![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Tags: choral, orchestra, solo, technique, vocalness |
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear addict |
I am wondering to folk leave vocal soloists mics on all the time or fade them in when required? If they are on all the time there will be no “ambience“ change during a solo, however the overall balance will always be “ affected” by the solo mic. Up until now I have tended to leave them open all the time, and ride the gain as necessary during the solo. Look forward to others comments. Larry |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2006 Location: Germany
Posts: 2,420
|
I leave them on. I try to keep my mixes as static as possible.
|
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear Head Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 48
|
I'll almost always mute or fade down a mic that's not in use.
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2009 Location: Carolina is where they'll bury me.
Posts: 7,096
|
I dont do as many orchestral things now, but quite a bit of choral(and bluegrass!) .... but I always left mine on.
__________________ "I would shoot a man if he put me through autotune" - Charlie Louvin |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2003 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,323
|
For me, it depends on the amount and kind of bleed that they are giving me. If the solo mic is completely messing up my string sound with an orchestra, then I may be inclined to mute them. I won't do a hard mute, though- rather more like riding levels with slow changes to deal with sound shifts. In the end, though, music rules and dictates what I do to them. --Ben |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear |
It depends on the situation, but I think I've usually lowered the level when they weren't singing, especially if the vocal soloist(s) only sing a few things here and there.
|
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear maniac |
I had to do a few recordings of a bigband and the vocal mics were pointing right at the horns when they didn't have a singer in between them. I did some slow fades etc during some songs where she took a step out from the band for solos as to not suddenly change the mix. Play around with the mix and see what feels best
|
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear |
I judge it in post. They are on the whole session. I sure do not need the soloists' asides in the mix.
__________________ Nov schmoz ka pop. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear Head Joined: Aug 2009 Location: London
Posts: 45
|
For classical -choral- stuff I leave them on
|
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear |
Are we talking about live sound reinforcement? Or mixing a recording? |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gear addict | |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear Head Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 48
| |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2005 Location: Australia
Posts: 1,323
|
Hi Larry, had this problem a few weeks ago, recording a large choir (4 mics), 4 vox soloists (4 mics) and small chamber orch (2 mics). Because the soloists were standing just in front of the first row of the choir, the vox spots when left in the mix picked up too much of the choir front rows. I recorded with them on, (which rendered the stereo backup almost useless) and had to clip them all off in post. A very time consuming process as the score had lots of little interjections from the vox soloists. Next time I will try to position the solo spots so I can leave them on. Getting a correct stereo mix is the most important thing on the night. Riding gain is a real gamble without a marked up score. |
| | |
| | #14 | ||
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2006 Location: Germany
Posts: 2,420
| Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #15 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2009 Location: Carolina is where they'll bury me.
Posts: 7,096
|
Heres a recording of the Blumlein Pair I used as for solo pickup for a Community Chorale/Orchestra type thing of Haydn Die Schöpfung Hier Picked up too much strings, though. I was younger and dumber, anyway. Now I am a bit less dumb. |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear |
Interesting that the strings sound so much more present than the voices, to me. How was the stage and mics setup in relation to each other? And what mic? I'm interested. Also I assume you are a bit less young as well... |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2009 Location: Carolina is where they'll bury me.
Posts: 7,096
| Quote:
Yes, I am 5 years older! AKG 426B in blumlein. it was C H O I R O R C H E S T R A SOLOISTS AKG | |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear |
The strings sound like they are in front of the soloists rather than the other way 'round. How did that happen? *Actually re-listening it's not really that drastic but the voices do feel more "in the hall" than the strings. I had a feeling it was an AKG. I have been hearing some samples of various stereo AKG condensers and wow, I love it. I need to get one. Or perhaps it's just the nice rooms they happen to be recording. It seems like even my Schoeps give a lackluster recording in these dead, boring halls around here. |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2009 Location: Carolina is where they'll bury me.
Posts: 7,096
| Quote:
Jeesh, I dont know Corran, I guess maybe the very strange acoustic had something to do with it... Ill post pics if I get a chance and can find them..it was a WEIRD! acoustic.. The AKG 426(stereo mic) is an amazing microphone. I love the sound..very laid back and complimentary/forgiving. Too bad they dont make them anymore. I snapped up the last two ever made right before I left Germany. The AKG distro man actually drove them to me! | |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Lives for gear |
Wow, the last two?? I wonder why they stopped making them. I'd love to pick up a 426 or a c34 one day. I'd love to see pics if you find them.
|
| | |
| | #21 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2009 Location: Carolina is where they'll bury me.
Posts: 7,096
| Quote:
Well, the Distributor told me that they just were not selling, that they were not a "marketable item" any longer. (like the cheap crap they are making in China!!) but yes, the last two..at least the last two to come from the Austrian Factory. I highly reccomend grabbing a 422 or 426...(BTW Opus 3 recordings..(which I love so dearly) used a lone 426 ...many of them, anyway) | |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Lives for gear |
Any reason you prefer those over the c34? I've seen a few recommendations for both in different situations. I don't have any really bright mics so I think the c34 might work better in my mic closet as it is now, though I admit I wouldn't mind having both a c34 and a 422/426! |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Gear addict | |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2009 Location: Carolina is where they'll bury me.
Posts: 7,096
| |
| | |
| | #25 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2009 Location: Carolina is where they'll bury me.
Posts: 7,096
| Quote:
The C34 has a top capsule that can rotate 270 degrees and a bottom capsule that is fixed to the body of the mic. Both of the 426 capsules can rotate. The C-34 is a small diaphragm mic, while the 426 is LD. c34 is a LOT brighter. | |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2003 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,323
|
Yup... The C34 is a completely different sounding microphone. The 426 has an almost big "Wooly" dark sound (in the best of ways), whereas the C34 is a smaller sounding mic with a sparkle on top. Before my colleage that owned a couple C34s passed, I'd use them on drum sets on jazz dates, pianos (great for concertos), classical guitars, etc... The 426/422 (I own both here) gets duties for large ensembles, brass and other situations. ---Ben |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Lives for gear |
Interesting. Well all this does is make me want both!
|
| | |
| | #29 |
| Lives for gear | Gorgeous sound. |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2009 Location: Carolina is where they'll bury me.
Posts: 7,096
| You are too kind, Corran. I was a bit green then, and I just put the mics where I thought they sounded good. (I actually had John Eargle's books with me and a protractor/compass(!) to set the angles. I am still a green rookie in every since of the word. thank you for your kind words, my friend. |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Vocal/Chorus Idea? Nothing works, | CISUM | High end | 4 | 9th October 2008 08:44 PM |
| Any U67 clone mics in the works? | Larry Heinemann | High end | 98 | 6th January 2008 11:13 PM |
| Choral and Orchestral recording equipment | Ronnie Dixon | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 7 | 14th November 2006 09:12 PM |
| Opinions on mics for orchestral percussion | secret secret | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 7 | 4th November 2005 05:06 PM |
| |