SHURE SM58 vs Beta58 for live vox recording - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: , , , , ,

SHURE SM58 vs Beta58 for live vox recording

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th May 2009   #1
Gear nut
 
cioto's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: Italy - Bari
Posts: 86

Thread Starter
Talking SHURE SM58 vs Beta58 for live vox recording

as the subject says, what's your experience with this two mic for live vox recording (mainly rock bands in small venues)?
I would like nice vocals but I would like to avoid spill and feedback, of course.
Which one should I prefear?
And what about shure beta 87?
Many thanks
cioto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2009   #2
Lives for gear
 
frans's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Posts: 1,648

The answer is simple: neither. IMHO get a Beyerdynamic M201. Better rejection and everything. ;-)
AND it kills on snare and everywhere you would use a SM57.
__________________
Property is not ability. Buying a drumset won't make you a drummer and buying gear won't make you an engineer.
frans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2009   #3
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 297

Depends on the monitor placement. SM58 for wedges directly infront of the mic, Beta 58a for wedges on either side.

This is because of the pickup patterns of Cardioid for the SM58 and Super Cardioid for the Beta 58a.
Murton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2009   #4
Lives for gear
 
Enginearing's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Left of the southern cross
Posts: 621

Quote:
Originally Posted by Murton View Post
Depends on the monitor placement. SM58 for wedges directly infront of the mic, Beta 58a for wedges on either side.

This is because of the pickup patterns of Cardioid for the SM58 and Super Cardioid for the Beta 58a.
+1thumbsupthumbsup

stay away from the 87 for your purposes.
Enginearing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2009   #5
Lives for gear
 
bishopthomas's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,565

I'm not a big fan of either. There are many better sounding vocal mics out there. Audix OM5 is my favorite but I also like the Sennheiser 835 (in fact I'm ordering 6 of them in a few minutes). If I had to choose between the two you listed I would definitely go with the SM58. I really do not like the sound of the Beta 58.
bishopthomas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2009   #6
Gear addict
 
Studiodawg's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 362

I respectfully disagree, I like the sound of the Beta 58 better.
Studiodawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2009   #7
Gear Head
 
Withnail's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 65

Beta 58.
And ever better: SM7.

/Richard
Withnail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2009   #8
Gear addict
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 426

I have done a lot of live recording, while running sound at the same time, with the beta87 as the main vocal mic, it was for broadway/jazz/popera type stuff however. I don't really do rock bands, so take that for what it's worth. That doesn't mean there aren't loud monitros on the stage! Sometimes I feel like I'm at a rock show the way these chicks want their vox mixed so hot in the monitors. I also have an older beta57 that I like a lot and use it as my second vocal. All and all, I (and my clients) have been very happy with my results. I haven't tried the beyerdynamic suggested though I am intrigued...

Good Luck man!
Robby
fallforward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2009   #9
Gear nut
 
cioto's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: Italy - Bari
Posts: 86

Thread Starter
Smile

thank you all with your suggestions, more opinion will be welcome.
cioto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2009   #10
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Chestertown MD USA
Posts: 969

They're very similar sounding and I like them both. On a VERY loud stage I prefer the Beta but SM is good in almost all cases. OM7 is really great for feedback problems too.
__________________
Steve


mixedupsteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2009   #11
Gear maniac
 
EV676's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 213

I've used Beta 58's for vocals for nearly 20 years. I mix the entertainment acts that appear on my station's local TV morning show. For my purposes, they work. But...

I had an act in recently and the vocalist had an endorsement with Beyer. His rep asked if we could use a Beyer mic on his vocals. I happen to have a pair of M-88's so it was easy to comply. They've always been personal favorites of mine and needless to say they sounded great. So for the next few acts we had in where possible I used the Beyer for vocal. Smooth and full is the best way I can describe it. I never realized the Beta 58s had so much grit and gloss to their sound.

I wish I had 6 of the M-88's, they'd replace the Shures for vocals but I don't. So they get used on guitar cabs when I need more than 2 vocal mics.

I just got a used pair of AKG 535eb's from a Slutzer over in the emporium, I've got a feeling they will be my go to mic on female vocals. Beta 87's sound like someone with nasal congestion to my ear!

Yes I know that the current version of the Beyer M-88 (88-TG) is double and a half the cost of a new Beta 58. It's also that much better sounding.
EV676 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2009   #12
Lives for gear
 
bishopthomas's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,565

Isn't that crazy that someone can show up with their "endorsement" preferences and not actually have that gear themselves?
bishopthomas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2009   #13
Super Moderator
 
Remoteness's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,405

It has happened to me a few times...
And, it still doesn't compute.


Quote:
Originally Posted by bishopthomas View Post
Isn't that crazy that someone can show up with their "endorsement" preferences and not actually have that gear themselves?
Remoteness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2009   #14
Lives for gear
 
RobAnderson's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: NY New York a wonderful town
Posts: 725

I've actually had the chance to compare the b58 and the M-88 on vocals.

