Vocal Solo Mics - Choral and Orchestral works ??? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: , , , ,

Vocal Solo Mics - Choral and Orchestral works ???

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 9th August 2009   #1
Gear addict
 
Larry Elliott's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Auckland , New Zealand
Posts: 325

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to Larry Elliott Send a message via Skype™ to Larry Elliott
Talking Vocal Solo Mics - Choral and Orchestral works ???

I am wondering to folk leave vocal soloists mics on all the time or fade them in when required? If they are on all the time there will be no “ambience“ change during a solo, however the overall balance will always be “ affected” by the solo mic.

Up until now I have tended to leave them open all the time, and ride the gain as necessary during the solo.

Look forward to others comments.

Larry
Larry Elliott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th August 2009   #2
Lives for gear
 
d_fu's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,420

I leave them on. I try to keep my mixes as static as possible.
d_fu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th August 2009   #3
jjb
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 48

I'll almost always mute or fade down a mic that's not in use.
jjb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th August 2009   #4
Lives for gear
 
Teddy Ray's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: Carolina is where they'll bury me.
Posts: 7,096

I dont do as many orchestral things now, but quite a bit of choral(and bluegrass!) .... but I always left mine on.
__________________
"I would shoot a man if he put me through autotune" - Charlie Louvin
Teddy Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th August 2009   #5
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,323

For me, it depends on the amount and kind of bleed that they are giving me. If the solo mic is completely messing up my string sound with an orchestra, then I may be inclined to mute them. I won't do a hard mute, though- rather more like riding levels with slow changes to deal with sound shifts.

In the end, though, music rules and dictates what I do to them.

--Ben
__________________
Benjamin Maas
Fifth Circle Audio
Long Beach, CA
http://www.fifthcircle.com
fifthcircle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th August 2009   #6
Lives for gear
 
Corran's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: South Georgia
Posts: 2,929

Send a message via AIM to Corran
It depends on the situation, but I think I've usually lowered the level when they weren't singing, especially if the vocal soloist(s) only sing a few things here and there.
__________________

www.oceanstarproductions.com
Corran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th August 2009   #7
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 188

Send a message via AIM to Drum9uy
I had to do a few recordings of a bigband and the vocal mics were pointing right at the horns when they didn't have a singer in between them. I did some slow fades etc during some songs where she took a step out from the band for solos as to not suddenly change the mix. Play around with the mix and see what feels best
Drum9uy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th August 2009   #8
Lives for gear
 
boojum's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Astoria, OR, US&A
Posts: 2,308

I judge it in post. They are on the whole session. I sure do not need the soloists' asides in the mix.
__________________
Nov schmoz ka pop.
boojum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2009   #9
Gear Head
 
ohmoka's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: London
Posts: 45

For classical -choral- stuff I leave them on
ohmoka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2009   #10
Lives for gear
 
NorseHorse's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: DC
Posts: 2,095

Are we talking about live sound reinforcement?

Or mixing a recording?
NorseHorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2009   #11
Gear addict
 
Larry Elliott's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Auckland , New Zealand
Posts: 325

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to Larry Elliott Send a message via Skype™ to Larry Elliott
Quote:
Originally Posted by NorseHorse View Post
Are we talking about live sound reinforcement?

Or mixing a recording?
Recording...
Larry Elliott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2009   #12
jjb
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 48

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Elliott View Post
Recording...
Oh, in that case, I leave them on. Never know if you'll get something useful out of it. For live work, though, my previous answer stands.
jjb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2009   #13
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,323

Hi Larry, had this problem a few weeks ago, recording a large choir (4 mics), 4 vox soloists (4 mics) and small chamber orch (2 mics). Because the soloists were standing just in front of the first row of the choir, the vox spots when left in the mix picked up too much of the choir front rows.

I recorded with them on, (which rendered the stereo backup almost useless) and had to clip them all off in post. A very time consuming process as the score had lots of little interjections from the vox soloists.

