Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: , , , ,

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 26th November 2009   #1
Gear addict
 
low_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sunny CA
Posts: 410

Thread Starter
Cool Fathead Classical Guitar MS

Hello fellow Gear slutz! I recently bought a matched pair of Fathead Ribbons through Bayview Pro Audio. Yesterday was my first chance to try them out - Here is a very short snippet that I recorded in my parents living room (home for Turkey Day) while everyone was asleep.

I am posting this as a reference available for those who are interested in hearing the Fatheads in MS configuration. I manually decoded (copy side, flip phase, pan & adjust volumes etc.) No e.q., no compression - just a bit of ReaVerbate on side channels and a quick normalization. "Mixed" with no monitors :( just phones. Hope this is helpful for some of you writing your lists for Santa!

Guitar ~ (slightly to the left) 1 foot from Fathead in MS (Blumlein rotated 90deg) => FF400 (using built in pres)=>Reaper @ 44.1 24bit.

I am pretty happy with the results, esp. considering untreated (though decent sounding) room and no eq. Will do a test with my RNP tomorrow maybe(just came today ).

Go on, give er' a listen!
Attached Files
File Type: mp3 guitar ms4.mp3 (1.14 MB, 438 views)
low_z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2009   #2
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Haifa,Israel
Posts: 1,282

Sounds great!
What pres did you run these through?
Tomer1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2009   #3
Gear addict
 
low_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sunny CA
Posts: 410

Thread Starter
ff pre's

Thanks Tomer! As I posted, the pres in the FF400 were used. Gain was set to 54db on each channel I think. The pres on the fireface units get so much crap here on GS, but I find them pretty usable. That being said, the fatheads are quite... well... fat sounding I guess. I will test with the RNP as soon as I have a chance! (I hope there is a significant difference at $475 for two channels!)
low_z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2009   #4
Gear Head
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 52

Thumbs up

It's pretty good!
But I'm sensing some sort of phase issue.Did you gain match the mics?
Perhaps it's my speakers acting funky...

Still cool though!

Edit: What guitar is it?
ThatOlBluesSound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2009   #5
Gear addict
 
low_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sunny CA
Posts: 410

Thread Starter
BluesSound - I also heard some "phasey" sounds when I played the file back on a system with LR Speakers very close to each other. Could this be due to separate reverbs set identically on the side channels? I may not have done the balance right on the mix. I brought the mid channel down quite a bit (4db or so) and used the ReaVerbate plugin (@ like -9db wet) on the S+ and S- channels. Like I said, no Monitors away from home, just phones :( I also may have set the gains off by a few db when recording. I can always post the dry signal mix if need be. Thanks for the feedback!

Edit: She's an Antonio Lorente Isabelle!
low_z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2009   #6
Lives for gear
 
Acoustic Cloud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: around the corner
Posts: 1,990

Sounds very nice! I have never done MS with 2 ribbons, always used a SDC as the mid. I bought a Triton audio dynamic adapter a while back, which allows dynamics to use phantom power, and it was a great purchase. It allows you to get ribbons further from a quieter source. Anyway, your setup there sounds real good.
__________________
If the Earth wasnt created, where'd all the dirt come from?

Acoustic Cloud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2009   #7
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York, Florida
Posts: 11

I believe the "Phase" issue might be coming from the rear side of the "mid" mic. Since the Fatheads are both figure 8, there seems to be another element that is causing a perceived phasing, the back-side of the "mid" mic. To my understanding, this is why you use a cardioid or single source as the mid mic (like the SDC that Acoustic Cloud mentioned), in an MS configuration.

Guitar sounds beautiful, nice chops too!

I purchased an original Fathead directly from Cascade several years ago Serial Number 606. I have ben very pleased with it and wish I would have bought 2 to do a Blumlein back then.

low_z, I have a question for you. Are these the newer "Round Backed" Fatheads?>FatHeads II? or the older version?

Last edited by VincentBlack; 27th November 2009 at 08:11 AM.. Reason: clarity
VincentBlack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2009   #8
Gear addict
 
low_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sunny CA
Posts: 410

Thread Starter
Acoustic Cloud - Thanks for the feedback! I did consider getting two of the Triton adaptors, but instead put the money (which I don't really have ) towards an FMR RNP. I bought the Fatheads specifically for recording classical strings and drum overheads (my only sdc is a dfegad Nady CM90). I have made decent recordings with the nady but meh...
Quote:
Originally Posted by VincentBlack View Post
I believe the "Phase" issue might be coming from the rear side of the "mid" mic. Since the Fatheads are both figure 8, there seems to be another element that is causing a perceived phasing, the back-side of the "mid" mic. To my understanding, this is why you use a cardioid or single source as the mid mic (like the SDC that Acoustic Cloud mentioned), in an MS configuration.

