Piano Mic'ing - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: , , ,

Piano Mic'ing

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th September 2009   #1
Lives for gear
 
RedWallStudio's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 974

Thread Starter
Talking Piano Mic'ing

I've always used a stereo pair of LDC's on piano and have always had the high end keys in the right speaker and the low end keys in the left... mostly because that is how the piano is visually which makes more sense to me. But a player today said I have it backwards and the the high end should be in the left and the low end should be in the right because thats the way the audience hears it. I've been recording piano for several years now and never gave it a second thought... now I'm questioning my logic.

Which way do you guys have it panned?
__________________
"I feel so miserable without you; it's almost like having you here." Stephen Bishop
RedWallStudio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2009   #2
Lives for gear
 
narcoman's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9,574

well he's talking nuts because i've NEVER seen a gig where a piano player is "front on" to the audience!


Nearly always side on. As for panning - it makes absolutely no difference, but for solo piano i do very very little panning - but i do run outriggers in addition for "spacial setting".
narcoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2009   #3
Lives for gear
 
Tonio Ruiz's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 588

I totally agree with narcoman, it's like in drums, sometimes I mix the drum kit as being the audience and sometimes I mixed it like being the player, it's all a matter of what the mix asks for

as for the piano, i think it should be the same regarding on which other instruments you have laid there and what ever works better for that particular track

I have usually record pianos with 2 mics like u described, but a few days ago I recorded a piano in a nice room, so, as it was for a vox/piano track, I decided to place some more mics to play with later on, so I did 3 mics close to each area of the piano, low/mid/high, and then I placed 2 room mics like 12 feet away from the piano to add ambience, I haven't mixed it yet, maybe I'll use them, maybe not, but I certainly will give it a try
Tonio Ruiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2009   #4
member no 666
 
Fletcher's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 10,110

If he's the client pan it the way he wants it panned. If he's an ancillary player on the session do what the client wants [and if the client has no opinion, do what you want].

FWIW I've always done left hand, left speaker - right hand, right speaker... or dead on mono.

Peace.
__________________

CN Fletcher

Professional Affiliations:

R/E/P Professional Recording Engineer and Producer forums - serious hobbyists welcome

SoundPure.com


mwagener wrote on Sat, 11 September 2004 14:33
We are selling emotions, there are no emotions in a grid

Roscoe Ambel once said:
Pro-Tools is to audio what fluorescent is to light
Fletcher is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2009   #5
Gear addict
 
studiostuff's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 488

Nobody except a piano player hears a piano left hand/left speaker... right hand/right speaker wide.

Most folks hear the piano from the reflected sound bouncing off the raised lid. (OK, we're talking a grand piano with the lid open).

Most of the time, for me, piano sounds best as a mono-ish source panned where you like in the mix.

If it's a solo piano recording, pan as you like. I think hard left and hard right sounds unreal.
studiostuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2009   #6
Lives for gear
 
Corran's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: South Georgia
Posts: 2,929

Send a message via AIM to Corran
If you see a piano in a classical recital, lid open, the low strings are to the right (because they are longer) and the high strings are to the left. If you are close enough you can kind of hear it in stereo but not really in general.

You didn't mention what genre you were recording for. If it's classical, I'd pan it correctly with bass - right and treble - left, but then I would just use a stereo pair in AB or ORTF a little ways outside of the lid (or in a concert hall) and not have to worry about it. Jazz, sometimes the whole thing panned to the left as a point source. If it's pop-oriented, then do what the client wants or whatever you like, but I guess it's more common to do it how you've done it, bass - left and treble - right?

Also it's important to note the sound doesn't come out of the keys, so the physical appearance of the keys doesn't particularly matter.
__________________

www.oceanstarproductions.com
Corran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2009   #7
Gear maniac
 
t-hiho's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Location: Nurember
Posts: 197

Send a message via Skype™ to t-hiho
I think this totally depends on what else is going on in your mix. I always try to choose my panning in relation
to the other content. So if muddy sounding rhythm guitar is panned on the left side, it could even be perfect to reverse the pianos panning as seen from the players view.
I know so many people who even connected their hifi speakers the wrong way... ;-) Of course, we don't wanna work for those, but what I'm trying to say is: just pan it that way, the mix itself requests...
t-hiho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2009   #8
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,048

context of the song.

what the producer says.

Wide stereo often is not the right perspective. Instead: mono (or near mono) panned in the field; relative to the mix.
Eric Greedy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2009   #9
Lives for gear
 
RKrizman's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 6,601

I'm a piano player, so I'm used to hearing treble right and bass left. And that's how the beautiful babe sitting on the bench next to me hears it. So everyone else can go suck it.

-R
RKrizman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2009   #10
Lives for gear
 
Greg Curtis's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,475

Wide-panned, close-mic'ed piano is nasty and tacky.

But worse is live, wide-panned, closed mic'ed piano. I remember attending a live jazz performance at the Jazz Bakery in Culver City, L.A. The live mix guy had the piano's low in the left/high in the right across 40' of stage, and the little trumpet soloist sitting all alone in the middle. Bizarre!
Greg Curtis is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2009   #11
Lives for gear
 
narcoman's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9,574

doubly bizarre if you're sat at a front table in the audience and everytime you get a run on the piano it shoots across the stage! I really don't like wide panned piano in any circumstance! Cheesey and horrible!
narcoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2009   #12
Baz
Lives for gear
 
Baz's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada / San Diego CA ,USA
Posts: 1,084

I record piano on almost every session here and used to obsess about this a few years ago but have been mixing from the players perspective for one simple fact: as a listener - sitting out in the room where that piano is being played - it's one giant mono instrument for all intents and purposes, so mixing "stereo" from the listeners perspective makes little sense to me...
__________________
"Buy good tools, with track records, not GS flavor of the day, and there isn't anything you can't cut and have pride in. The flavor of the day will or won't prove itself over time." - Dan Kennedy 08.08'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenny Gioia View Post
That's a ridiculous analogy because Bruce is not a donut expert. He's an audio expert.
Baz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th September 2009   #13
Lives for gear
 
unit7's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: SoFo,Stockholm,Sweden
Posts: 697

+1 on not wide panning piano. On jazz mixes I use to pan full left/1 o'clock, with the treble side mic to the right. The other way around (treble side panned full left) I sometimes feel that when there's a piano solo it tends to get a bit too much on the left side. However I wouldn't mind panning the piano to the right instead (11 o'clock/full right). Then I would pan bass mic full right and treble mic 11 o'clock. I guess...
__________________

unit7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th September 2009   #14
Gear addict
 
Leon EA's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: Gearmany
Posts: 370

Quote:
Originally Posted by narcoman View Post
doubly bizarre if you're sat at a front table in the audience and everytime you get a run on the piano it shoots across the stage! I really don't like wide panned piano in any circumstance! Cheesey and horrible!
There is definitely something wrong when it sounds like the piano is 888 keys wide instead of 88 keys. tutt
__________________
We do what we must because we can.
Leon EA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th September 2009   #15
Lives for gear
 
narcoman's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9,574

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leon EA View Post
There is definitely something wrong when it sounds like the piano is 888 keys wide instead of 88 keys. tutt
ha ha !!

I've been at a gig like this at the Jazz Cafe in Camden, London. The audience can get close to the stage and the PA is, from that position, very wide - obviously. The gig indeed had the piano panned in such an extreme way....888 keys indeed!!
narcoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th September 2009   #16
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,010

If it does not collapse well to mono, fogetta bout it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baz View Post
I record piano on almost every session here and used to obsess about this a few years ago but have been mixing from the players perspective for one simple fact: as a listener - sitting out in the room where that piano is being played - it's one giant mono instrument for all intents and purposes, so mixing "stereo" from the listeners perspective makes little sense to me...
Ollie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2009   #17
Baz
Lives for gear
 
Baz's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada / San Diego CA ,USA
Posts: 1,084

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ollie View Post
If it does not collapse well to mono, fogetta bout it.
Not sure if you're adding to my point and are agreeing, or saying that with my thinking, if I can't collapse to mono without the bottom falling out, it's moot. If the latter, I agree whole heartedly. I'm constantly collapsing to mono and am very cognizant of what's happening mono, especially seeing that I use 3 mics on the piano now.
Baz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2009   #18
Lives for gear
 
fhames's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 720

[QUOTE]Wide stereo often is not the right perspective. Instead: mono (or near mono) panned in the field; relative to the mix.[/QUOTE/]

Wide panned piano looses focus in a dense mix. It's all over the place.


Bryant - Hames Music
fhames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2009   #19
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,010

Yes, I am agreeing with you about that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baz View Post
Not sure if you're adding to my point and are agreeing, or saying that with my thinking, if I can't collapse to mono without the bottom falling out, it's moot. If the latter, I agree whole heartedly. I'm constantly collapsing to mono and am very cognizant of what's happening mono, especially seeing that I use 3 mics on the piano now.
Ollie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2009   #20
Lives for gear
 
joelpatterson's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 9,509

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedWallStudio View Post
...
Which way do you guys have it panned?
Stereo-ish! Not wide as a football field... but enough room so that each note can fill and occupy its own space without stomping all over other notes. (By the way, an audience will never hear anything remotely stereo from a piano, but every player instinctively knows: bass is left, treble right.)

This is solo piano I'm talking about... you gotta mix it with other stuff, all bets off.

4shared.com - online file sharing and storage - download Fantasy in D minor by Mozart--Summer Sonata.mp3
__________________
Mountaintop Studios
~the peak of perfection~
Petersburgh NY 12138

mountaintop@taconic.net

www.joelpatterson.us
joelpatterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2009   #21
Lives for gear
 
Quint's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,798

I agree. Unless it's a solo piece I don't like wide panned piano, or anything for that matter. Even then, I don't really like wide panned piano. In a rock mix I like mono piano to be honest. If it's a solo piece I like a mono mic making up the majority of the sound and then the stereo mics making up the accents to the sound at a lower volume.
__________________
We (AudioLot) accept VISA/MC, Paypal, Google Checkout, Bank Wire, Checks, and Cash. - Kittonian
Quint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2009   #22
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,323

Quote:
Originally Posted by RKrizman View Post
I'm a piano player, so I'm used to hearing treble right and bass left. And that's how the beautiful babe sitting on the bench next to me hears it. So everyone else can go suck it.

