![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Tags: advice observations enlightenment, recorder, technical techiness |
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3
Thread Starter |
hi i have ampex f44. i want to make sound on sound records. but recorder doesnt copy data from channel 1 to channel 2. interesting thing is that it can copy data from channel 2 to channel 1. what do you think can be the reason? i'll explain sticker on the case cover says: "To record sound on sound, first use mono 1 position, then add 1>2 position, then add 2>1 position, etc" i did exactly as it says. for first record take - i used mono 1 position - everything is ok, RECORDED DATA IS ON CHANNEL 1. for second record take - i used 1>2 position AND RECORDER DOESNT COPY TAKE 1 FROM CHANNEL 1 TO CHANNEL 2, it only records take 2 to channel 2. so after step 1>2 first take is in channel 1 alone, and second take is in channel 2 also alone. it shouldnt be so.. both 1 and 2 takes should be on channel 2 how can i fix it? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear interested Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3
Thread Starter |
btw can anyone give me Ampex F44 schematics?
|
| | |
| | #3 |
| Super Moderator Joined: Aug 2002 Location: NYC
Posts: 7,405
| Vintage Stereo Service Manuals, Marantz, Akai, Teac, Sony, etc $8.50 for the service manual. Parts Sources for Ampex Buffs Parts resource for Ampex machines Ampex, F-44 The Audio Circuit may be able to help you.
__________________ Steve Remote AuraSonicLtd.com the home of ASL Mobile & Location Production Remoteness on the Linkedin Network What about my Facebook Profile? Remoteness on Myspace |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2003 Location: Atascadero, CA
Posts: 4,058
|
I had an f44 way back. It was not intuitive to use in the manner you are trying. Yes it is supposed to work but I distinctly remember being frustrated with it and turning to other machines to accomplish the "sound on sound" thing. It is a lot easier with 2 machines and bouncing back and forth. Sorry I couldn't help but it has been close to 40 years since I had the machine.
|
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear interested Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3
Thread Starter |
thanks a lot for respond guys! i recently got acquintance of one man who knows a lot about old ampex machines, he helped me with advice.. btw Rick, can you tell me what vintage machines you suppose to be intuitive for sound on sound recording? |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Accurate Sound .... Ampex reissue | tomcolliva | So much gear, so little time! | 3 | 27th July 2007 10:26 AM |
| Does this sound like a record? | cjbdrmr | Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs | 10 | 2nd December 2006 01:13 PM |
| Ampex mm-1200 sound | vikingdude | High end | 3 | 30th January 2005 10:58 AM |
| |