Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording

Tags: , , , ,

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
dbx project 1 286 over female vocal for live band - opinions? LukeSnarl Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 1 16th September 2007 05:32 PM
Which mic for LIVE (female) Vocals!!! Arsene Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 4 2nd December 2006 07:24 PM
Smooth, round, airy R&B vocal mic Joemamma Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 14 25th November 2006 11:06 PM
Live female vocal mic JSVice Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 9 4th November 2006 03:50 AM
Female Vocal Mic TLMUSIC So much gear, so little time! 0 22nd February 2006 11:19 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 1st September 2005, 03:40 PM   #1
SoundChances
Gear nut
 
SoundChances's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 97
Question Help with airy female vocal (live & studio)?

My band is making a major change in our sound with a change in our vocalist.
She has a fairly airy type voice and the SM58 we have been using for rehersals is not cutting it.

I haven't recorded a female voice since 1992!!! So help me out here.

First off, Mic choice, note that I'm posting this in the Low End so keep those prices down.
My main concern right now is for a live mic for rehersals and to take to gigs and if it could be used for recording too, even better!

Recording mic, tips, tricks, technique suggestions would also be appreciated...
SoundChances is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2005, 10:57 AM   #2
Jamstudio
Gear nut
 
Jamstudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Capelle aan den IJssel, Netherlands
Posts: 138
i Like beyer m400 (soundstar II), senn 421 is cool to
a kms105 is great for 'airy' vocals but not realy 'budget'

Remco
__________________
Remco van grevenbroek
www.jamstudio.nl

Yeah i got bad taste
Jamstudio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2005, 05:47 PM   #3
kenm
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: berkeley, ca
Posts: 104
My band has a very sweet sounding female vocalist. I tend to use either a Marshall V67G or Studio Projects B1 to record her. She also sounds good with a 57. Live she uses whatever is available, but usually a 58. You might try a Beta 57 or 58 if you don't think a regular 58 is cutting it.

You can hear her here: http://www.loyaltyday.com

Be well,
Ken
kenm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2005, 03:59 PM   #4
jmossmusic
Gear interested
 
jmossmusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 14
mmm... This brings me to a question to yours. What type of a sound are you going for. Are you trying to keep her light, and airy, or are you trying to add something a little deeper, and give her more of a warmer tone, or is she not cutting the mixes/rehearsal, and needs a little more edge, or whatever?
__________________
"Make rocket go..." - Courtesy of Ted Paduck at Mix One Studios Inc.
jmossmusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2005, 04:09 PM   #5
kidvybes
Gear nut
 
kidvybes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenm
My band has a very sweet sounding female vocalist. I tend to use either a Marshall V67G or Studio Projects B1 to record her.
Ken
...I have to second those recommendations...I also have had some excellent results with the MXL V67 and SP B1 on "airy" female voices...at those pricepoints (less than $100. per mic), why not start there...either or both mics would be an excellent addition to any mic locker, for very minimal dollars...
kidvybes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2005, 04:52 PM   #6
SoundChances
Gear nut
 
SoundChances's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 97
The problem with the 58 during rehearsals is she is sounding kind of muffled; the "air" in her vocals does not come through worth crap.

We did some recordings Wednesday night and I tried a Rode NTK and that worked out pretty good.

I do have a SP C1 as well, I'll give that a shot next time since the B1 got a recommendation.
I've always had sibilance problems with the C1 in the past though, but we'll see...

Thanks for the info so far guys, it's appreciated....
SoundChances is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2005, 05:15 PM   #7
kidvybes
Gear nut
 
kidvybes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoundChances
The problem with the 58 during rehearsals is she is sounding kind of muffled; the "air" in her vocals does not come through worth crap.

We did some recordings Wednesday night and I tried a Rode NTK and that worked out pretty good.

I do have a SP C1 as well, I'll give that a shot next time since the B1 got a recommendation.
I've always had sibilance problems with the C1 in the past though, but we'll see...

Thanks for the info so far guys, it's appreciated....