Next time I will try to position the solo spots so I can leave them on. Getting a correct stereo mix is the most important thing on the night. Riding gain is a real gamble without a marked up score.
David Spearritt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2009   #14
Lives for gear
 
d_fu's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,420

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Spearritt View Post
Hi Larry, had this problem a few weeks ago, recording a large choir (4 mics), 4 vox soloists (4 mics) and small chamber orch (2 mics). Because the soloists were standing just in front of the first row of the choir, the vox spots when left in the mix picked up too much of the choir front rows.
Of course, it always depends. In a situation like this, I would probably also reduce the solo mics' levels during choir passages, as David did.

Quote:
Next time I will try to position the solo spots so I can leave them on.
Consider hypers, turned sideways a bit. Might reduce choir leakage. Or try to get a bit closer, if possible.
d_fu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th August 2009   #15
Lives for gear
 
Teddy Ray's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: Carolina is where they'll bury me.
Posts: 7,096

Heres a recording of the Blumlein Pair I used as for solo pickup for a Community Chorale/Orchestra type thing of Haydn Die Schöpfung

Hier

Picked up too much strings, though.

I was younger and dumber, anyway. Now I am a bit less dumb.
Teddy Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th August 2009   #16
Lives for gear
 
Corran's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: South Georgia
Posts: 2,929

Send a message via AIM to Corran
Interesting that the strings sound so much more present than the voices, to me. How was the stage and mics setup in relation to each other? And what mic? I'm interested.

Also I assume you are a bit less young as well...
Corran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th August 2009   #17
Lives for gear
 
Teddy Ray's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: Carolina is where they'll bury me.
Posts: 7,096

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corran View Post
Interesting that the strings sound so much more present than the voices, to me. How was the stage and mics setup in relation to each other? And what mic? I'm interested.

Also I assume you are a bit less young as well...

Yes, I am 5 years older!
AKG 426B in blumlein.

it was

C H O I R

O R C H E S T R A
SOLOISTS


AKG
Teddy Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th August 2009   #18
Lives for gear
 
Corran's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: South Georgia
Posts: 2,929

Send a message via AIM to Corran
The strings sound like they are in front of the soloists rather than the other way 'round. How did that happen? *Actually re-listening it's not really that drastic but the voices do feel more "in the hall" than the strings.

I had a feeling it was an AKG. I have been hearing some samples of various stereo AKG condensers and wow, I love it. I need to get one. Or perhaps it's just the nice rooms they happen to be recording. It seems like even my Schoeps give a lackluster recording in these dead, boring halls around here.
Corran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th August 2009   #19
Lives for gear
 
Teddy Ray's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: Carolina is where they'll bury me.
Posts: 7,096

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corran View Post
The strings sound like they are in front of the soloists rather than the other way 'round. How did that happen? *Actually re-listening it's not really that drastic but the voices do feel more "in the hall" than the strings.

I had a feeling it was an AKG. I have been hearing some samples of various stereo AKG condensers and wow, I love it. I need to get one. Or perhaps it's just the nice rooms they happen to be recording. It seems like even my Schoeps give a lackluster recording in these dead, boring halls around here.

Jeesh, I dont know Corran, I guess maybe the very strange acoustic had something to do with it... Ill post pics if I get a chance and can find them..it was a WEIRD! acoustic.. The AKG 426(stereo mic) is an amazing microphone. I love the sound..very laid back and complimentary/forgiving. Too bad they dont make them anymore. I snapped up the last two ever made right before I left Germany. The AKG distro man actually drove them to me!
Teddy Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th August 2009   #20
Lives for gear
 
Corran's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: South Georgia
Posts: 2,929

Send a message via AIM to Corran
Wow, the last two?? I wonder why they stopped making them. I'd love to pick up a 426 or a c34 one day. I'd love to see pics if you find them.
Corran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th August 2009   #21
Lives for gear
 
Teddy Ray's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: Carolina is where they'll bury me.
Posts: 7,096

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corran View Post
Wow, the last two?? I wonder why they stopped making them. I'd love to pick up a 426 or a c34 one day. I'd love to see pics if you find them.