My one complaint about the M88 was that it seemed to have a lot more handling noise than the b58. Of course, this is no problem if the mic is remaining on the stand, but if the singer is going to hold it and move around...

The M88 has a very robust bass response with a whopper of a proximity effect, while the b58 sounds more bright and thin to me. Depending on the sound system and the room, either of these things could be good or bad.
__________________
"Everybody gets so much information all day long that they lose their common sense." - G. Stein 1946

The reputation of a thousand years may be determined by the conduct of one hour. - Japanese Proverb

"Look into his face and hear the music of the ages. Don't pay too much attention to the sounds--for if you do, you may miss the music." - George Ives

http://www.andersonsoundrecording.com

RobAnderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2009   #15
Gear interested
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enginearing View Post
+1thumbsupthumbsup

stay away from the 87 for your purposes.
Why? You can get cardioid or supercardioid versions of the BETA87.
KoolAidDrinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2009   #16
Gear interested
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16

Quote:
Originally Posted by bishopthomas View Post
I'm not a big fan of either. There are many better sounding vocal mics out there. Audix OM5 is my favorite but I also like the Sennheiser 835 (in fact I'm ordering 6 of them in a few minutes). If I had to choose between the two you listed I would definitely go with the SM58. I really do not like the sound of the Beta 58.
If only the OM5's polarity pattern held up across it's frequency range.
KoolAidDrinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2009   #17
Lives for gear
 
Enginearing's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Left of the southern cross
Posts: 621

Koolaid:
The OP states he's recording Rock bands in small venues where i'd suggest spill will already be an issue. using condensers on vocals would only serve to exacerbate the spill from guitar stacks and the drumkit that is likely 4 foot behind the vocalists. I think the 2 versions of 58 he mentions in the title would serve his purpose more effectively .

The 87 is a great mic in lots of situations, but not this one.
__________________
A city built on Rock'n'Roll may be structurally unsound

Quote:
Originally Posted by chrislago
Don't ever believe what people say
Quote:
Behringer is fine as long as it works. Tad Donely
Enginearing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2009   #18
Lives for gear
 
loujudson's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,684

One more opinion:

I absolutely hate Beta mics. The only Shure vocal I use is the SM-87 which is smooth, clean, supercardioid, and sweet. Beta 58s have a harsh bump in the high mids right where sibilance is a problem.

But I prefer Sennheiser 835s, or Audix OM5 though they are a bit bright, or even AKG 535s if you want a crisp and rich condenser sound.

Beyer M69 is the best hyper cardioid mic I know and love, though:
Vocals/ speech
loujudson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th May 2009   #19
Gear nut
 
cioto's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: Italy - Bari
Posts: 86

Thread Starter
I really thank you all for your kind replys.
Yes, in 70% of my recordings, the stage is little and bleed is a serious issue, so you are right saying that a condenser isn't a good idea.
All your suggestion have been useful, I'm gathering infos
cioto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th May 2009   #20
Gear nut
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 102

Hi,
Beta 58 will give you a more open and natural sound as opposed to the SM. Beta has a lot more "space" in the sound.

Have you considered Beta 57 ? I actually prefer those to Beta 58. Might be worth a try for Vocals

-Chris
clw123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th May 2009   #21
Lives for gear
 
Enginearing's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Left of the southern cross
Posts: 621

Quote:
Originally Posted by clw123 View Post
Hi,
Beta 58 will give you a more open and natural sound as opposed to the SM. Beta has a lot more "space" in the sound.

Have you considered Beta 57 ? I actually prefer those to Beta 58. Might be worth a try for Vocals

-Chris
what you can hear the difference in the shape of the grille... more proximity, smoother top end
Enginearing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2011   #22
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 16

I'm kind of a noob in the effects thing, but i am looking to make a good vocal for a live sound and here is probably going to be my chain just let me know if its good.
1.shure sm 58
2.fab pedals (delay,chorus,and many others maybe)
3. to my behringer mixer to pa
HERES CHAIN AFTER I INVEST A BIT
1.shure sm 58
2.fab pedals
3.art pro channel pre
4.nady eq
5.bbe maxcom
6.to pa
I don't plan on going crazy with effects i just want a big clean warm vocal for cheap i thought about a rack effects but i won't have much control unless it has pedal.
deciferthis is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Handheld Vocal Mic for Live Recording? Alternatives to SM58.... zakco Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 43 14th June 2008 02:01 PM
Shure beta58 whireless comes in PLASTIC?? blackcom So much gear, so little time! 2 2nd February 2008 04:56 PM
Shure Beta58 on a guitar cab? spacecadet Low End Theory 8 1st August 2007 02:57 AM
recording vox/acoustic guitar live/od? djs So much gear, so little time! 0 30th June 2004 01:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:56 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.