...I find that the NTK has much more in common (darker sounding) with the B1 and V67 than with the C1...try the NTK mounted upside-down with the capsule slightly tilted toward the singer, level with the bridge of the singer's nose (or a bit higher), so that she has to slightly extend her neck with her jaw tilted upwards...this opens the throat (giving the airy voice a bit more body and projection) and greatly reduces sibilance...I think you might be good to go like that...
kidvybes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2005, 05:45 PM   #8
SoundChances
Gear nut
 
SoundChances's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 97
Ha!
That's exactly how I set the mic up the other night.
Which is generally where I start any time I'm doing vocals....

I'm really looking to stay away from the really low end(unless it does the trick) so if ya'll have some other suggestions in the $300-500 range, I'm all ears.
Though I have been considering getting a V67 or 2 anyway because of all the good things I hear about them.....
SoundChances is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2005, 06:28 PM   #9
kidvybes
Gear nut
 
kidvybes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoundChances
Ha!
That's exactly how I set the mic up the other night.
Which is generally where I start any time I'm doing vocals....

I'm really looking to stay away from the really low end(unless it does the trick) so if ya'll have some other suggestions in the $300-500 range, I'm all ears.
Though I have been considering getting a V67 or 2 anyway because of all the good things I hear about them.....
...keep in mind that all of these suggestions are primarily for recording mics, not live gigging mics:

...the SE 2200A is also a terrific mic for vocals but cost about twice the price as the V67...it's actually designed on the same circuit as the V67 but with better construction/capsule with the addition of high pass and pad switches...I sold my V67 after getting the 2200A because of the similarity in sound...

Here's a review:
http://www.sonic-distribution.com/2/...um%20AWARD.pdf


...for a bit more dollars, the Rode NT2A (little brother to the K2 Valve mic) is also a killa mic with the addition of totally variable polar patterns...the capsule is a newer design than that found in the NTK...

...check out this review:
http://www.musictechmag.co.uk/mtm/reviews/nt2-a
kidvybes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2005, 07:20 AM   #10
aussie_techie
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 2,020
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoundChances
My main concern right now is for a live mic for rehersals and to take to gigs and if it could be used for recording too, even better!
try a Beta 57a and a beta 58a see which one works best. beta58 is generally a betetr vocal mic but ive found the beta57 to be realy good on certain vocals and its cheeper and more versitile
aussie_techie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2005, 08:50 PM   #11
cdog
Lives for gear
 
cdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 2,219
Shure BETA 87A (condenser) or Senn 421 with the low cut on....
cdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2005, 09:48 PM   #12
doug_hti
Lives for gear
 
doug_hti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Calabasas, California
Posts: 1,138
For live and on budget, absolutely a beta 87 (A or C). Although if she is light and airy, you can have trouble with sound from the backline (drums) with the looser C pattern.

I'm sorry, but if a regular 58 is not working well, a 57 or beta 58 will NOT be a huge difference. 58s and the sort definately DO NOT work on everyone. Of course you can give me a couple grand worth of comps/eqs/preamps and the 58 will be fine.
__________________
doug
doug_hti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th September 2005, 04:49 AM   #13
aussie_techie
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 2,020
i hardly call a beta87 cheep but if you get it at a good price then ok
if you want to go into condensers, the Rode NT3 is my favourite live vocal mic but in most situations its simply unusable
there are many things you need to consider in live situations which studio oriented people often forget
1) are you mixing the band or are you playing
2) how are you going to power the mic if its a condenser, do you power it from the FB desk or the FOH desk and do they have clean individualy switchable phantom. (many older desks in installs go unserviced and can start to have problems and often it is in the phantom power, i have seen some strage problems in a beta91 due to power problems)
3) are you going to be able to get the venues early enough to EQ foldbacks for you different mic
4) if she wants a stand is it going to fit a standard cradle
for these reasons i would always stick with a common dyanmic mic, which is realy only SM57 SM58 Beta57a or Beta58a. i know these mics can be kind of limiting sometimes but if you cant get a decent sound out of them with a bit of EQ then you have other problems
aussie_techie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0