![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Tags: decisions decisions decisions, portable, recorder, youtube |
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear Head |
Hi all, I'm looking to buy a portable recorder, for recording dialogue and sound effects. I've got a AT8015 shotgun and I'm using Beyerdynamic DT 770 M headphones; they're not great to run in a field but do have kick ass isolation ![]() I've been trying to make up my mind about these recorders but I can't seem to find very detailed comparisons. I've come across a few review though and here's what I've found out. I am looking for further advice ![]() The FR2-LE has slightly better pre-amps and I read this does for recording backgrounds. I don't have a stereo mic yet but it's an option for the near future. So the -129dB noise floor of the Fostex is said to be more suitable than the -125dB of the Marantz. The FR2-LE has a trim and a level knobs as opposed to only one gain knob on the PMD661. The trim knobs set mic levels independently and then the big "master volume" knob is for global gain on both channels as well as monitoring levels, that's what I understand anyway. YouTube - Coffey Sound's Video Vault - Episode 1 - Fostex FR-2LE These are the only advantages I see on the Fostex. Beyond that, the Marantz seems to be better rugged, have better bigger knobs - it's true that the trim knobs of the Fostex look stupidly small but if it's been engineered that way it must be ok to use... the navigation in the menu of the PMD661 also looks much more pleasant and the pad is intuitive. My dilemma is that the Fostex seems to offer finer adjustments and better sound quality that the PMD661 but is less rugged and has a crappy navigation system with buttons all over the place. What do you think, does the Marantz ergonomy win over the Fostex sound quality? |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Gear Head | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2007 Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492
| |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear Head | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2007 Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492
| |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear Head | Awwwrrr!!! But I read a lot that they were rather quiet... and Ric Viers recommends it in his book The Sound Effects Bible. Right, I just don't know... Marantz, Fostex, Tascam...
|
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2007 Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492
|
In your OP you said you were going to use this recorder with an AT8015 shotgun mic, so is it really important how the built-in mics sound? If you want good built-in mics you probably want a Sony PCM-D50, but it lacks balanced mic inputs. Between the Tascam and the Fostex I would give the Tascam a try. No opinion on the Marantz. |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Gear Head | Quote:
I mean it's fairly disappointing to spend £400 on a device that you can't even use fully if you need to. Built-in mics would mostly be for slating but in case of a breakdown of my mic it's good to know i've got some back up...I haven't got my head around all this yet it's gonna be my first recorder but i gotta start with something, and I'm ready to pay for the Marantz... it's the one that people seem the most enthusiastic about! And yeah the PCM-D50 doesn't do XLR or phantom power (unbalanced only) so out of the question. I'm gonna keep looking for reviews of the Tascam though | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2007 Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492
|
You seem to be giving a lot of weight to that one review of the Tascam (I think I found the review in question and have read it).
|
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear |
i just did lots of research on these units, and wound up buying two of the tascam DR-100s. i just recieved the first one today, and will be testing it over the next couple of days, comparing the preamps with my regular studio stuff, etc. i will post some comparative clips asap.
__________________ jnorman sunridge studios salem, oregon |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Gear Head | Quote:
Also I must say I like the Marantz S/PDIF for an eventual mic preamp...
| |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Gear Head | Quote:
Cheers | |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear Head |
I watched this review: YouTube - Tascam DR100: Oral History and Digital Technology The guy doesn't say anything about preamps quality apart from "good sound quality"... otherwise I really like all the switches, file renaming, the wheel looks pretty handy... I still can't figure out why there seems to be two gain/volume knobs on the right side but they also seem to rotate together... can you manage XLR inputs levels independently? I guess not since he doesn't point it out in the video... Otherwise it seems a fair choice for me. But for £50 more I can get the Fostex with the trim knobs... I am not using two mics at the moment but what if I want a long term solution. That's it, the Tascam doesn't seem like a long term solution :( I guess this is just between me and myself now! I'm still waiting your review jnorman |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Lives for gear |
hiya bloo - hey, i just got this thing yesterday afternoon, so give me a minute on the review, okay? ![]() yes, you can control the LR signal levels independently. so far, the unit seems well built and sturdy, controls are smooth, and it is quite attractive and a good size. more later... |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2007 Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492
|
Again, I really can't recommend the Fostex.
