![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Tags: portable, recorder, stereo |
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear nut |
I am a classical site recordist. I got an M-Audio Microtrack II for stereo site recordings. Three weeks ago the Microtrack froze just before a critical recording. After pressing every button and holding various combiantions, I got it unstuck and it worked fine. Then, a week after that, I had the recording going already and the microtrack stopped in the middle of an opera. Needless to say, this really sucked! Fortunately, I was helping friends at the time so there was no paying client. I would love if people could direct me to an appropriate recorder to replace the Microtrack II. It must: -be highly stable and responsive (no locks or freezes) -record at 44.1/16, 44.1/24 and 88.2/24 -have a digital input (I prefer AES, but SPDIF would do) -have USB or FireWire access to files -record on stable HD or flash media -have a small or medium form-factor (not a rack unit) This seems like a lot to ask, but I'm sure other people have the same needs. The unit needs to be sub-$1000. If I had a real budget I would go for Sound devices or similar. Let me know what might work. Thanks. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear addict Joined: Sep 2009 Location: San Francisco
Posts: 462
|
My Tascam HD-P2 has been working fine for a few years & I bought it used. Wish the Eco-Charge people were still around - having AA batteries has been great. Retail was 900ish now with their newer models it should be even better pricing. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear interested Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 21
|
How are the pres on the Tascam HD-P2? Can they be bypassed to use better pres?
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear addict Joined: Sep 2009 Location: San Francisco
Posts: 462
|
The Tascam's pre-amps are marginal. I have a Focusrite &/or Mackie 1402 that can feed the Tascam. It will also take S/PDIF in. Thinking about: Upgrade your Digital Recorder or maybe a used Black Lion Auteur - if I was was to spend any more it would be to go for a Sound Devices. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear |
I use the hell out of my Zoom H4. Probably the best investment I have ever made. I also have owned the Edirol r-09. Like the zoom best because all of the usable features, fx, 4 track, usb interface, etc... They have a newer h4n model now so they are going on ebay for cheap.
__________________ It's just fun. "OH! There's air in my Hi Hat! I like that very much! |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2004 Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,376
| Did you update the firmware? I remember mine did that when I first bought it, then I updated the firmware. So far, no troubles. I use it as a backup for my Sound Devices 702 and feed it via the SPDIF input.
__________________ www.symphonicsound.com "The secret of life, though, is falling down seven times and get up eight times." Paulo Coelho |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear |
This is what we are using... Fostex FR2LE FR-2 Field Memory Recorder It does not have a digital input but its bigger brother does but it is more expensive FR-2 FR-2 Field Memory Recorder Cost of the FR2LE is under $500.00 the FR2 is just under $800.00 Works GREAT, sounds GREAT and it is easy to download from the card to the PC. A typical concert downloads in less than two minutes. Hope this helps...
__________________ -TOM- Thomas W. Bethel Managing Director Acoustik Musik, Ltd. Room with a View Productions Oberlin, OH 44074 www.acoustikmusik.com Doing what you love is freedom. Loving what you do is happiness. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2003 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,323
|
The FR2 is a great machine, but don't let it loose power while it is recording. You *will* loose everything recorded since the last time you completely stopped. Use a battery backup like an APC or similar (issues with internal batteries and power). And change out that stupid power conector for a TA-4 or something similar. I had that done at Location Sound to mine and it didn't cost much at all. Getting rid of the Microtrack would be a good thing- I had tons of issues with mine and when the battery finally died, I decided it wasn't good for much other than the landfill. Marantz makes some slick recorders as well. I have the rackmount CF recorder (PMD 580) and I've been very pleased with it. Doesn't do hi-res, but I don't really care so much about that. What is really nice is that every time you place a track, you get a new audio file. Line them all up and you have your full session without a dropped sample. Means that if you loose power for any reason, you're not screwed. I don't have a whole lot of experience with the Marantz portables, but the experience I have had has been very positive in terms of sound and reliability. --Ben |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2008 Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 5,291
|
For small and portable the Olympus LS-10 and LS-11 are nice. But you may like the Edirol R-09HR - very slightly larger, but unique in that it has a "repair" function. If you lose power and it lock, the "repair" function will find the file and then write the TOC so you can access it - without this function it would have been lost. I hope this helps. Yes - the HD-P2 and FR-2LE are nice machines, but are a lot larger and more "professional". I used the original FR-2 for a few years until I upgraded to the Nagra a year ago.