Well, the Distributor told me that they just were not selling, that they were not a "marketable item" any longer. (like the cheap crap they are making in China!!)

but yes, the last two..at least the last two to come from the Austrian Factory.

I highly reccomend grabbing a 422 or 426...(BTW Opus 3 recordings..(which I love so dearly) used a lone 426 ...many of them, anyway)
Teddy Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th August 2009   #22
Lives for gear
 
Corran's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: South Georgia
Posts: 2,929

Send a message via AIM to Corran
Any reason you prefer those over the c34? I've seen a few recommendations for both in different situations. I don't have any really bright mics so I think the c34 might work better in my mic closet as it is now, though I admit I wouldn't mind having both a c34 and a 422/426!
Corran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th August 2009   #23
Gear addict
 
Larry Elliott's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Auckland , New Zealand
Posts: 325

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to Larry Elliott Send a message via Skype™ to Larry Elliott
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teddy Ray View Post
AKG 426B in blumlein.
How far in front of the Soloists was the mic.

Very nice sound indeed....

Thanks

Larry Elliott
Larry Elliott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th August 2009   #24
Lives for gear
 
Teddy Ray's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: Carolina is where they'll bury me.
Posts: 7,096

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Elliott View Post
How far in front of the Soloists was the mic.

Very nice sound indeed....

Thanks

Larry Elliott
Oh, Id say about...oops.. dug out my notes on the PC .. says the Soloists were 4 ft away.
Teddy Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th August 2009   #25
Lives for gear
 
Teddy Ray's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: Carolina is where they'll bury me.
Posts: 7,096

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corran View Post
Any reason you prefer those over the c34? I've seen a few recommendations for both in different situations. I don't have any really bright mics so I think the c34 might work better in my mic closet as it is now, though I admit I wouldn't mind having both a c34 and a 422/426!

The C34 has a top capsule that can rotate 270 degrees and a bottom capsule that is fixed to the body of the mic. Both of the 426 capsules can rotate. The C-34 is a small diaphragm mic, while the 426 is LD. c34 is a LOT brighter.
Teddy Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th August 2009   #26
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,323

Yup... The C34 is a completely different sounding microphone. The 426 has an almost big "Wooly" dark sound (in the best of ways), whereas the C34 is a smaller sounding mic with a sparkle on top. Before my colleage that owned a couple C34s passed, I'd use them on drum sets on jazz dates, pianos (great for concertos), classical guitars, etc... The 426/422 (I own both here) gets duties for large ensembles, brass and other situations.

---Ben
fifthcircle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th August 2009   #27
Lives for gear
 
Corran's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: South Georgia
Posts: 2,929

Send a message via AIM to Corran
Interesting. Well all this does is make me want both!
Corran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th August 2009   #28
Lives for gear
 
Teddy Ray's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: Carolina is where they'll bury me.
Posts: 7,096

Different song, same Haydn different night....

das lied
Teddy Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th August 2009   #29
Lives for gear
 
Corran's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: South Georgia
Posts: 2,929

Send a message via AIM to Corran


Gorgeous sound.
Corran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th August 2009   #30
Lives for gear
 
Teddy Ray's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: Carolina is where they'll bury me.
Posts: 7,096

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corran View Post


Gorgeous sound.

You are too kind, Corran. I was a bit green then, and I just put the mics where I thought they sounded good. (I actually had John Eargle's books with me and a protractor/compass(!) to set the angles. I am still a green rookie in every since of the word.

thank you for your kind words, my friend.
Teddy Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vocal/Chorus Idea? Nothing works, CISUM High end 4 9th October 2008 08:44 PM
Any U67 clone mics in the works? Larry Heinemann High end 98 6th January 2008 11:13 PM
Choral and Orchestral recording equipment Ronnie Dixon Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 7 14th November 2006 09:12 PM
Opinions on mics for orchestral percussion secret secret Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 7 4th November 2005 05:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:07 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.