Comparative Samples - MC930, KM184, AT4051, and XXX - Page 3 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: , , , , , ,

Comparative Samples - MC930, KM184, AT4051, and XXX

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th October 2009   #61
Lives for gear
 
rkopald's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: PNW
Posts: 569

All you people have better ears than me. After repeated listenings, I can get what some folks are saying about the grainy sound in the Avantones, but with the other 3, they sounded pretty close to me. The high end was a *bit* harsh on the MC930s, but only a little. The bigger thing I heard was the reverb tails. I think the AT, Neumann and Beyer mics all sound like a go. With some EQ they're pretty damn close to each other.
rkopald is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2009   #62
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,254

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikey77 View Post
On both the Mozart and Hoover I homed in on Mic 3, because of its character. Of course the piano bottom end was a tad boomy but I found it easy to forgive with the expectation that eq or placement would cheer it up.
The Beyers have a very accurate (i.e. full) low midrange. The capsule is very light and responsive and somehow the design overall makes it less thin than many other SDCs when used at a distance from the source.
MichaelPatrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2009   #63
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: France - Toulouse
Posts: 554

Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelPatrick View Post
The Beyers have a very accurate (i.e. full) low midrange. The capsule is very light and responsive and somehow the design overall makes it less thin than many other SDCs when used at a distance from the source.
I agree with you Michael.

For example, here is a sample from a recent concert violin + organ recorded with a pair of MC930 in ORTF at nearly 10m from the instruments.

No eq, nothing !

Don't be surprised by the rain on the roof of the church and the thunder

JMM
Attached Files
File Type: mp3 Rheinberger.mp3 (4.26 MB, 309 views)
mathieujm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2009   #64
Lives for gear
 
rkopald's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: PNW
Posts: 569

Quote:
Originally Posted by mathieujm View Post
.. here is a sample from a recent concert violin + organ recorded with a pair of MC930 in ORTF at nearly 10m from the instruments.

No eq, nothing !

Don't be surprised by the rain on the roof of the church and the thunder

JMM
That sounds great! Good playing.
rkopald is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2009   #65
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,254

MC930 is like a directional "omni" in low midrange frequencies

It is well known that omnis are undesirable in poor acoustics because their pattern doesn't discriminate between source and room.

The MC930 is a special microphone. I've read posts in other threads saying it is boomy or muddy in the low mids. In fact, it captures low midrange frequencies directionally, but with the flatness of an omni, and with some of the same headaches omnis cause in rooms with buildup, tubbiness and resonant modes. But the benefits are also compelling. At live recording distances it can capture the natural tonal balance of a source better than any other cardioid I know, including Schoeps CMC6-MK4.
MichaelPatrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2011   #66
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: United States of America
Posts: 514

Quote:
Originally Posted by sunflute View Post
ribbons are sooo great on flute

Just wondering which ribbon(s) in particular you like on close-mic'd flute?
Brackish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2011   #67
Gear addict
 
GIACOMO-_'s Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 404

Send a message via MSN to GIACOMO-_ Send a message via Skype™ to GIACOMO-_
n 1 and n 1 are very thin and unnatural.

Good 3 and 4. I love my MC930.

I want 2 mc910 for omni.
__________________
-----------------------------------------------

** Two Beyer MC910 omni for sell **


-----------------------------------------------



GIACOMO-_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2012   #68
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 17

After listening to the files several times without peeking at the answer, it was always a toss-up between the Beyer MC930s and the Neumann KM184s, though I think I liked the Neumanns a little more.

The AT4051 didn't impress me at all, which is funny, since I thought I liked that mic and expected it would come out at the top. In the AT4051 Medieval Suite clip, I'd say the flute was even a tad harsh.

I'm surprised the flutists in this thread described the flute in the Avantone clips as being "smoother", since I heard the opposite. The flute in those clips sounded almost fuzzy or distorted.

Still, for a $200 pair of mics, I thought the Avantones hung in there pretty well with mics costing 5-8 times more, and some people obviously like the way they sound.
Igor2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2012   #69
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 17

Quote:
Originally Posted by mathieujm View Post
...here is a sample from a recent concert violin + organ recorded with a pair of MC930 in ORTF at nearly 10m from the instruments.

No eq, nothing !

Don't be surprised by the rain on the roof of the church and the thunder

JMM
Yikes! That is one shrieky violin. It hurts my ears.

I wish the organ were more prominent, and the violin, less so.

The MC930 seems to be a fairly bright mic.
Igor2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2012   #70
Gear addict
 
amfortas2006's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 432

Quote:
Originally Posted by mathieujm View Post
I agree with you Michael.

For example, here is a sample from a recent concert violin + organ recorded with a pair of MC930 in ORTF at nearly 10m from the instruments.

No eq, nothing !

Don't be surprised by the rain on the roof of the church and the thunder

JMM
I like this one a lot JMM, it's nice and realistic, and I think that the violin sounds really good. Not shrieky at all.

You should get something like Izotope RX to clean this recording up a little- then, all the distracting noises, coughs and HVAC could at least be reduced to a level where they wouldn't be bothering the listener.
cheers
amfortas2006 is online now   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
mc930 vs c42 vs km184 gregory High end 31 14th July 2010 03:04 AM
Acoustic Guitar Samples KM84 vs MC930 trustyjim High end 85 6th October 2009 09:40 PM
Comparative CPU Load of PT LE v6.9.2 and v7.4 - Advice Needed The_Cartel So much gear, so little time! 0 24th November 2008 12:47 PM
Comparison samples: AKG C451B <> Beyer MC930 hanisch So much gear, so little time! 0 7th April 2008 10:01 AM
UAD-1 again (groan) A comparative analysis. max cooper Music computers 36 23rd May 2006 08:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:03 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.