__________________ John Willett Sound-Link ProAudio Ltd. Circle Sound Services President - Fédération Internationale des Chasseurs de Sons (and lots more - please look at my Profile) |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear nut | Thanks. If the firmware update did the job, I should consider keeping it going. The issue is that I don't use it as backup. Due to the lack of paying clients and income, it is my primary recorder. Despite my age, I have been doing this a while. I would think I could have graduated to something higher-end, but the money is not there. Also, the Microtrack has the advantage of a tiny form factor. It's no sweat to take it with me on the subway, etc. If only my sytek and Mytek got that small!
|
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Gear nut | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2007 Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492
|
I am going to retire my FR-2LE. It's OK for recording but the output section is for s**t. In addition to the well-known hiss, the output clips if you turn the level control up too high. This is a definite impediment to accurate monitoring.
|
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
and here for $1300 Fostex FR-2 | Sweetwater.com Not sure why the one is so cheap but most places have it for about $1200. You may want to contact Musician's Friend and ask them to confirm the lower price. Good shopping! | |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2004 Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,376
|
FWIW - I do believe that both Fostex FR machines are currently discontinued. Maybe that explains the price difference? At NPR, the Marantz recorders are preferred. The 661 is a pretty nice bang for the buck and uses the SD card media. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Lives for gear |
Your biggest problem is the digital input. Most 'Pocket Style' recorders do not have one. I believe the M-Audio is the ONLY one under $500 that has a digital input. Hey, what else is out there under $500 that has digital inputs? Nothing....... |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2004 Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,376
| Yes, this is correct! And the only reason that I use it. Even the Korg DSD machines are void of this feature. Go figure!
|
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2008 Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 5,291
| The Sony PCM-D50 has a digital input - but I don't know the $ price, so I can't say if it's in budget or not.
|
| | |
| | #18 |
| Gear nut |
Is the Sony a reliable unit? The price is right at about $450. Also, it looks better built than the M-audio.
|
| | |
| | #19 | |
| One with big hooves |
The Marantz 661 has a digital input... I picked up a Fostex FR2LE last year & other then the weakass headphone output its been pretty stellar. I love the autosave feature... it saves once a minute so if the power goes it won't drop the whole recording. Its also impossible to accidentally delete something with the machine... fool proof & doesn't sound like much of anything which is just what I wanted.
__________________ J. 'Moose' Kahrs producer|mixer|recordist MooseAudio.com mooseaudio.bandcamp.com Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 206
|
The digital input on the D50 has been known to be incompatible with some equipment. Perhaps the issue has been resolved since I read about a while back, but from what I remember the Sony was very picky about the type of signal it requires (consumer stuff worked better than pro gear).
|
| | |
| | #21 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2008 Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 5,291
| Quote:
But I found that the 120dB efficient HD 25-1 worked perfectly with it. So, you really need to look at low-impedance and very efficient headphones - or use a battery headphone amp. like the Graham Slee Voyager. I hope this helps. | |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2007 Location: New York
Posts: 2,425
|
I have the Zoom H4n, and I love it. It's a swiss army knife recording tool. It also works nice as a headphone amp. for $299, It's kind of one of those can't go wrong things.
|
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| inexpensive stereo pair | jayjames | Low End Theory | 15 | 26th February 2006 10:37 PM |
| Best inexpensive recorder for phone interviews? | Flymax | Low End Theory | 4 | 28th September 2005 02:13 PM |
| Inexpensive stereo parametric EQ's | MASSIVE Master | So much gear, so little time! | 17 | 15th June 2004 01:03 PM |
| Good inexpensive stereo effects module wanted! | Manny Grossman | So much gear, so little time! | 15 | 19th January 2003 05:39 AM |
| |