Guitar sounds beautiful, nice chops too!

I purchased an original Fathead directly from Cascade several years ago Serial Number 606. I have ben very pleased with it and wish I would have bought 2 to do a Blumlein back then.

I have a question for you. Are these the newer "Round Backed" Fatheads?>FatHeads II? or the older version?
First of all WELCOME TO GEARSLUTZ!!!!dfegad

Thanks for the kind words! I would be surprised if the phasey sound is always a result of using two fig 8 mics, as the mics came with a blumlein bar and a crash coarse in MS recording. I have heard many lovely recordings done with a stereo Royer mic ( the active one which is also two fig 8's). I probably just F'd something up along the way or messed up by putting reverb on just the side channels separately (Mid channel is totally dry).

My mics are the original Fatheads (4057 and 4059) and are the new round basket on both sides with a very pretty gold mesh/burgundy body color scheme! The very nice woman and the tech dude I spoke with at Cascade both told me there is no sonic difference between the two. I justified using the price difference in cash towards a pair of Mogami cables I received with the order.
low_z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2009   #9
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York, Florida
Posts: 11

low_z thank you for the enthusiastic welcome!!!

I have been a gearslutz member for only a short while, but I have been involved with professional audio for quite some time, 20+ years.

The explanation of your phasing issue was based on my own experiences over the years. I have run into exactly the same issue when using 2 figure 8 mics in a MS set up in a "poorly treated" room, there seems to be a reflected sound that works its way into the blend, I think only exacerbated by the reverb treatment used. I'm certain that in a properly treated room, this affect would be negated.

BTW, your playing is what got me to comment in the first place. I was happy "lurking" on GS. I never, ever planned on posting, but was inspired by your dedication to learning how to actually play your instrument, which is rare these days and your dedication to the GS community, even on a holiday trip, you found time to contribute. I figured if you could take the time to do that, it was worth me coming out of the shadows to add my 2 cents and making my first ever post. Kudos.
VincentBlack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2009   #10
Gear addict
 
low_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sunny CA
Posts: 410

Thread Starter
Smile

Quote:
BTW, your playing is what got me to comment in the first place. I was happy "lurking" on GS. I never, ever planned on posting, but was inspired by your dedication to learning how to actually play your instrument, which is rare these days and your dedication to the GS community, even on a holiday trip, you found time to contribute. I figured if you could take the time to do that, it was worth me coming out of the shadows to add my 2 cents and making my first ever post. Kudos.
Well that just makes me feel all warm and ...phasey? Glad you're "out of the shadows!" I'm sure you'll contribute much here on GS.

Regarding the room - unfortunately (or maybe fortunately) I am leaving tomorrow and won't have time to record any more at my parents' house. I had planned on trying out the RNP, but I'm a dweeb and forgot to bring trs patch cables to go into the fireface.

I'll post examples as soon as I find time/space/cables to record. (I actually wrote a fun little ditty for recording, but alas, it will have to wait.) I am curious to hear the mix on my monitors, and also to see if I get the same effect with the new recording in my living room back home.

Is anyone else hearing phasey effects?
low_z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2009   #11
Gear nut
 
Horking My Lunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 103

Send a message via AIM to Horking My Lunch
Buying a pair of Fatheads was pretty much the best investment I've made in a while. Stellar mics for the price.
Horking My Lunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2009   #12
Gear addict
 
low_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sunny CA
Posts: 410

Thread Starter
Yeah, for the type of music I record, I hardly touch LDC/SDC's anymore. I guess I'm just on a dynamics kick. I eventually will purchase a KEL or Mojave mulitipattern mic, but for now... Dude your screename is frickin hilariousthumbsup
low_z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2009   #13
Lives for gear
 
NorseHorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: DC
Posts: 2,067

Lightbulb

Just dropping by, and I wanted to chime in the "phase" issue. I'm listening on crappy speakers at the moment and don't hear it, but then again, they would only reveal if something was waaay off. Here are a few thoughts...

If you had your mics as close as possible, you shouldn't have any phase issues. And contrary to ThatOleBlues' suggestion, you don't need to level match mics. That's part of the beauty of M/S - changing to levels to determine the width. Judging by your gain structure (-4 on the sides relative to the mid), you should have a pretty decent balance (which you do).

If something sounds off to you, your likely culprit is the reverb. Try applying it to the whole mix after it's summed. Or... apply it just to the original side and then run it through a m/s plug, thereby preserving the true +/- mirror imaging required for m/s. By applying the reverb separately to the positive and negative side, you are no longer in TRUE m/s land.

