![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Tags: board console desk, digitalicious, live sound |
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2006 Location: ∑∆
Posts: 1,553
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 379
|
I see it has TDM plugin support. I wonder whats in that box?
|
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2006 Location: ∑∆
Posts: 1,553
Thread Starter | Two of the Venue cards. From what I understand the audio engine takes up most of the first card.
__________________ "Oh freddled gruntbuggly/thy micturations are to me/As plurdled gabbleblotchits on a lurgid bee. Groop I implore thee, my foonting turlingdromes. And hooptiously drangle me with crinkly bindlewurdles, Or I will rend thee in the gobberwarts with my blurglecruncheon, see if I don't!" |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,708
|
think we will see this all in one concept in next generation of Pro Tools TDM hardware
|
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2007 Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,112
|
Looks very cool. If this is the sort of direction that Pro Tools LE will be going in the future, (in the light processing, more I/O, interfaces with expansion slots sense) I will be a very happy camper. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 379
| |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 670
|
You guys are aware this has been the case with Digi's VENUE line for a few years, right? The DShow Console, Profile, and SC48 all run TDM plugins. Nothing really new here, just a smaller console for the VENUE line. Cool implementation though.
__________________ ----------------------------------------------------- If at first you don't succeed, meh...screw it and try something else. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2007 Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,112
|
^^Right. But this one seems more targeted at the "LE" sort of consumer base. We could be completely wrong, but this sort of direction seems like a logical (and great) next step for the LE line. Perhaps with some better, expandable interfaces, LE (+Complete production toolkit) could be a great option for people wanting something in between LE and HD. |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,432
| Quote:
Still, though, I've heard some great stuff done on the Venue consoles, and I'd imagine we'll see quite a few of these out there in the near future... | |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2007 Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,112
| Quote:
I don't mean to say that this product is in any way an LE recording solution for a project studio. I am just speculating (hoping) that some of the feature ideas included in this new Venue machine will be considered for the next wave of LE interfaces. My speculation was sparked by the fact that this Venue is meant to connect to an LE system. | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear |
only big problem is the simultaneous track recording limitation on LE. So unless they are going to open up the track record counts on LE, you can record 1/2 of most bands inputs. It looks like a well thought out console, i love the new features. Many of my digital console pet peeves have been resolved on this model. Nice Job to the design team. If anyone gets one, please post your thoughts |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear addict Joined: Oct 2005 Location: Berlin
Posts: 341
| SC 48 - 48 Inputs and only 18 recordable??? - Digi User Conference my thoughts, no need to double post that here again.... |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear | yeah I hear ya. sometimes you just want to hit these digi reps with a shovel for defending their company's stance on this matter. but then they probably don't agree with it either. the company itself has forced itself in this corner and now they're sitting there, shrugging their shoulders as if silently saying "See??? we're cornered! just go HD if you need to record more than 18 tracks simultaneously, because if you need to do so, you obviously earn enough money to do so.... See????? OUR market dictates that OUR model makes perfect sense." let's hope avid central command kicks some sense into these people. Last edited by ~ufo~; 8th May 2009 at 07:20 PM.. Reason: grammy boo |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2007 Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,112
|
^^yeah. Its my speculative hope that this is foreshadowing of an option for more I/O in LE. My guess is that it might be an upgrade option via the complete production toolkit when the next wave of interfaces come out. |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
i really like the design of this console for its size, the online demo movie & interactive info is very good. Lets hope they up the ante and open up LE recording for all without a $500+ price tag | |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2006 Location: ∑∆
Posts: 1,553
Thread Starter | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
