![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Tags: decisions decisions decisions, live performance, location recording, mikage, rock, vocalness |
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear nut Joined: Mar 2006 Location: Italy - Bari
Posts: 86
Thread Starter |
as the subject says, what's your experience with this two mic for live vox recording (mainly rock bands in small venues)? I would like nice vocals but I would like to avoid spill and feedback, of course. Which one should I prefear? And what about shure beta 87? Many thanks |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear |
The answer is simple: neither. IMHO get a Beyerdynamic M201. Better rejection and everything. ;-) AND it kills on snare and everywhere you would use a SM57.
__________________ Property is not ability. Buying a drumset won't make you a drummer and buying gear won't make you an engineer. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 297
|
Depends on the monitor placement. SM58 for wedges directly infront of the mic, Beta 58a for wedges on either side. This is because of the pickup patterns of Cardioid for the SM58 and Super Cardioid for the Beta 58a. |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2009 Location: Left of the southern cross
Posts: 621
| Quote:
stay away from the 87 for your purposes. | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2006 Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,565
|
I'm not a big fan of either. There are many better sounding vocal mics out there. Audix OM5 is my favorite but I also like the Sennheiser 835 (in fact I'm ordering 6 of them in a few minutes). If I had to choose between the two you listed I would definitely go with the SM58. I really do not like the sound of the Beta 58.
|
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear addict Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 362
|
I respectfully disagree, I like the sound of the Beta 58 better.
|
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear Head Joined: May 2009
Posts: 65
|
Beta 58. And ever better: SM7. /Richard |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear addict Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 426
|
I have done a lot of live recording, while running sound at the same time, with the beta87 as the main vocal mic, it was for broadway/jazz/popera type stuff however. I don't really do rock bands, so take that for what it's worth. That doesn't mean there aren't loud monitros on the stage! Sometimes I feel like I'm at a rock show the way these chicks want their vox mixed so hot in the monitors. I also have an older beta57 that I like a lot and use it as my second vocal. All and all, I (and my clients) have been very happy with my results. I haven't tried the beyerdynamic suggested though I am intrigued... Good Luck man! Robby |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear nut Joined: Mar 2006 Location: Italy - Bari
Posts: 86
Thread Starter |
thank you all with your suggestions, more opinion will be welcome.
|
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008 Location: Chestertown MD USA
Posts: 969
|
They're very similar sounding and I like them both. On a VERY loud stage I prefer the Beta but SM is good in almost all cases. OM7 is really great for feedback problems too.
|
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gear maniac |
I've used Beta 58's for vocals for nearly 20 years. I mix the entertainment acts that appear on my station's local TV morning show. For my purposes, they work. But... I had an act in recently and the vocalist had an endorsement with Beyer. His rep asked if we could use a Beyer mic on his vocals. I happen to have a pair of M-88's so it was easy to comply. They've always been personal favorites of mine and needless to say they sounded great. So for the next few acts we had in where possible I used the Beyer for vocal. Smooth and full is the best way I can describe it. I never realized the Beta 58s had so much grit and gloss to their sound. I wish I had 6 of the M-88's, they'd replace the Shures for vocals but I don't. So they get used on guitar cabs when I need more than 2 vocal mics. I just got a used pair of AKG 535eb's from a Slutzer over in the emporium, I've got a feeling they will be my go to mic on female vocals. Beta 87's sound like someone with nasal congestion to my ear! Yes I know that the current version of the Beyer M-88 (88-TG) is double and a half the cost of a new Beta 58. It's also that much better sounding. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2006 Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,565
|
Isn't that crazy that someone can show up with their "endorsement" preferences and not actually have that gear themselves?
|
| | |
| | #13 |
| Super Moderator Joined: Aug 2002 Location: NYC
Posts: 7,405
|
It has happened to me a few times... And, it still doesn't compute.
__________________ Steve Remote AuraSonicLtd.com the home of ASL Mobile & Location Production Remoteness on the Linkedin Network What about my Facebook Profile? Remoteness on Myspace |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear |
I've actually had the chance to compare the b58 and the M-88 on vocals. My one complaint about the M88 was that it seemed to have a lot more handling noise than the b58. Of course, this is no problem if the mic is remaining on the stand, but if the singer is going to hold it and move around... The M88 has a very robust bass response with a whopper of a proximity effect, while the b58 sounds more bright and thin to me. Depending on the sound system and the room, either of these things could be good or bad.
__________________ "Everybody gets so much information all day long that they lose their common sense." - G. Stein 1946 The reputation of a thousand years may be determined by the conduct of one hour. - Japanese Proverb "Look into his face and hear the music of the ages. Don't pay too much attention to the sounds--for if you do, you may miss the music." - George Ives http://www.andersonsoundrecording.com |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear interested Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16
| |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Gear interested Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #17 | ||
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2009 Location: Left of the southern cross
Posts: 621
|
Koolaid: The OP states he's recording Rock bands in small venues where i'd suggest spill will already be an issue. using condensers on vocals would only serve to exacerbate the spill from guitar stacks and the drumkit that is likely 4 foot behind the vocalists. I think the 2 versions of 58 he mentions in the title would serve his purpose more effectively . The 87 is a great mic in lots of situations, but not this one.
__________________ A city built on Rock'n'Roll may be structurally unsound Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear |
One more opinion: I absolutely hate Beta mics. The only Shure vocal I use is the SM-87 which is smooth, clean, supercardioid, and sweet. Beta 58s have a harsh bump in the high mids right where sibilance is a problem. But I prefer Sennheiser 835s, or Audix OM5 though they are a bit bright, or even AKG 535s if you want a crisp and rich condenser sound. Beyer M69 is the best hyper cardioid mic I know and love, though: Vocals/ speech |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear nut Joined: Mar 2006 Location: Italy - Bari
Posts: 86
Thread Starter |
I really thank you all for your kind replys. Yes, in 70% of my recordings, the stage is little and bleed is a serious issue, so you are right saying that a condenser isn't a good idea. All your suggestion have been useful, I'm gathering infos |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Gear nut Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 102
|
Hi, Beta 58 will give you a more open and natural sound as opposed to the SM. Beta has a lot more "space" in the sound. Have you considered Beta 57 ? I actually prefer those to Beta 58. Might be worth a try for Vocals ![]() -Chris |
| | |
| | #21 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2009 Location: Left of the southern cross
Posts: 621
| Quote:
what you can hear the difference in the shape of the grille... more proximity, smoother top end
| |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 16
|
I'm kind of a noob in the effects thing, but i am looking to make a good vocal for a live sound and here is probably going to be my chain just let me know if its good. 1.shure sm 58 2.fab pedals (delay,chorus,and many others maybe) 3. to my behringer mixer to pa HERES CHAIN AFTER I INVEST A BIT 1.shure sm 58 2.fab pedals 3.art pro channel pre 4.nady eq 5.bbe maxcom 6.to pa I don't plan on going crazy with effects i just want a big clean warm vocal for cheap i thought about a rack effects but i won't have much control unless it has pedal. |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Handheld Vocal Mic for Live Recording? Alternatives to SM58.... | zakco | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 43 | 14th June 2008 02:01 PM |
| Shure beta58 whireless comes in PLASTIC?? | blackcom | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 2nd February 2008 04:56 PM |
| Shure Beta58 on a guitar cab? | spacecadet | Low End Theory | 8 | 1st August 2007 02:57 AM |
| recording vox/acoustic guitar live/od? | djs | So much gear, so little time! | 0 | 30th June 2004 01:55 AM |
| |