|
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear Head |
Ha ha I was not putting any pressure on you jnorman, just keeping the conversation going ![]() I'll be on the lookout for your review, good stuff! |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear |
short update - i did a couple of quick recordings yesterday using the internal mics on the DR-100 and also using a pair of KM184s on some solo flute material in the studio. while it was obvious that the 184s produced a much nicer recording, the internal mics on the tascam actually made a useable pair of tracks - a bit lifted in the top end, but overall fairly smooth response, and low self noise. i dont plan to ever use the internal mics, but it did speak to some level of overall quality of the unit. defintely not bad for the money. the km184s performed admirably with the dr-100 preamps (there was plenty of gain - input was set at about 6), and i did not hear any untoward noise from the preamps. it was a breeze getting the files from the unit to my DAW. the unit powers up and down very quickly, which is nice. saturday, i have a long session of flute/piano duo and i will try to do a more comprehnsive comparison, and get some short clips to post here. i will probably start a new trhread for a short review of the DR-100 sunday or so. |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jan 2009 Location: Vilnius
Posts: 427
|
I had the exact same dilemma up until last week! Decided to go for the Fostex FR2-LE. Mainly based on the fact it's got slightly quieter preamps than the Marantz (only a few dBs) + good recommendations from two highly regarded sound recordists + personal experience with it while at university. Since I haven't intended to use the built in mics anyway, I am extremely pleased with the results. Have tried it with both Sennheiser MKH-416 & Rode NT3. Absolutely love the sound. Listened to some foley sounds I've recorded (water, doors opening) as well as speech on my monitors - sounded very natural and even convincingly realistic. If I have to think of something negative about it, then perhaps I'm not in love with its size and slightly plasticky construction of the battery compartment. That's it. But it's in terms of performance and SOUND (and that's what ultimately matters for me), it's an absolutely high quality piece of equipment. The Marantz is perhaps slightly smaller and has more usable built in mics, but otherwise I think the Fostex is a great unit! |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Gear Head |
Do you have the possibility to slate with the built-in mic on the Fostex?
|
| | |
| | #21 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2005 Location: All Over
Posts: 1,115
|
Can a Fostex FR2LE user answer the following please: Is it possible to monitor from both the RCA monitor outputs and the headphone out at the same time? From the manual it seems that one cancels out the other. I am looking for a way to send a mix to camera and be able to monitor from the FR2LE at the same time. |
| | |
| | #22 | ||
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2007 Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492
| Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #23 |
| Gear Head |
I might sound stupid but I'm confronted to a serious problem: the Tascam DR-100 doesn't seem to have anything to attach a strap to it. I was pretty much happy to buy that one, but if I can't carry it with a strap it is out of the question! Anyone to prove me wrong? Can the DR-100 actually be a suitable field recorder for a running man? |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2007 Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492
|
Maybe you could fabricate something that would attach with hooks to those metal things that surround the on-board mics?
|
| | |
| | #25 | |
| Gear interested Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 14
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Lives for gear |
bloo - the dr100 comes with a small padded case - you might could attach a strap to the case. or you can attach a strap to something with a tripod screw on it. are you really planning to record something while you are running?
|
| | |
| | #27 |
| Gear Head |
I won't necessarily be running but walking around yeah, and I am obviously not gonna get a tripod just for the recorder. I already have a custom boom pole that doesn't collapse to less than 1.10m and I'm not gonna get any more cumbersome gear/hardware; I spared £85 making my own boom pole, I can spend this money on a recorder with a proper native attaching system or try to fiddle something else, a mod for the Tascam...
|
| | |
| | #28 |
| Gear Head |
I was re-reading the thread and find it hard to believe how much of a pest I made myself and I apologize... I eventually went for the Tascam DR-100, it's not performing so well with my AT8015 but it seems that the impedances are not matching so well. I should look for a lower impedance mic (around 100 ohms) since the Tascam has a 1.2kOhms input impedance. Other than that it's performing quite well, I just need to crank up the gain so much that my recordings are a bit noisy but that should go away with a better matching mic. Thanks for all the advice, I'm very happy with the Tascam DR-100! |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2007 Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492
|
The AT8015 is a hot mic (-38 dBV @ 1 Pa). You're doing something wrong.
|
| | |
| | #30 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2008 Location: France - Toulouse
Posts: 554
| Quote:
JMM | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Marantz PMD661 any good? | SaschaP | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 77 | 17th May 2011 07:25 AM |
| Fostex FR2 LE VS FR2 | Dumb-Ask | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 5 | 17th May 2010 05:41 PM |
| Tascam DR-100 vs. Marantz PMD661 (Audio Quality) | Nityananda_SCSM | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 33 | 22nd March 2010 02:48 AM |
| Fireworks recorded on Marantz PMD661 | ImJohn | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 0 | 5th July 2009 08:37 AM |
| Limiters: Fostex FR2 vs FR2-LE | dsteinwedel | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 1 | 5th December 2008 04:39 PM |
| |