lined up to play.

Some of the instruments will be recorded in the school's studios, the big stuff like timpani and concert chimes and the like will be done in the music hall.

I will update this thread regularly as I begin the project, and I hope to get some great suggestions from you as I go.

EDIT: Many of you may be interested in getting copies of this stuff. Please hold off your emails and private messages until you see in this thread a call for interest. It may be months, but this will get done and be worth the wait. Thanks!
recordinghopkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd February 2010   #2
Lives for gear
 
recordinghopkins's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Music City
Posts: 1,536

Thread Starter
my first question:
What file type would be the best to distribute the files? I will be recording 24 bit / 96k audio, should I just zip the wavs up and let others worry about file type for their application?
recordinghopkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th March 2010   #3
Lives for gear
 
recordinghopkins's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Music City
Posts: 1,536

Thread Starter
bump
recordinghopkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th March 2010   #4
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,254

Quote:
Originally Posted by recordinghopkins View Post
my first question:
What file type would be the best to distribute the files? I will be recording 24 bit / 96k audio, should I just zip the wavs up and let others worry about file type for their application?
24/96 would be ideal, and if you can also create a downsampled version at 24/48. That would do it I think as most engineers can easily work with those rates.

Sounds like fun but challenging project. Good luck!
MichaelPatrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2010   #5
Gear addict
 
Mats H's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 469

Send a message via MSN to Mats H
Quote:
Originally Posted by recordinghopkins View Post
my first question:
What file type would be the best to distribute the files? I will be recording 24 bit / 96k audio, should I just zip the wavs up and let others worry about file type for their application?
Hi,

Having recorded loads of sampled instruments, I find that 24 bit 96 Khz .WAV files are the way to go. Better give people clean .WAV files and let them use whatever sampler they prefer. Also, recording at 96k allows you to detune the samples while still retaining a lot of the audio energy above 20 KHz. Most engineers/musicians who are working with samples have a grasp about sample rates and resampling. Even if they don't, most software will resample with at least acceptably good quality.

I recommend you to record a lof of samples in all velocities. Even though you get a couple of perfect samples in a few select velocities, I can't stand the machine gun effect of repeated samples when working with samples. And one imperfect sample might be perfect in another project.

Best of luck, I hope you'll have a lot of fun doing this! thumbsup
Mats H is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2010   #6
Lives for gear
 
recordinghopkins's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Music City
Posts: 1,536

Thread Starter
hey thanks for the replies! I assumed that 24/96 would be the best way to go when tracking, but I hadn't thought about detuning doing a better job at 96. for the sake of server space and bandwidth, I may dither down and distro at 48 though.
recordinghopkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2010   #7
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,254

Quote:
Originally Posted by recordinghopkins View Post
hey thanks for the replies! I assumed that 24/96 would be the best way to go when tracking, but I hadn't thought about detuning doing a better job at 96. for the sake of server space and bandwidth, I may dither down and distro at 48 though.
I would suggest not dithering unless you're going to release at 44.1, and even then having 24 bits is better for most people. The ideal package would include all these:

24/96 - hi res "pro" quality
24/48 - "pro" quality
24/44.1 - many people record at this quality
16/44.1 dithered - some people record at CD audio quality, but pros rarely do

I think it comes down to what you want to put out there and support. Do you want "pros" using it, hobbyists, or both?
MichaelPatrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st April 2010   #8
Lives for gear
 
recordinghopkins's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Music City
Posts: 1,536

Thread Starter
I am not going to financially benefit from this, so to be frank, I don't care who uses it. From pro to garageband, all will be welcome. The trick is finding affordable hosting (free) for others to download from. I am hoping I can get my university to host them. If so, I would definitely want to release all files at 24/96. Perhaps a fellow GS has some space on their server somewhere.... we'll see. That's still a ways off.
recordinghopkins is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Looking for NYC studio/engineer for percussion recording project onion So much gear, so little time! 5 5th June 2011 11:02 AM
Orchestral Percussion ? Audio Child Music computers 6 12th January 2010 11:28 AM
Master Chan EQ (high shelf) for Orchestral Sampling Music (with nice color)? Edmond Dantes So much gear, so little time! 4 17th September 2009 09:54 PM
Mastering with different sampling rates across project Matt Hepworth Mastering forum 2 7th March 2008 04:17 PM
Opinions on mics for orchestral percussion secret secret Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 7 4th November 2005 05:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:34 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.