Gefell M296 and DPA 4061 Comparo - Page 2 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: , ,

Gefell M296 and DPA 4061 Comparo

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th March 2011   #31
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,960

M296 is an omni microphone so comparison is AB vs AB.


/Peter
Audiop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th March 2011   #32
Gear maniac
 
fafalio's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: italy
Posts: 159

Send a message via MSN to fafalio Send a message via Skype™ to fafalio
ah, i thought it was a widecardiod!
but the distance of the two AB are completly different.
fafalio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2011   #33
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 850

4060 are ideal for small ensembles in very good acoustics.
aracu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2011   #34
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 941

I'm not asserting anything about the small DPA's, but I am bothered by references to the noise of microphones relative to the amount of ambient noise in a room, or even the level of program material.

That comparison or relationship is not necessarily meaningful.

Just because the level of electronic noise is lower than the ambient noise level of the room or the level of program material does not, at all, mean the noise is masked. Even program material is often under the noise level of the room.

A question for those with an engineering background:

Does noise produce modulation effects with program material and/or other noise? Or, doesn't everything intermodulate?

Not to confuse modulation with modulation distortion.
JEGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2011   #35
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,960

If you feed a periodic signal and low level noise thru a nonlinear system the periodic signal will be modulated by the noise but since the noise is very low to begin with the artefacts will end up at very low levels.

Also the resulting artefacts will by random like the noise = a small inaudible increase in noise level.

For new stationary spectral components (HD, IMD) to form two periodic signals are needed.


/Peter
Audiop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2011   #36
Lives for gear
 
didier.brest's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,792

Quote:
Originally Posted by JEGG View Post
Just because the level of electronic noise is lower than the ambient noise level of the room or the level of program material does not, at all, mean the noise is masked. Even program material is often under the noise level of the room.
I agree. The ambient noise may not mask a sound at lower level than itself when this sound has a different distribution of power in frequency so that, despite its lower global level, it has a higher level around some frequencies, like a musical program, or in some frequency band, like the self-noise of a microphone that has less roll-off in HF than the ambient noise. However I never noticed the noise excess from my DPA 4060s (-23 dBA ?) with respect to quieter condensers (Schoeps etc.).
didier.brest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2011   #37
Lives for gear
 
hbphotoav's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Location: NashVegas
Posts: 1,044

Thread Starter
re: fafalio's comment: 'Twas a 40cm AB vs. a 1m AB comparison, and to see how the $400 DPA compared to the $1,500 Gefell. I planned to use the take from the Gefells from the beginning, and that's what the client chose as well. If I didn't have the 4x price of the Gefells, I could live very well with the 4061s. In real-world playback, the differences are minute.

I've done a similar comparison on an organ concert (Cool Mic Comparo: Golden Ears requested) with a truly ORTF pair of Sennheiser MKH8040, a Brauner VM-1S in XY, and the DPAs in a 3m AB spacing. All three were rather well received. Nobody was particularly impressed with the AA CM-28s spread wide.
__________________
Harry Butler
Photography • Videography • Audio Visual Production
www.harrybutlerphotoav.com
hbphotoav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2011   #38
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 941

Peter, thanks for that. As I thought.
JEGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2011   #39
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,807

i have been using a pair of the DPA 4090s for chamber work, the 4090 is very similar to the 4060 and 4061, but is housed in a metal body for stand mounting. i posted a sample recording from the 4090s in this thread:
another video sample for critique
__________________
jnorman
sunridge studios
salem, oregon
jnorman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2011   #40
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,323

Quote:
Originally Posted by didier.brest View Post
I never noticed the noise excess from my DPA 4060s (-23 dBA ?) with respect to quieter condensers (Schoeps etc.).
I hope you meant +23dBA. I am astonished by this statement. The 4060 self noise floor is profoundly more noisy than any Schoeps.

Assuming that this argument, stated again ad infinitum, is that the self noise of DPA miniatures does not preclude them from being ambient main pairs in high quality classical recordings, I say quote me examples of them being used by the majors for CD release.

Their noise level is way to high for this purpose.
David Spearritt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2011   #41
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,807

david - please go listen to the recording i posted from the DPA 4090s and see what you think of them. (link in thread right above your last post.)
jnorman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2011   #42
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 850

Clip of 4060 pair on contemporary classical vocal duo, in a small church:
http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/8/...09/magn.sh.mp3
aracu is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
DPA 4061 On Orchestra rumleymusic Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 62 21st September 2009 07:26 PM
DPA 4061 Rentals? fifthcircle Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 8 1st September 2007 05:56 PM
DPA 4006/M296 opportunity DaveD Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 14 6th October 2006 03:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:16 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.