![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
| Tags: daw for remote, smpte timecode, video reference sync |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Protools LE, DV toolkit, Digitranslator, SMPTE, and video sync | Jeff16years | So much gear, so little time! | 16 | 30th May 2006 01:35 AM |
| UAD-1 + Protools + smpte online = nervous breakdown | mattsiegel | Music computers | 3 | 18th July 2005 01:59 PM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Germany
Posts: 272
| Hello, not really a recording question - but you PT cracks might know... Is it possible to sync PTLE (not HD) to incoming SMPTE with the DV-option software and the old SSD (SMPTE Slave Driver)? This would of course mean MTC out of the SSD and into the 002R Midi in. I was asked to operate for a show on a car trade fair and have to decide if I need to rent a HD system for the job or not. Thank you Stefan
__________________ http://www.proaudioart.com http://www.mixingonly.com http://www.masteringonly.com |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Germany
Posts: 272
| On a second thought this setup lacks of a clock connection as the 002R does not have WC-in and the SSD has no S/P-DIF clock out... So position via MTC o.k. but no varispeed clock info - or am I missing something? Thanks again Stefan
__________________ http://www.proaudioart.com http://www.mixingonly.com http://www.masteringonly.com |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: NYC
Posts: 4,804
| No, your second thought is correct.
__________________ Steve Remote AuraSonicLtd.com the home of ASL Mobile & Location Production Remoteness on the Linkedin Network Remoteness on Myspace |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: New York Friggin' City
Posts: 2,267
| There is a great deal of discussion of using the digital I/O's on Digi 002/001 with LE to sync, but I don't know anyone "pro" who trusts it, since you fly by the seat of your pants without a word or video clock source to lock to. Anyone have experience actually doing this? I have always rented HD systems or utilized hard disk recorders with sync instead of considering LE systems, though I own a Digi 002 and would not hesistate to use it if it was robust. I thought that was the reason Digi made these LE versions this way! JvB |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Moderator Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,779
| Quote:
To maintain sync, you need a positional reference and a speed reference. If you have a house sync generator, you send the same reference (black burst) to the video machines and the master clock device (Rosenthal has black built in), and just clock the PTLE box with the digital input. Everything is now referencing the same sync. You have no SMPTE input in LE, so you'll have to use midi time code or plug your SMPTE into your midi interface, but that will function just fine for your positional reference. | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: NYC
Posts: 4,804
| Jay, do you feel confident that PT LE will stay sync'd to video especially when the program may be more than an hour?
__________________ Steve Remote AuraSonicLtd.com the home of ASL Mobile & Location Production Remoteness on the Linkedin Network Remoteness on Myspace |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Moderator Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,779
| Quote:
I know a couple composers and sound designers who use LE systems in this way (and were quite happy to find out it was possible) and I've done it myself in the past when a TDM system was not available. If you're feeding everything from a common reference, there's no reason it shouldn't stay locked. Famous last words... | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: NYC
Posts: 4,804
| I beg to differ... I've used TDM systems during (long form) video shoot environments that worked flawlessly under test conditions but, failed on location for one reason or another. On this one particular video shoot our tests were solid in the field shop; the system worked great on the setup & rehearsal day but, bagged us on the shoot day. Thank goodness we had a DTRS backup running... I suggested we run a DTRS backup to the TDM system. I didn't feel comfortable with the TDM system as the only multi-track recording device. The guest recording engineer didn't want the backup. He said it never failed before so, it wasn't a necessary expense. I told him I wouldn't do the live video shoot unless we backup the TDM system with another type of media. ...After the show we spent about another hour or two dubbing the missing 20 seconds when the system dumped. It happened to be on one the artists hit songs. IMO, I cannot imagine using a PT LE system on any of my important (mission critical) live projects unless it was tested ahead of time for a number of times. Then I would use it as my third backup. Plus. the client would have to "sign off" on it too! For me, confidence is not high -- Just because it may technically make sense doesn't mean it's the most logical approach. Again, this is my opinion. Feeling lucky? Then go for it! More famous last words.
__________________ Steve Remote AuraSonicLtd.com the home of ASL Mobile & Location Production Remoteness on the Linkedin Network Remoteness on Myspace |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Germany
Posts: 272
| Thank you all for the great answers! So in theory I could use my BigBen to clock VTR, SSD, and 002R and it should stay sync. In fact I can not do it because video is coming from an OB-Van far from the FOH and what is more this is indeed very "mission critical". (A major German-US car brand presenting their top of the line limousine to the press on the IAA) Have a good day, Stefan
__________________ http://www.proaudioart.com http://www.mixingonly.com http://www.masteringonly.com |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: New York City
Posts: 627
| ProTools LE and SYNC NO BUENO!!!
__________________ |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Moderator Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,779
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: LA, USA
Posts: 3,934
| Quote:
I know people who have used those systems to record hours worth of material for Live shows. A non-standalone system? Not withotu a backup. If it has to be multitrack, get a standalonbe box desgned to do one thing. Otherwise a time code dat, or similar. | |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 18
| "On this one particular video shoot our tests were solid in the field shop; the system worked great on the setup & rehearsal day but, bagged us on the shoot day. Thank goodness we had a DTRS backup running... " Hi Steve, Uh, I think I was with you on that shoot...:-( I agree with you on running a backup, and I'm looking into a couple of the Tascam, Mackie, or Alesis HD24 recorders to do just that. But on the issue of PT HD being solid, I have great faith in it. The only trouble I've ever had with it and SMPTE, was when I was resolving to TC supplied by someone else. PT would just simply jump out of record and park. It would take right off again and be fine after I hit record again. Of course, that's unacceptable on any count, but it does require clean incoming time code, and the problem has never occured when I was being supplied proper house sync from a source that wasn't somewhere in the next city block, or being daisy-chained all over the venue before it got to me. If I'm not getting a home run feed from my own dedicated output from the master sync device, I just print it to an audio track and let them know that the money they saved by not having proper house sync will be paid in post....:-) Sorry it took so long for me to pop up on the forum! Later, Michael Spence |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |