Lectrosonics 211 vs. 201

bigcitysound · 25th August 2009

Hey
You should really be asking these questions over at rec.arts.movies.picture.sound google group.. people there know these answers. With all due respect to the pros here, they work in mostly in the music recording arena..
Anyways from my knowledge the 200 series receivers are not digital hybrid, and the 400 series are.
secondly the 211 aqnd 411 differ from the 201 and the 401 in that they have a "tracking front end" which basically means they have a narrow front end filter that excludes alot of other RF that is flying around. That means you will get better range and better resistance to "hits" with 211 or 411 receivers.

The 211Rx and UM200CTx is a very solid system and if you can find those used for a good price you could do alot worse..

Check used gear pages at coffey sound and location sound corporation.

Best,

Jon Chiles

philper · 25th August 2009

211 had a tracking front end and removeable antennas (can be used in a quad box and share an antenna system w/ other RX, the 201 does not.

Philip Perkins

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Sennheiser EW100 or Lectrosonics 100 Radio/ UHF Mics	Sound Sorcerer	Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording	15	13th November 2008 01:53 AM
Audix CX-211	triple_A	So much gear, so little time!	1	25th April 2006 06:52 AM
Lectrosonics Mic! WOW Impressive specs...	Dr Gruv	Product Alerts older than 2 months	10	3rd April 2006 04:02 PM
Lectrosonics - world's smallest wireless microphone	The Press Desk at Gearslutz.com	So much gear, so little time!	0	29th March 2006 04:45 PM

25th August 2009	#1
bigcitysound Gear Head Joined: Mar 2009 Location: NYC Posts: 34 Thread Starter	Hey You should really be asking these questions over at rec.arts.movies.picture.sound google group.. people there know these answers. With all due respect to the pros here, they work in mostly in the music recording arena.. Anyways from my knowledge the 200 series receivers are not digital hybrid, and the 400 series are. secondly the 211 aqnd 411 differ from the 201 and the 401 in that they have a "tracking front end" which basically means they have a narrow front end filter that excludes alot of other RF that is flying around. That means you will get better range and better resistance to "hits" with 211 or 411 receivers. The 211Rx and UM200CTx is a very solid system and if you can find those used for a good price you could do alot worse.. Check used gear pages at coffey sound and location sound corporation. Best, Jon Chiles

25th August 2009	#2
philper Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2005 Location: San Francisco area Posts: 2,422	211 had a tracking front end and removeable antennas (can be used in a quad box and share an antenna system w/ other RX, the 201 does not. Philip Perkins