![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Tags: advice observations enlightenment, mic placement, stereo, technique, woodwind |
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 26
Thread Starter |
I recently acquired a gig recording a 45 piece concert band, all winds plus a small percussion section(timpani, bass, snare, bells). I came to ask your advice on the best micing technique. I'm using two small diaphragm AKG C1000's for my stereo pair, as well as a Blue Baby Bottle. The room is in a church cafeteria area, carpeted with fairly high ceilings. I've gotten to hear them play in the room already and the acoustics aren't bad at all. I currently have two tall boom stands so I can get the C1000's as high as I need to. So my question is, should I try a spaced stereo pair, with the Bottle front and center, or an X-Y configuration without the Bottle? Should I try to suspend the C1000's over the band, or place the 3 mics across the front? Should I spot mic the percussion section with an SM57 or Beta 52? I'm looking forward to hearing your advice! Thanks |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2006 Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,565
|
A stereo pair in ORTF configuration is hard to mess up. Knowing how many tracks you have available is the first step.
|
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear interested Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 26
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear addict Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 426
|
Yeah a coincedent pair like XY or ORTF and just find the best spot in the room. If the conductor is willing. I would record 4-5 passes and move the mics on each one, then listen back and see which sounds best. I would also use a stereo bar of some sort, and not seperate stands. Good Luck man! This is exactly how it starts. I am super excited for you! Just make sure you don't forget to record anything, don't erase anything that you think you don't need, bring all the extension cords and power distribution that you need, and be early! Robby |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear interested Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 26
Thread Starter |
An ORTF will give me a little more stereo width than an XY(correct?), so I think I'll try that. I really want to try the 3 mic set up across the front but I don't know if time will permit. And if i have enough cable I'm still going to spot mic the percussion with a Beta-52 just to see how that sounds. Any suggestions on how high I should try to get the stereo pair? I can go about 15 feet with the stands I have, maybe more. |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Gear interested Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 26
Thread Starter | Quote:
Thanks! | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear addict Joined: Mar 2006 Location: Harvard on the Hocking, Spaceship Earth
Posts: 384
|
You might also consider NOS instead of XY or ORTF. I have found it a nice alternative. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear interested Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 26
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Jul 2005 Location: SW CT
Posts: 264
|
What sort of stereo-bar device can I use to try the NOS technique? I've never done it. I need a good, adjustable stereo bar. Looks like 30cm between the mics and an angle of 41.5 degrees to perpendicular? |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear |
Williams has published a paper on setting up spaced arrays dependent upon the width of the group to be recorded and the mics to be used. You will see that the ORTF, NOS, DIN, DINa and so on are compromises. ORTF seems to give the most even distribution. But do check the Williams paper: http://www.microphone-data.com/pdfs/Stereo%20zoom.pdf
__________________ Nov schmoz ka pop. |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Aug 2005 Location: Lancaster, OH
Posts: 90
| Quote:
I have a pair of c1000s that haven't seen the light of day in years for that reason. Not only is the low end weak, but the high end is hyped IMHO. I would go with your 1st idea if you have enough set up time: the bottle in the middle and the AKGs on the sides--I've never used the bottle, but I would hope that it would give you a more accurate capture of all the frequencies present. The bottle should provide a solid center image and then the AKGs can be use to fill out the stereo field. I would not bother spot micing the percussion section with the shure--in a band that size the bigger danger is the percussion being too loud for the winds. All of this depends on the ensemble too of course. If they have one tuba, two trombones and a bari sax, the low end will be pretty thin no matter what you do ![]() Just my 2 cents. | |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 555
|
"""I have a pair of c1000s that haven't seen the light of day in years for that reason. Not only is the low end weak, but the high end is hyped IMHO. I would go with your 1st idea if you have enough set up time: the bottle in the middle and the AKGs on the sides--I've never used the bottle, but I would hope that it would give you a more accurate capture of all the frequencies present. The bottle should provide a solid center image and then the AKGs can be use to fill out the stereo field. I would not bother spot micing the percussion section with the shure--in a band that size the bigger danger is the percussion being too loud for the winds.""""" Very good advice but I would emphasize the "if you have enough setup time". Reading between the lines I would say that the ease and relatively safety of the stereo pair approach might be better. Matched pair = easy and won't suck; Baby bottle and c1000s array = tricky and has suck potential. Just take your time listening to the band warm up and find the right spot/angle/stereo technique |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2006 Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,565
|
I agree and stand by my statement that ORTF is the hardest to screw up. If you have the channels and time maybe mic the quieter and lower pitched instruments like tuba and bari sax. More mics never hurt but remember you don't have to use them all in the mix.
|
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear |
You only really have three options; an XY (coincident) array (or variant - ORTF, NOS etc.), an AB (spaced) array, or an LCR. If you could beg/steal/borrow a fig8 mic it may be worth trying MS with flanks (bottle as the M), but with the stuff you have I would personally lean toward LCR - because the C1000s don't sound great and the sound would be augmented by a better microphone. Also, FYI, it's a mid-diaphragm (0.75") condenser, not small diaphragm.