Good luck! Sounds pretty good already. thumbsup
__________________
I-95, I-64, I-85
FS: Three sets of headphones ($35)
NorseHorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2009   #14
Gear addict
 
low_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sunny CA
Posts: 410

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by NorseHorse View Post
Just dropping by, and I wanted to chime in the "phase" issue. I'm listening on crappy speakers at the moment and don't hear it, but then again, they would only reveal if something was waaay off. Here are a few thoughts...

If you had your mics as close as possible, you shouldn't have any phase issues. And contrary to ThatOleBlues' suggestion, you don't need to level match mics. That's part of the beauty of M/S - changing to levels to determine the width. Judging by your gain structure (-4 on the sides relative to the mid), you should have a pretty decent balance (which you do).

If something sounds off to you, your likely culprit is the reverb. Try applying it to the whole mix after it's summed. Or... apply it just to the original side and then run it through a m/s plug, thereby preserving the true +/- mirror imaging required for m/s. By applying the reverb separately to the positive and negative side, you are no longer in TRUE m/s land.



Good luck! Sounds pretty good already. thumbsup
Thanks for dropping in NorseHorse! btw, what do you consider to be "crappy speakers?" My monitors are hardly pro (event tr5's), but definitely better than some options out there.
I made the recording with a blumlein pattern mic adaptor (rotated 90 deg so mid mic facing guitar) so I doubt any phase issues would have developed in mic placement. I will try your advice and put the reverb on a mix of the side tracks instead of on each side track individually to keep me in "true MS land" which sounds like the place to be. I may also just post the tracks dry - I suppose this is the real listening test. Thanks for the feedback!!
Edit: Just added mp3 files. ms402 is reverb on the sum of the sides , ms4dry is... dry
Attached Files
File Type: mp3 guitar ms402.mp3 (1.15 MB, 107 views)
File Type: mp3 guitar ms4dry.mp3 (1.15 MB, 134 views)

Last edited by low_z; 30th November 2009 at 09:18 AM.. Reason: added mp3 files
low_z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2009   #15
Gear Head
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 52

Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by NorseHorse View Post
Just dropping by, and I wanted to chime in the "phase" issue. I'm listening on crappy speakers at the moment and don't hear it, but then again, they would only reveal if something was waaay off. Here are a few thoughts...

If you had your mics as close as possible, you shouldn't have any phase issues. And contrary to ThatOleBlues' suggestion, you don't need to level match mics. That's part of the beauty of M/S - changing to levels to determine the width. Judging by your gain structure (-4 on the sides relative to the mid), you should have a pretty decent balance (which you do).

If something sounds off to you, your likely culprit is the reverb. Try applying it to the whole mix after it's summed. Or... apply it just to the original side and then run it through a m/s plug, thereby preserving the true +/- mirror imaging required for m/s. By applying the reverb separately to the positive and negative side, you are no longer in TRUE m/s land.

Good luck! Sounds pretty good already. thumbsup

Yup.
The speakers I was listening tend to play funky sometimes, so it might have been that. But I sensed something weird...It might have been the reverb.I'll hear them raw to see (hear ).

Oh and norsehorse's right! I totally forgot the nature of these mics.When I heard the "issue" my mind must have tricked me into thinking you were doing it with 3 mics hence why I asked about if you had gain matched the sides. At least, that's how they taught me M/S (with 3 mics ).

Sorry if I confused you.
ThatOlBluesSound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2009   #16
Gear addict
 
low_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sunny CA
Posts: 410

Thread Starter
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatOlBluesSound View Post
Yup.
The speakers I was listening tend to play funky sometimes, so it might have been that. But I sensed something weird...It might have been the reverb.I'll hear them raw to see (hear ).

Oh and norsehorse's right! I totally forgot the nature of these mics.When I heard the "issue" my mind must have tricked me into thinking you were doing it with 3 mics hence why I asked about if you had gain matched the sides. At least, that's how they taught me M/S (with 3 mics ).

Sorry if I confused you.
No worries, how did the dry files sound to you?
low_z is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Miking classical guitar nygade48 Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs 6 19th June 2008 03:29 AM
fathead II thru biz for heavy guitar clip mus1k_freak Gear Shoot-Outs / Sound File Comparisons / Audio Tests 1 12th January 2008 04:53 PM
Classical Guitar Mic? GearGeek Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 10 13th November 2006 09:32 PM
Mics for classical guitar. Cosmonauta Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 31 2nd September 2006 04:43 PM
Classical Guitar Haydn Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs 0 17th August 2006 10:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:01 AM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.