Schoeps CMTS 501 v. Crown SASS v. Rode NT5 on Piano - Page 2 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: , , , ,

Schoeps CMTS 501 v. Crown SASS v. Rode NT5 on Piano

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22nd December 2009   #31
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,807

christian - i preferrred the apollo on these samples. very nice, smooth response and good overall presentation of the instrument. that schoeps is a damn nice mic, though. thanks for posting the clips.
__________________
jnorman
sunridge studios
salem, oregon
jnorman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd December 2009   #32
Gear addict
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 446

I think both mics have some good and not-so-good qualities. The 501 is slightly brighter and perhaps more centered-sounding, while the Apollo is a little more diffuse and warmer. I thought they both worked and didn't particularly prefer one over the other.
BrianHanke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th December 2009   #33
Lives for gear
 
d1rtynyc's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Look behind you.
Posts: 2,306

Cool test. THANKS for posting it.thumbsup
I do prefer the Schoeps over the Rode's, but I am still very impressed by the Rodes.
d1rtynyc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25th December 2009   #34
Lives for gear
 
Jim vanBergen's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: New York Friggin' City
Posts: 2,562

I'm liking the Schoeps everywhere, but I am attuned to their accuracy and slight euphoric response in comparison to other very neutral mics.

The Crown SASS- is this is a SASS-B with the B&K heads? It sounds pretty good to my ears! The first real stereo mic I worked with was a SASS-P, and when I compared from P to B I was impressed with both the stunning accuracy of the B&K capsules in a perfect matched setup, as well as the quality of the low-cost sound from the P capsules.

JvB
Jim vanBergen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th December 2009   #35
Lives for gear
 
NorseHorse's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: DC
Posts: 2,095

Thread Starter
Post

It's the SASS-P MK II. "MK II" just means it came in a case, I think! Go figure. I've been very pleased with its neutral response and beautiful imaging. It's binaural, so it's gorgeous on headphones. I wasn't aware there was a SASS-B. I didn't come across any info about it on the Crown website. Do you have a link? I've compared the SASS to DPA 4006s. Out of a score of microphones, the SASS was the closest to the 4006 to my ears.

With regards to the most recent samples (Schoeps CMTS 501 v. Sontronics Apollo Ribbon), I preferred the Apollo on the Gershwin sample. Just listen to the first five notes! It's a smooth, focused sound which I feel compliments the music really well.

For the Bach, I could go either way. The hammer attack revealed by the Schoeps is very seductive. Like little raindrops.

I was curious to hear that Brian H felt the Schoeps was more "centered sounding". I felt the exact opposite. The attenuated HF response of the ribbon tempered some of the room reflections, making it seem to me as if the piano sound is coming mainly from the piano itself. I would describe it as less immersive, but more focused.
__________________
http://www.facebook.com/ArtsLaureate
I-95, I-64, I-85
NorseHorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th December 2009   #36
Lives for gear
 
Piedpiper's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Between the Notes, Iowa
Posts: 2,037

The Mk II was actually a later iteration that came only a couple years after the original SASS-P introduction. It incorporates a resistor and capacitor from the audio out of the capsule to ground to flatten what was an overly bright response in the original. I find it quite good. The SASS-B is simply the housing that controls the stereo pick up pattern with accommodation for a pair of B&K 4006s to be installed. Both have been discontinued but are still in stock at a few distributors.
__________________
Tim Britton
producer, engineer, musician, audio sales
http://www.piedpiperprod.com
http://uilleanpipes.com

row, row, row your boat...
Piedpiper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2009   #37
Lives for gear
 
Jim vanBergen's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: New York Friggin' City
Posts: 2,562

Quote:
Originally Posted by Piedpiper View Post
It incorporates a resistor and capacitor from the audio out of the capsule and ground to flatten what was an overly bright response in the original. I find it quite good.
great info! good to know- I only knew the original -P and -B.
Jim vanBergen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2009   #38
Lives for gear
 
Piedpiper's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Between the Notes, Iowa
Posts: 2,037

The -B, of course, has nothing in it at all; just an empty housing with holes in for the 4006s to be inserted into.

I've rebuilt the -P Mk II version several times for people and continue to use one as my main stereo configuration.
Piedpiper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2009   #39
Gear Head
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: London UK
Posts: 46

Have you got any omni capsules for your Rodes? They have great low-end extension which helps give a piano some weight
TonyF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th December 2009   #40
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,807

hey tony - i just looked at the freq repsonse curves for the rode omni capsules, and they have a very significant bump, like +8dB in the top end. so i assume you normally would only use these in a diffuse field situation, right? seems like they would be a bit too bright for near field micing of a small chamber group, yes?

though i know john willett has used km183s pointed straight up for that kind of situation, and i guess you could do the same with the rodes.
jnorman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2010   #41
Gear Head
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 40

Quote:
Originally Posted by Piedpiper View Post
[...] The SASS-B is simply the housing that controls the stereo pick up pattern with accommodation for a pair of B&K 4006s to be installed. Both have been discontinued but are still in stock at a few distributors.
The SASS-B was discontinued as of 1994 and I'd imagine one would have a hard time finding one in stock somewhere? Crown still stocks parts for the new SASS Mk. IIs, though, and if someone wants to build themselves a SAS-B lookalike...
Dark1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2010   #42
Lives for gear
 
didier.brest's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,792

Quote:
Originally Posted by rumleymusic View Post
Which is which?
I think that Rode is a. I prefer the original Schoeps take with respect to both these ones.
didier.brest is online now   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Schoeps MK4, how much better than Rode NT5? bove Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 471 9th November 2010 05:43 PM
Schoeps CMTS 501? jnorman Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 6 16th July 2010 10:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:09 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.