however, if I would spend that much money on a new live console which abrings "studio quality sound" on stage I would like it not to dictate how I should record. "aaahhhhhhh" says the digi rep "but we feel that BECAUSE we bring studio sound to the stage, you won't feel the NEED to record every channel to a track, our console is THAT good!" gee wow digi rep, of course if you put it like that, how silly of me to forget that when I started working on protools, the need to process individual tracks after tracking completely evaporated too! ugh...... (trying hard to loosen my grip on that shovel) plus, the biggest market for digital live consoles IMO still is theater. Rock venues (at least over hither) usually rock analogue boards which suits me just fine, because I prefer working on analogue boards. However, for touring productions like musicals the stages ARE turning into studios. choirs are recording during the rehearsals to blend in with the performance later etc. on one hand it's a good thing that digi aren't approaching the live market completely from a studio perspective, on the other hand it's gonna look totally silly to see a venue with a 24 track recorder (radar/tascam/alesis etc) or two connected to it just to be able to record every track. pretty silly indeed. don't mean to bash the board for what it is, because I'm half looking forward to mixing a live show on it, just the eternal 18 track limit...... doh! | |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 187
|
I just checked this board out and I like how it has PTLE built in. This COULD be the future of LE or just a dream. Maybe not this exact board, but I'm sure Digi will introduce something new within the next year or 2 (just a guess) above HD, so with that logic I'm sure Digi will bring LE up to speed with the current HD systems (or just slightly behind it), including more i/o, higher track count out of the box and stuff like that. It's like looking at PT24|Mix and LE. Mix WAS top of the line, and now other then i/o limitations, a current LE system is better then a MIX system out of the box. I can see LE catching up to HD fast after Digi introduces their next system, and this could be something simililar to the future of LE. Just a thought |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear addict Joined: Oct 2005 Location: Berlin
Posts: 341
| |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Oct 2005 Location: Berlin
Posts: 341
| Quote:
But in 2009 the integration between live and studio is almost complete!!! Every Artist would want a studio quality file of their show - especially at no extra cost! and I as an engineer would like to a) be able to offer this service b) would like to be able to check my work later c) enhance my business! Every desk in that price range can do this, take a Yamaha LS9-32 and add 2 MY16-AT Cards, and ADAT Interface like the M-Audio Lightbrigdge, and BOOM, there you go, 32 direct outs!!! Now with a company like didigesign, who are sooooooo saying of themselves how "groundbreaking" they are, I am REALLY dissapointed that they do not offer an option! for me it is NOT AT ALL about LE vs HD, I own both - I just want to be able to work with what I have, and I like the small footprint of the SC48. All I would have expected is a HDx Option! after all, it is existing technology! stupid not to integrate that. with the 18 I/O limit, you are missing 30 of the 48 Inputs, Hello? What´s that??? tutt | |
| | |
| | #21 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Oct 2005 Location: Berlin
Posts: 341
| Quote:
I do not believe this will happen anytime soon - if ever! They will always keep the gap between LE and HD.... and I don´t care. Just in this case with the SC48, this decision to go with LE instead of HD or even better, BOTH, is stupid - IMHO. | |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2007 Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,794
| Exactly. In case they don't have some awesome plan behind this, it's a very poor decision.
|
| | |
| | #23 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 187
| You are right, there will always be a gap between LE and HD, but if you compare LE to 24|MIX (which was the "HD" before 2003) then you will see that LE can now do more then 24|MIX could when it was top of the line. Other then the i/o limitations LE surpasses MIX by miles with track count, options, and features. So yes there will always be a gap between LE and Digi's top of the line hardware, but a gap between LE and HD will get smaller over the next couple years I believe.
|
| | |
| | #24 |
| Registered User Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,084
|
Looks good ... It's expandable to 32 outs .... very nice |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Digidesign!!! | rvwainscott | The Moan Zone | 21 | 29th September 2008 07:16 AM |
| Digidesign PRE's Preamp's vs. Digidesign Control 24 Preamp's? | 777 | So much gear, so little time! | 44 | 19th July 2008 01:59 AM |
| What does Digidesign do next? | tubejay | High end | 186 | 4th October 2006 03:07 AM |
| |