__________________ |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear addict Joined: Aug 2006 Location: Suburbs of Philly, PA
Posts: 432
|
I just did a similar recording last week. It was a wind ensemble with a full percussion section. I used two Fathead IIs in a blumlein config. Just for sh1ts and giggles (and partly to have a Plan B), I threw up an pair of 57s in and XY config (right below the fatheads). The fatheads were running into a TRP. All mics were recorded by my R-44. My mic stand was near the back middle of an auditorium (didn't have a choice on this). Frankly, I'm glad I put up the 57s. As expected, they had the high and mid ranges covered but totally lacked any low end. They also lacked detail. However, I was shocked at how the fatheads performed. I expected a somewhat flatter response than I got. They were extremely bass heavy. Very detailed, but bass heavy. Also very clean from a noise perspective thanks to the TRP. I had the TRP cranked a bit and it was just a clean sound. It seemed like either the 57s alone or the fatheads alone didn't cut it. So I blended the 57s and Fatheads together - which resulted in a pretty decent recording. When I get a free moment I'll post some audio clips. I'm wondering if my expectations of the fatheads were unrealistic or if I did something wrong along the way. Anyhow - my point in posting this is to say it never hurts to have a few extra mics put to work if you have the mics and channels available! |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Gear interested Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 26
Thread Starter | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004 Location: southeast
Posts: 1,393
|
If you want to try 3 across the front THEY MUST BE IDENTICAL MICS. If the bottle is omni your idea is good--- simply roll off the HF and keep it perhaps 10dB below your main pair. If it is a cardioid (and not likely to have much LF) then keep it simple-- stick to a cardioid pair and use EQ to try for some bottom. There really isn't much substitute for a pair of omnis for mains, tho. I use ORTF for mains perhaps 2 or 3 times a year-- FWIW. Try to concentrate on the musical impression rather than the gearhead stuff. Rich |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Gear interested Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 26
Thread Starter | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2008 Location: NashVegas
Posts: 1,044
| Quote:
Also... from a visual perspective... buy black extensions and use black gaff tape on any spikes that are in the open. I hate orange/yellow/fluorescent green power cables in concert situations. Spike the cable runs well, and pick up some mats from Home Depot or Lowe's to cover the runs across aisles and walkways. Your liability extends to your cables, especially in public venues. And... be sure to clean up any goo that's left when you pull up the spikes. It's a good way to get invited back. That, and making a nice recording. | |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Lives for gear |
Use four mics to mic this set-up. A central pair of cardioid mics in NOS and two omni outriggers. Classic technique yields classic results.
__________________ Atelier HudSonic, Chicago EARS-Chicago (Engineering And Recording Society) visit me at https://public.me.com/hudsonic1 to hear recordings and ephemera |
| | |
| | #22 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Aug 2005 Location: St Paul MN
Posts: 162
| Quote:
In general, would you have a starting point to spacing the omni outriggers? Do you just move them around to find the sweetest spot? Is there a percentage of NOS/omni to listen for? Thanks for all your insight, past and future. | |
| | |
| | #23 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004 Location: southeast
Posts: 1,393
| Quote:
I think he is best off doing what was originally suggested-- his AKGs in either ORTF or NOS with the HF rolled off. Rich | |
| | |
| | #24 | |
| Gear interested Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 26
Thread Starter | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #25 | |
| Gear interested Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 26
Thread Starter | Quote:
I'll definitely post the recordings sometime next week once they're finished to let everyone know how they turned out! | |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 555
|
Your task is to get a balanced recording of the whole group, this will be made more difficult by incorporating the extra mic (especially a directional mic!!). For every hypothetical problem that you are fixing there is an actual problem that arises----The image will collapse towards mono depending on the dynamic. The middle of the band will be louder than the sides. Will your mixing fix or exacerbate these problems? It defeats the whole point of using ORTF in the first place. If you want to run the Bottle, maybe use it as a room, hall, or audience mic. Setting up an extra mic does indeed cost you greatly. That is time you could have been spending fine-tuning the placement of your main pair (or as was suggested, comparing results from several different positions). That is the crux of the whole thing and will determine the quality of the result to a surprising degree. What you should be asking, is "How can I find the best spot to put my mics". If you can find that spot (and have a stereo bar to put your pair there) you will have a fine recording, Bottle or no. |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Gear interested Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 26
Thread Starter |
The recording is done, I'm happy with the way it turned out. I attached a few clips if anyone wants to listen, comment. Thanks! |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Gear nut Joined: Aug 2005 Location: Lancaster, OH
Posts: 90
|
Sounds like it turned out pretty well. Did you end up using the bottle at all, or is that just the AKGs?
|
| | |
| | #29 | |
| Gear interested Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 26
Thread Starter | Quote:
I just bought a stereo bar though and they've asked me to come back tomorrow and record the actual concert. I'm looking forward to it. | |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Sep 2004 Location: Florida
Posts: 172
|
I do a little bit of this type recording and I use an Mbox and two AT 4033's on large boom all the way up with the ortf pattern and get good results even from the audience/applause. I've gotten invited back again and again.. Nothing hi-tech.
__________________ "Nothing on earth is so well-suited to make the sad merry, to give courage to the despairing, to make the proud humble, to lessen envy and hate, as music." ~ Martin Luther |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tracking options for a 4-piece band | Sunim Koria | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 10th September 2008 05:15 PM |
| Suggestions for recording a 7 piece mariachi band | decius01 | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 12 | 10th June 2008 05:14 PM |
| anyone tried this: Blumlein for Big Band concert recording | pkautzsch | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 1 | 27th December 2006 09:58 PM |
| Best stereo mic'ing method for whole rock band | XJR | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 12 | 31st October 2006 02:43 PM |
| Best Matched pair for choir, concert band | Sean Holland | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 11 | 27th January 2005 06:40 PM |
| |