-R
Guess that means we need to redo the Angel City Project... tutt

For me it really depends on the style of music as to how it is mixed and panned (and mic'd for that matter). I usually put the high mics on the left and the low on the right for jazz. For the more traditional stuff, I pan the low to about 1 o'clock (and drums are exactly opposite). The reason for that is that it puts the solos out in a part of the mix where it doesn't have to fight the rest of the band. In a rock situation, that isn't an issue so I may be more likely to approach it from a "pianists" perspective.

--Ben
__________________
Benjamin Maas
Fifth Circle Audio
Long Beach, CA
http://www.fifthcircle.com
fifthcircle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2009   #23
Lives for gear
 
Piedpiper's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Between the Notes, Iowa
Posts: 2,037

I like to mic a piano ORTF but at least 4 feet away, and with the lid completely off. Then I can pan it hard without it sounding weird. In any case I pan to simulate a natural audience perspective. That means treble left and bass right for solo, or, in ensemble, often treble left and bass center. Personally, I don't relate to using more than two mics. If I want more room I just move the mics further out. But I'm a less is more kinda guy.
__________________
Tim Britton
producer, engineer, musician, audio sales
http://www.piedpiperprod.com
http://uilleanpipes.com

row, row, row your boat...
Piedpiper is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2009   #24
Lives for gear
 
beingmf's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: Telefunkenland
Posts: 1,138

mic'ing techniques aside: how many percent of listeners a) have their speakers plugged in correctly, b) will care about a perspective?
(if it's an audiophile jazz recording, ok, then...)
beingmf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2009   #25
Gear maniac
 
lambro's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Location: CA USA
Posts: 289

SF Symphony has right side of piano to audience for most performances


and the point of reflection is well taken


when you are 20+ rows back, and add in some room for the pit, its a sonic swirl
lambro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2009   #26
Gear nut
 
roostert's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 135

How 'bout recording the stereo image you want to hear......ie.....wider or narrower, by adjusting the mic's? Then you can pan hard left and right, and it only sounds as wide as you intended.....or......you can fix it later in the mix......your choice....
roostert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2009   #27
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Orange CT
Posts: 22

Almost everyone at some time in their life has sat at a piano and played it.
I cant say this about any other instrument.
So this one instrument deserves the player's perspective.
bass on left treble on right.
You dont have to make it wide if you dont want to.
Sometimes wide panning leaves a nice hole in the middle for ? a vocal.
Craig Calistro
CalistroMusic.com
Pro Audio Sales
Calistro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2009   #28
Lives for gear
 
RonT's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,746

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corran View Post
If you see a piano in a classical recital, lid open, the low strings are to the right (because they are longer) and the high strings are to the left. If you are close enough you can kind of hear it in stereo but not really in general.

You didn't mention what genre you were recording for. If it's classical, I'd pan it correctly with bass - right and treble - left, but then I would just use a stereo pair in AB or ORTF a little ways outside of the lid (or in a concert hall) and not have to worry about it. Jazz, sometimes the whole thing panned to the left as a point source. If it's pop-oriented, then do what the client wants or whatever you like, but I guess it's more common to do it how you've done it, bass - left and treble - right?

Also it's important to note the sound doesn't come out of the keys, so the physical appearance of the keys doesn't particularly matter.
???? Base strings on the right? What chu talking bout Willis?!
Attached Images
 
RonT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2009   #29
Gear maniac
 
audibell's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 293

PNO stereo or mono

Last year I recorded the Beethoven Pno Concerto 2 and used an LDC in the curve, inside about a foot and a foot over the mid strings, slightly favoring the bass side. The aspect, about 11 o'clock, came mostly from my main pair and the mono mic strengthened the sound during the three solos without any weird width. The pianoforte was player's right side to the audience and on a long stick. If it were Bach, w/out orchestra, I use schoeps in ortf, back 6 feet and omni flanks, balancing to taste. I think a piano-only recital deserves some width-assistance but still narrowish and not the 888 keys mentioned earlier. Of course, if the a/c MUST be left on, a pzm on the floor is probably all they need.
rgds, WT
audibell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2009   #30
Lives for gear
 
Corran's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: South Georgia
Posts: 2,929

Send a message via AIM to Corran
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonT View Post
???? Base strings on the right? What chu talking bout Willis?!
tutt

Have you been to a piano recital?
Attached Thumbnails
Piano Mic'ing-pianoview.jpg  
Corran is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mic'ing a Grand Piano field Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 14 18th November 2008 10:06 PM
My New Favorite Piano Mic'ing smoothmoniker High end 4 27th August 2006 05:06 AM
Mic'ing acoustic piano for a jazz trio + henryrobinett Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 8 17th March 2006 06:41 AM
Piano mic'ing kind of unorthodox xSalx Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs 0 16th January 2006 02:08 AM
Piano Mic'ing for Drum Room Schexnayder So much gear, so little time! 0 22nd January 2005 06:10 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:15 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.